RF Reception: T637 v. K700i

I'm trying to decide between the SE T637 and the K700i. Reception is
my main selection criteria (BT is huge too, but they both have it).

I've read definitive reports (mobileburn.com, etc) about the K700i's
excellent reception, but fairly little about how it compares to the
T637.

I need to buy two phones, so the T637 is my preference from a price
persepective, but if the K700i is far and away the better phone in
this regard, I'll have no argument about paying for the more expensive
K700i's.

All things being equal, does anyone have first-hand experience with
both phones? Which is the best RF performer?

---

› See More: RF Reception: T637 v. K700i

>
> All things being equal, does anyone have first-hand experience with
> both phones? Which is the best RF performer?

www.howardforums.com

There is a review of the k700i by a guy named bengalboy. He said that as
good as the t637 was, the k700 was noticably better.

"lewdvig" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ZZ3ad.698241$gE.447263@pd7tw3no...
> >
>> All things being equal, does anyone have first-hand experience with
>> both phones? Which is the best RF performer?
>
> www.howardforums.com
>
> There is a review of the k700i by a guy named bengalboy. He said that as
> good as the t637 was, the k700 was noticably better.
>

But if you need the 850 band, you should wait for the N.A. version of the
k700i. In some areas, like where I live in Western Canada, 850 is more
prevalent than 1900 so the k700i is no good to me.