Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 114
  1. #16
    Carl.
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > > >
    > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
    > > >
    > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even

    > > better,
    > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our

    > > free
    > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?

    > >
    > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    > >
    > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > > Cannon, R-Utah.
    > >
    > > Bob

    >
    >
    > Wonder who was paying them.


    Probably a lot of different payments, but never overlook the likelyhood of
    these 8 people just being dumbasses. Odds were good for at least 8
    dumbasses out of a few hundred falling for the "free speech" argument.


    ---
    Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003





    See More: NEWS: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill




  2. #17
    Carl.
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > > >
    > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
    > > >
    > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even

    > > better,
    > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our

    > > free
    > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?

    > >
    > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    > >
    > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > > Cannon, R-Utah.
    > >
    > > Bob

    >
    >
    > Wonder who was paying them.


    Probably a lot of different payments, but never overlook the likelyhood of
    these 8 people just being dumbasses. Odds were good for at least 8
    dumbasses out of a few hundred falling for the "free speech" argument.


    ---
    Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003





  3. #18
    Peter Pan
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill


    "DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
    > Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
    >
    > >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
    > >their local time.

    >
    > Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
    > bucket of steaming dog****.
    >
    > --
    > If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've

    had twice as much fun as you.

    I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
    people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
    think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
    coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
    of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone by
    the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
    wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!






  4. #19
    Peter Pan
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill


    "DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
    > Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
    >
    > >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
    > >their local time.

    >
    > Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
    > bucket of steaming dog****.
    >
    > --
    > If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've

    had twice as much fun as you.

    I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
    people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
    think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
    coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
    of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone by
    the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
    wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!






  5. #20
    boe
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their phone
    numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if they
    agreed with them.

    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > >
    > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.

    > >
    > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even

    > better,
    > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our

    > free
    > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?

    >
    > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    >
    > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > Cannon, R-Utah.
    >
    > Bob
    >
    >






  6. #21
    boe
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their phone
    numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if they
    agreed with them.

    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > >
    > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.

    > >
    > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even

    > better,
    > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our

    > free
    > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?

    >
    > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    >
    > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > Cannon, R-Utah.
    >
    > Bob
    >
    >






  7. #22
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill


    "boe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    newslRcb.431999$Oz4.236150@rwcrnsc54...
    > Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their

    phone
    > numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if

    they
    > agreed with them.

    <snipped>

    If one wants to, they can get that information via
    http://www.house.gov/

    Bob





  8. #23
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill


    "boe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    newslRcb.431999$Oz4.236150@rwcrnsc54...
    > Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their

    phone
    > numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if

    they
    > agreed with them.

    <snipped>

    If one wants to, they can get that information via
    http://www.house.gov/

    Bob





  9. #24
    Stuart Friedman
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on First
    Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
    Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
    political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
    discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
    off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against organized
    religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
    telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
    ruling will be upheld on appeal.

    Stu

    "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > > >
    > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
    > > >
    > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even

    > > better,
    > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our

    > > free
    > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?

    > >
    > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    > >
    > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > > Cannon, R-Utah.
    > >
    > > Bob

    >
    >
    > Wonder who was paying them.
    >
    >






  10. #25
    Stuart Friedman
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on First
    Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
    Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
    political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
    discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
    off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against organized
    religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
    telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
    ruling will be upheld on appeal.

    Stu

    "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > > >
    > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
    > > >
    > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even

    > > better,
    > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our

    > > free
    > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?

    > >
    > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    > >
    > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > > Cannon, R-Utah.
    > >
    > > Bob

    >
    >
    > Wonder who was paying them.
    >
    >






  11. #26
    Larry Turner
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    LOL! Peter.

    I actually have co-workers who TALK on their phones in the bathroom....

    --
    LARRY TURNER
    "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
    > > Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
    > >
    > > >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
    > > >their local time.

    > >
    > > Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
    > > bucket of steaming dog****.
    > >
    > > --
    > > If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've

    > had twice as much fun as you.
    >
    > I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
    > people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
    > think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
    > coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
    > of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone

    by
    > the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
    > wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!
    >
    >
    >






  12. #27
    Larry Turner
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    LOL! Peter.

    I actually have co-workers who TALK on their phones in the bathroom....

    --
    LARRY TURNER
    "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > "DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > > In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
    > > Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
    > >
    > > >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
    > > >their local time.

    > >
    > > Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
    > > bucket of steaming dog****.
    > >
    > > --
    > > If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've

    > had twice as much fun as you.
    >
    > I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
    > people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
    > think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
    > coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
    > of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone

    by
    > the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
    > wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!
    >
    >
    >






  13. #28
    Peter Pan
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    Excuse me Telemarketer lover, I have been wireless for 2 years now and
    CONSTANTLY get telemarketing calls on my cellphone. What's you cellphone
    number? I'll be glad to forward them to you so YOU can pay for incoming
    calls from salespeople. Pay a few bills for the connect time they waste and
    see if you change your mind!


    "Stuart Friedman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on

    First
    > Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
    > Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
    > political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
    > discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
    > off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against

    organized
    > religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
    > telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
    > ruling will be upheld on appeal.
    >
    > Stu
    >
    > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > >
    > > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > > > >
    > > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
    > > > >
    > > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
    > > > better,
    > > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
    > > > free
    > > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
    > > >
    > > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    > > >
    > > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > > > Cannon, R-Utah.
    > > >
    > > > Bob

    > >
    > >
    > > Wonder who was paying them.
    > >
    > >

    >
    >






  14. #29
    Peter Pan
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill

    Excuse me Telemarketer lover, I have been wireless for 2 years now and
    CONSTANTLY get telemarketing calls on my cellphone. What's you cellphone
    number? I'll be glad to forward them to you so YOU can pay for incoming
    calls from salespeople. Pay a few bills for the connect time they waste and
    see if you change your mind!


    "Stuart Friedman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on

    First
    > Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
    > Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
    > political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
    > discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
    > off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against

    organized
    > religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
    > telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
    > ruling will be upheld on appeal.
    >
    > Stu
    >
    > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    > >
    > > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > > >
    > > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > >
    > > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > > > news:[email protected]...
    > > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
    > > > > >
    > > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
    > > > >
    > > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
    > > > better,
    > > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
    > > > free
    > > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
    > > >
    > > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
    > > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
    > > >
    > > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
    > > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
    > > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
    > > > Cannon, R-Utah.
    > > >
    > > > Bob

    > >
    > >
    > > Wonder who was paying them.
    > >
    > >

    >
    >






  15. #30
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill


    "DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
    > Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
    >
    > >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
    > >their local time.

    >
    > Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
    > bucket of steaming dog****.



    It is against the law to solicit via telephone after a certain time, which I
    believe to be 8PM or 9PM.

    Tom Veldhouse





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast