Results 76 to 90 of 90
- 09-06-2003, 10:44 PM #76Eddie HaskelGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have a 2
meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as you
control it above 222Mhz.
But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it. I
personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a cellular
to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:csy6b.47043$xf.25645@lakeread06...
> Eddie Haskel wrote:
>
> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:swV4b.42850$xf.2721@lakeread06...
> >
> >>Mark F wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>That was really good Larry, thanks for the educated and unbiased net
> >>>demo on Verizon PTT from someone who knows how PTT should work being
> >>>that they have a 1x3 ham call. :-)
> >>>
> >>>Now I have one thing less on my to-do list to do now that you gave a
> >>>real clear understanding of the Push-To-Wait technology, somehow I had
a
> >>>feeling it was going to end up that way.
> >>>
> >>>73's
> >>>Mark KS4VT
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hehe, I'll have to go in for a demo my self with my Nextel AND my
> >>2M HT set to my personal auto-patch hooked up at the house.
> >>
> >>Your "autopatch" is illegal there hamboy......remember...NO PRIMARY
> >
> > CONTROL under 222Mhz.......you lid!
> >
> >
>
> No it's not. Again, you're a moron.
>
› See More: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
- 09-06-2003, 10:47 PM #77WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Larry W4CSC wrote:
>>>Your "autopatch" is illegal there hamboy......remember...NO PRIMARY
>>
>>CONTROL under 222Mhz.......you lid!
>>
>>
>
> Funny, we've been running Autopatch on 2M since 1967......
>
> Autopatch isn't primary control, which is on 440 Mhz here......
>
> Where'd you hear this bull****?
>
>
> Larry
>
> Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
> You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
The person who claims to have purposly driven a truck over his i90
and doesn't even have the cods to have his email address in his
return is trying to show his superior intellect. I really don't care
what he says, but if he steps over the line again I will contact his
ISP again.
- 09-06-2003, 10:47 PM #78WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Larry W4CSC wrote:
>>>Your "autopatch" is illegal there hamboy......remember...NO PRIMARY
>>
>>CONTROL under 222Mhz.......you lid!
>>
>>
>
> Funny, we've been running Autopatch on 2M since 1967......
>
> Autopatch isn't primary control, which is on 440 Mhz here......
>
> Where'd you hear this bull****?
>
>
> Larry
>
> Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
> You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
The person who claims to have purposly driven a truck over his i90
and doesn't even have the cods to have his email address in his
return is trying to show his superior intellect. I really don't care
what he says, but if he steps over the line again I will contact his
ISP again.
- 09-07-2003, 07:29 AM #79Larry W4CSCGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Holy ****, Batman! EVERY 2 meter repeater with autopatch across the
country has been operating illegally for 30 years!! Man, wait until
the FCC hears this!
Horse****. What's your call Eddie, darlin'? Are you even a ham? I
don't see it. How long you been operatin' repeaters? Our original
repeater call was WR4ABF and it dates back to when you needed a comm
attorney and topo maps to get in 1967. Have you ever been a repeater
owner? Where's it at and what frequency is it on?
Yeah, right........(c;
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 04:44:44 GMT, "Eddie Haskel" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
>station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
>control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have a 2
>meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as you
>control it above 222Mhz.
>But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
>not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it. I
>personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a cellular
>to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
>
>"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:csy6b.47043$xf.25645@lakeread06...
>> Eddie Haskel wrote:
>>
>> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:swV4b.42850$xf.2721@lakeread06...
>> >
>> >>Mark F wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>That was really good Larry, thanks for the educated and unbiased net
>> >>>demo on Verizon PTT from someone who knows how PTT should work being
>> >>>that they have a 1x3 ham call. :-)
>> >>>
>> >>>Now I have one thing less on my to-do list to do now that you gave a
>> >>>real clear understanding of the Push-To-Wait technology, somehow I had
>a
>> >>>feeling it was going to end up that way.
>> >>>
>> >>>73's
>> >>>Mark KS4VT
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hehe, I'll have to go in for a demo my self with my Nextel AND my
>> >>2M HT set to my personal auto-patch hooked up at the house.
>> >>
>> >>Your "autopatch" is illegal there hamboy......remember...NO PRIMARY
>> >
>> > CONTROL under 222Mhz.......you lid!
>> >
>> >
>>
>> No it's not. Again, you're a moron.
>>
>
>
Larry
Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
- 09-07-2003, 07:29 AM #80Larry W4CSCGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Holy ****, Batman! EVERY 2 meter repeater with autopatch across the
country has been operating illegally for 30 years!! Man, wait until
the FCC hears this!
