t610 any good?

Believe this is STN display problem. TFT is slightly better.
But I could not understand why Ericsson choose to build a phne with 64K
color and yet using a STN display.

"Alan B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Pikkis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > You all se t610 users, tell me if itīs any good. Iīve read that the
> display
> > is unreadable in sunlight or even outside, any truth in that? I need an
> good
> > bluetooth phone, so every advice is welcome. Sorry my english
> >
> >
>
> The comments made about wrist angle are presumably from people who never
see
> the sun I'm afraid. Even in the UK on a bright cloudy day the display is
> unreadable outside unless you cover it over with your cupped hand and look
> very closely, one of the view minus points of this phone, but most colour
> displays are just as bad (apart from the Sharp which is a little bit
> better) - try taking a tv outside on a bright day and you'd have the same
> problem
>
>

---

› See More: t610 any good?

Because using STN screen would have much better battery time than
using TFT, just look at samsung, its battery lasts less than 1 day !!
Anyway, I have no problem reading my T610 screen under sunlight ! Its
very clear and visible !


"news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Believe this is STN display problem. TFT is slightly better.
> But I could not understand why Ericsson choose to build a phne with 64K
> color and yet using a STN display.
>
> "Alan B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Pikkis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > You all se t610 users, tell me if itīs any good. Iīve read that the
> display
> > > is unreadable in sunlight or even outside, any truth in that? I need an
> good
> > > bluetooth phone, so every advice is welcome. Sorry my english
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The comments made about wrist angle are presumably from people who never
> see
> > the sun I'm afraid. Even in the UK on a bright cloudy day the display is
> > unreadable outside unless you cover it over with your cupped hand and look
> > very closely, one of the view minus points of this phone, but most colour
> > displays are just as bad (apart from the Sharp which is a little bit
> > better) - try taking a tv outside on a bright day and you'd have the same
> > problem
> >
> >

No, base on technical spec. It is only 5 to 7% different. I think the main
consideration is cost.
Which Samsung you are using. I am using the v200. With standard battery, it
can go for 2.5 days for me.

Many phone started to have TFT soon. Including the new Motorola E365.

"caff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Because using STN screen would have much better battery time than
> using TFT, just look at samsung, its battery lasts less than 1 day !!
> Anyway, I have no problem reading my T610 screen under sunlight ! Its
> very clear and visible !
>
>
> "news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> > Believe this is STN display problem. TFT is slightly better.
> > But I could not understand why Ericsson choose to build a phne with 64K
> > color and yet using a STN display.
> >
> > "Alan B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Pikkis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > You all se t610 users, tell me if itīs any good. Iīve read that the
> > display
> > > > is unreadable in sunlight or even outside, any truth in that? I need
an
> > good
> > > > bluetooth phone, so every advice is welcome. Sorry my english
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > The comments made about wrist angle are presumably from people who
never
> > see
> > > the sun I'm afraid. Even in the UK on a bright cloudy day the display
is
> > > unreadable outside unless you cover it over with your cupped hand and
look
> > > very closely, one of the view minus points of this phone, but most
colour
> > > displays are just as bad (apart from the Sharp which is a little bit
> > > better) - try taking a tv outside on a bright day and you'd have the
same
> > > problem
> > >
> > >

Hallo!
And my T610 8-14 days!!!!!!! ---> to V200 2,5 days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:-)
Cheers TM

"news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> No, base on technical spec. It is only 5 to 7% different. I think the main
> consideration is cost.
> Which Samsung you are using. I am using the v200. With standard battery,
it
> can go for 2.5 days for me.
>
> Many phone started to have TFT soon. Including the new Motorola E365.
>
> "caff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Because using STN screen would have much better battery time than
> > using TFT, just look at samsung, its battery lasts less than 1 day !!
> > Anyway, I have no problem reading my T610 screen under sunlight ! Its
> > very clear and visible !
> >
> >
> > "news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > > Believe this is STN display problem. TFT is slightly better.
> > > But I could not understand why Ericsson choose to build a phne with
64K
> > > color and yet using a STN display.
> > >
> > > "Alan B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "Pikkis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > You all se t610 users, tell me if itīs any good. Iīve read that
the
> > > display
> > > > > is unreadable in sunlight or even outside, any truth in that? I
need
> an
> > > good
> > > > > bluetooth phone, so every advice is welcome. Sorry my english
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The comments made about wrist angle are presumably from people who
> never
> > > see
> > > > the sun I'm afraid. Even in the UK on a bright cloudy day the
display
> is
> > > > unreadable outside unless you cover it over with your cupped hand
and
> look
> > > > very closely, one of the view minus points of this phone, but most
> colour
> > > > displays are just as bad (apart from the Sharp which is a little bit
> > > > better) - try taking a tv outside on a bright day and you'd have the
> same
> > > > problem
> > > >
> > > >
>
>

If you don't need color or camera but want Bluetooth, great reception,
sunlight readability, and incredible battery life... look at the Nokia
6310i. It's very slim, has GPRS, infrared, Bluetooth, 1100 mAh LiIon, and
easy navigation buttons. Most color displays, even TFT, will wash out in
sunshine unless you orient the display for the best viewing angle.

