Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    NEXT ALERT
    Guest

    "Joe Hayes" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:Ci6pd.3363$Nw.2661@lakeread08...
    > Some words of wisdom from "NEXT ALERT" :
    >
    > > (((Are you for real,))) or possibly you work
    > > for or have stock in Motorola and or Nextel?

    >
    > > Gee, you must be a stock holder in one of these companies and or you

    work
    > > for them.

    >
    > > There's not a perception problem here other than you, rather you are no
    > > different from the staff of both companies. Based on your wording, if I
    > > did
    > > not know better, your work for Nextel.

    >
    >
    > So anyone who disagrees with your point of view is an employee of Nextel

    or
    > Motorola, or has some financial interest in the companies? Sheesh. Talk
    > about naive. You post your bellyache rants in a public forum and then

    have
    > the nerve to denegrate people for responding?


    <SNIP>

    Wait a minute; I simply posted a story about my case and the first few post
    that responded to my post start grilling me for posting it. "Are you for
    real?" ...is not an inflammatory question, however hard that is for you to
    accept. Rather the question implies that you don't necessarily grasp all
    what is going on. And guess what, neither did I fully at the time of my
    original post, as my case has now taken a HUGE turn since then. I say again,
    GIVE ME A BREAK, and lighten up will you?


    > > Based on your wording, if I
    > > did
    > > not know better, your work for Nextel.



    The expertise or degree of shop talk with a person in groups is often an
    indicator that you're not communicating with just anyone, rather you may
    very well be dealing with a trained representative passing them self off as
    just anyone. Nice try, but your not dumbing me down.

    Anyone can respond I don't care; there was nothing in my post that stated
    who could or could not respond. I only asked for constructive feedback, as I
    know all to well how some people have anything but something helpful to say
    and give you nothing but trouble in return, like you. When people attack my
    post right out of the gate, I am naturally going to stand up and fight back
    and that's what has happened here; it's simply defense, nothing more,
    nothing less. Please let it go.

    Over all, I have been nothing but a gentleman in my post, and in no way have
    I been a smart-ass or otherwise, let alone name-calling. Stating nothing but
    the facts of my case is NOT cause for trouble on any level. If people abject
    to my post, then they don't have to read them.

    Soon I will post a follow up, like I said, my case has taken a HUGE turn.
    All thanks to a very thoughtful Nextel employer who uncovered some serious
    findings that are not only about the phone that was sent to me, but also how
    my phone repair records with Nextel were more then just mishandled. It
    clearly explains why (still) no one with Nextel or Motorola has returned any
    of my calls. However, now Nextel & Motorola will have to return calls they
    may wish had never come their way. Will see.

    For those of you who can't stand a cliffhanger, I leave you with this for
    now.

    The findings of a very helpful Nextel employer have resulted in a criminal
    investigation currently headed by the FBI. As for the advice by some here to
    turn my sub phone back in for yet another one that works properly, is not
    going to happen now. As the phone is now being held for evidence.

    No, the sub phone Motorola sent me was NOT used in a crime. However, if my
    hunch is right, there are lots of these phones circulating out there,
    complements of Motorola and there is no way of knowing if Nextel is involved
    in it as well. No, I'm not referring to knock off phones either. If you BY
    CHANCE have one of these phones, or even own other equipment by Motorola,
    you defiantly will want to learn more, but then again not everyone cares,
    until it directly effects them.


    To Be Continued.


    That is, as long as I'm not met with a gag order come Monday, even so, I
    still think I should spill the beans because of the way my case was handled.





    See More: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .




  2. #2
    Richard Ness
    Guest

    Re: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .

    I think the 'issue' was with how agitated you got over a damn phone.
    The easiest thing would have been to simply go back and get a different phone.
    Keep going back and calmly and nicely keep requesting 'till you were satisfied.
    But, you chose to get all worked up here and I'm quite sure with all the Nextel
    people you were working with. Attitude is everything. (Yours is called "whining")

    99% of the time, when you get all worked up about something, the desired result
    very rarely is realized. The old saying "more flies with honey" is quite applicable.
    It holds true in newsgroups also, bucko....

    As to making a federal case out of this, my first impression is "get a life", or that you
    are suffering from delusions of grandeur or that you just like to stir things up. But.......

    I have to admit that I am a bit curious also. What nefarious plot have you uncovered?
    Nextel and Motorola swapping phones with used ones and shipping the new ones to
    China? Using phone repair parts in secret illicit nuclear weapons programs?
    Motorola has a Mafia connection? Osama is now using your old phone?

    My bet is that if this "gag order" is your excuse for not revealing this 'evil doing' in the next
    few days, that this was very likely, shall we say, a work of pure fiction?

    Film at 11.......



    "NEXT ALERT" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    >
    >
    > Over all, I have been nothing but a gentleman in my post, and in no way have
    > I been a smart-ass or otherwise, let alone name-calling. Stating nothing but
    > the facts of my case is NOT cause for trouble on any level. If people abject
    > to my post, then they don't have to read them.
    >
    > Soon I will post a follow up, like I said, my case has taken a HUGE turn.
    > All thanks to a very thoughtful Nextel employer who uncovered some serious
    > findings that are not only about the phone that was sent to me, but also how
    > my phone repair records with Nextel were more then just mishandled. It
    > clearly explains why (still) no one with Nextel or Motorola has returned any
    > of my calls. However, now Nextel & Motorola will have to return calls they
    > may wish had never come their way. Will see.
    >
    > For those of you who can't stand a cliffhanger, I leave you with this for
    > now.
    >
    > The findings of a very helpful Nextel employer have resulted in a criminal
    > investigation currently headed by the FBI. As for the advice by some here to
    > turn my sub phone back in for yet another one that works properly, is not
    > going to happen now. As the phone is now being held for evidence.
    >
    > No, the sub phone Motorola sent me was NOT used in a crime. However, if my
    > hunch is right, there are lots of these phones circulating out there,
    > complements of Motorola and there is no way of knowing if Nextel is involved
    > in it as well. No, I'm not referring to knock off phones either. If you BY
    > CHANCE have one of these phones, or even own other equipment by Motorola,
    > you defiantly will want to learn more, but then again not everyone cares,
    > until it directly effects them.
    >
    >
    > To Be Continued.
    >
    >
    > That is, as long as I'm not met with a gag order come Monday, even so, I
    > still think I should spill the beans because of the way my case was handled.
    >
    >






  3. #3
    NEXTEL USER
    Guest

    Re: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .

    (1) I never cop an attitude with those who are trying to help me, never
    have, never will, even if someone cops one with me over the phone as I would
    simply exercise the power of the hook. But with email I find myself wanting
    to stand my ground, for it does not require raising my voice, not to mention
    I can take time out to think about what I'm trying to say.

    (2) After the interview with the FBI agent, I agreed not to communicate any
    further to Motorola or Nextel about this matter. Then right after that, I
    was then asked if I was going to contact Nextel about this matter in regards
    to getting another phone to use, or discontinuing my service. I said, "no."
    as I would have to go into detail about my case as to why I can no longer
    exchange my phone for another one and I have a two-year contract with Nextel
    that I'm obligated too. It's best that way for now. I'll have to find
    another phone somewhere else now; I guess the web is the best way, since
    the next Nextel office is an eighty plus mile trip. Possibly I could do it
    over the phone instead.

    (3) I was teed off because I saw it as being ripped off. However I had no
    idea just how truly fooled I actually was, and now (possibly) countless
    others worldwide on all kinds of Motorola products have been deceived as
    well. How far and wide the problem goes is unknown at this time. I can tell
    you this much, you don't tell your customers one thing when you actually did
    some completely different and very sneaky at that. Was it a disgruntle
    employer and thus this matter is an isolated case? I don't think so, because
    the deception looked high-tech on an old low-tech trick, meaning that
    special equipment was required to perform the job, and most likely was
    supplied by the company in question. However, if Motorola farms out their
    repairs, then there's a good chance that Motorola may not be aware of such
    practice. However, that would not fully explain incorrect records or record
    tampering in regards to tracking information or at least why it has not
    raised any red flags with Motorola, let alone Nextel. Remember, even though
    I have never copped an atitude with either company, nor have I made them
    aware of what I have learned, my calls have never-ever been returned. The
    deletion/alteration of my records make it so that person within Nextel
    cannot find any records on me in regards to my case, there by when they try
    to pull up my records on this matter to call me, they can't, as my records
    are no longer there, or never was for that matter. So there by Nextel sees
    nothing to call me about as it must appear that the matter in question has
    either (1) been solved, (2) never existed or, (3) they might think there
    looking up the wrong customer. Whatever the case, who rally knows.

    (4) After Monday or so, I hope to know more as to where I stand with what I
    should or should not be sharing, period. Be it on the net or with others in
    general. I am proud of myself for being able to keep a lid on this for now,
    however, if I were a news reporter the lid would be blown clean clear off
    the moment I had all of my facts together.




    "Richard Ness" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > I think the 'issue' was with how agitated you got over a damn phone.
    > The easiest thing would have been to simply go back and get a different

    phone.
    > Keep going back and calmly and nicely keep requesting 'till you were

    satisfied.
    > But, you chose to get all worked up here and I'm quite sure with all the

    Nextel
    > people you were working with. Attitude is everything. (Yours is called

    "whining")
    >
    > 99% of the time, when you get all worked up about something, the desired

    result
    > very rarely is realized. The old saying "more flies with honey" is quite

    applicable.
    > It holds true in newsgroups also, bucko....
    >
    > As to making a federal case out of this, my first impression is "get a

    life", or that you
    > are suffering from delusions of grandeur or that you just like to stir

    things up. But.......
    >
    > I have to admit that I am a bit curious also. What nefarious plot have you

    uncovered?
    > Nextel and Motorola swapping phones with used ones and shipping the new

    ones to
    > China? Using phone repair parts in secret illicit nuclear weapons

    programs?
    > Motorola has a Mafia connection? Osama is now using your old phone?
    >
    > My bet is that if this "gag order" is your excuse for not revealing this

    'evil doing' in the next
    > few days, that this was very likely, shall we say, a work of pure fiction?
    >
    > Film at 11.......
    >
    >
    >
    > "NEXT ALERT" <[email protected]> wrote in message

    news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > >
    > > Over all, I have been nothing but a gentleman in my post, and in no way

    have
    > > I been a smart-ass or otherwise, let alone name-calling. Stating nothing

    but
    > > the facts of my case is NOT cause for trouble on any level. If people

    abject
    > > to my post, then they don't have to read them.
    > >
    > > Soon I will post a follow up, like I said, my case has taken a HUGE

    turn.
    > > All thanks to a very thoughtful Nextel employer who uncovered some

    serious
    > > findings that are not only about the phone that was sent to me, but also

    how
    > > my phone repair records with Nextel were more then just mishandled. It
    > > clearly explains why (still) no one with Nextel or Motorola has returned

    any
    > > of my calls. However, now Nextel & Motorola will have to return calls

    they
    > > may wish had never come their way. Will see.
    > >
    > > For those of you who can't stand a cliffhanger, I leave you with this

    for
    > > now.
    > >
    > > The findings of a very helpful Nextel employer have resulted in a

    criminal
    > > investigation currently headed by the FBI. As for the advice by some

    here to
    > > turn my sub phone back in for yet another one that works properly, is

    not
    > > going to happen now. As the phone is now being held for evidence.
    > >
    > > No, the sub phone Motorola sent me was NOT used in a crime. However, if

    my
    > > hunch is right, there are lots of these phones circulating out there,
    > > complements of Motorola and there is no way of knowing if Nextel is

    involved
    > > in it as well. No, I'm not referring to knock off phones either. If you

    BY
    > > CHANCE have one of these phones, or even own other equipment by

    Motorola,
    > > you defiantly will want to learn more, but then again not everyone

    cares,
    > > until it directly effects them.
    > >
    > >
    > > To Be Continued.
    > >
    > >
    > > That is, as long as I'm not met with a gag order come Monday, even so, I
    > > still think I should spill the beans because of the way my case was

    handled.
    > >
    > >

    >
    >






  4. #4
    Joe Hayes
    Guest

    Re: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .

    I think the whole FBI investigation story is just a charade you concoted
    because you're starved for attention. Either that or you're just
    delusional. No organization would waste their time investigating something
    so trivial as a used cell phone. And you have no facts whatsoever, only
    hearsay.


