Consumer code - Has anything changed?

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > "O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> > > <[email protected]>:
> > > >
> > > > No, it has to do with false advertising.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Which *is* off-topic if that's not happening in North Dakota or
Montana.
> >
> >
> > Ok, Mr. Microtopic. Nitpick til your heart's content.
> >
> > > Is it happening there? The original poster has not reported what
> > > coverage he was speaking, Sprint native, or F&CA.
> >
> > Doesn't matter. I'm sure Sprint falsely advertises under both plans.
>
> Obviously, it *does* matter. To the original poster. But, of course,
> that means nothing to you. You're too busy flinging at windmills.
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
>
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]


Wow, that was original, Mr. Pot.

---

› See More: Consumer code - Has anything changed?

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
<snipped>

> > > Doesn't matter. I'm sure Sprint falsely advertises under both
> > plans.
> >
> > Either plan? With F&CA, you can make a call anywhere in the states
> > where either 800 analog, 800 CDMA or 1900 CDMA is available.
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> Yep, that's right. Paint the entire US red. No holes whatsoever.

Sure there are. In those places where there is no analog or CDMA
signal available ... as I listed above ...

Bob

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> Yep, that's right. Paint the entire US red. No holes whatsoever.
>
>

Interesting, no one used to complain when Verizon (and Bell Atlantic
Mobile) did that...

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> Either plan? With F&CA, you can make a call anywhere in the states
> where either 800 analog, 800 CDMA or 1900 CDMA is available.
>
>
*disclaimer*

You'll need a tri-mode phone for 800MHz CDMA coverage (where it is
available).

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"Tech Geek" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Yep, that's right. Paint the entire US red. No holes whatsoever.
> >
> >
>
> Interesting, no one used to complain when Verizon (and Bell Atlantic
> Mobile) did that...
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]

Maybe not, but I would have. It's not right, no matter who does it.

x-no-archive:yes "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...r

"...Either plan? With F&CA, you can make a call anywhere in the states
> where either 800 analog, 800 CDMA or 1900 CDMA is available.... Bob"

Wrong.
People are under the False ASSumption that a "Tri Mode" fone will
first latch on to whatever compatible digital carrier is in the area,
(CDMA in the case of VZW/Sprint) & then find a local analog carrier.
FALSE! The fone has internal PRL software that decides what carriers
to use & not use, & in what order, & if VZW or Sprint does not include
a carrier in the PRL, you get No Service.
For Example, in the NYC/NJ areas, both Sprint (CDMA), & ATT
(Analog), are NOT in the VZW PRL for those areas. If you wander into
bad spot for verizon, you will see "no Service" on your fone, even
though you could be right under a tower that both Sprint & ATT are
using!!This applies to many areas of the country for ALL carriers.

"Blaster" <****[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> x-no-archive:yes "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote
in message
news:<[email protected]>...r
>
> "...Either plan? With F&CA, you can make a call anywhere in the
states
> > where either 800 analog, 800 CDMA or 1900 CDMA is available....
Bob"
>
> Wrong.
> People are under the False ASSumption that a "Tri Mode" fone will
> first latch on to whatever compatible digital carrier is in the
area,
> (CDMA in the case of VZW/Sprint) & then find a local analog carrier.
> FALSE! The fone has internal PRL software that decides what
carriers
> to use & not use, & in what order, & if VZW or Sprint does not
include
> a carrier in the PRL, you get No Service.
> For Example, in the NYC/NJ areas, both Sprint (CDMA), & ATT
> (Analog), are NOT in the VZW PRL for those areas. If you wander into
> bad spot for verizon, you will see "no Service" on your fone, even
> though you could be right under a tower that both Sprint & ATT are
> using!!This applies to many areas of the country for ALL carriers.

We are not talking about Verizon Wireless and what they have in their
PRL. The point above was for SPCS, their roaming agreements, and their
PRL.

BTW, SPCS was in Verizon's PRL in many markets, till Verizon pulled
those SIDS out of future PRL versions, as Verizon had more users
roaming on SPCS (and incurring roaming expenses to Verizon), than on
their own towers.

