Let AH speak for himself (was i like spam)

"Andy H" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> >
> >The original unsolicited post was from AH, and I have a sort of folk
memory
> >that this guy has done stuff like this before.
> >
> Not sure how this all works. It seems that its wriong for someone to
> post emails with intent to cause spam but its OK for others to
> continue posting my details.
> well I don't think you really wanted to do that did you Richard
snip

This is what he appears to have sent me: -


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:48 PM
Subject: pratt


> >The original unsolicited post was from AH, and I have a sort of folk
memory
> >that this guy has done stuff like this before.
> >
> WHO RATTLED YOUR CAGE. IF WHAT EVERYBODY IS SAYING IS TRUE YOU ARE
> ALSO COMMITTING AN OFFENCE RE SPAM SO TELL YOUR MATES TO WATCH OUT
> ELSE YOU WILL BE FOLLOWING THEM. THIS IS NOT A THREAT BUT A FACT AND
REPORTS
> WILL BE FLOWING BT's WAY - IN FACT I MIGHT REPORT YOU ANYWAY AND SEE IF
ITS
> THE SAME OLD BT - I WORKED FOR BT FOR OVER 20 YEARS SO I KNOW A FEW TRICKS
> AND SHORTCUTS
>
>
======== headers =========
Received: from tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.168.141])
by cadmium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
id 1AEbhv-0001Rs-00
for mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:55 +0000
Received: from modem-1079.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.135.196.55]
helo=andrewf7zm3w4x)
by tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1AEbhB-0006dC-VO
for MClayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:10 +0000
From: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
To: <mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com>
Subject: pratt
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:29 -0000
Message-ID:
<!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA9v4eu5SRIEWj8khi03RIYcKAAAAQ
[email protected]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C39D9D.3B03D8C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Thread-Index: AcOdnQknozUIEigsRfShk1mDXLq/7Q==
Disposition-Notification-To: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
Status:

======== trace =============

to follow

======= response =========

for the record

I didn't post your details others did.

I did not send Spam.

Stating an intention to knowingly make a bogus complaint to an ISP is an
illegal threat (or "menace").

Everything appears to indicate that AH rattled everyone else's cage by an
net abusive posting in multiple newsgroups - I suppose the original message
might just have been forged, but then AH's subsequent posts and emails
suggest very strongly that this is his typical behaviour. OTOH I think we
should go lightly on him because he exhibits symptoms of mental ill health,
and he should refer himself to his GP in the first instance.

---

› See More: Let AH speak for himself (was i like spam)

<cut the crap out>
>======== headers =========
>Received: from tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.168.141])

sent from a Freeserve connection
> by cadmium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
> id 1AEbhv-0001Rs-00
> for mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:55 +0000

received by a bt connection


>Received: from modem-1079.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.135.196.55]
>helo=andrewf7zm3w4x)
> by tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
> id 1AEbhB-0006dC-VO
> for MClayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:10 +0000

From Andy's computer which is named andrewf7zm3w4x

>From: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
>To: <mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com>
>Subject: pratt
>Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:29 -0000
>Message-ID:
><!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA9v4eu5SRIEWj8khi03RIYcKAAAAQ
>[email protected]>

message ID so o2 can look up in their records and see when this was
sent and what the original email said.

>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C39D9D.3B03D8C0"
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165

sent with microsoft outlook

>Thread-Index: AcOdnQknozUIEigsRfShk1mDXLq/7Q==
>Disposition-Notification-To: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
>Status:
>
>======== trace =============
>
>to follow
>
>======= response =========
>
>for the record
>
>I didn't post your details others did.
>
>I did not send Spam.
>
>Stating an intention to knowingly make a bogus complaint to an ISP is an
>illegal threat (or "menace").
>
>Everything appears to indicate that AH rattled everyone else's cage by an
>net abusive posting in multiple newsgroups - I suppose the original message
>might just have been forged, but then AH's subsequent posts and emails
>suggest very strongly that this is his typical behaviour. OTOH I think we
>should go lightly on him because he exhibits symptoms of mental ill health,
>and he should refer himself to his GP in the first instance.
>
>
why the hell andy don't you give up? you wouldnt be good as a burglar,
you would leave to many clues behind. give up and go home, if you
have to type on the keyboard again, may i suggest you type a message
to samaratians asking them for help.


-----
sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
-----

>
>for the record
>
>I didn't post your details others did.

you reposted them which is equally as bad

>I did not send Spam.
>
>Stating an intention to knowingly make a bogus complaint to an ISP is an
>illegal threat (or "menace").

thats fine also as it was not a threat as I did file a complaint
minutes later with the thread you posted that included my details.
>
>Everything appears to indicate that AH rattled everyone else's cage by an
>net abusive posting in multiple newsgroups - I suppose the original message
>might just have been forged, but then AH's subsequent posts and emails
>suggest very strongly that this is his typical behaviour. OTOH I think we
>should go lightly on him because he exhibits symptoms of mental ill health,
>and he should refer himself to his GP in the first instance.
>

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:24:12 GMT, [email protected]
(smstextaddict.co.uk ) (smstextaddict co uk) wrote:

><cut the crap out>
>>======== headers =========
>>Received: from tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.168.141])
>
>sent from a Freeserve connection
>> by cadmium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
>> id 1AEbhv-0001Rs-00
>> for mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:55 +0000
>
>received by a bt connection
>
>
>>Received: from modem-1079.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.135.196.55]
>>helo=andrewf7zm3w4x)
>> by tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
>> id 1AEbhB-0006dC-VO
>> for MClayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:10 +0000
>
>From Andy's computer which is named andrewf7zm3w4x
>
>>From: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
>>To: <mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com>
>>Subject: pratt
>>Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:29 -0000
>>Message-ID:
>><!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA9v4eu5SRIEWj8khi03RIYcKAAAAQ
>>[email protected]>
>
>message ID so o2 can look up in their records and see when this was
>sent and what the original email said.
>
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C39D9D.3B03D8C0"
>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>>X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>
>sent with microsoft outlook
>
>>Thread-Index: AcOdnQknozUIEigsRfShk1mDXLq/7Q==
>>Disposition-Notification-To: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
>>Status:
>>
>>======== trace =============
>>
>>to follow
>>
>>======= response =========
>>
>>for the record
>>
>>I didn't post your details others did.
>>
>>I did not send Spam.
>>
>>Stating an intention to knowingly make a bogus complaint to an ISP is an
>>illegal threat (or "menace").
>>
>>Everything appears to indicate that AH rattled everyone else's cage by an
>>net abusive posting in multiple newsgroups - I suppose the original message
>>might just have been forged, but then AH's subsequent posts and emails
>>suggest very strongly that this is his typical behaviour. OTOH I think we
>>should go lightly on him because he exhibits symptoms of mental ill health,
>>and he should refer himself to his GP in the first instance.
>>
>>
>why the hell andy don't you give up? you wouldnt be good as a burglar,
>you would leave to many clues behind. give up and go home, if you
>have to type on the keyboard again, may i suggest you type a message
>to samaratians asking them for help.
>
>
>-----
>sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
>-----


whats the point in all that crap above . I am not hiding.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:23:30 +0000, Andy H <[email protected]> wrote:

>On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 07:24:12 GMT, [email protected]
>(smstextaddict.co.uk ) (smstextaddict co uk) wrote:
>
>><cut the crap out>
>>>======== headers =========
>>>Received: from tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk ([195.92.168.141])
>>
>>sent from a Freeserve connection
>>> by cadmium.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #23)
>>> id 1AEbhv-0001Rs-00
>>> for mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:55 +0000
>>
>>received by a bt connection
>>
>>
>>>Received: from modem-1079.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk ([217.135.196.55]
>>>helo=andrewf7zm3w4x)
>>> by tmailb1.svr.pol.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
>>> id 1AEbhB-0006dC-VO
>>> for MClayton [nospam] @btinternet.com; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:10 +0000
>>
>>From Andy's computer which is named andrewf7zm3w4x
>>
>>>From: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
>>>To: <mclayton [nospam] @btinternet.com>
>>>Subject: pratt
>>>Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:48:29 -0000
>>>Message-ID:
>>><!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA9v4eu5SRIEWj8khi03RIYcKAAAAQ
>>>[email protected]>
>>
>>message ID so o2 can look up in their records and see when this was
>>sent and what the original email said.
>>
>>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
>>> boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00CA_01C39D9D.3B03D8C0"
>>>X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
>>>X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
>>
>>sent with microsoft outlook
>>
>>>Thread-Index: AcOdnQknozUIEigsRfShk1mDXLq/7Q==
>>>Disposition-Notification-To: "Andrew Haigh" <[email protected]>
>>>Status:
>>>
>>>======== trace =============
>>>
>>>to follow
>>>
>>>======= response =========
>>>
>>>for the record
>>>
>>>I didn't post your details others did.
>>>
>>>I did not send Spam.
>>>
>>>Stating an intention to knowingly make a bogus complaint to an ISP is an
>>>illegal threat (or "menace").
>>>
>>>Everything appears to indicate that AH rattled everyone else's cage by an
>>>net abusive posting in multiple newsgroups - I suppose the original message
>>>might just have been forged, but then AH's subsequent posts and emails
>>>suggest very strongly that this is his typical behaviour. OTOH I think we
>>>should go lightly on him because he exhibits symptoms of mental ill health,
>>>and he should refer himself to his GP in the first instance.
>>>
>>>
>>why the hell andy don't you give up? you wouldnt be good as a burglar,
>>you would leave to many clues behind. give up and go home, if you
>>have to type on the keyboard again, may i suggest you type a message
>>to samaratians asking them for help.
>>
>>
>>-----
>>sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
>>-----
>
>
>whats the point in all that crap above . I am not hiding.


Just thought perhaps it would make it easier for anyone wanting to
report you to [email protected]
-----
sms text addict? www.smstextaddict.co.uk
-----