whick nokia phones take the best quality pictures/video ?

god damn what a wanker.
whats the point of digging and digging when youve already hit 6 ft under?

"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Stop making a total **** of yourself... go back and read the question
>> carefully.... if you still dont understand it, then i will explain it in
>> very simple terms, specially for you... to save me time, and others the
>> pity, we can only hope that you may be able to clear enough of the snot
> out
>> of those neural pathways of yours to allow understanding to find its way
>> through...
>
> Please don't use foul language to me, it is totally unnecessary and only
> serves to prove me right.
>
> <Plonk>
>
> Ivor
>
>

---

› See More: whick nokia phones take the best quality pictures/video ?

"Daniel Juhn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> god damn what a wanker.
> whats the point of digging and digging when youve already hit 6 ft under?

No idea. Why do you?

Give it a rest and try being civil to other members of the group for a
change.

BTW, I believe you forgot to put your sig seperator just above the "god
damn" bit. ;-)

--
>>> Unlock Your Phone's Potential <<<
>>> www.uselessinfo.org.uk <<<
>>> www.thephonelocker.co.uk <<<

<Plonk>
<Plonk>

"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Stop making a total **** of yourself... go back and read the question
> > carefully.... if you still dont understand it, then i will explain it in
> > very simple terms, specially for you... to save me time, and others the
> > pity, we can only hope that you may be able to clear enough of the snot
> out
> > of those neural pathways of yours to allow understanding to find its way
> > through...
>
> Please don't use foul language to me, it is totally unnecessary and only
> serves to prove me right.
>
> <Plonk>
>
> Ivor
>
>

5 entries found for wank.
wank ( P ) Pronunciation Key (wngk) Chiefly British Vulgar Slang
tr. & intr.v. wanked, wank·ing, wanks
To masturbate. Often used with off.

n.
An act of masturbation.
A detestable person.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
[Origin unknown.]

Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth
Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.


wank

n : slang terms for masturbation [syn: jacking off, jerking off, hand job] v
: get sexual gratification through self-stimulation [syn: masturbate, ****
off, she-bop, jack off, jerk off]


Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University


wank



/wangk/ [Columbia University: probably by mutation from
Commonwealth slang "wank", to masturbate] Used much as hack
is elsewhere, as a noun denoting a clever technique or person
or the result of such cleverness. May describe (negatively)
the act of hacking for hacking's sake ("Quit wanking, let's go
get supper!") or (more positively) a wizard. "wanky"
describes something particularly clever (a person, program, or
algorithm). Conversations can also get wanky when there are
too many wanks involved. This excess wankiness is signalled
by an overload of the "wankometer" (compare bogometer).
When the wankometer overloads, the conversation's subject must
be changed, or all non-wanks will leave. Compare
"neep-neeping" (under neep-neep). Usage: US only. In
Britain and the Commonwealth this word is *extremely* rude and
is best avoided unless one intends to give offense.



Source: The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing, © 1993-2004 Denis Howe


wank

/wangk/ n.,v.,adj. [Columbia University: prob. by
mutation from Commonwealth slang v. `wank', to masturbate] Used much
as hack is elsewhere, as a noun denoting a clever technique or
person or the result of such cleverness. May describe (negatively)
the act of hacking for hacking's sake ("Quit wanking, let's go get
supper!") or (more positively) a wizard. Adj. `wanky' describes
something particularly clever (a person, program, or algorithm).
Conversations can also get wanky when there are too many wanks
involved. This excess wankiness is signalled by an overload of the
`wankometer' (compare bogometer). When the wankometer overloads,
the conversation's subject must be changed, or all non-wanks will
leave. Compare `neep-neeping' (under neep-neep). Usage: U.S.
only. In Britain and the Commonwealth this word is _extremely_ rude
and is best avoided unless one intends to give offense. Adjectival
`wanky' is less offensive and simply means `stupid' or `broken'
(this is mainstream in Great Britain).

<Plonk>
<Plonk>

"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Stop making a total **** of yourself... go back and read the question
> > carefully.... if you still dont understand it, then i will explain it in
> > very simple terms, specially for you... to save me time, and others the
> > pity, we can only hope that you may be able to clear enough of the snot
> out
> > of those neural pathways of yours to allow understanding to find its way
> > through...
>
> Please don't use foul language to me, it is totally unnecessary and only
> serves to prove me right.
>
> <Plonk>
>
> Ivor
>
>

Can you stop bottom-posting? How inconsiderate...

"Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > you seem to have a very vague grasp of the english language, if you dont
> > understand the question, please ask me to reword it or dont respond at
> > all....
>
> I understood the question perfectly, you just didn't understand the
> answer..!
>
> Oh and please don't top post, thanks.
>
> Ivor
>
>

I think the reason for the seemingly rude response, is that the current
batch of cell-phone cameras don't offer much compared to a digicam, nor
between each other. If you can wait for 2Mp models to start to emerge, with
larger F's, it'll be for the better.

The cam on a most of the current models are no more than toys, or the $25
vga focus-free things you can get at markets.


"Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> you seem to have a very vague grasp of the english language, if you dont
> understand the question, please ask me to reword it or dont respond at
> all....
>
>
> "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > > can someone please give me the top 3 nokia camera/video phones that
> > deliver
> > > the best quality images ??
> >
> > None of them. If I asked you which camera made the best phone calls,
what
> > would you say..?!
> >
> > Ivor
> >
> >
>
>

>I think the reason for the seemingly rude response, is that the current
> batch of cell-phone cameras don't offer much compared to a digicam

no, it was just out of utter stupidity

yes, but what igor failed to understand, was that my question was 'only'
asking if someone could give me the 3 top models in reguards to picture
quality, i was not asking him to give us his 'supposed' intelligent quip
about how crap the quality on all mobile phone cameras are, that is a
subject for another thread, he should really read questions before he lets
the putrid stink of his brain farts permeate this newsgroup...

Just for the record, i use a Nikon F80 SLR when i want to take serious
shots, but i must say, there is nothing out there at the moment which
compares with the convenience of a mobile camera,

its not rocket science to see that the quality is crappy in comparison to a
$5000 Digital SLR, but if igor rubs two of his braincells together, he will
feel something called understanding laying in the fact, that the two were
never meant to be put up against each other...





"AC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I think the reason for the seemingly rude response, is that the current
> batch of cell-phone cameras don't offer much compared to a digicam, nor
> between each other. If you can wait for 2Mp models to start to emerge,
with
> larger F's, it'll be for the better.
>
> The cam on a most of the current models are no more than toys, or the $25
> vga focus-free things you can get at markets.
>
>
> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > you seem to have a very vague grasp of the english language, if you dont
> > understand the question, please ask me to reword it or dont respond at
> > all....
> >
> >
> > "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > > > can someone please give me the top 3 nokia camera/video phones that
> > > deliver
> > > > the best quality images ??
> > >
> > > None of them. If I asked you which camera made the best phone calls,
> what
> > > would you say..?!
> > >
> > > Ivor
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

but thats not even the matter at hand here...
ivor asks which camera has the best phone calls...
the point is that all phones will make more or less similar calls (save
those with reception issues), however the quality of camera would vary
significantly...

"Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> yes, but what igor failed to understand, was that my question was 'only'
> asking if someone could give me the 3 top models in reguards to picture
> quality, i was not asking him to give us his 'supposed' intelligent quip
> about how crap the quality on all mobile phone cameras are, that is a
> subject for another thread, he should really read questions before he lets
> the putrid stink of his brain farts permeate this newsgroup...
>
> Just for the record, i use a Nikon F80 SLR when i want to take serious
> shots, but i must say, there is nothing out there at the moment which
> compares with the convenience of a mobile camera,
>
> its not rocket science to see that the quality is crappy in comparison to
> a
> $5000 Digital SLR, but if igor rubs two of his braincells together, he
> will
> feel something called understanding laying in the fact, that the two were
> never meant to be put up against each other...
>
>
>
>
>
> "AC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I think the reason for the seemingly rude response, is that the current
>> batch of cell-phone cameras don't offer much compared to a digicam, nor
>> between each other. If you can wait for 2Mp models to start to emerge,
> with
>> larger F's, it'll be for the better.
>>
>> The cam on a most of the current models are no more than toys, or the $25
>> vga focus-free things you can get at markets.
>>
>>
>> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > you seem to have a very vague grasp of the english language, if you
>> > dont
>> > understand the question, please ask me to reword it or dont respond at
>> > all....
>> >
>> >
>> > "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> > >
>> > > "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > > news:[email protected]...
>> > > > can someone please give me the top 3 nokia camera/video phones that
>> > > deliver
>> > > > the best quality images ??
>> > >
>> > > None of them. If I asked you which camera made the best phone calls,
>> what
>> > > would you say..?!
>> > >
>> > > Ivor
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

No, the fact is, he wants someone else to do his research for him.