    "NEXTEL USER" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > (1) I never cop an attitude with those who are trying to help me, never
    > have, never will, even if someone cops one with me over the phone as I
    > would
    > simply exercise the power of the hook. But with email I find myself
    > wanting
    > to stand my ground, for it does not require raising my voice, not to
    > mention
    > I can take time out to think about what I'm trying to say.
    >
    > (2) After the interview with the FBI agent, I agreed not to communicate
    > any
    > further to Motorola or Nextel about this matter. Then right after that, I
    > was then asked if I was going to contact Nextel about this matter in
    > regards
    > to getting another phone to use, or discontinuing my service. I said,
    > "no."
    > as I would have to go into detail about my case as to why I can no longer
    > exchange my phone for another one and I have a two-year contract with
    > Nextel
    > that I'm obligated too. It's best that way for now. I'll have to find
    > another phone somewhere else now; I guess the web is the best way, since
    > the next Nextel office is an eighty plus mile trip. Possibly I could do it
    > over the phone instead.
    >
    > (3) I was teed off because I saw it as being ripped off. However I had no
    > idea just how truly fooled I actually was, and now (possibly) countless
    > others worldwide on all kinds of Motorola products have been deceived as
    > well. How far and wide the problem goes is unknown at this time. I can
    > tell
    > you this much, you don't tell your customers one thing when you actually
    > did
    > some completely different and very sneaky at that. Was it a disgruntle
    > employer and thus this matter is an isolated case? I don't think so,
    > because
    > the deception looked high-tech on an old low-tech trick, meaning that
    > special equipment was required to perform the job, and most likely was
    > supplied by the company in question. However, if Motorola farms out their
    > repairs, then there's a good chance that Motorola may not be aware of such
    > practice. However, that would not fully explain incorrect records or
    > record
    > tampering in regards to tracking information or at least why it has not
    > raised any red flags with Motorola, let alone Nextel. Remember, even
    > though
    > I have never copped an atitude with either company, nor have I made them
    > aware of what I have learned, my calls have never-ever been returned. The
    > deletion/alteration of my records make it so that person within Nextel
    > cannot find any records on me in regards to my case, there by when they
    > try
    > to pull up my records on this matter to call me, they can't, as my records
    > are no longer there, or never was for that matter. So there by Nextel sees
    > nothing to call me about as it must appear that the matter in question has
    > either (1) been solved, (2) never existed or, (3) they might think there
    > looking up the wrong customer. Whatever the case, who rally knows.
    >
    > (4) After Monday or so, I hope to know more as to where I stand with what
    > I
    > should or should not be sharing, period. Be it on the net or with others
    > in
    > general. I am proud of myself for being able to keep a lid on this for
    > now,
    > however, if I were a news reporter the lid would be blown clean clear off
    > the moment I had all of my facts together.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > "Richard Ness" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> I think the 'issue' was with how agitated you got over a damn phone.
    >> The easiest thing would have been to simply go back and get a different

    > phone.
    >> Keep going back and calmly and nicely keep requesting 'till you were

    > satisfied.
    >> But, you chose to get all worked up here and I'm quite sure with all the

    > Nextel
    >> people you were working with. Attitude is everything. (Yours is called

    > "whining")
    >>
    >> 99% of the time, when you get all worked up about something, the desired

    > result
    >> very rarely is realized. The old saying "more flies with honey" is quite

    > applicable.
    >> It holds true in newsgroups also, bucko....
    >>
    >> As to making a federal case out of this, my first impression is "get a

    > life", or that you
    >> are suffering from delusions of grandeur or that you just like to stir

    > things up. But.......
    >>
    >> I have to admit that I am a bit curious also. What nefarious plot have
    >> you

    > uncovered?
    >> Nextel and Motorola swapping phones with used ones and shipping the new

    > ones to
    >> China? Using phone repair parts in secret illicit nuclear weapons

    > programs?
    >> Motorola has a Mafia connection? Osama is now using your old phone?
    >>
    >> My bet is that if this "gag order" is your excuse for not revealing this

    > 'evil doing' in the next
    >> few days, that this was very likely, shall we say, a work of pure
    >> fiction?
    >>
    >> Film at 11.......
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> "NEXT ALERT" <[email protected]> wrote in message

    > news:[email protected]...
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > Over all, I have been nothing but a gentleman in my post, and in no way

    > have
    >> > I been a smart-ass or otherwise, let alone name-calling. Stating
    >> > nothing

    > but
    >> > the facts of my case is NOT cause for trouble on any level. If people

    > abject
    >> > to my post, then they don't have to read them.
    >> >
    >> > Soon I will post a follow up, like I said, my case has taken a HUGE

    > turn.
    >> > All thanks to a very thoughtful Nextel employer who uncovered some

    > serious
    >> > findings that are not only about the phone that was sent to me, but
    >> > also

    > how
    >> > my phone repair records with Nextel were more then just mishandled. It
    >> > clearly explains why (still) no one with Nextel or Motorola has
    >> > returned

    > any
    >> > of my calls. However, now Nextel & Motorola will have to return calls

    > they
    >> > may wish had never come their way. Will see.
    >> >
    >> > For those of you who can't stand a cliffhanger, I leave you with this

    > for
    >> > now.
    >> >
    >> > The findings of a very helpful Nextel employer have resulted in a

    > criminal
    >> > investigation currently headed by the FBI. As for the advice by some

    > here to
    >> > turn my sub phone back in for yet another one that works properly, is

    > not
    >> > going to happen now. As the phone is now being held for evidence.
    >> >
    >> > No, the sub phone Motorola sent me was NOT used in a crime. However, if

    > my
    >> > hunch is right, there are lots of these phones circulating out there,
    >> > complements of Motorola and there is no way of knowing if Nextel is

    > involved
    >> > in it as well. No, I'm not referring to knock off phones either. If you

    > BY
    >> > CHANCE have one of these phones, or even own other equipment by

    > Motorola,
    >> > you defiantly will want to learn more, but then again not everyone

    > cares,
    >> > until it directly effects them.
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > To Be Continued.
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > That is, as long as I'm not met with a gag order come Monday, even so,
    >> > I
    >> > still think I should spill the beans because of the way my case was

    > handled.
    >> >
    >> >

    >>
    >>

    >
    >






  5. #5
    NEXTEL USER
    Guest

    Re: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .

    "Joe Hayes" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:179qd.4437$Nw.4095@lakeread08...
    > I think the whole FBI investigation story is just a charade you concoted
    > because you're starved for attention. Either that or you're just
    > delusional. No organization would waste their time investigating

    something
    > so trivial as a used cell phone. And you have no facts whatsoever, only
    > hearsay.
    >


    You should read all of my post, not some of them, as I do not want to cut
    and paste my posts over and over to each person's reply who is not fully
    informed. In simple, the matter is no longer about a used cell phone, (that
    post is five days old) rather it's about alleged fraud and deception to
    Nextel and Motorola customers, possibly on a grand scale. Since your not
    reading all of the posts, (or possibly you're not getting all of them) it's
    no longer just about cell phones as Motorola makes all kinds of stuff from
    satellite communications to Free Scale Semiconductors to Homeland Security
    Solutions Technology, Homologation Engineering, their even into making
    Portable Energy Systems and lots more, far more than what most people think
    Motorola's into. So... hopefully what happened to me is an isolated case and
    not Motorola's company as a whole. In other areas of commerce, many have
    been arrested, fined and sentence to jail for what was done to me. So, I'm
    pretty sure that just because Motorola is in the communication industry that
    by any means does it get them off of the hook.

    By the way, I do in fact have proof, all thanks to Motorola, Nextel, FedEx,
    the phone that was sent back to me, three eyewitnesses, and macro
    photography as well. I will post those pics as well, should and when the
    times comes, for seeing is believing, well at least it use to be that way.





    >
    > "NEXTEL USER" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > (1) I never cop an attitude with those who are trying to help me, never
    > > have, never will, even if someone cops one with me over the phone as I
    > > would
    > > simply exercise the power of the hook. But with email I find myself
    > > wanting
    > > to stand my ground, for it does not require raising my voice, not to
    > > mention
    > > I can take time out to think about what I'm trying to say.
    > >
    > > (2) After the interview with the FBI agent, I agreed not to communicate
    > > any
    > > further to Motorola or Nextel about this matter. Then right after that,

    I
    > > was then asked if I was going to contact Nextel about this matter in
    > > regards
    > > to getting another phone to use, or discontinuing my service. I said,
    > > "no."
    > > as I would have to go into detail about my case as to why I can no

    longer
    > > exchange my phone for another one and I have a two-year contract with
    > > Nextel
    > > that I'm obligated too. It's best that way for now. I'll have to find
    > > another phone somewhere else now; I guess the web is the best way,

    since
    > > the next Nextel office is an eighty plus mile trip. Possibly I could do

    it
    > > over the phone instead.
    > >
    > > (3) I was teed off because I saw it as being ripped off. However I had

    no
    > > idea just how truly fooled I actually was, and now (possibly) countless
    > > others worldwide on all kinds of Motorola products have been deceived as
    > > well. How far and wide the problem goes is unknown at this time. I can
    > > tell
    > > you this much, you don't tell your customers one thing when you actually
    > > did
    > > some completely different and very sneaky at that. Was it a disgruntle
    > > employer and thus this matter is an isolated case? I don't think so,
    > > because
    > > the deception looked high-tech on an old low-tech trick, meaning that
    > > special equipment was required to perform the job, and most likely was
    > > supplied by the company in question. However, if Motorola farms out

    their
    > > repairs, then there's a good chance that Motorola may not be aware of

    such
    > > practice. However, that would not fully explain incorrect records or
    > > record
    > > tampering in regards to tracking information or at least why it has not
    > > raised any red flags with Motorola, let alone Nextel. Remember, even
    > > though
    > > I have never copped an atitude with either company, nor have I made them
    > > aware of what I have learned, my calls have never-ever been returned.

