Results 1 to 15 of 73
- 11-27-2003, 04:45 PM #1King of ZorgGuest
Hi,
apparently there is one coming in the new year but has anyone been able to
find out about it?
Bruce
› See More: Nokia 6310i replacement
- 11-28-2003, 12:40 PM #2alanGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i replacement
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:45:37 GMT, "King of Zorg"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>Hi,
>apparently there is one coming in the new year but has anyone been able to
>find out about it?
>
>Bruce
>
If you mean one that is compatible with the cark-91 car kit - No.
The closest seem to be the 6230 or 6810 coming next year unless you
know better.
Alan
alan@TaKe_ThIs_OuTbenfordauto.co.uk
- 05-15-2004, 11:07 AM #3Bob MartinGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
>> Someone posted a few days ago that some distributors have had hints from
>> Nokia that a true 6310 replacement is been worked on so CAR-91 will be
>>compatible, cant see it myself, was either in this group or the nokia
group
>
> I saw that post, but the advert Nokia have been running in the
> broadsheets on Thurs or Fri showing a photo of a 6310i and what they
> suggest would be a good replacement for it (not sure of the model, but
> it looks like a normal phone, but you can swing the keypad through 180
> degs to have a keyboard split by the screen) would tend to suggest
> that nokia have indeed buried the 6310i.
Didn't see the broadsheet adverts, but your description does rather sound
like a 6810, which Nokia are touting as the "Ideal Upgrade" for the 6310i
online(http://www.nokia.co.uk/nfb/n6810.html)
- 05-15-2004, 11:13 AM #4Bob MartinGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
>> The 6820 is available already, and is much the same as the 6810 with the
>> addition of a (useless toy) camera.
>>
>> I predict that the 6810 will never actually be produced, as the airtime
>> companies want to encourage camera phones so we'll all use (and pay for)
>>MMS. (just a wild guess.)
>
> This would be extremely foolish of the networks. Many businesses ban
> camera phones.
Exactly my reason for wanting the 6810 ... it seems that the number of
client sites etc. I visit with a "no camera phones" policy or similar is
ever increasing, but the manufacturers and networks persist in chasing the
Consumer market with the addition of useless toys, despite the *much* higher
ARPU from Business Users.
To quote Dilbert - "Marketing Department - 2 drinks minimum" .... nothing
there about numeracy ;-(
Bob
- 05-16-2004, 04:42 AM #5Guest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sat, 15 May 2004 18:13:55 +0100, "Bob Martin"
<[email protected]> wrote:
>>> The 6820 is available already, and is much the same as the 6810 with the
>>> addition of a (useless toy) camera.
>>>
>>> I predict that the 6810 will never actually be produced, as the airtime
>>> companies want to encourage camera phones so we'll all use (and pay for)
>>>MMS. (just a wild guess.)
>>
>> This would be extremely foolish of the networks. Many businesses ban
>> camera phones.
>
>Exactly my reason for wanting the 6810 ... it seems that the number of
>client sites etc. I visit with a "no camera phones" policy or similar is
>ever increasing, but the manufacturers and networks persist in chasing the
>Consumer market with the addition of useless toys, despite the *much* higher
>ARPU from Business Users.
>
>To quote Dilbert - "Marketing Department - 2 drinks minimum" .... nothing
>there about numeracy ;-(
>
>
>Bob
>
Got the 6820 myself which is more compact than the 6810 - it has a
camera but you don't have to use it!
Alan
Take DogForAWalk before replying by e-mail
- 05-16-2004, 04:53 AM #6Michael McConnellGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 10:42:47 GMT, [email protected]
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sat, 15 May 2004 18:13:55 +0100, "Bob Martin"
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> This would be extremely foolish of the networks. Many businesses ban
>>> camera phones.
>>
>>Exactly my reason for wanting the 6810 ... it seems that the number of
>>client sites etc. I visit with a "no camera phones" policy or similar is
>>ever increasing, but the manufacturers and networks persist in chasing the
>>Consumer market with the addition of useless toys, despite the *much* higher
>>ARPU from Business Users.
>>
>>To quote Dilbert - "Marketing Department - 2 drinks minimum" .... nothing
>>there about numeracy ;-(
>>
>Got the 6820 myself which is more compact than the 6810 - it has a
>camera but you don't have to use it!
The fact it /has/ a camera is enough for many businesses to ban them from
their premises.
--
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell
Eridani MailStripper -- www.eridani.co.uk/MailStripper -- Uncovers Everything!
/* Halley */ <--- Halley's Comment
- 05-16-2004, 07:07 AM #7Stuart FriedmanGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
I agree. They should offer many of these models camera free even as an
option which we have to pay more for.
Stu
"Michael McConnell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 10:42:47 GMT, [email protected]
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >On Sat, 15 May 2004 18:13:55 +0100, "Bob Martin"
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>> This would be extremely foolish of the networks. Many businesses ban
> >>> camera phones.
> >>
> >>Exactly my reason for wanting the 6810 ... it seems that the number of
> >>client sites etc. I visit with a "no camera phones" policy or similar is
> >>ever increasing, but the manufacturers and networks persist in chasing
the
> >>Consumer market with the addition of useless toys, despite the *much*
higher
> >>ARPU from Business Users.
> >>
> >>To quote Dilbert - "Marketing Department - 2 drinks minimum" ....
nothing
> >>there about numeracy ;-(
> >>
> >Got the 6820 myself which is more compact than the 6810 - it has a
> >camera but you don't have to use it!
>
> The fact it /has/ a camera is enough for many businesses to ban them from
> their premises.
