V710 and OBEX

"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by your
adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is trying to
keep us safe from terrorists.

Ed

---

› See More: V710 and OBEX

As much as I hate to continue this thread, I have to agree with Michelle.

"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated
>> by your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President
>> who is trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> Anything intelligent you may have to contribute has yet to appear. And
> unlike smarmy ignorant knee-jerk bushbots, I know that Bush is not
> trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> If you grow up enough to be able to think for yourself, get back to us.
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

Since politics has very little to do with this thread and NG, may I
suggest that the politcal comments and debates be posted on a more
appropriate forum?

From:Strike
[email protected]

> As much as I hate to continue this thread, I have to agree with
> Michelle.
> "Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> In article <[email protected]>,
>> "Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated
>>> by your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President
>>> who is trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>>
>> Anything intelligent you may have to contribute has yet to appear.
>> And unlike smarmy ignorant knee-jerk bushbots, I know that Bush is
>> not trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>>
>> If you grow up enough to be able to think for yourself, get back to
>> us. --
>> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>
> "The V710 phone hardware regardless of carrier software does not support
> the SPP (Serial Port Profile) or OBEX (Object Exchange) profile that
> most devices require to access the phonebook or transfer files. These
> features can not be added via a software upgrade. Particularly this is
> an issue when customers want to get their phonebook out of the phone and
> into their non-Motorola Bluetooth Car Kit. Our Motorola IHF1000 and OEM
> Telematics Bluetooth Car Kits allow access to the phonebook through the
> Bluetooth connection using the Motorola AT commands available to
> registered developers at www.motocoder.com."
>
> <https://motorola.custhelp.com/cgi-bi...user/std_adp.p
> hp?p_admin=1&p_userid=177&p_passwd=u8ZqM5YrTNBhaBbppUzEz/&p_faqid=4136&p_
> created=1092940495>
>
> <http://tinyurl.com/d5yd>
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

Love your sig line. Is that dope still in office???????

"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>
> "The V710 phone hardware regardless of carrier software does not support
> the SPP (Serial Port Profile) or OBEX (Object Exchange) profile that
> most devices require to access the phonebook or transfer files. These
> features can not be added via a software upgrade. Particularly this is
> an issue when customers want to get their phonebook out of the phone and
> into their non-Motorola Bluetooth Car Kit. Our Motorola IHF1000 and OEM
> Telematics Bluetooth Car Kits allow access to the phonebook through the
> Bluetooth connection using the Motorola AT commands available to
> registered developers at www.motocoder.com."

> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

Is there a point to this post? This has been known ever since the V710
came out.

"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated
>> by your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President
>> who is trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> Anything intelligent you may have to contribute has yet to appear. And
> unlike smarmy ignorant knee-jerk bushbots, I know that Bush is not
> trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> If you grow up enough to be able to think for yourself, get back to us.

Ya' know the Navy thought I was able to think well enough to command an
F/A18 attack wing on numerous combat missions over Iraq and Kuwait. This was
from an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf as part of Operation Desert
Shield and Desert Storm where we were protecting even you and your ilk from
harm. And yes I've been shot at and yes I've been hit.

A simple apology to me an every other military person in the NG would be
appropriate.

Ed

Michelle Steiner wrote:

> I do not owe you an apology for anything; I merely replied to you in the
> same manner you addressed me. So stop whining that I hit you back!
>
> Nor do I owe any military person an apology because I did not insult
> them.
>
> I appreciate your service to our country, but while you were in Desert
> Storm and Desert Shield, you weren't protecting me from anything. You
> were, however, rescuing Kuwait from an invasion, and I salute you for
> that. I'm sure that my "ilk" (i.e., patriotic American citizens) also
> salute you for that.
>
> Nor is Bush keeping us safe from terrorists; Iraq was never a threat to
> the United States.
>
> Too bad you can't realize what it actually is that you swore to defend
> when you took your oath of office upon your commissioning, or you
> wouldn't have called my sig "adolescent," or called me a child, ordered
> or me to support the president.

The president's an idiot, and people who *order* *anyone* to support him
are, at best, misguided in doing so.

a) I will support the troops until the day I die. Period, full stop.

b) However, I don't agree with most of the reasons for which our country has
gone to war over the past fifteen years.

