i like spam

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:47:22 -0000, "jon" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>"Andy H" <[email protected]> wrote
>
>all sorts of twaddle!
>
>
>the guy just doesnt quit does he???
>
>can anyone blame me for saying he is a sad bastard and a silly little boy
>who needs to grow up????
>
>i think the guy may well have a serious mental health problem, so far he has
>sent me 17 emails in 3 days (8 of them today) all claiming his innocence and
>how much of a "loser loser" i am (wtf is that about???)
>
>its a good job i am a very experienced forensic mental health professional
>and am well trained in personal safety techniques, a member of the public
>would no doubt begin to feel their physical safety was at risk of being
>comprimised!
>
>this does smack somewhat of stalking type behaviour
>
>oh well such is life.
>
and this was a reply from jon,



yeah yeah whatever.

do you think i really give a damn.

tell me, are you married? have a partner?

if so i wonder if she' d like to experience a realman,
instead of the dickless wonder she has now.

get her to drop me a line if shes interested.

ill look forward to responding to her requests.

of course if she would rather remain ignorant, thats fine, but if that
is the case there is no need for you to continue mailing me.

i really dont give a **** anymore. my point was made, take it like a
man (if you are of course)




I just gave him a bit of his own medicine back but it appears he
doesn't like it...seems you he has learnt his lesson about posting
other peoples email addresses and edited it carefully, much
appreciated but too late for some people on here as several abuse
reports have already been filed this evening.
Whats good for the goose and all that....

---

› See More: i like spam

>
>i think the guy may well have a serious mental health problem, so far he has
>sent me 17 emails in 3 days (8 of them today) all claiming his innocence and
>how much of a "loser loser" i am (wtf is that about???)

and guess what, he didn't reply to any of the FACTUAL comments made,
he just hurled personal abuse at me...but I can take it unlike some
>

"Andy H" <[email protected]>

is now kill filed...why didnt i do it last night when i was first gonna to

--
jon
________
replace the WORDS to make it work

"Andy H" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:02:58 +0000 (UTC), "R. Mark Clayton"
> <MClayton [nospam] @btinternet.com> wrote:
>
> >
>
> >
> >The original unsolicited post was from AH, and I have a sort of folk
memory
> >that this guy has done stuff like this before.
> >
> ABUSE REPORT SENT TO BT

Actually the abuse seems to have been sent by you to me - see other part of
this thread. There are some pretty unusual posts from you in these news
groups too.

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:16:48 +0000, Andy H <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>>
>>i aint helping a spamming tosser like you, i just hope freeserve knock
>>you off the net for your stunt with you spamming her email address on
>>here. Otherwise I hope she takes you to the cleaners.
>>
>I doubt she would have the intelligence to do that but you would know
>that if you had read the emails she has sent....but thats the hole
>point....you haven't read the emails so how can you comment.
>Kepp your comments to yourself as they are not welcome and mostly
>incorrect and it seems you just like publicity.
>
>
hold on andy, here is the emails, I know what is going on so why don't
you shut up and we will let the public judge:

----- Original Message -----
From: elaine KELT
To: Fred
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 8:36 PM
Subject: Re: Blocked Nokia

Maybe if you hadn't put me on the news groups with your liablous
comments you wouldn't be judged by them as is they think you are very
childish and have
been extremely helpful in notifying me of your acts and helping to
resolve them. I look forward to seeing both of our responses from
e-bay as well as O2, Virgin,
Orange, freeserve and my solicitor.

----- Original Message -----
From: Fred
To: 'elaine KELT'
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 7:36 PM
Subject: RE: Blocked Nokia

Thanks for your email sent in reply to mine, if I had received your
phone message I would not have sent it but BT Answer doesn't inform
users of waiting
messages unless they use their phone and I haven't until a few minutes
ago when I just noticed your message saying you are perusing the
matter with your
solicitor why I do not know but that is your choice. I had already
ended the matter as far as you were concerned and I was just replying
to the nosy people on
the newsgroups who were trying to by judge and jury without knowing
all the facts. As far as I am concerned the matter is closed but as
far as eBay is
concerned that's a different matter as my email was sent days ago so
there little I can do about that.



