I think T-Mobile is looking to get bought

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:45:52
GMT, John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

>Looks to me more like Earnings than Operating Income (or EBITDA for that
>matter). What am I missing?

No response. Guess I didn't miss anything.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>

---

› See More: I think T-Mobile is looking to get bought

On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 23:02:54 GMT, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:

>[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
>
>In <[email protected]> on Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:45:52
>GMT, John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Looks to me more like Earnings than Operating Income (or EBITDA for that
>>matter). What am I missing?
>
>No response. Guess I didn't miss anything.

Except a life. I've long since forgot particular numbers, but the only
way you can have earnings without operating income is through one-time
gains.

Now, please go get a life Navas. You can get autoposters to send out
messages about those FAQs.

T-Mobile has been looking to be bought ever since they took over VoiceStream
Wireless. VoiceStream has lost T-Mobile a lot of money as well as upset the
stock holders. T-Mobile has not yet been able to find a buyer for the
VoiceStream end yet but is always looking for a buyer, they would sell it as
quick as possible if they could find someone who wanted it.

Eric
"Cyrus Afzali" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 23:02:54 GMT, John Navas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
> >
> >In <[email protected]> on Mon, 11 Aug 2003
23:45:52
> >GMT, John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>Looks to me more like Earnings than Operating Income (or EBITDA for that
> >>matter). What am I missing?
> >
> >No response. Guess I didn't miss anything.
>
> Except a life. I've long since forgot particular numbers, but the only
> way you can have earnings without operating income is through one-time
> gains.
>
> Now, please go get a life Navas. You can get autoposters to send out
> messages about those FAQs.

[POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

In <[email protected]> on Tue, 09 Sep 2003 12:19:03
GMT, Cyrus Afzali <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Sep 2003 23:02:54 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>In <[email protected]> on Mon, 11 Aug 2003 23:45:52
>>GMT, John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>Looks to me more like Earnings than Operating Income (or EBITDA for that
>>>matter). What am I missing?

Apparently nothing.

>>No response. Guess I didn't miss anything.
>
>Except a life. I've long since forgot particular numbers, but the only
>way you can have earnings without operating income is through one-time
>gains.

I suggest you learn more about accounting.

>Now, please go get a life Navas. You can get autoposters to send out
>messages about those FAQs.

I didn't think so.

--
Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>