    The
    > > deletion/alteration of my records make it so that person within Nextel
    > > cannot find any records on me in regards to my case, there by when they
    > > try
    > > to pull up my records on this matter to call me, they can't, as my

    records
    > > are no longer there, or never was for that matter. So there by Nextel

    sees
    > > nothing to call me about as it must appear that the matter in question

    has
    > > either (1) been solved, (2) never existed or, (3) they might think there
    > > looking up the wrong customer. Whatever the case, who rally knows.
    > >
    > > (4) After Monday or so, I hope to know more as to where I stand with

    what
    > > I
    > > should or should not be sharing, period. Be it on the net or with others
    > > in
    > > general. I am proud of myself for being able to keep a lid on this for
    > > now,
    > > however, if I were a news reporter the lid would be blown clean clear

    off
    > > the moment I had all of my facts together.
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > "Richard Ness" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > >> I think the 'issue' was with how agitated you got over a damn phone.
    > >> The easiest thing would have been to simply go back and get a different

    > > phone.
    > >> Keep going back and calmly and nicely keep requesting 'till you were

    > > satisfied.
    > >> But, you chose to get all worked up here and I'm quite sure with all

    the
    > > Nextel
    > >> people you were working with. Attitude is everything. (Yours is called

    > > "whining")
    > >>
    > >> 99% of the time, when you get all worked up about something, the

    desired
    > > result
    > >> very rarely is realized. The old saying "more flies with honey" is

    quite
    > > applicable.
    > >> It holds true in newsgroups also, bucko....
    > >>
    > >> As to making a federal case out of this, my first impression is "get a

    > > life", or that you
    > >> are suffering from delusions of grandeur or that you just like to stir

    > > things up. But.......
    > >>
    > >> I have to admit that I am a bit curious also. What nefarious plot have
    > >> you

    > > uncovered?
    > >> Nextel and Motorola swapping phones with used ones and shipping the new

    > > ones to
    > >> China? Using phone repair parts in secret illicit nuclear weapons

    > > programs?
    > >> Motorola has a Mafia connection? Osama is now using your old phone?
    > >>
    > >> My bet is that if this "gag order" is your excuse for not revealing

    this
    > > 'evil doing' in the next
    > >> few days, that this was very likely, shall we say, a work of pure
    > >> fiction?
    > >>
    > >> Film at 11.......
    > >>
    > >>
    > >>
    > >> "NEXT ALERT" <[email protected]> wrote in message

    > > news:[email protected]...
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> > Over all, I have been nothing but a gentleman in my post, and in no

    way
    > > have
    > >> > I been a smart-ass or otherwise, let alone name-calling. Stating
    > >> > nothing

    > > but
    > >> > the facts of my case is NOT cause for trouble on any level. If people

    > > abject
    > >> > to my post, then they don't have to read them.
    > >> >
    > >> > Soon I will post a follow up, like I said, my case has taken a HUGE

    > > turn.
    > >> > All thanks to a very thoughtful Nextel employer who uncovered some

    > > serious
    > >> > findings that are not only about the phone that was sent to me, but
    > >> > also

    > > how
    > >> > my phone repair records with Nextel were more then just mishandled.

    It
    > >> > clearly explains why (still) no one with Nextel or Motorola has
    > >> > returned

    > > any
    > >> > of my calls. However, now Nextel & Motorola will have to return calls

    > > they
    > >> > may wish had never come their way. Will see.
    > >> >
    > >> > For those of you who can't stand a cliffhanger, I leave you with this

    > > for
    > >> > now.
    > >> >
    > >> > The findings of a very helpful Nextel employer have resulted in a

    > > criminal
    > >> > investigation currently headed by the FBI. As for the advice by some

    > > here to
    > >> > turn my sub phone back in for yet another one that works properly, is

    > > not
    > >> > going to happen now. As the phone is now being held for evidence.
    > >> >
    > >> > No, the sub phone Motorola sent me was NOT used in a crime. However,

    if
    > > my
    > >> > hunch is right, there are lots of these phones circulating out there,
    > >> > complements of Motorola and there is no way of knowing if Nextel is

    > > involved
    > >> > in it as well. No, I'm not referring to knock off phones either. If

    you
    > > BY
    > >> > CHANCE have one of these phones, or even own other equipment by

    > > Motorola,
    > >> > you defiantly will want to learn more, but then again not everyone

    > > cares,
    > >> > until it directly effects them.
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> > To Be Continued.
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >> > That is, as long as I'm not met with a gag order come Monday, even

    so,
    > >> > I
    > >> > still think I should spill the beans because of the way my case was

    > > handled.
    > >> >
    > >> >
    > >>
    > >>

    > >
    > >

    >
    >






  6. #6
    Richard Ness
    Guest

    Re: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .

    We all read your posts.
    And I'd be willing to bet, most, if not all came to the same conclusion.

    What a HUGE load of bull ****.

    I'm seriously doubtful that LOCAL law enforcement, much less the FBI
    would give such a trivial matter, more than a second of their time.
    They all have better things to do than deal with your used phone whining.