Statement (a) and statement (b) are not mutually exclusive. There are a lot
of brave people fighting in our military. Some of them are friends of mine;
others are family members. Most of them are people I have never met and will
never have the privilege of meeting. (And yes, I do consider it a privilege.)

Most of them shouldn't be doing what they're doing right now. But that is
most certainly *not* their fault. Why they shouldn't be there is a
discussion that is way off-topic for these newsgroups, although if someone
really wants to argue with me in email, I welcome replies to this message.
Just not here. (If there is a more appropriate newsgroup in which to discuss
this, I'll be happy to post there instead.)

--
JustThe.net - Steve Sobol / [email protected] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Coming to you from Southern California's High Desert, where the
temperatures are as high as the gas prices! / 888.480.4NET (4638)

"Life's like an hourglass glued to the table" --Anna Nalick, "Breathe"

"Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Ya' know the Navy thought I was able to think well enough to command an
> F/A18 attack wing on numerous combat missions over Iraq and Kuwait. This
> was from an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf as part of Operation
> Desert Shield and Desert Storm where we were protecting even you and your
> ilk from harm. And yes I've been shot at and yes I've been hit.
>
> A simple apology to me an every other military person in the NG would be
> appropriate.
>

eD,

Thanks for helping to keep the rest of us safe. May all your traps be
good ones.


--
Thomas M. Goethe

"Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >I just found this on Motorola's web site:
> >
> > Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.
>
> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by
your
> adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is trying
to
> keep us safe from terrorists.

You know, anything intelligent that you may have to contribute is negated by
your adolescent reply. Grow up, child. At least for the time being, people
are allowed to have differing political views. Disagreeing with yours
doesn't make one immature. Stamping one's feet and calling people names
because you disagree with their politics, on the the other hand, does.


>
> Ed
>
>

"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > A simple apology to me an every other military person in the NG would be
> > appropriate.
>
> I do not owe you an apology for anything; I merely replied to you in the
> same manner you addressed me. So stop whining that I hit you back!
>
> Nor do I owe any military person an apology because I did not insult
> them.
>
> I appreciate your service to our country, but while you were in Desert
> Storm and Desert Shield, you weren't protecting me from anything. You
> were, however, rescuing Kuwait from an invasion, and I salute you for
> that. I'm sure that my "ilk" (i.e., patriotic American citizens) also
> salute you for that.
>
> Nor is Bush keeping us safe from terrorists; Iraq was never a threat to
> the United States.
>
> Too bad you can't realize what it actually is that you swore to defend
> when you took your oath of office upon your commissioning, or you
> wouldn't have called my sig "adolescent," or called me a child, ordered
> or me to support the president.

Well said, Michelle!



>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.

"Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>>
>> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.
>
> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by
> your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is
> trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>
> Ed
>

You are a retard.

willum wrote:
> "Special Ed" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>> I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>>>
>>> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.
>>
>> You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated
>> by your adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President
>> who is trying to keep us safe from terrorists.
>>
>> Ed
>>
>
> You are a retard.

Damn! That comment strikes right at Ed's heart. There can be no
counter-argument. My taxes pay for the creation of intellectual giants.

Q

Michelle Steiner wrote:
> Now, Motorola is saying that it doesn't matter which carrier--the phone
> will never support OBEX, and no software upgrade can change that.

Given that BT profiles are just software using the underlying BT RF
hardware, I wonder how it can be that no software upgrade can change it?
That's the whole idea of protocol stacks such as defined by BT: the
layers at the bottom have no idea what is running on top of them.

On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:57:27 -0400, "Special Ed" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>I just found this on Motorola's web site:
>>
>> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.
>
>You know, anything intelligent you may have to contribute is negated by your
>adolescent sig. Grow up, child...and support the President who is trying to
>keep us safe from terrorists.
>
>Ed
>

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety"
-- Benjamin Franklin

It's all Bush's fault!


"Michelle Steiner" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> CharlesH <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> > Now, Motorola is saying that it doesn't matter which carrier--the
>> > phone will never support OBEX, and no software upgrade can change
>> > that.
>>
>> Given that BT profiles are just software using the underlying BT RF
>> hardware, I wonder how it can be that no software upgrade can change
>> it?
>
> Well, there is either a valid reason or else Motorola is lying.
>
> --
> Stop Mad Cowboy Disease: Impeach the son of a Bush.