Results 16 to 30 of 114
- 09-25-2003, 08:34 PM #16Carl.Guest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > > >
> > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> > >
> > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> > better,
> > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> > free
> > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
> >
> > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
> >
> > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> > Cannon, R-Utah.
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> Wonder who was paying them.
Probably a lot of different payments, but never overlook the likelyhood of
these 8 people just being dumbasses. Odds were good for at least 8
dumbasses out of a few hundred falling for the "free speech" argument.
---
Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
› See More: NEWS: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
- 09-25-2003, 08:34 PM #17Carl.Guest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > > >
> > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> > >
> > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> > better,
> > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> > free
> > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
> >
> > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
> >
> > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> > Cannon, R-Utah.
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> Wonder who was paying them.
Probably a lot of different payments, but never overlook the likelyhood of
these 8 people just being dumbasses. Odds were good for at least 8
dumbasses out of a few hundred falling for the "free speech" argument.
---
Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.521 / Virus Database: 319 - Release Date: 9/23/2003
- 09-25-2003, 10:35 PM #18Peter PanGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
"DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
> Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
>
> >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
> >their local time.
>
> Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
> bucket of steaming dog****.
>
> --
> If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've
had twice as much fun as you.
I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone by
the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!
- 09-25-2003, 10:35 PM #19Peter PanGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
"DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
> Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
>
> >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
> >their local time.
>
> Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
> bucket of steaming dog****.
>
> --
> If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've
had twice as much fun as you.
I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone by
the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!
- 09-26-2003, 12:51 AM #20boeGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their phone
numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if they
agreed with them.
"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > >
> > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> >
> > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> better,
> > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> free
> > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
>
> Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
>
> The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> Cannon, R-Utah.
>
> Bob
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 12:51 AM #21boeGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their phone
numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if they
agreed with them.
"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > >
> > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> >
> > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> better,
> > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> free
> > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
>
> Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
>
> The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> Cannon, R-Utah.
>
> Bob
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 05:42 AM #22Bob SmithGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
"boe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
newslRcb.431999$Oz4.236150@rwcrnsc54...
> Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their
phone
> numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if
they
> agreed with them.
<snipped>
If one wants to, they can get that information via
http://www.house.gov/
Bob
- 09-26-2003, 05:42 AM #23Bob SmithGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
"boe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
newslRcb.431999$Oz4.236150@rwcrnsc54...
> Thanks for posting their names. I bet if someone were to post their
phone
> numbers and e-mail addresses a lot of people would let them know if
they
> agreed with them.
<snipped>
If one wants to, they can get that information via
http://www.house.gov/
Bob
- 09-26-2003, 06:54 AM #24Stuart FriedmanGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on First
Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against organized
religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
ruling will be upheld on appeal.
Stu
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > > >
> > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> > >
> > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> > better,
> > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> > free
> > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
> >
> > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
> >
> > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> > Cannon, R-Utah.
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> Wonder who was paying them.
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 06:54 AM #25Stuart FriedmanGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on First
Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against organized
religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
ruling will be upheld on appeal.
Stu
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > > >
> > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> > >
> > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> > better,
> > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> > free
> > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
> >
> > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
> >
> > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> > Cannon, R-Utah.
> >
> > Bob
>
>
> Wonder who was paying them.
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 11:03 AM #26Larry TurnerGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
LOL! Peter.
I actually have co-workers who TALK on their phones in the bathroom....
--
LARRY TURNER
"Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
> > Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
> >
> > >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
> > >their local time.
> >
> > Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
> > bucket of steaming dog****.
> >
> > --
> > If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've
> had twice as much fun as you.
>
> I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
> people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
> think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
> coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
> of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone
by
> the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
> wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!
>
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 11:03 AM #27Larry TurnerGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
LOL! Peter.
I actually have co-workers who TALK on their phones in the bathroom....
--
LARRY TURNER
"Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
> > Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
> >
> > >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
> > >their local time.
> >
> > Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
> > bucket of steaming dog****.
