6100 or 6610 (WAS: 6100 or 6310)

"Ben Pope" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Ben Pope wrote:
> > They do seem to have the formula right with the 6310i - all problems
>
>
> Oh, and it can store ALL your phone numbers - I have the phone number for
> everywhere , I just don't delete numbers - I have about 500 numbers on
my
> phone (about 2/3 full) - e.g., I can tell you the number of B&Qs in three
> major cities in England :-)
>
> Looking at the 6600 - you got 6MBs to play with (shared with all your
media,
> applications, et. al.), and that's expandable
>
> Ben
> --
> A7N8X FAQ: www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html
> Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
> I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...
>
>
Correcting Topic

---

› See More: 6100 or 6610 (WAS: 6100 or 6310)

JP wrote:
> Correcting Topic

I apologise for my superfluous ramblings. I shall endeavour to be more
concise in the future and would like to offer the version below as an
alternative to the previous text:

The 6310i can store over 500 phone numbers with details, the 6600 can
probably store more as it has 6MB onboard with the ability to capacity,
which is shared between your applications, media et. al.

Ben
--
A7N8X FAQ: www.ben.pope.name/a7n8x_faq.html
Questions by email will likely be ignored, please use the newsgroups.
I'm not just a number. To many, I'm known as a String...

> I apologise for my superfluous ramblings. I shall endeavour to be more
> concise in the future and would like to offer the version below as an
> alternative to the previous text:
>
> The 6310i can store over 500 phone numbers with details, the 6600 can
> probably store more as it has 6MB onboard with the ability to capacity,
> which is shared between your applications, media et. al.

"6100 or 6610"

not 6310i or 6600...

-mark