Bob

In alt.cellular Bob Smith <[email protected]> wrote:

> We are not talking about Verizon Wireless

THEN STOP POSTING TO THE VERIZON WIRELESS NEWSGROUP.

How many times do I have to say this?


--
JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]

Just as I've asserted before: All Phillippe and Justin want to do is
start an argument over some of the dumbest points of Sprint PCS.

--
Chris

Please respond on Usenet or Phonescoop.com


"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> "Phill." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > You disagree quite often when others say they are happy with the
> > > service they are receiving.
> >
> > Not at all. Undoubtably many people are happy with Sprint. I am
> happy
> > with my Retention Deal. I disagree with the assertion that "MOST"
> > posters here tell about being happy.
> >
> > And Smitty and vargie trying to paint it differently is TROLLing.
>
> I'm not trolling, I'm correcting you ... And all your misstatements
> are lies ...
>
> Bob
>
>

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Just as I've asserted before: All Phillippe and Justin want to do is
> start an argument over some of the dumbest points of Sprint PCS.
>
> --
> Chris


You need to catch up. Bob was one of the main nitpickers in my original
story, claiming that it got "old" after my one post.





> Please respond on Usenet or Phonescoop.com
>
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > "Phill." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > In article <[email protected]>,
> > > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > You disagree quite often when others say they are happy with the
> > > > service they are receiving.
> > >
> > > Not at all. Undoubtably many people are happy with Sprint. I am
> > happy
> > > with my Retention Deal. I disagree with the assertion that "MOST"
> > > posters here tell about being happy.
> > >
> > > And Smitty and vargie trying to paint it differently is TROLLing.
> >
> > I'm not trolling, I'm correcting you ... And all your misstatements
> > are lies ...
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]

"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Just as I've asserted before: All Phillippe and Justin want to do
is
> > start an argument over some of the dumbest points of Sprint PCS.
> >
> > --
> > Chris
>
>
> You need to catch up. Bob was one of the main nitpickers in my
original
> story, claiming that it got "old" after my one post.

I don't remember saying that. I do remember saying that your problem
got "Old", after you continually repeated the story ... and with those
continued fights with Rob ...

Bob

In article <2%[email protected]>,
"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I don't remember saying that. I do remember saying that your problem
> got "Old", after you continually repeated the story ... and with those
> continued fights with Rob ...
>
> Bob

The story is still VERY MUCH NEW, because it hasn't ended with a zeroed
out balance from Sprint. After it has, then we can start to consider it
old.

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:2%[email protected]...
>
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Just as I've asserted before: All Phillippe and Justin want to do
> is
> > > start an argument over some of the dumbest points of Sprint PCS.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Chris
> >
> >
> > You need to catch up. Bob was one of the main nitpickers in my
> original
> > story, claiming that it got "old" after my one post.
>
> I don't remember saying that. I do remember saying that your problem
> got "Old", after you continually repeated the story ... and with those
> continued fights with Rob ...
>
> Bob


I didn't post it more than once. A handful of people kept nitpicking,
asking me questions so they could call me a liar. So, perhaps answering
there questions got old for you.

Chris Russell wrote in <[email protected]>:

>Just as I've asserted before: All Phillippe and Justin want to do is
>start an argument over some of the dumbest points of Sprint PCS.

I fail to see what contribution your generally idiotic posts make.

The fact that they are trolling for an argument. If you haven't been
reading their posts for the past month, you won't understand my initial
response. As to the Consumer Code argument, noone has been able to post
a location to read the Code point that Phillipe brought up. And this is
his fourth or fifth ID in the last month to get by many killfiles.

--
Chris

Please respond on Usenet or Phonescoop.com


Steve Hanson <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
> Chris Russell wrote in <[email protected]>:
>
> >Just as I've asserted before: All Phillippe and Justin want to do is
> >start an argument over some of the dumbest points of Sprint PCS.
>
> I fail to see what contribution your generally idiotic posts make.

[posted via phonescoop.com]