> >
> > --
> > If you've had half as much fun reading this as I've had writing it, I've
> had twice as much fun as you.
>
> I don't see any reason why people can't call them after 9PM, after all the
> people calling for donations to political people can call later. Don't you
> think it's interesting that free nights usually start at 9PM? Just a
> coincidence, or is it a conspiracy to interrupt us after we eat? I say all
> of us that wake up at 3 AM to go to the bathroom should put a cell phone
by
> the toilet and call them in the middle of the night (and as I get older, I
> wake up more often to go to the bathroom). Oh.. and don't forget to flush!
>
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 11:10 AM #28Peter PanGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
Excuse me Telemarketer lover, I have been wireless for 2 years now and
CONSTANTLY get telemarketing calls on my cellphone. What's you cellphone
number? I'll be glad to forward them to you so YOU can pay for incoming
calls from salespeople. Pay a few bills for the connect time they waste and
see if you change your mind!
"Stuart Friedman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on
First
> Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
> Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
> political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
> discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
> off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against
organized
> religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
> telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
> ruling will be upheld on appeal.
>
> Stu
>
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > > > >
> > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> > > better,
> > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> > > free
> > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
> > >
> > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
> > >
> > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> > > Cannon, R-Utah.
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> >
> > Wonder who was paying them.
> >
> >
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 11:10 AM #29Peter PanGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
Excuse me Telemarketer lover, I have been wireless for 2 years now and
CONSTANTLY get telemarketing calls on my cellphone. What's you cellphone
number? I'll be glad to forward them to you so YOU can pay for incoming
calls from salespeople. Pay a few bills for the connect time they waste and
see if you change your mind!
"Stuart Friedman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Doesn't matter, a Federal District Judge in Colorado tossed the law on
First
> Amendment grounds yesterday afternoon. This will be a much harder fix for
> Congress because the judge's problem with the law was that it exempt
> political and charitable fund raisers from the prohibition, thus
> discriminating against speech based on content. Congress will need to cut
> off their own political fundraising and be willing to vote against
organized
> religion to pass a new law which passes constitutional scrutiny. I HATE
> telemarketers, but I think that the judge has a point and I fear that her
> ruling will be upheld on appeal.
>
> Stu
>
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Peter Pan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > >
> > > > "PDA Man" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > > Well that didnt take too long folks!
> > > > >
> > > > > THE HOUSE VOTED 412-8 after less than hour of debate.
> > > >
> > > > Anyone know who those 8 people that voted against it are, and even
> > > better,
> > > > how about their home telephone numbers so we can call em with our
> > > free
> > > > evening minutes and interrupt them when eating/sleeping etc?
> > >
> > > Ask and ye shall receive ... from the following web article -
> > > http://apnews.myway.com//article/200...D7TPJDJ81.html
> > >
> > > The eight who voted against the bill were: Ron Paul, R-Texas; Jeff
> > > Flake, R-Ariz.; Kendrick Meek, D-Fla.; Tim Ryan, D-Ohio; Ted
> > > Strickland, D-Ohio; Lee Terry, R-Neb.; Rob Bishop, R-Utah, and Chris
> > > Cannon, R-Utah.
> > >
> > > Bob
> >
> >
> > Wonder who was paying them.
> >
> >
>
>
- 09-26-2003, 11:23 AM #30Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: House Votes to Reinstate the "DO NOT CALL" Bill
"DevilsPGD" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In message <<[email protected]>> "Thomas T.
> Veldhouse" <[email protected]> did ramble:
>
> >In which case, you had better not call them after 9PM (or is it 8PM) in
> >their local time.
>
> Why not? I'll invest into a payphone call and offer to sell them a large
> bucket of steaming dog****.
It is against the law to solicit via telephone after a certain time, which I
believe to be 8PM or 9PM.
Tom Veldhouse
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.cingular
- alt.cellular.verizon
Creditare Eficientă
in Chit Chat