Horse****. What's your call Eddie, darlin'? Are you even a ham? I
don't see it. How long you been operatin' repeaters? Our original
repeater call was WR4ABF and it dates back to when you needed a comm
attorney and topo maps to get in 1967. Have you ever been a repeater
owner? Where's it at and what frequency is it on?
Yeah, right........(c;
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 04:44:44 GMT, "Eddie Haskel" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
>station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
>control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have a 2
>meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as you
>control it above 222Mhz.
>But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
>not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it. I
>personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a cellular
>to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
>
>"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:csy6b.47043$xf.25645@lakeread06...
>> Eddie Haskel wrote:
>>
>> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:swV4b.42850$xf.2721@lakeread06...
>> >
>> >>Mark F wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>That was really good Larry, thanks for the educated and unbiased net
>> >>>demo on Verizon PTT from someone who knows how PTT should work being
>> >>>that they have a 1x3 ham call. :-)
>> >>>
>> >>>Now I have one thing less on my to-do list to do now that you gave a
>> >>>real clear understanding of the Push-To-Wait technology, somehow I had
>a
>> >>>feeling it was going to end up that way.
>> >>>
>> >>>73's
>> >>>Mark KS4VT
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hehe, I'll have to go in for a demo my self with my Nextel AND my
>> >>2M HT set to my personal auto-patch hooked up at the house.
>> >>
>> >>Your "autopatch" is illegal there hamboy......remember...NO PRIMARY
>> >
>> > CONTROL under 222Mhz.......you lid!
>> >
>> >
>>
>> No it's not. Again, you're a moron.
>>
>
>
Larry
Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
- 09-07-2003, 11:20 AM #81Eddie HaskelGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Yes Larry, I am licensed (since 1972) and a "Advanced" ticket. I own 2 UHF
systems, one a repeater the other a remote base system. They are both closed
systems, I have way too much invested to allow them as "open" systems. We
never needed a WR call as I have them both licensed as remotely controlled
BASE STATIONS. They still to this day carry my callsign. I'm active on 80-10
(dont care for the stuffed shirts on 160) and active on all modes on
6,2,440.....I do have some experiance in amatuer radio Larry. I choose to
NOT publish my repeaters,frequencies and callsign all over the
internet...anymore than I would want my telephone number and or address on
it either....just a good measure these days. God knows we try to be loved by
all, but sometimes that just doesnt happen (Right Windsorfox )....Eddie
"Larry W4CSC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Holy ****, Batman! EVERY 2 meter repeater with autopatch across the
> country has been operating illegally for 30 years!! Man, wait until
> the FCC hears this!
>
> Horse****. What's your call Eddie, darlin'? Are you even a ham? I
> don't see it. How long you been operatin' repeaters? Our original
> repeater call was WR4ABF and it dates back to when you needed a comm
> attorney and topo maps to get in 1967. Have you ever been a repeater
> owner? Where's it at and what frequency is it on?
>
> Yeah, right........(c;
>
>
>
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 04:44:44 GMT, "Eddie Haskel" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
> >station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
> >control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have
a 2
> >meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as
you
> >control it above 222Mhz.
> >But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
> >not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it
.. I
> >personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a
cellular
> >to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
> >
> >"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:csy6b.47043$xf.25645@lakeread06...
> >> Eddie Haskel wrote:
> >>
> >> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:swV4b.42850$xf.2721@lakeread06...
> >> >
> >> >>Mark F wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>That was really good Larry, thanks for the educated and unbiased net
> >> >>>demo on Verizon PTT from someone who knows how PTT should work being
> >> >>>that they have a 1x3 ham call. :-)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Now I have one thing less on my to-do list to do now that you gave a
> >> >>>real clear understanding of the Push-To-Wait technology, somehow I
had
> >a
> >> >>>feeling it was going to end up that way.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>73's
> >> >>>Mark KS4VT
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hehe, I'll have to go in for a demo my self with my Nextel AND my
> >> >>2M HT set to my personal auto-patch hooked up at the house.
> >> >>
> >> >>Your "autopatch" is illegal there hamboy......remember...NO PRIMARY
> >> >
> >> > CONTROL under 222Mhz.......you lid!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> No it's not. Again, you're a moron.