"Daniel Juhn" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> but thats not even the matter at hand here...
> ivor asks which camera has the best phone calls...
> the point is that all phones will make more or less similar calls (save
> those with reception issues), however the quality of camera would vary
> significantly...
>
> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > yes, but what igor failed to understand, was that my question was 'only'
> > asking if someone could give me the 3 top models in reguards to picture
> > quality, i was not asking him to give us his 'supposed' intelligent quip
> > about how crap the quality on all mobile phone cameras are, that is a
> > subject for another thread, he should really read questions before he
lets
> > the putrid stink of his brain farts permeate this newsgroup...
> >
> > Just for the record, i use a Nikon F80 SLR when i want to take serious
> > shots, but i must say, there is nothing out there at the moment which
> > compares with the convenience of a mobile camera,
> >
> > its not rocket science to see that the quality is crappy in comparison
to
> > a
> > $5000 Digital SLR, but if igor rubs two of his braincells together, he
> > will
> > feel something called understanding laying in the fact, that the two
were
> > never meant to be put up against each other...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > "AC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> I think the reason for the seemingly rude response, is that the current
> >> batch of cell-phone cameras don't offer much compared to a digicam, nor
> >> between each other. If you can wait for 2Mp models to start to emerge,
> > with
> >> larger F's, it'll be for the better.
> >>
> >> The cam on a most of the current models are no more than toys, or the
$25
> >> vga focus-free things you can get at markets.
> >>
> >>
> >> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> > you seem to have a very vague grasp of the english language, if you
> >> > dont
> >> > understand the question, please ask me to reword it or dont respond
at
> >> > all....
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[email protected]...
> >> > >
> >> > > "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > > news:[email protected]...
> >> > > > can someone please give me the top 3 nokia camera/video phones
that
> >> > > deliver
> >> > > > the best quality images ??
> >> > >
> >> > > None of them. If I asked you which camera made the best phone
calls,
> >> what
> >> > > would you say..?!
> >> > >
> >> > > Ivor
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>

nothing wrong with asking opinions.
its the dumbass replies from people that dont **** that are the problem

"AC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> No, the fact is, he wants someone else to do his research for him.
>
>
> "Daniel Juhn" <[email protected]> wrote in
> message
> news:[email protected]...
>> but thats not even the matter at hand here...
>> ivor asks which camera has the best phone calls...
>> the point is that all phones will make more or less similar calls (save
>> those with reception issues), however the quality of camera would vary
>> significantly...
>>
>> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> > yes, but what igor failed to understand, was that my question was
>> > 'only'
>> > asking if someone could give me the 3 top models in reguards to picture
>> > quality, i was not asking him to give us his 'supposed' intelligent
>> > quip
>> > about how crap the quality on all mobile phone cameras are, that is a
>> > subject for another thread, he should really read questions before he
> lets
>> > the putrid stink of his brain farts permeate this newsgroup...
>> >
>> > Just for the record, i use a Nikon F80 SLR when i want to take serious
>> > shots, but i must say, there is nothing out there at the moment which
>> > compares with the convenience of a mobile camera,
>> >
>> > its not rocket science to see that the quality is crappy in comparison
> to
>> > a
>> > $5000 Digital SLR, but if igor rubs two of his braincells together, he
>> > will
>> > feel something called understanding laying in the fact, that the two
> were
>> > never meant to be put up against each other...
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "AC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> >> I think the reason for the seemingly rude response, is that the
>> >> current
>> >> batch of cell-phone cameras don't offer much compared to a digicam,
>> >> nor
>> >> between each other. If you can wait for 2Mp models to start to emerge,
>> > with
>> >> larger F's, it'll be for the better.
>> >>
>> >> The cam on a most of the current models are no more than toys, or the
> $25
>> >> vga focus-free things you can get at markets.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[email protected]...
>> >> > you seem to have a very vague grasp of the english language, if you
>> >> > dont
>> >> > understand the question, please ask me to reword it or dont respond
> at
>> >> > all....
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "Ivor Jones" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> > news:[email protected]...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > "Tripetaka" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> > > news:[email protected]...
>> >> > > > can someone please give me the top 3 nokia camera/video phones
> that
>> >> > > deliver
>> >> > > > the best quality images ??
>> >> > >
>> >> > > None of them. If I asked you which camera made the best phone
> calls,
>> >> what
>> >> > > would you say..?!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Ivor
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>

"AC" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> No, the fact is, he wants someone else to do his research for him.
>

Ever asked peoples opinions when researching a new phone?

JL