    As I said before, you will cry "gag order" and fail to prove any of this.

    Put up or shut up.

    I'll bet you don't...



    "NEXTEL USER" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
    >
    > You should read all of my post, not some of them, as I do not want to cut
    > and paste my posts over and over to each person's reply who is not fully
    > informed. In simple, the matter is no longer about a used cell phone, (that
    > post is five days old) rather it's about alleged fraud and deception to
    > Nextel and Motorola customers, possibly on a grand scale. Since your not
    > reading all of the posts, (or possibly you're not getting all of them) it's
    > no longer just about cell phones as Motorola makes all kinds of stuff from
    > satellite communications to Free Scale Semiconductors to Homeland Security
    > Solutions Technology, Homologation Engineering, their even into making
    > Portable Energy Systems and lots more, far more than what most people think
    > Motorola's into. So... hopefully what happened to me is an isolated case and
    > not Motorola's company as a whole. In other areas of commerce, many have
    > been arrested, fined and sentence to jail for what was done to me. So, I'm
    > pretty sure that just because Motorola is in the communication industry that
    > by any means does it get them off of the hook.
    >
    > By the way, I do in fact have proof, all thanks to Motorola, Nextel, FedEx,
    > the phone that was sent back to me, three eyewitnesses, and macro
    > photography as well. I will post those pics as well, should and when the
    > times comes, for seeing is believing, well at least it use to be that way.
    >







  7. #7
    MOTOROLA USER
    Guest

    Re: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .

    Man you sure missed the boat on what and why my case was referred to the
    FBI. Either you're not getting all of my posts, or you're to lazy to
    actually read them in there entirety, and at speed in which you can not only
    (fully) comprehend what is being said, but (retain) what you have read. You
    may want to try www.usenet.com rather then using your Outlook Express to
    peruse newsgroups in finding (all) of my post.

    And yes, FRAUD is taken very seriously by law local law enforcement, just
    that this case became a federal one because of the operation crossing state
    lines. I don't call the shots; I just do as I am told to do. This shows just
    how little you actually know and understand when national law enforcement
    comes into play, verses state/local law enforcement issues. Example: If you
    commit a crime using the postal service, (known as, mail fraud) it's a
    federal crime, as the postal service crosses state lines, thus making it,
    "A Federal Crime." Not to mention using government buildings to commit the
    crime.

    You might want to scratch your ole noggin a little bit longer next time
    before you respond, aside from the fact that responding when were all
    frazzled up clouds our judgment.

    For god's sakes, I moved on with the old warranty issue, can't you catch up
    with the current issue? Please let it go. Please. Otherwise I will have to
    ignore your ranting, of which I should have done in the first place, but did
    not, in the name of keeping this post on track.

    Please contribute to the cause in a constructive way, or at least hold your
    tongue until you have all of the facts straight. Again I say, stay away from
    jury duty when and (if) possible.

    Thanks in advance.



    "Richard Ness" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > We all read your posts.
    > And I'd be willing to bet, most, if not all came to the same conclusion.
    >
    > What a HUGE load of bull ****.
    >
    > I'm seriously doubtful that LOCAL law enforcement, much less the FBI
    > would give such a trivial matter, more than a second of their time.
    > They all have better things to do than deal with your used phone whining.
    >
    > As I said before, you will cry "gag order" and fail to prove any of this.
    >
    > Put up or shut up.
    >
    > I'll bet you don't...
    >
    >
    >
    > "NEXTEL USER" <[email protected]> wrote in message

    news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > You should read all of my post, not some of them, as I do not want to

    cut
    > > and paste my posts over and over to each person's reply who is not fully
    > > informed. In simple, the matter is no longer about a used cell phone,

    (that
    > > post is five days old) rather it's about alleged fraud and deception to
    > > Nextel and Motorola customers, possibly on a grand scale. Since your not
    > > reading all of the posts, (or possibly you're not getting all of them)

    it's
    > > no longer just about cell phones as Motorola makes all kinds of stuff

    from
    > > satellite communications to Free Scale Semiconductors to Homeland

    Security
    > > Solutions Technology, Homologation Engineering, their even into making
    > > Portable Energy Systems and lots more, far more than what most people

    think
    > > Motorola's into. So... hopefully what happened to me is an isolated case

    and
    > > not Motorola's company as a whole. In other areas of commerce, many have
    > > been arrested, fined and sentence to jail for what was done to me. So,

    I'm
    > > pretty sure that just because Motorola is in the communication industry

    that
    > > by any means does it get them off of the hook.
    > >
    > > By the way, I do in fact have proof, all thanks to Motorola, Nextel,

    FedEx,
    > > the phone that was sent back to me, three eyewitnesses, and macro
    > > photography as well. I will post those pics as well, should and when the
    > > times comes, for seeing is believing, well at least it use to be that

    way.
    > >

    >
    >
    >






  8. #8
    dep_blueman
    Guest

    Re: WARNING - ALERT TO ALL NEXTEL USERS: 11/27/2004 / Cliffhanger Enclosed. . .

    "... Motorola, at its option, will at no charge repair, replace or
    refund the purchase price of any Products, Accessories or Software
    that does not conform to this warranty. We may use functionally
    equivalent reconditioned/refurbished/pre-owned or new Products,
    Accessories or parts. No data, software or applications added to your
    Product, Accessory or Software, including but not limited to personal
    contacts, games and ringer tones, will be reinstalled. To avoid losing
    such data, software and applications please create a back up prior to
    requesting service. ..."

    "MOTOROLA USER" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    > Man you sure missed the boat on what and why my case was referred to the
    > FBI. Either you're not getting all of my posts, or you're to lazy to
    > actually read them in there entirety, and at speed in which you can not only
    > (fully) comprehend what is being said, but (retain) what you have read. You
    > may want to try www.usenet.com rather then using your Outlook Express to
    > peruse newsgroups in finding (all) of my post.
    >
    > And yes, FRAUD is taken very seriously by law local law enforcement, just
    > that this case became a federal one because of the operation crossing state
    > lines. I don't call the shots; I just do as I am told to do. This shows just
    > how little you actually know and understand when national law enforcement
    > comes into play, verses state/local law enforcement issues. Example: If you
    > commit a crime using the postal service, (known as, mail fraud) it's a
    > federal crime, as the postal service crosses state lines, thus making it,
    > "A Federal Crime." Not to mention using government buildings to commit the
    > crime.
    >
    > You might want to scratch your ole noggin a little bit longer next time
    > before you respond, aside from the fact that responding when were all
    > frazzled up clouds our judgment.
    >
    > For god's sakes, I moved on with the old warranty issue, can't you catch up
    > with the current issue? Please let it go. Please. Otherwise I will have to
    > ignore your ranting, of which I should have done in the first place, but did
    > not, in the name of keeping this post on track.
    >
    > Please contribute to the cause in a constructive way, or at least hold your
    > tongue until you have all of the facts straight. Again I say, stay away from
    > jury duty when and (if) possible.
    >
    > Thanks in advance.
    >
    >
    >
    > "Richard Ness" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > We all read your posts.
    > > And I'd be willing to bet, most, if not all came to the same conclusion.
    > >
    > > What a HUGE load of bull ****.
    > >
    > > I'm seriously doubtful that LOCAL law enforcement, much less the FBI
    > > would give such a trivial matter, more than a second of their time.
    > > They all have better things to do than deal with your used phone whining.
    > >
    > > As I said before, you will cry "gag order" and fail to prove any of this.
    > >
    > > Put up or shut up.
    > >
    > > I'll bet you don't...
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > "NEXTEL USER" <[email protected]> wrote in message

    > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > You should read all of my post, not some of them, as I do not want to

    > cut
    > > > and paste my posts over and over to each person's reply who is not fully
    > > > informed. In simple, the matter is no longer about a used cell phone,

    > (that
    > > > post is five days old) rather it's about alleged fraud and deception to
    > > > Nextel and Motorola customers, possibly on a grand scale. Since your not
    > > > reading all of the posts, (or possibly you're not getting all of them)

    > it's
    > > > no longer just about cell phones as Motorola makes all kinds of stuff

    > from
    > > > satellite communications to Free Scale Semiconductors to Homeland

    > Security
    > > > Solutions Technology, Homologation Engineering, their even into making
    > > > Portable Energy Systems and lots more, far more than what most people

    > think
    > > > Motorola's into. So... hopefully what happened to me is an isolated case

    > and
    > > > not Motorola's company as a whole. In other areas of commerce, many have
    > > > been arrested, fined and sentence to jail for what was done to me. So,

    > I'm
    > > > pretty sure that just because Motorola is in the communication industry

    > that
    > > > by any means does it get them off of the hook.
    > > >
    > > > By the way, I do in fact have proof, all thanks to Motorola, Nextel,

    > FedEx,
    > > > the phone that was sent back to me, three eyewitnesses, and macro
    > > > photography as well. I will post those pics as well, should and when the
    > > > times comes, for seeing is believing, well at least it use to be that

    > way.
    > > >

    > >
    > >
    > >




  • Similar Threads