> >>
> >
> >
>
> Larry
>
> Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
> You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
- 09-07-2003, 11:20 AM #82Eddie HaskelGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Yes Larry, I am licensed (since 1972) and a "Advanced" ticket. I own 2 UHF
systems, one a repeater the other a remote base system. They are both closed
systems, I have way too much invested to allow them as "open" systems. We
never needed a WR call as I have them both licensed as remotely controlled
BASE STATIONS. They still to this day carry my callsign. I'm active on 80-10
(dont care for the stuffed shirts on 160) and active on all modes on
6,2,440.....I do have some experiance in amatuer radio Larry. I choose to
NOT publish my repeaters,frequencies and callsign all over the
internet...anymore than I would want my telephone number and or address on
it either....just a good measure these days. God knows we try to be loved by
all, but sometimes that just doesnt happen (Right Windsorfox )....Eddie
"Larry W4CSC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Holy ****, Batman! EVERY 2 meter repeater with autopatch across the
> country has been operating illegally for 30 years!! Man, wait until
> the FCC hears this!
>
> Horse****. What's your call Eddie, darlin'? Are you even a ham? I
> don't see it. How long you been operatin' repeaters? Our original
> repeater call was WR4ABF and it dates back to when you needed a comm
> attorney and topo maps to get in 1967. Have you ever been a repeater
> owner? Where's it at and what frequency is it on?
>
> Yeah, right........(c;
>
>
>
> On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 04:44:44 GMT, "Eddie Haskel" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> >Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
> >station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
> >control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have
a 2
> >meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as
you
> >control it above 222Mhz.
> >But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
> >not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it
.. I
> >personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a
cellular
> >to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
> >
> >"WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >news:csy6b.47043$xf.25645@lakeread06...
> >> Eddie Haskel wrote:
> >>
> >> > "WindsorFox[SS]" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:swV4b.42850$xf.2721@lakeread06...
> >> >
> >> >>Mark F wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>>That was really good Larry, thanks for the educated and unbiased net
> >> >>>demo on Verizon PTT from someone who knows how PTT should work being
> >> >>>that they have a 1x3 ham call. :-)
> >> >>>
> >> >>>Now I have one thing less on my to-do list to do now that you gave a
> >> >>>real clear understanding of the Push-To-Wait technology, somehow I
had
> >a
> >> >>>feeling it was going to end up that way.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>73's
> >> >>>Mark KS4VT
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Hehe, I'll have to go in for a demo my self with my Nextel AND my
> >> >>2M HT set to my personal auto-patch hooked up at the house.
> >> >>
> >> >>Your "autopatch" is illegal there hamboy......remember...NO PRIMARY
> >> >
> >> > CONTROL under 222Mhz.......you lid!
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> No it's not. Again, you're a moron.
> >>
> >
> >
>
> Larry
>
> Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
> You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
- 09-07-2003, 05:53 PM #83WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Eddie Haskel wrote:
> Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
> station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
> control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have a 2
> meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as you
> control it above 222Mhz.
> But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
> not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it. I
> personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a cellular
> to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
>
You are clueless. Anyway, Yes, it's a joke, I can answer and use
my home phone from my car or my HT from most anywhere I go around
town and being 2M instead of 800MHz, it gets better penetration into
the Mal. And it's -0- monthy fee. I'm not laughing.
- 09-07-2003, 05:53 PM #84WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Eddie Haskel wrote:
> Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
> station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
> control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have a 2
> meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as you
> control it above 222Mhz.
> But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
> not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it. I
> personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a cellular
> to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
>
You are clueless. Anyway, Yes, it's a joke, I can answer and use
my home phone from my car or my HT from most anywhere I go around
town and being 2M instead of 800MHz, it gets better penetration into
the Mal. And it's -0- monthy fee. I'm not laughing.
- 09-07-2003, 05:55 PM #85WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Larry W4CSC wrote:
> Holy ****, Batman! EVERY 2 meter repeater with autopatch across the
> country has been operating illegally for 30 years!! Man, wait until
> the FCC hears this!
>
> Horse****. What's your call Eddie, darlin'? Are you even a ham? I
> don't see it. How long you been operatin' repeaters? Our original
> repeater call was WR4ABF and it dates back to when you needed a comm
> attorney and topo maps to get in 1967. Have you ever been a repeater
> owner? Where's it at and what frequency is it on?
>
> Yeah, right........(c;
>
I agree. P I'm a member of W5GIX repeater.
- 09-07-2003, 05:55 PM #86WindsorFox[SS]Guest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
Larry W4CSC wrote:
> Holy ****, Batman! EVERY 2 meter repeater with autopatch across the
> country has been operating illegally for 30 years!! Man, wait until
> the FCC hears this!
>
> Horse****. What's your call Eddie, darlin'? Are you even a ham? I
> don't see it. How long you been operatin' repeaters? Our original
> repeater call was WR4ABF and it dates back to when you needed a comm
> attorney and topo maps to get in 1967. Have you ever been a repeater
> owner? Where's it at and what frequency is it on?
>
> Yeah, right........(c;
>
I agree. P I'm a member of W5GIX repeater.
- 09-07-2003, 07:29 PM #87Larry W4CSCGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 17:20:38 GMT, "Eddie Haskel" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Yes Larry, I am licensed (since 1972) and a "Advanced" ticket. I own 2 UHF
>systems, one a repeater the other a remote base system. They are both closed
>systems, I have way too much invested to allow them as "open" systems. We
>never needed a WR call as I have them both licensed as remotely controlled
>BASE STATIONS. They still to this day carry my callsign. I'm active on 80-10
>(dont care for the stuffed shirts on 160) and active on all modes on
>6,2,440.....I do have some experiance in amatuer radio Larry. I choose to
>NOT publish my repeaters,frequencies and callsign all over the
>internet...anymore than I would want my telephone number and or address on
>it either....just a good measure these days. God knows we try to be loved by
>all, but sometimes that just doesnt happen (Right Windsorfox )....Eddie
>
I'm terribly sorry you live in an area where you have to be so
paranoid about letting the amateur community use your repeaters. I'd
move if I lived there.....
Every repeater I know of in South Carolina is an open repeater,
privately owned or club repeaters. This is the spirit of amateur
radio, not some little clique of the "elite" with some secret code to
get the repeater to work for fear of someone saying "****" on it,
which, when it happens here, doesn't cause the sky to fall.
Any member of our club who wants to play has the extensive control
codes for the club's repeaters and links. We took the autopatch down
when noone was using it to save the club telephone bill money we
wanted to spend on more important things....like parties and steaks!
Most everyone has cellphones, now, making it obsolete, anyways.
One of my buds has a 147.300 repeater located 1,800' up the WCSC 2200'
TV tower on a platform with split antennas. It's open, no tones, no
funny business and anyone is welcome. A 50W mobile can use it nearly
80 miles away in this flat territory. I can key it from the 55' VHF
sailboat antenna cut for the marine band almost 70 miles at sea on the
other side of the tower.
I'm terribly sorry ham radio isn't as much fun for you as it always
was for me. Sure, we've had some assholes, from time to time, but
they usually give up and go away or are caught and fed to the
alligators. **** happens.
I was down on my buddy's 41' Amel Sharpi cruising ketch until an hour
ago. Had a great time from the marina talking to the guys on 40
meters from the insulated backstay with the new Icom M802/AT140 HF rig
I installed. Worked on completing the NMEA network for all our
instruments, including the HF and VHF radios, today. The boat now has
full GMDSS/DSC capabilities on all the marine bands.....way cool.
I'll have PSK31, RTTY, Pactor, AMTOR, SITOR, NAVTEX, WEFAX, Packet and
other modes I can't remember before we put to sea. Can't wait to work
PSK31 from W4CSC/MM2 on the way to Daytona Beach and Bermuda this
fall.
73, Larry W4CSC
What did you say your call is? I didn't see it in your post? Why are
you hiding behind that rock?
Larry
Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
- 09-07-2003, 07:29 PM #88Larry W4CSCGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 17:20:38 GMT, "Eddie Haskel" <[email protected]>
wrote:
>Yes Larry, I am licensed (since 1972) and a "Advanced" ticket. I own 2 UHF
>systems, one a repeater the other a remote base system. They are both closed
>systems, I have way too much invested to allow them as "open" systems. We
>never needed a WR call as I have them both licensed as remotely controlled
>BASE STATIONS. They still to this day carry my callsign. I'm active on 80-10
>(dont care for the stuffed shirts on 160) and active on all modes on
>6,2,440.....I do have some experiance in amatuer radio Larry. I choose to
>NOT publish my repeaters,frequencies and callsign all over the
>internet...anymore than I would want my telephone number and or address on
>it either....just a good measure these days. God knows we try to be loved by
>all, but sometimes that just doesnt happen (Right Windsorfox )....Eddie
>
I'm terribly sorry you live in an area where you have to be so
paranoid about letting the amateur community use your repeaters. I'd
move if I lived there.....
Every repeater I know of in South Carolina is an open repeater,
privately owned or club repeaters. This is the spirit of amateur
radio, not some little clique of the "elite" with some secret code to
get the repeater to work for fear of someone saying "****" on it,
which, when it happens here, doesn't cause the sky to fall.
