Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 27 of 27
  1. #16
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    In article <PpXic.9278$eZ5.8[email protected]>,
    Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Most whistleblowers do what they do for the greater good; their aim is
    > to help people. Who do you help?


    I have had MANY thank yous for the posts and FAQs I leave here. More
    thank yous than childish insults actually.



    See More: Sprint apologists




  2. #17
    Chris Russell
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    Post the URL's of your many thank yous.

    Chris

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Most whistleblowers do what they do for the greater good; their aim is
    > > to help people. Who do you help?

    >
    > I have had MANY thank yous for the posts and FAQs I leave here. More
    > thank yous than childish insults actually.






  3. #18
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Apologists


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Most whistleblowers do what they do for the greater good; their aim is
    > > to help people. Who do you help?

    >
    > I have had MANY thank yous for the posts and FAQs I leave here. More
    > thank yous than childish insults actually.


    That's a laugh ... Have you only learned to count with less than 3 fingers?

    Bob





  4. #19
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Apologists


    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    >
    > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Most whistleblowers do what they do for the greater good; their aim is
    > > > to help people. Who do you help?

    > >
    > > I have had MANY thank yous for the posts and FAQs I leave here. More
    > > thank yous than childish insults actually.

    >
    > That's a laugh ... Have you only learned to count with less than 3

    fingers?
    >


    THat's the problem, Bob- he CAN'T count with more than 3 fingers.





  5. #20
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Robert M. <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > Seeing folks with defective A500 and 8500's being given the run around.
    >
    > Watch an apologist who owns an A500 pretend it has no issues, when
    > Google finds many posts of his about those very issues.


    Since you refer to me as an apologist, I may as well respond. I had an
    A500 up until last week (I still have it, but it is not activated). The
    phone was GREAT. I had a few minor issues with software, but WD29 fixed
    that. Also, the way it roamed to analog carriers over digital carriers
    bugged me, but it turned out that was PRL related and NOT the phone.
    So, all in all, I find the phone flawless with the latest software and
    will recommend it to anybody.

    > Having *2 CSRs hang up on me after 6 minutes.


    I would hang up on you too ... if you are anything like you are here.


    - --

    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

    iD8DBQFAjGZ51p0e3NXsrtERAtjVAJ4tgau9JLd2yE4qTkLTnDNqrBsi/wCgqNzI
    gj+t4gWBzBrjeN7PFIESEw4=
    =EkPQ
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  6. #21
    Lawrence Glasser
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    "Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
    >
    > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    > Hash: SHA1
    >
    > Robert M. <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > Seeing folks with defective A500 and 8500's being given the run around.
    > >
    > > Watch an apologist who owns an A500 pretend it has no issues, when
    > > Google finds many posts of his about those very issues.

    >
    > Since you refer to me as an apologist, I may as well respond. I had an
    > A500 up until last week (I still have it, but it is not activated). The
    > phone was GREAT. I had a few minor issues with software, but WD29 fixed
    > that. Also, the way it roamed to analog carriers over digital carriers
    > bugged me, but it turned out that was PRL related and NOT the phone.
    > So, all in all, I find the phone flawless with the latest software and
    > will recommend it to anybody.
    >
    > > Having *2 CSRs hang up on me after 6 minutes.

    >
    > I would hang up on you too ... if you are anything like you are here.


    Actually, I'm pretty sure that *I'm* the apologist he was referring to.

    Either way, good phone... And good company! <g>

    Larry



  7. #22
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    [email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
    <<I have had MANY thank yous for the posts and FAQs I leave here. More
    thank yous than childish insults actually. >>

    Don't count the ones from your other IDs though, and that number will
    dwindle rather quickly.

    Man, posting lies on the Lord's day. Phillipe will not be getting into
    heaven that way.




  8. #23
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Lawrence Glasser <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Actually, I'm pretty sure that *I'm* the apologist he was referring to.
    >
    > Either way, good phone... And good company! <g>


    I'm not denying you currently like the A500.

    I am saying that for you to post that you are unaware of ISSUEs with the
    phone is a total lie, as you posted replies to posts on those issues.



  9. #24
    Chris Russell
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    You are the one bragging about your many thank yous, I'm not going to bother
    w/Google to look up your BS. Find a program for that Mac that will allow
    you to do the simple things we can do in Outlook Express (like post a URL of
    any length-yours just have the first line hyperlinked and the rest turns
    into regular type).

    Chris

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Post the URL's of your many thank yous.

    >
    > My Newsreader doesn't allow a posting of that length.
    >
    > Try using Google, they show up.
    >
    > >
    > > Chris
    > >
    > > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]
    > > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Most whistleblowers do what they do for the greater good; their aim

    is
    > > > > to help people. Who do you help?
    > > >
    > > > I have had MANY thank yous for the posts and FAQs I leave here. More
    > > > thank yous than childish insults actually.






  10. #25
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > You are the one bragging about your many thank yous, I'm not going to bother
    > w/Google to look up your BS.


    Fine, but I did and found you like to call people you disagree with
    "moron".



  11. #26
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    Since Robert M./Phillipe/Cell Merger is a self-proclaimed whistleblower,
    and wants to expose all of Sprint's "secrets"... why don't we try and
    expose some of his secrets? After all, if he feels like he has a right
    to know everything about Sprint PCS and all of their "secrets", why
    shouldn't we know all about him and his little "secrets"?
    1. What's with all the name/email/user id changes? He claims its not to
    get around people's killfiles... but rather it's "because he can".
    Shhhh! It must be a SECRET.
    2. His claims about his kids' SAT scores. "They" got a 1536 (or
    something like that). Did all of his kids get the exact same SAT score?
    Are they really that smart, just like him?? Shhh! It must be a SECRET.
    3. He claims he was never an AT&T wireless customer, but yet they were
    billing him. So much so that he had to get into "talks" with their
    "lawyers" and refuses to answer any direct questions about it because of
    a "non-disclosure agreement". Shhh! It must be a SECRET.
    4. Why does he post like he knows it all over in the Cingular and AT&T
    groups? He has never been a customer of theirs, but yet he's over there
    posting like he's an expert... trashing them as much as he can. Why?
    Shhh! It must be a SECRET.
    5. What's with his misquoting of people? Why does he only pick out a
    small phrase or comment out of a long detailed post, and then either
    misquote it or twist it around and make it mean something entirely
    different? Shhhh! Must be a SECRET.
    6. Why is he so anxious to be holier-than-thou, quickly dismissing
    anyone who uses bad language or insults? But yet when his good buddy
    Justin did it (multiple, multiple times) last summer -- swearing up a
    storm in many of his posts -- Phillipe *never* said anything negative
    about him. Why? Shhh!!! It must be a SECRET.
    7. What is his reasoning to expose the real email address in certain
    peoples' posting ids here (i.e. like what he does to Bob Smith)? And
    when confronted about it, he says nothing, knowing full well it is a
    horrible thing to do. Why? Shhhhh! It must be a SECRET.




  12. #27
    Eric
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    [email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
    <<Fine, but I did and found you like to call people you disagree with
    "moron". >>

    PERSON... not people. The second quoted post was one directed at you
    (an alternate id of yours), so that obviously doesn't count.
    Phillipe2004=3DRobert M.=3DCell Merger=3DSprint Secrets=3DSunday Auto=3DPh=
    il_Real




  • Similar Threads

    1. Sprint PCS
    2. Sprint PCS
    3. alt.cellular.sprintpcs
    4. alt.cellular.sprintpcs
    5. alt.cellular.sprintpcs



  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12