"news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Believe this is STN display problem. TFT is slightly better.
> But I could not understand why Ericsson choose to build a phne with 64K
> color and yet using a STN display.
>
> "Alan B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Pikkis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > You all se t610 users, tell me if itīs any good. Iīve read that the
> > display
> > > is unreadable in sunlight or even outside, any truth in that? I need
an
> > good
> > > bluetooth phone, so every advice is welcome. Sorry my english
> > >
> > >
> >
> > The comments made about wrist angle are presumably from people who never
> see
> > the sun I'm afraid. Even in the UK on a bright cloudy day the display
is
> > unreadable outside unless you cover it over with your cupped hand and
look
> > very closely, one of the view minus points of this phone, but most
colour
> > displays are just as bad (apart from the Sharp which is a little bit
> > better) - try taking a tv outside on a bright day and you'd have the
same
> > problem
> >
> >
>
>

"caff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Because using STN screen would have much better battery time than
> using TFT, just look at samsung, its battery lasts less than 1 day !!
> Anyway, I have no problem reading my T610 screen under sunlight ! Its
> very clear and visible !
>
>

This is true of the older Samsungs. The newer ones are much improved - the
better higher spec the components, the less the battery life.

--
Antz,
Part of the UKtm family.


---
This message is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.504 / Virus Database: 302 - Release Date: 24/07/2003

That depend on your useage.
Those T610 users in my country commented that it usually last for 3 - 3.5
days for normal use. So 2.5 vs 3 days is not much of different. One big
different is Samsung come with 2 batteries. You have to compare them with
the same telco provider.

"tm" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Hallo!
> And my T610 8-14 days!!!!!!! ---> to V200 2,5 days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> :-)
> Cheers TM
>
> "news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > No, base on technical spec. It is only 5 to 7% different. I think the
main
> > consideration is cost.
> > Which Samsung you are using. I am using the v200. With standard battery,
> it
> > can go for 2.5 days for me.
> >
> > Many phone started to have TFT soon. Including the new Motorola E365.
> >
> > "caff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Because using STN screen would have much better battery time than
> > > using TFT, just look at samsung, its battery lasts less than 1 day !!
> > > Anyway, I have no problem reading my T610 screen under sunlight ! Its
> > > very clear and visible !
> > >
> > >
> > > "news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>...
> > > > Believe this is STN display problem. TFT is slightly better.
> > > > But I could not understand why Ericsson choose to build a phne with
> 64K
> > > > color and yet using a STN display.
> > > >
> > > > "Alan B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > >
> > > > > "Pikkis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > You all se t610 users, tell me if itīs any good. Iīve read that
> the
> > > > display
> > > > > > is unreadable in sunlight or even outside, any truth in that? I
> need
> > an
> > > > good
> > > > > > bluetooth phone, so every advice is welcome. Sorry my english
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > The comments made about wrist angle are presumably from people who
> > never
> > > > see
> > > > > the sun I'm afraid. Even in the UK on a bright cloudy day the
> display
> > is
> > > > > unreadable outside unless you cover it over with your cupped hand
> and
> > look
> > > > > very closely, one of the view minus points of this phone, but most
> > colour
> > > > > displays are just as bad (apart from the Sharp which is a little
bit
> > > > > better) - try taking a tv outside on a bright day and you'd have
the
> > same
> > > > > problem
> > > > >
> > > > >
> >
> >
>
>

2 days max out of my T610, but I do use it quite a bit. Don't know anyone
who gets more than 3 though

"news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> That depend on your useage.
> Those T610 users in my country commented that it usually last for 3 - 3.5
> days for normal use. So 2.5 vs 3 days is not much of different. One big
> different is Samsung come with 2 batteries. You have to compare them with
> the same telco provider.
>
> "tm" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Hallo!
> > And my T610 8-14 days!!!!!!! ---> to V200 2,5
days!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
> > :-)
> > Cheers TM
> >
> > "news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > No, base on technical spec. It is only 5 to 7% different. I think the
> main
> > > consideration is cost.
> > > Which Samsung you are using. I am using the v200. With standard
battery,
> > it
> > > can go for 2.5 days for me.
> > >
> > > Many phone started to have TFT soon. Including the new Motorola E365.
> > >
> > > "caff" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Because using STN screen would have much better battery time than
> > > > using TFT, just look at samsung, its battery lasts less than 1 day
!!
> > > > Anyway, I have no problem reading my T610 screen under sunlight !
Its
> > > > very clear and visible !
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > "news.new" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:<[email protected]>...
> > > > > Believe this is STN display problem. TFT is slightly better.
> > > > > But I could not understand why Ericsson choose to build a phne
with
> > 64K
> > > > > color and yet using a STN display.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Alan B" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Pikkis" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > > > You all se t610 users, tell me if itīs any good. Iīve read
that
> > the
> > > > > display
> > > > > > > is unreadable in sunlight or even outside, any truth in that?
I
> > need
> > > an
> > > > > good
> > > > > > > bluetooth phone, so every advice is welcome. Sorry my english
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The comments made about wrist angle are presumably from people
who
> > > never
> > > > > see
> > > > > > the sun I'm afraid. Even in the UK on a bright cloudy day the
> > display
> > > is
> > > > > > unreadable outside unless you cover it over with your cupped
hand
> > and
> > > look
> > > > > > very closely, one of the view minus points of this phone, but
most
> > > colour
> > > > > > displays are just as bad (apart from the Sharp which is a little
> bit
> > > > > > better) - try taking a tv outside on a bright day and you'd have
> the
> > > same
> > > > > > problem
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Lines: 12
NNTP-Posting-Host: dab7d889.news.newshosting.com
X-Trace: DXC=Z_jYWgmdYTH\R3i`B;82<AXMDXCI2J8LCXkcEe:=NIiKnJQEUU?_1dA9]lkOhbH:I@ZQ1bSK6Oc?H]DV=klOKh2L4TWjFSX5YQH
X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.cellular.ericsson:59185


it is a great phone good value for your money. you wont be
dissapointed.


--
nookiehunter - Battousai: MIDI Slasher
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via MIDIBuddy - Professional MIDI Files and Music Community
http://midibuddy.net
View this thread: http://board.midibuddy.net/t62795.html