Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 49
  1. #31
    Jason Cothran
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide


    "Patrick Bosley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    | In article <[email protected]>,
    | John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    |
    | > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
    | >
    | > In <[email protected]> on Sat, 22 Nov
    2003
    | > 15:58:19 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
    | >
    | > >Long-Short-Long John Navas has switched carriers to Verizon
    | >
    | > Not terribly likely, given the crappy coverage in this area, but you
    keep on
    | > hoping, Steven.
    |
    |
    | Is Dublin one of the top 100 markets? Or do you combine it with
    | Pleasanton to get into the top 1000 markets?

    1. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 51. Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
    2. New York, NY 52. Hartford, CT
    3. Chicago, IL PMSA 53. Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY
    4. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 54. Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ
    5. Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV 55. Memphis, TN-AR-MS
    6. Detroit, MI 56. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL
    7. Houston, TX 57. Monmouth-Ocean, NJ
    8. Atlanta, GA 58. Jacksonville, FL
    9. Dallas, TX 59. Rochester, NY
    10. Boston, MA-NH 60. Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI
    11. Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 61. Oklahoma City, OK
    12. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 62. Louisville, KY-IN
    13. Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI 63. Richmond-Petersburg, VA
    14. Orange County, CA 64. Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC
    15. San Diego, CA 65. Dayton-Springfield, OH
    16. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 66. Fresno, CA
    17. St. Louis, MO-IL 67. Birmingham, AL
    18. Baltimore, MD 68. Honolulu, HI
    19. Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA 69. Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
    20. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 70. Tucson, AZ
    21. Oakland, CA 71. Tulsa, OK
    22. Pittsburgh, PA 72. Ventura, CA
    23. Miami, FL 73. Syracuse, NY
    24. Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, OH 74. Omaha, NE-IA
    25. Denver, CO 75. Albuquerque, NM
    26. Newark, NJ 76. Tacoma, WA
    27. San Juan-Bayamon, PR 77. Akron, OH
    28. Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA 78. Knoxville, TN
    29. Kansas City, MO-KS 79. El Paso, TX
    30. San Francisco, CA 80. Bakersfield, CA
    31. Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 81. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA
    32. San Jose, CA 82. Gary, IN
    33. Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 83. Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA
    34. Orlando, FL 84. Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton, PA
    35. Sacramento, CA 85. Toledo, OH
    36. Fort Lauderdale, FL 86. Jersey City, NJ
    37. Indianapolis, IN 87. Baton Rouge, LA
    38. San Antonio, TX 88. Youngstown-Warren, OH
    39. Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News, VA-NC 89. Springfield, MA
    40. Las Vegas, NV-AZ 90. Sarasota-Bradenton, FL
    41. Columbus, OH 91. Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD
    42. Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI 92. Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR
    43. Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 93. Ann Arbor, MI
    44. Bergen-Passaic, NJ 94. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX
    45. New Orleans, LA 95. Stockton-Lodi, CA
    46. Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT 96. Charleston-North Charleston, SC
    47. Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point, NC 97. Wichita, KS
    48. Austin-San Marcos, TX 98. New Haven-Meriden, CT
    49. Nashville, TN 99. Mobile, AL
    50. Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA 100. Columbia, SC







    See More: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide




  2. #32
    RH
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    forget switching the moron companies don't have it together
    "Jason Cothran" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    >
    > "Patrick Bosley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news[email protected]...
    > | In article <[email protected]>,
    > | John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    > |
    > | > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
    > | >
    > | > In <[email protected]> on Sat, 22

    Nov
    > 2003
    > | > 15:58:19 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > | >
    > | > >Long-Short-Long John Navas has switched carriers to Verizon
    > | >
    > | > Not terribly likely, given the crappy coverage in this area, but you
    > keep on
    > | > hoping, Steven.
    > |
    > |
    > | Is Dublin one of the top 100 markets? Or do you combine it with
    > | Pleasanton to get into the top 1000 markets?
    >
    > 1. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 51. Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
    > 2. New York, NY 52. Hartford, CT
    > 3. Chicago, IL PMSA 53. Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY
    > 4. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 54. Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ
    > 5. Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV 55. Memphis, TN-AR-MS
    > 6. Detroit, MI 56. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL
    > 7. Houston, TX 57. Monmouth-Ocean, NJ
    > 8. Atlanta, GA 58. Jacksonville, FL
    > 9. Dallas, TX 59. Rochester, NY
    > 10. Boston, MA-NH 60. Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI
    > 11. Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 61. Oklahoma City, OK
    > 12. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 62. Louisville, KY-IN
    > 13. Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI 63. Richmond-Petersburg, VA
    > 14. Orange County, CA 64. Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC
    > 15. San Diego, CA 65. Dayton-Springfield, OH
    > 16. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 66. Fresno, CA
    > 17. St. Louis, MO-IL 67. Birmingham, AL
    > 18. Baltimore, MD 68. Honolulu, HI
    > 19. Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA 69. Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
    > 20. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 70. Tucson, AZ
    > 21. Oakland, CA 71. Tulsa, OK
    > 22. Pittsburgh, PA 72. Ventura, CA
    > 23. Miami, FL 73. Syracuse, NY
    > 24. Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, OH 74. Omaha, NE-IA
    > 25. Denver, CO 75. Albuquerque, NM
    > 26. Newark, NJ 76. Tacoma, WA
    > 27. San Juan-Bayamon, PR 77. Akron, OH
    > 28. Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA 78. Knoxville, TN
    > 29. Kansas City, MO-KS 79. El Paso, TX
    > 30. San Francisco, CA 80. Bakersfield, CA
    > 31. Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 81. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA
    > 32. San Jose, CA 82. Gary, IN
    > 33. Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 83. Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA
    > 34. Orlando, FL 84. Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton, PA
    > 35. Sacramento, CA 85. Toledo, OH
    > 36. Fort Lauderdale, FL 86. Jersey City, NJ
    > 37. Indianapolis, IN 87. Baton Rouge, LA
    > 38. San Antonio, TX 88. Youngstown-Warren, OH
    > 39. Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News, VA-NC 89. Springfield, MA
    > 40. Las Vegas, NV-AZ 90. Sarasota-Bradenton, FL
    > 41. Columbus, OH 91. Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD
    > 42. Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI 92. Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR
    > 43. Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 93. Ann Arbor, MI
    > 44. Bergen-Passaic, NJ 94. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX
    > 45. New Orleans, LA 95. Stockton-Lodi, CA
    > 46. Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT 96. Charleston-North Charleston, SC
    > 47. Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point, NC 97. Wichita, KS
    > 48. Austin-San Marcos, TX 98. New Haven-Meriden, CT
    > 49. Nashville, TN 99. Mobile, AL
    > 50. Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA 100. Columbia, SC
    >
    >
    >
    >






  3. #33
    RH
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    forget switching the moron companies don't have it together
    "Jason Cothran" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...
    >
    > "Patrick Bosley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news[email protected]...
    > | In article <[email protected]>,
    > | John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    > |
    > | > [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]
    > | >
    > | > In <[email protected]> on Sat, 22

    Nov
    > 2003
    > | > 15:58:19 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > | >
    > | > >Long-Short-Long John Navas has switched carriers to Verizon
    > | >
    > | > Not terribly likely, given the crappy coverage in this area, but you
    > keep on
    > | > hoping, Steven.
    > |
    > |
    > | Is Dublin one of the top 100 markets? Or do you combine it with
    > | Pleasanton to get into the top 1000 markets?
    >
    > 1. Los Angeles-Long Beach, CA 51. Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill, NC
    > 2. New York, NY 52. Hartford, CT
    > 3. Chicago, IL PMSA 53. Buffalo-Niagara Falls, NY
    > 4. Philadelphia, PA-NJ 54. Middlesex-Somerset-Hunterdon, NJ
    > 5. Washington, DC-MD-VA-WV 55. Memphis, TN-AR-MS
    > 6. Detroit, MI 56. West Palm Beach-Boca Raton, FL
    > 7. Houston, TX 57. Monmouth-Ocean, NJ
    > 8. Atlanta, GA 58. Jacksonville, FL
    > 9. Dallas, TX 59. Rochester, NY
    > 10. Boston, MA-NH 60. Grand Rapids-Muskegon-Holland, MI
    > 11. Riverside-San Bernardino, CA 61. Oklahoma City, OK
    > 12. Phoenix-Mesa, AZ 62. Louisville, KY-IN
    > 13. Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN-WI 63. Richmond-Petersburg, VA
    > 14. Orange County, CA 64. Greenville-Spartanburg-Anderson, SC
    > 15. San Diego, CA 65. Dayton-Springfield, OH
    > 16. Nassau-Suffolk, NY 66. Fresno, CA
    > 17. St. Louis, MO-IL 67. Birmingham, AL
    > 18. Baltimore, MD 68. Honolulu, HI
    > 19. Seattle-Bellevue-Everett, WA 69. Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY
    > 20. Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL 70. Tucson, AZ
    > 21. Oakland, CA 71. Tulsa, OK
    > 22. Pittsburgh, PA 72. Ventura, CA
    > 23. Miami, FL 73. Syracuse, NY
    > 24. Cleveland-Lorain-Elyria, OH 74. Omaha, NE-IA
    > 25. Denver, CO 75. Albuquerque, NM
    > 26. Newark, NJ 76. Tacoma, WA
    > 27. San Juan-Bayamon, PR 77. Akron, OH
    > 28. Portland-Vancouver, OR-WA 78. Knoxville, TN
    > 29. Kansas City, MO-KS 79. El Paso, TX
    > 30. San Francisco, CA 80. Bakersfield, CA
    > 31. Fort Worth-Arlington, TX 81. Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA
    > 32. San Jose, CA 82. Gary, IN
    > 33. Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN 83. Harrisburg-Lebanon-Carlisle, PA
    > 34. Orlando, FL 84. Scranton-Wilkes-Barre-Hazleton, PA
    > 35. Sacramento, CA 85. Toledo, OH
    > 36. Fort Lauderdale, FL 86. Jersey City, NJ
    > 37. Indianapolis, IN 87. Baton Rouge, LA
    > 38. San Antonio, TX 88. Youngstown-Warren, OH
    > 39. Norfolk-Virginia Beach-Newport News, VA-NC 89. Springfield, MA
    > 40. Las Vegas, NV-AZ 90. Sarasota-Bradenton, FL
    > 41. Columbus, OH 91. Wilmington-Newark, DE-MD
    > 42. Milwaukee-Waukesha, WI 92. Little Rock-North Little Rock, AR
    > 43. Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, NC-SC 93. Ann Arbor, MI
    > 44. Bergen-Passaic, NJ 94. McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX
    > 45. New Orleans, LA 95. Stockton-Lodi, CA
    > 46. Salt Lake City-Ogden, UT 96. Charleston-North Charleston, SC
    > 47. Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point, NC 97. Wichita, KS
    > 48. Austin-San Marcos, TX 98. New Haven-Meriden, CT
    > 49. Nashville, TN 99. Mobile, AL
    > 50. Providence-Fall River-Warwick, RI-MA 100. Columbia, SC
    >
    >
    >
    >






  4. #34
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    In alt.cellular.verizon RH <[email protected]> wrote:
    > forget switching the moron companies don't have it together


    I wouldn't have switched in the first few weeks for exactly that reason.

    Things will get smoothed out over time (hopefully in the next month or two),
    but right now I'm seeing a lot of reports of glitches.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  5. #35
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    In alt.cellular.verizon RH <[email protected]> wrote:
    > forget switching the moron companies don't have it together


    I wouldn't have switched in the first few weeks for exactly that reason.

    Things will get smoothed out over time (hopefully in the next month or two),
    but right now I'm seeing a lot of reports of glitches.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  6. #36
    Jason Cothran
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide


    "Steven J Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > I wouldn't have switched in the first few weeks for exactly that reason.
    >
    > Things will get smoothed out over time (hopefully in the next month or

    two),
    > but right now I'm seeing a lot of reports of glitches.
    >



    Seems most problems are between AT&T and others. I guess because AT&T is
    using a different "vendor" for their WNP changes.





  7. #37
    Jason Cothran
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide


    "Steven J Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    > I wouldn't have switched in the first few weeks for exactly that reason.
    >
    > Things will get smoothed out over time (hopefully in the next month or

    two),
    > but right now I'm seeing a lot of reports of glitches.
    >



    Seems most problems are between AT&T and others. I guess because AT&T is
    using a different "vendor" for their WNP changes.





  8. #38
    Aboutdakota
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    > Seems most problems are between AT&T and others. I guess because AT&T is
    > using a different "vendor" for their WNP changes.


    AT&T Wireless is having a multitude of problems not limited to the fact
    that ATTWS chose to use a different company to assist in administering
    WLNP. Take a look at the AT&T Wireless GSM system - then you'll see
    what's really going on with them.

    ==AD




  9. #39
    Aboutdakota
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    > Seems most problems are between AT&T and others. I guess because AT&T is
    > using a different "vendor" for their WNP changes.


    AT&T Wireless is having a multitude of problems not limited to the fact
    that ATTWS chose to use a different company to assist in administering
    WLNP. Take a look at the AT&T Wireless GSM system - then you'll see
    what's really going on with them.

