FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

Good Riddance AT&T wrote:
> Why would it matter where he's located?

Right now I am in North Dakota. Verizon Wireless sucks here, so I can
safely assume that Verizon has TERRIBLE SERVICE all over the United
States, right? Nextel has limited service here, but is expanding via
their roaming partner Extend America. Sprint PCS coverage is also very
limited. Cingular and AT&T have no native coverage in North Dakota, so
I can safely assume that they have no native coverage in the United
States, right?

I think I made my point. A wireless network is not equal throughout the
nation. There was a three way tie for #1 by JD Power and Associates,
and Verizon was not there (Nextel, Cingular, T-Mobile).

> No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.

True. But it's never going to happen.

> Even a poll made by AT&T said their CS sucks donkey's ass.

Really, they released a report about themselves and claimed that "we
suck donkey's ass"? Where was this published?

> I ported my service to a different provider and while the number was ported
> not AT&T still says that I still have service with them with the same number
> and that they're going to send me the bill for usage up to Friday plus
> cancellation fee because I was still under contract. I know my contract
> ended Nov. 15th and the phone number ported completely on Tuesday, and they
> don't even see that in their system. What gives? What a bunch of
> nincompoop!!!

Congratulations. You, being a resident of a select area, have the
freedom to port your number. You know, AT&T has GREAT coverage in parts
on Minnesota...why would you want to switch?

> Those who have not had problem with AT&T has either just been lucky or work
> for them in some way. Wait and see. Mark my words.

Like I say, AT&T has some GREAT Coverage in Minnesota.

--AD

---

› See More: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

Good Riddance AT&T wrote:
> Why would it matter where he's located?

Right now I am in North Dakota. Verizon Wireless sucks here, so I can
safely assume that Verizon has TERRIBLE SERVICE all over the United
States, right? Nextel has limited service here, but is expanding via
their roaming partner Extend America. Sprint PCS coverage is also very
limited. Cingular and AT&T have no native coverage in North Dakota, so
I can safely assume that they have no native coverage in the United
States, right?

I think I made my point. A wireless network is not equal throughout the
nation. There was a three way tie for #1 by JD Power and Associates,
and Verizon was not there (Nextel, Cingular, T-Mobile).

> No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.

True. But it's never going to happen.

> Even a poll made by AT&T said their CS sucks donkey's ass.

Really, they released a report about themselves and claimed that "we
suck donkey's ass"? Where was this published?

> I ported my service to a different provider and while the number was ported
> not AT&T still says that I still have service with them with the same number
> and that they're going to send me the bill for usage up to Friday plus
> cancellation fee because I was still under contract. I know my contract
> ended Nov. 15th and the phone number ported completely on Tuesday, and they
> don't even see that in their system. What gives? What a bunch of
> nincompoop!!!

Congratulations. You, being a resident of a select area, have the
freedom to port your number. You know, AT&T has GREAT coverage in parts
on Minnesota...why would you want to switch?

> Those who have not had problem with AT&T has either just been lucky or work
> for them in some way. Wait and see. Mark my words.

Like I say, AT&T has some GREAT Coverage in Minnesota.

--AD

jdoe wrote:
> It's no better with VZW. I constantly have trouble withtheir billing and
> them trying to slip one by me etc. The only company I've ever done business
> with (wireless) that didn't pull that crap was US Cellular. If I ddin't need
> service in MN they'd be first choice. VZ just frustrates the s%^t out of me.
> Larry

What part of Minnesota? I have Cingular (Preferred Nation TDMA and
Cingular Nation) plans and I have great coverage in Minnesota. I have
not had a problem with their customer service, either. I called to have
wireless insurance removed, and when it was still on my bill, they
immediately gave me a credit, along with a credit for roaming in a home
airtime rate area.

If you live in the MSP area, Cingular Nation is great. With a T62u, you
can roam on T-Mobile (GSM), AT&T (żGSM and TDMA? and AMPS), and Verizon
Wireless (AMPS). Coverage cannot be beat with that phone.

AD

jdoe wrote:
> It's no better with VZW. I constantly have trouble withtheir billing and
> them trying to slip one by me etc. The only company I've ever done business
> with (wireless) that didn't pull that crap was US Cellular. If I ddin't need
> service in MN they'd be first choice. VZ just frustrates the s%^t out of me.
> Larry

What part of Minnesota? I have Cingular (Preferred Nation TDMA and
Cingular Nation) plans and I have great coverage in Minnesota. I have
not had a problem with their customer service, either. I called to have
wireless insurance removed, and when it was still on my bill, they
immediately gave me a credit, along with a credit for roaming in a home
airtime rate area.

If you live in the MSP area, Cingular Nation is great. With a T62u, you
can roam on T-Mobile (GSM), AT&T (żGSM and TDMA? and AMPS), and Verizon
Wireless (AMPS). Coverage cannot be beat with that phone.

AD

René wrote:
> Good Riddance AT&T wrote:
>
>>No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.
>
>
> True. Currently, FauxNews is annoying the **** outta me.

Really? I thought I was the only one annoyed by ****sNews.

AD

René wrote:
> Good Riddance AT&T wrote:
>
>>No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.
>
>
> True. Currently, FauxNews is annoying the **** outta me.

Really? I thought I was the only one annoyed by ****sNews.

AD

N9WOS wrote:


> That annalist is ignorant in making those statements unless
> he gives an idea of where he is talking about.
> Someone that makes blanket statements on a national
> TV show like that, because his local experience, needs fired.

Yeah well, that's Faux News for ya. All opinion, no facts.

--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

N9WOS wrote:


> That annalist is ignorant in making those statements unless
> he gives an idea of where he is talking about.
> Someone that makes blanket statements on a national
> TV show like that, because his local experience, needs fired.

Yeah well, that's Faux News for ya. All opinion, no facts.

--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

Isaiah Beard wrote:
> N9WOS wrote:
>
>
>> That annalist is ignorant in making those statements unless
>> he gives an idea of where he is talking about.
>> Someone that makes blanket statements on a national
>> TV show like that, because his local experience, needs fired.
>
>
> Yeah well, that's Faux News for ya. All opinion, no facts.
>

That's the problem with the media in the United States. They don't care
what is heard, as long as they make money off it. ALL national news
networks (with the exclusion of NewsWorld International) are owned by
[for profit] corporation.

AD

Isaiah Beard wrote:
> N9WOS wrote:
>
>
>> That annalist is ignorant in making those statements unless
>> he gives an idea of where he is talking about.
>> Someone that makes blanket statements on a national
>> TV show like that, because his local experience, needs fired.
>
>
> Yeah well, that's Faux News for ya. All opinion, no facts.
>

That's the problem with the media in the United States. They don't care
what is heard, as long as they make money off it. ALL national news
networks (with the exclusion of NewsWorld International) are owned by
[for profit] corporation.

AD

"Aboutdakota" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> René wrote:
> > Good Riddance AT&T wrote:
> >
> >>No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.
> >
> >
> > True. Currently, FauxNews is annoying the **** outta me.
>
> Really? I thought I was the only one annoyed by ****sNews.
>
> AD

If you want a vulgar and reliable news source, go here:
www.****edcompany.com



---
Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003

"Aboutdakota" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> René wrote:
> > Good Riddance AT&T wrote:
> >
> >>No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.
> >
> >
> > True. Currently, FauxNews is annoying the **** outta me.
>
> Really? I thought I was the only one annoyed by ****sNews.
>
> AD

If you want a vulgar and reliable news source, go here:
www.****edcompany.com



---
Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003

"Aboutdakota" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Isaiah Beard wrote:
> > N9WOS wrote:
> >
> >
> >> That annalist is ignorant in making those statements unless
> >> he gives an idea of where he is talking about.
> >> Someone that makes blanket statements on a national
> >> TV show like that, because his local experience, needs fired.
> >
> >
> > Yeah well, that's Faux News for ya. All opinion, no facts.
> >
>
> That's the problem with the media in the United States.

Yeah right, it never happens anywhere else. [sarcasm in case you missed it]


---
Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003

"Aboutdakota" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Isaiah Beard wrote:
> > N9WOS wrote:
> >
> >
> >> That annalist is ignorant in making those statements unless
> >> he gives an idea of where he is talking about.
> >> Someone that makes blanket statements on a national
> >> TV show like that, because his local experience, needs fired.
> >
> >
> > Yeah well, that's Faux News for ya. All opinion, no facts.
> >
>
> That's the problem with the media in the United States.

Yeah right, it never happens anywhere else. [sarcasm in case you missed it]


---
Update your PC at http://windowsupdate.microsoft.com
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.545 / Virus Database: 339 - Release Date: 11/27/2003

On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:35:52 GMT, "Karen" <[email protected]> wrote:

>I watch the Sat morning finance shows on FOX news. One of the shows (the
>cost of freedom, Bulls & Bears or one of them), was talking about wireless
>stocks. One analyst said that he had just ended his "abusive" relationship
>with ATT Wireless and actually said that "their service sucks so bad." He
>said he switched to Verizon. I was surprised that he said that on a
>national cable program, but he must have been really annoyed with ATT. He
>also said that ATT offered him $150 to stay as a customer and sign up for 2
>more years - he said no way. The two companies that got positive reviews
>(from an investor point of view) were Verizon and Nextel. They said that
>Sprint was too small and had an unstable parent company - also said that the
>coverage was too small. They said that Nextel was making money and although
>Verizon had $30 billion in debt, they had the best service and would gain
>from number portability. Didn't even mention Stinkular or T-imobile.
>

What a crock of ****. AT&T has been known to provide good cusomter
service for years. I had them from 1996-2000. Absolutely no problems.
Even JD Powers gives them good ratings. Yes, they may be biased to a
degree, but in my experiences, I'd say to say they're farily accurate
in their judgements.

AT&T's TDMA service is just fine, it's the GSM service they offer that
stinks. They're taking way too implementing 850Mhz service and the
coverage has more holes than swiss cheese.