Any member of our club who wants to play has the extensive control
codes for the club's repeaters and links. We took the autopatch down
when noone was using it to save the club telephone bill money we
wanted to spend on more important things....like parties and steaks!
Most everyone has cellphones, now, making it obsolete, anyways.
One of my buds has a 147.300 repeater located 1,800' up the WCSC 2200'
TV tower on a platform with split antennas. It's open, no tones, no
funny business and anyone is welcome. A 50W mobile can use it nearly
80 miles away in this flat territory. I can key it from the 55' VHF
sailboat antenna cut for the marine band almost 70 miles at sea on the
other side of the tower.
I'm terribly sorry ham radio isn't as much fun for you as it always
was for me. Sure, we've had some assholes, from time to time, but
they usually give up and go away or are caught and fed to the
alligators. **** happens.
I was down on my buddy's 41' Amel Sharpi cruising ketch until an hour
ago. Had a great time from the marina talking to the guys on 40
meters from the insulated backstay with the new Icom M802/AT140 HF rig
I installed. Worked on completing the NMEA network for all our
instruments, including the HF and VHF radios, today. The boat now has
full GMDSS/DSC capabilities on all the marine bands.....way cool.
I'll have PSK31, RTTY, Pactor, AMTOR, SITOR, NAVTEX, WEFAX, Packet and
other modes I can't remember before we put to sea. Can't wait to work
PSK31 from W4CSC/MM2 on the way to Daytona Beach and Bermuda this
fall.
73, Larry W4CSC
What did you say your call is? I didn't see it in your post? Why are
you hiding behind that rock?
Larry
Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
- 09-07-2003, 07:32 PM #89Larry W4CSCGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:53:21 -0500, "WindsorFox[SS]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Eddie Haskel wrote:
>
>> Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
>> station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
>> control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have a 2
>> meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as you
>> control it above 222Mhz.
>> But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
>> not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it. I
>> personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a cellular
>> to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
>>
>
> You are clueless. Anyway, Yes, it's a joke, I can answer and use
>my home phone from my car or my HT from most anywhere I go around
>town and being 2M instead of 800MHz, it gets better penetration into
>the Mal. And it's -0- monthy fee. I'm not laughing.
>
He'd probably have fainted if he could have seen my crossband packet
node on 14.105 running for 4 years to my 2M packet node at 330' a few
years back. I lost interest in packet because of the net. PSK31
fascinates me, now. Hell, it copies signals you can't even DETECT
with your ears on 14.070!
73, Larry W4CSC
160M Marine Mobile is up and TUNING FINE! Can't wait for winter...(c;
Larry
Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
- 09-07-2003, 07:32 PM #90Larry W4CSCGuest
Re: Verizon PTT - The sales contact...
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 18:53:21 -0500, "WindsorFox[SS]"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Eddie Haskel wrote:
>
>> Read the FCC rules about repeaters and remotely controlled stations. The
>> station (Repeater) can have AUTOMATIC controls working, BUT the PRIMARY
>> control (your autopatch) MUST be done above 222Mhz...PERIOD. If you have a 2
>> meter AND a 222 or 440 or 900 or 1.2 Ghz in tandem thats OK...as long as you
>> control it above 222Mhz.
>> But then again Windsorfox.....all you have is a little "base station" and
>> not a full fledged repeater or remote base..so no one will even notice it. I
>> personally DONT want "autopatch" on any of my systems...I prefer a cellular
>> to a UHF Autopatch....Autopatch is a joke...Eddie
>>
>
> You are clueless. Anyway, Yes, it's a joke, I can answer and use
>my home phone from my car or my HT from most anywhere I go around
>town and being 2M instead of 800MHz, it gets better penetration into
>the Mal. And it's -0- monthy fee. I'm not laughing.
>
He'd probably have fainted if he could have seen my crossband packet
node on 14.105 running for 4 years to my 2M packet node at 330' a few
years back. I lost interest in packet because of the net. PSK31
fascinates me, now. Hell, it copies signals you can't even DETECT
with your ears on 14.070!
73, Larry W4CSC
160M Marine Mobile is up and TUNING FINE! Can't wait for winter...(c;
Larry
Extremely intelligent life must exist in the universe.
You can tell because they never tried to contact us.
Similar Threads
- Verizon
- Verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.verizon
How to Network Unlock Your Samsung Galaxy S24 from Claro
in Samsung