    ==AD




  10. #40
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    In alt.cellular.verizon Jason Cothran <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Seems most problems are between AT&T and others. I guess because AT&T is
    > using a different "vendor" for their WNP changes.


    That's what I'm hearing. Don't know, since I have no plans to drop either of
    the carriers my family uses, but that's what I've heard from others.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  11. #41
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    In alt.cellular.verizon Jason Cothran <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Seems most problems are between AT&T and others. I guess because AT&T is
    > using a different "vendor" for their WNP changes.


    That's what I'm hearing. Don't know, since I have no plans to drop either of
    the carriers my family uses, but that's what I've heard from others.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services
    22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
    Steve Sobol, Proprietor
    888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]



  12. #42
    Steven M. Scharf
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    "Patrick Bosley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...

    > Is Dublin one of the top 100 markets? Or do you combine it with
    > Pleasanton to get into the top 1000 markets?


    Probably it's bundled into Oakland. But in any case, John is once again
    trying to promote Cingular by mis-stating the facts about the competition's
    coverage. Verizon coverage is excellent throughout Alameda and Contra Costa
    County, including the tri-valley area. I spend a lot of time out in
    Pleasanton and Dublin, and Verizon is excellent, and I'm not just talking
    about on the freeway corridors. out in Moraga, Verizon was the _only_
    carrier that worked at all at my relative's house (not great, but it did
    work). Up at Tilden Park above Berkeley, Verizon worked fine (AMPS) but
    Cingular had no signal. I suspect that Cingular has good coverage in
    Pleasanton and Dubin since Pleasanton is where their western regional
    headquarters is located and it would be rather embarassing if they had bad
    coverage there. If only they could expand this coverage to the Silicon
    Valley, 280 corridor, peninsula, and San Francisco!

    Steve
    http://sfbacell.com
    http://socalcell.com
    http://nyccell.com





  13. #43
    Steven M. Scharf
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    "Patrick Bosley" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news[email protected]...

    > Is Dublin one of the top 100 markets? Or do you combine it with
    > Pleasanton to get into the top 1000 markets?


    Probably it's bundled into Oakland. But in any case, John is once again
    trying to promote Cingular by mis-stating the facts about the competition's
    coverage. Verizon coverage is excellent throughout Alameda and Contra Costa
    County, including the tri-valley area. I spend a lot of time out in
    Pleasanton and Dublin, and Verizon is excellent, and I'm not just talking
    about on the freeway corridors. out in Moraga, Verizon was the _only_
    carrier that worked at all at my relative's house (not great, but it did
    work). Up at Tilden Park above Berkeley, Verizon worked fine (AMPS) but
    Cingular had no signal. I suspect that Cingular has good coverage in
    Pleasanton and Dubin since Pleasanton is where their western regional
    headquarters is located and it would be rather embarassing if they had bad
    coverage there. If only they could expand this coverage to the Silicon
    Valley, 280 corridor, peninsula, and San Francisco!

    Steve
    http://sfbacell.com
    http://socalcell.com
    http://nyccell.com





  14. #44
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Wed, 03 Dec
    2003 09:54:34 GMT, Patrick Bosley <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 22 Nov 2003
    >> 15:58:19 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Long-Short-Long John Navas has switched carriers to Verizon

    >>
    >> Not terribly likely, given the crappy coverage in this area, but you keep on
    >> hoping, Steven.

    >
    >Is Dublin one of the top 100 markets? Or do you combine it with
    >Pleasanton to get into the top 1000 markets?


    Last time I checked, it was part of the San Francisco Bay Area, which easily
    made the top 100. ;-)

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  15. #45
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Wireless Number Portability--Public Preparedness Guide

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Wed, 03 Dec
    2003 09:54:34 GMT, Patrick Bosley <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    > John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >> In <[email protected]> on Sat, 22 Nov 2003
    >> 15:58:19 GMT, "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >> >Long-Short-Long John Navas has switched carriers to Verizon

    >>
    >> Not terribly likely, given the crappy coverage in this area, but you keep on
    >> hoping, Steven.

    >
    >Is Dublin one of the top 100 markets? Or do you combine it with
    >Pleasanton to get into the top 1000 markets?


    Last time I checked, it was part of the San Francisco Bay Area, which easily
    made the top 100. ;-)

    --
    Best regards, HELP FOR CINGULAR GSM & SONY ERICSSON PHONES:
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/#Cingular>



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast