Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1
    Rob
    Guest




  2. #2
    Andy S
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    the below link provided by rob doesn't work.
    try this one
    http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/prod...577091,00.html

    --
    Andrew D. Sisson
    "Rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Go figure!
    > Here's the example video:
    > http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/pro...3577091,00.html
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Rob B
    > http://www.techhowto.org
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >






  3. #3
    Andy S
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    the below link provided by rob doesn't work.
    try this one
    http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/prod...577091,00.html

    --
    Andrew D. Sisson
    "Rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Go figure!
    > Here's the example video:
    > http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/pro...3577091,00.html
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Rob B
    > http://www.techhowto.org
    >
    >
    >
    >
    >






  4. #4
    Mark Kim
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    I watched the Video already, with Verizon, you have to wait about 10
    seconds before the Radio kicks in! Long, isn't it?

    With Nextel, you only have to wait 1-2 seconds before you hear a churp,
    for the majority of the time, you only need to wait 1 second to hear a
    Churp and Talk.

    Any Nationwide Direct Connect junkies here? Anyone tried Nationwide
    Direct Connect?




  5. #5
    Mark Kim
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    I watched the Video already, with Verizon, you have to wait about 10
    seconds before the Radio kicks in! Long, isn't it?

    With Nextel, you only have to wait 1-2 seconds before you hear a churp,
    for the majority of the time, you only need to wait 1 second to hear a
    Churp and Talk.

    Any Nationwide Direct Connect junkies here? Anyone tried Nationwide
    Direct Connect?




  6. #6
    MarkF
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    "Rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    > Go figure!
    > Here's the example video:
    > http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/pro...3577091,00.html



    I posted the video link days ago here:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&...ellular.nextel

    Mark



  7. #7
    MarkF
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    "Rob" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    > Go figure!
    > Here's the example video:
    > http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/pro...3577091,00.html



    I posted the video link days ago here:

    http://groups.google.com/groups?dq=&...ellular.nextel

    Mark



  8. #8
    Ugly
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:00:31 -0500, Rob babbled on about Verizon PTT stinks comparied to
    Nextel proclaiming:

    >Go figure!
    >Here's the example video:
    >http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/pro...3577091,00.html


    HTTP 400 - BAD REQUEST

    The page cannot be found
    The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name changed, or is
    temporarily unavailable.




  9. #9
    Jamel L. Raines
    Guest

    Re: Verizon PTT stinks comparied to Nextel

    Understand. Netxtel is the only carrier licensing the IDEN technology from
    motorola. IDEN technology is the only technology able to bring you the
    efficiency and immediacy of direct connect that nextel offers. dont believe
    the hype. No other carrier will be able to reproduce what nextel direct
    connect does unless they license the technology from motorola like nextel
    has done.
    "Ugly" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:00:31 -0500, Rob babbled on about Verizon PTT
    > stinks comparied to
    > Nextel proclaiming:
    >
    >>Go figure!
    >>Here's the example video:
    >>http://www.techtv.com/freshgear/pro...3577091,00.html

    >
    > HTTP 400 - BAD REQUEST
    >
    > The page cannot be found
    > The page you are looking for might have been removed, had its name
    > changed, or is
    > temporarily unavailable.
    >






  • Similar Threads