>
> --
> -- Michael "Soruk" McConnell
> Eridani MailStripper -- www.eridani.co.uk/MailStripper -- Uncovers
Everything!
> /* Halley */ <--- Halley's Comment
- 05-16-2004, 12:45 PM #8ChogaireGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
"Bob Martin" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >> The 6820 is available already, and is much the same as the 6810 with
the
> >> addition of a (useless toy) camera.
> >>
> >> I predict that the 6810 will never actually be produced, as the airtime
> >> companies want to encourage camera phones so we'll all use (and pay
for)
> >>MMS. (just a wild guess.)
> >
> > This would be extremely foolish of the networks. Many businesses ban
> > camera phones.
>
> Exactly my reason for wanting the 6810 ... it seems that the number of
> client sites etc. I visit with a "no camera phones" policy or similar is
> ever increasing, but the manufacturers and networks persist in chasing the
> Consumer market with the addition of useless toys, despite the *much*
higher
> ARPU from Business Users.
Well I for one am glad of my camera in my phone. I don't own nor want a
stand-alone digital camera, I have a perfectly good 'old skool' camera. The
one on my phone though is ever so useful, I use it to take pictures of goods
I sell on eBay for example, which are quickly uploaded to my PC. If I see
something while out shopping that I wonder if my girlfriend would like, I
quickly snap it and send it her, a "yes, buy it!" or "I'm not wearing that!"
reply is back to me in no time. I'm amazed at how many times it has come in
handy for me. Toy? Pah! Essential piece of equipment, for me that is, from
now on.
I'm afraid that these 'toys' are here to stay, what with video calls putting
the foot firmly in the door. It's the future now :-) we will be all
communicating like on sci-fi films, perfect video calling....3G is just the
tip of the iceberg.
From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
Regards.
- 05-16-2004, 01:09 PM #9SorukGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:45:04 +0100, Chogaire <spam@my*****up.co.uk> wrote:
>
>From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
>from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
>I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
>with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
Any business that is a contractor to the government, for starters. And,
don't even THINK about taking one anywhere near a MoD establishment.
--
-- Michael "Soruk" McConnell
Eridani MailStripper -- www.eridani.co.uk/MailStripper -- Uncovers Everything!
/* Halley */ <--- Halley's Comment
- 05-16-2004, 01:16 PM #10michael turnerGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:09:26 +0000, Soruk wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:45:04 +0100, Chogaire <spam@my*****up.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
>>from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
>>I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
>>with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
>
> Any business that is a contractor to the government, for starters. And,
> don't even THINK about taking one anywhere near a MoD establishment.
Yup I will concur with that, and it's exactly the same with GCHQ in
Cheltenham.
http://www.gchq.gov.uk/
--
Michael Turner
Email (ROT13)
[email protected]
- 05-16-2004, 01:19 PM #11michael turnerGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:45:04 +0100, Chogaire wrote:
> From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
> from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
> I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
> with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
A lot of public swimming-baths, health-clubs and gyms are now banning
camera-phones for obvious reasons.
--
Michael Turner
Email (ROT13)
[email protected]
- 05-16-2004, 01:23 PM #12michael turnerGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 20:19:46 +0100, michael turner wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:45:04 +0100, Chogaire wrote:
>
>> From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
>> from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
>> I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
>> with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
>
> A lot of public swimming-baths, health-clubs and gyms are now banning
> camera-phones for obvious reasons.
Oh yeh...
Add primary-schools to that list as well.
--
Michael Turner
Email (ROT13)
[email protected]
- 05-16-2004, 01:30 PM #13Guest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 20:19:46 +0100, michael turner
<[email protected]> wrote:
>On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:45:04 +0100, Chogaire wrote:
>
>> From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
>> from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
>> I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
>> with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
>
>A lot of public swimming-baths, health-clubs and gyms are now banning
>camera-phones for obvious reasons.
What obvious reasons? Mindless paranoia?
- 05-16-2004, 01:34 PM #14michael turnerGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 20:30:05 +0100, lysander wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 20:19:46 +0100, michael turner
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:45:04 +0100, Chogaire wrote:
>>
>>> From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
>>> from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
>>> I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
>>> with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
>>
>>A lot of public swimming-baths, health-clubs and gyms are now banning
>>camera-phones for obvious reasons.
>
>
> What obvious reasons? Mindless paranoia?
The 'obvious reason' I had in mind was, paedophiles trying to photograph
children in the changing-rooms.
--
Michael Turner
Email (ROT13)
[email protected]
- 05-16-2004, 01:37 PM #15michael turnerGuest
Re: Nokia 6310i Replacement
On Sun, 16 May 2004 20:30:05 +0100, lysander wrote:
> On Sun, 16 May 2004 20:19:46 +0100, michael turner
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 16 May 2004 19:45:04 +0100, Chogaire wrote:
>>
>>> From curiosity, what businesses are banning camera phones, and banning who
>>> from using them? The employees? People who come onto their 'patch'? And why?
>>> I don't understand. (well if it's people visiting then I suppose it's to do
>>> with industrial espionage or some such? Bloody drama queens!!!)
>>
>>A lot of public swimming-baths, health-clubs and gyms are now banning
>>camera-phones for obvious reasons.
>
>
> What obvious reasons? Mindless paranoia?
From Australia:
http://www.theage.com.au/articles/20...220630598.html
--
Michael Turner
Email (ROT13)
[email protected]
Phones Discussed Above
More Nokia 6310I topics | Nokia Forum | Reviews |
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.nokia
- alt.cellular.ericsson
¿Quién edita la foto?
in Chit Chat