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com




From: elaine KELT
Sent: 26 October 2003 18:36
To: Fred
Subject: Re: Blocked Nokia

Andy YOU are the one who needs to put a stop to things you have gone
to far already. YOU are losing friends on usenet and ebay. As for my
husband he
can look after himself so if you really want to inform the authorities
please feel free to do so . Just remember YOU started all this stupid
nonsense and have
made allegations that are not true. YOU have also done some childish
things on ebay i.e setting up other user names to bid on our items
then leaving negative
feedback. Why did you do that. It was obvious Jimmy would do the same
back to you. It was quite for a week or so but YOU just could not
accept that things
had not gone your way. Jimmy was going to cancel your bid but trusted
you enough to leave it on in the hope you would just call it a day.Now
you have
negative feedback as a result of what YOU did to me. Be honest and ask
yourself if that is what you really wanted? YOU too have made threats
i.e "Wonder
when you are in Grays next", We too have kept every e-mail that you
have sent. How else do you think we would have known all your e-mail
addresses. And
as for what I told Jon, I don't see what difference it makes whether I
thought you worked for o2 or not! I certainly don't feel embaressed
about thinking you
worked for o2, Virgin or MI5 for that matter.
Now let me suggest to you that YOU stop before it gets out of hand as
I reckon I have enough evidence to have YOU done for harrasment, which
I am sure
you will agree is far more serious than a lost mobile phone. Still if
you don't agree we would soon find out when the police get involved!
You were asked last
night to stop, this time I trust you can just accept that you have met
your match and just walk away!
----- Original Message -----
From: Fred
To: 'elaine KELT'
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 5:58 PM
Subject: RE: Blocked Nokia

Had a nice chat with Jon I understand but I don't think you told him
about all the foolish mistakes you made thinking I worked for O2 just
as I had an O2 email
and then threatening to tell Orange as I sold a phone.

I hope I haven't upset you again.....


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
FIGHT BACK AGAINST SPAM!
Download Spam Inspector, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com




From: elaine KELT
Sent: 24 October 2003 23:31
To: Andrew Haigh
Subject: Re: Blocked Nokia

Andy you are so predictable. Its a shame we caught you out. Your a sad
little man who will be stopped. E bay already know it was you who made
the bid
so now we can complain about you yet again. Cyberkid999's days are
numbered!!!

-----
sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
-----

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:16:48 +0000, Andy H <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>>
>>i aint helping a spamming tosser like you, i just hope freeserve knock
>>you off the net for your stunt with you spamming her email address on
>>here. Otherwise I hope she takes you to the cleaners.
>>
>I doubt she would have the intelligence to do that but you would know
>that if you had read the emails she has sent....but thats the hole
>point....you haven't read the emails so how can you comment.
>Kepp your comments to yourself as they are not welcome and mostly
>incorrect and it seems you just like publicity.
>
>
As they say Andy, the writings on the wall and so many times you have
admitted privately that you were wrong, yet publicly its a different
story.

Lets cut the chase, you use different alias's on ebay to try and cover
your tracks, you bid for items and then not pay for them when you win.
You go around spamming peoples email addresses around, you say one
thing by email yet something entirly different by the newsgroup. You
use different email addresses to try and hide who you are, basically
your a lyer.

All you have done is confirm to many suspicions, now people can see
for themselves the real you. Hopefully if they ever come across you
on ebay or elsewhere they will avoid you like the plague.
-----
sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
-----

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:18:37 +0000, Andy H <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Tue
>
>>>
>>>
>>oh andy, look your email addresses, didnt you do something similar
>>about 30 times with some poor ladies address?
>>
>>
>>-----
>>sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
>>-----
>Not guilty...put up or shut up


Eh yes you are, but nevermind freeserve have been informed and are
investigating you as we speak. so would you like to take some of your
own advice now and either put up or shut up lol!!!
-----
sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
-----

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:01:48 +0000, Andy H <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:02:58 +0000 (UTC), "R. Mark Clayton"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>
>>The original unsolicited post was from AH, and I have a sort of folk memory
>>that this guy has done stuff like this before.
>>
>ABUSE REPORT SENT TO BT


Why is it abuse? any isp will have records of all threads on every
newsgroup, they will only have to look thorugh them and see what a
spamming twerp you are and how you spend your time trolling.

As for stalking jon, there are laws against stalking thank god so we
are all offered some form of protection ;-)
-----
sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
-----

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 22:01:48 +0000, Andy H <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:02:58 +0000 (UTC), "R. Mark Clayton"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>
>>
>>The original unsolicited post was from AH, and I have a sort of folk memory
>>that this guy has done stuff like this before.
>>
>ABUSE REPORT SENT TO BT


Must add to this Andy. Freeserve will also find out that you use
forte as your newsgroup client, your ip address is 217.135.196.55
(well was on your last post) the last post you made was also logged by
freeserve as news7.svr.pol.co.uk 1067378509 11878 217.135.196.55 (28
Oct 2003 22:01:49 GMT)

from this they can trace everything you send and receive over the net,
all this thread, the spamming and your little temper tantrums (and
trace where you threw your rattle)..

Face it you are the one here who is in the stoomp!! You can run, but
you can't hide!!
-----
sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
-----

aaaaarrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

even though ive blocked the ?!?!?$$%^^&%**^&%""$£%%£^% i still get to see
his !"$%^&&*?"><">$ posts when you lot reply to them!!!! lol

just want to say thanks to all those that have mailed me off group with your
support

regards

--
jon
________
replace the WORDS to make it work

>
>All you have done is confirm to many suspicions, now people can see
>for themselves the real you. Hopefully if they ever come across you
>on ebay or elsewhere they will avoid you like the plague.
>-----
>sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
>-----
perhaps you should look at my feedback received over the last few
days. I made my point and the sellers of property that was not theirs
to sell have received warning from eBay and as thats were the problem
started I think thay are the judge. They have yet again thanked me for
my efforts in helping to keep eBay a safe place to trade.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:07:31 GMT, [email protected]
(smstextaddict.co.uk ) (smstextaddict co uk) wrote:

>On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:18:37 +0000, Andy H <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Tue
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>oh andy, look your email addresses, didnt you do something similar
>>>about 30 times with some poor ladies address?
>>>
>>>
>>>-----
>>>sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
>>>-----
>>Not guilty...put up or shut up
>
>
>Eh yes you are, but nevermind freeserve have been informed and are
>investigating you as we speak. so would you like to take some of your
>own advice now and either put up or shut up lol!!!
>-----
>sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
>-----
I was reffering to some stupid persons comments that I had done this
before and he was searching the newsgroups to find it. thats what I
meant by not guilty and he has yet to prove otherwise so perhaps he
should put up or shut up.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 01:34:56 +0000 (UTC), "R. Mark Clayton"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>
>"Andy H" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:02:58 +0000 (UTC), "R. Mark Clayton"
>> <MClayton [nospam] @btinternet.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>
>> >
>> >The original unsolicited post was from AH, and I have a sort of folk
>memory
>> >that this guy has done stuff like this before.
>> >
>> ABUSE REPORT SENT TO BT
>
>Actually the abuse seems to have been sent by you to me - see other part of
>this thread. There are some pretty unusual posts from you in these news
>groups too.
>
>
aren't we getting petty. my thread went to the wrong one but the fact
remains you posted my details and I have reported you. whats good for
the goose is good for the gander !!!!

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:18:14 -0000, "jon" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>aaaaarrrrrrrrrrggggggghhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
>even though ive blocked the ?!?!?$$%^^&%**^&%""$£%%£^% i still get to see
>his !"$%^&&*?"><">$ posts when you lot reply to them!!!! lol
>
>just want to say thanks to all those that have mailed me off group with your
>support
>
>regards


here here, thanks to all my supporters also.
it would seem that the majority of people who bother to reply on
newsgroups just do it to cause trouble and correct others for petty
mistakes like top posting.
I do my busniess on eBay and its thriving and have never had a
complaint so i don't care what you lot say as most of it is pure ****E

"Andy H" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 14:04:10 GMT, [email protected]
> (smstextaddict.co.uk ) (smstextaddict co uk) wrote:
>
> >On Sun, 26 Oct 2003 10:51:10 GMT, "Richard Colton"
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>And if it was me, I'd notify EBay of the sale (which they should have
> >>noticed in the first place), and possibly forward the details on to the
> >>Police (not that I think they'll bother to do anything about it - too
busy
> >>checking windscreen washer fluid levels). But then again, some people
are
> >>just plain dishonest.
> >>

> >but not bening funny the description CLEARLY discribed the goods as
> >being blocked and left in a taxi. ok they should have been handed in,
> >but why did this andy haigh then go and bid for it?
>
> basically to try and stop them from gaing from selling goods whcih
> were not their property and to protect others. do you know how many
> people there are out there that get blocked and locked confused

That's their problem.

Do you know your bid and winning was a binding legal contract to buy the
goods?


--
John C. Rymer
www.UnlockingIreland.com
UK, Ireland and worldwide phone unlocking.