Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 27
  1. #1
    DSL GURU
    Guest
    To keep an anal-retentive Sprint apologist happy, I have a further iteration of
    the FAQs. Scott has pointed out zero errors in them, so I assume he just
    doesn't want SprintPCS customers to be knowledgeable.



    See More: Sprint apologists




  2. #2
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Sprint apologists

    DSL GURU wrote:

    > To keep an anal-retentive Sprint apologist happy, I have a further
    > iteration of the FAQs. Scott has pointed out zero errors in them, so I
    > assume he just doesn't want SprintPCS customers to be knowledgeable.


    Assume all you want- once again, you prove your ignorance of the facts.



  3. #3
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > ..

    >
    > Disappointing, incendiary, useless.
    > -mike


    Its the way the blind sprintpcs apologists here operate.

    if they disagree with you or you dare post something that might hint
    SprintPCS is less than perfect, you're either

    a Liar

    or a Moron.


    When they're proven wrong, the next thing they do is start with the
    childish insults. They especially dislike it when you post one of their
    older posts that disproves what they're now saying.



  4. #4
    Mike
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    Robert M. wrote:

    > Its the way the blind sprintpcs apologists here operate.
    >
    > if they disagree with you or you dare post something that might hint
    > SprintPCS is less than perfect, you're either
    >
    > a Liar
    >
    > or a Moron.
    >
    >
    > When they're proven wrong, the next thing they do is start with the
    > childish insults. They especially dislike it when you post one of their
    > older posts that disproves what they're now saying.


    So, what do you represent yourself as?
    -mike




  5. #5
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > Its the way the blind sprintpcs apologists here operate.
    > >
    > > if they disagree with you or you dare post something that might hint
    > > SprintPCS is less than perfect, you're either
    > >
    > > a Liar
    > >
    > > or a Moron.
    > >
    > >
    > > When they're proven wrong, the next thing they do is start with the
    > > childish insults. They especially dislike it when you post one of their
    > > older posts that disproves what they're now saying.

    >
    > So, what do you represent yourself as?


    A whistleblower.



  6. #6
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Apologists


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Robert M. wrote:
    > >
    > > > ..

    > >
    > > Disappointing, incendiary, useless.
    > > -mike

    >
    > Its the way the blind sprintpcs apologists here operate.


    The only blind one is the one who never admits his mistakes and lies;

    Your lies:
    Sprint offers the fewest phones of the top ten providers
    AT&T was not capable of offering 7pm nights
    AT&T would not match web prices at retail stores
    Cingular paid over $50B for AT&TW
    Sprint PCS would be out of business by the end of the year
    Sprint has no team handling Retention
    Cingular was liable for the break-in at a third party authorized dealer

    >
    > if they disagree with you or you dare post something that might hint
    > SprintPCS is less than perfect, you're either
    >
    > a Liar


    which you are

    >
    > or a Moron.


    Two for two.

    >
    >
    > When they're proven wrong, the next thing they do is start with the
    > childish insults. They especially dislike it when you post one of their
    > older posts that disproves what they're now saying.


    No- they dislike the fact that you have been proven wrong time after time,
    and can not admit your mistakes.





  7. #7
    Mike
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    Robert M. wrote:

    > A whistleblower.


    Many people do what they do for a reason. What made you decide to become
    a Sprint PCS whistleblower?
    -mike




  8. #8
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Apologists


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Robert M. wrote:
    > >
    > > > Its the way the blind sprintpcs apologists here operate.
    > > >
    > > > if they disagree with you or you dare post something that might hint
    > > > SprintPCS is less than perfect, you're either
    > > >
    > > > a Liar
    > > >
    > > > or a Moron.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > When they're proven wrong, the next thing they do is start with the
    > > > childish insults. They especially dislike it when you post one of

    their
    > > > older posts that disproves what they're now saying.

    > >
    > > So, what do you represent yourself as?

    >
    > A whistleblower.


    Well, at least you got the blowing part right.





  9. #9
    Chris Russell
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    We know you're blowing something Philly and it ain't no whistle!

    Chris

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Robert M. wrote:
    > >
    > > > Its the way the blind sprintpcs apologists here operate.
    > > >
    > > > if they disagree with you or you dare post something that might hint
    > > > SprintPCS is less than perfect, you're either
    > > >
    > > > a Liar
    > > >
    > > > or a Moron.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > When they're proven wrong, the next thing they do is start with the
    > > > childish insults. They especially dislike it when you post one of

    their
    > > > older posts that disproves what they're now saying.

    > >
    > > So, what do you represent yourself as?

    >
    > A whistleblower.






  10. #10
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > We know you're blowing something Philly and it ain't no whistle!
    >
    > Chris


    Does your mommy know you're using her computer little boy?



  11. #11
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > A whistleblower.

    >
    > Many people do what they do for a reason. What made you decide to become
    > a Sprint PCS whistleblower?


    Seeing O/Siris call Jason a liar last August.

    Seeing folks with defective A500 and 8500's being given the run around.

    Watch an apologist who owns an A500 pretend it has no issues, when
    Google finds many posts of his about those very issues.

    See folks improperly charged ETF.

    Seeing folks told they were stuck in their contract when Sprint stopped
    providing coverage where they lived.

    Seeing folks getting the run-around trying to get their rebates.

    Seeing stores lie to customers about the "Free" 14 day trial.

    Seeing employees lie to customers that they just needed a newer phone to
    get better coverage.

    Watch SprintPCS try to charge for *2 calls. (At least they backed off
    that).

    Watching blind apologists feebly try to discredit the JD Power reports
    about SprintPCS, and then watch The yankee group and Consumer Reports
    also repeatedly rate SprintPCS Customer Service worst.

    Having *2 CSRs hang up on me after 6 minutes.

    Being told by Executive Services that "Yes there is a tracked handle ime
    for CSRs" and then watch employees post here and lie about that.

    Watching a couple of apologists try to keep customers from going to
    Executive Services .

    Watching Lauer get outrageous bonus for making SprintPCS stock disappear
    so Sprint could coverup how bad the its wireless division is doing.
    (Churn up, WLNP loser, cost of new customer acquisition up).

    Being insulted by SprintPCS employees for pointing out some of the
    the above issues. That is **ALWAYS** counterproductive.

    amongst others.



  12. #12
    Lawrence Glasser
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    "Robert M." wrote:
    >
    > <snip>
    >
    > Watch an apologist who owns an A500 pretend it has no issues, when
    > Google finds many posts of his about those very issues.
    >
    > <snip>


    OK, Robert.

    Show me, EXACTLY, where the "many posts" are about those "issues."

    I posted ONE negative thing about my A500, and that was in reference
    to a very minor problem.

    Just because you read a post, about a problem, multiple times, that
    doesn't mean that I experienced multiple problems.

    Are you an asshole everywhere else, or just on Usenet?

    Larry



  13. #13
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Apologists


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Robert M. wrote:
    > >
    > > > A whistleblower.

    > >
    > > Many people do what they do for a reason. What made you decide to become
    > > a Sprint PCS whistleblower?

    >
    > Seeing O/Siris call Jason a liar last August.


    I find it interesting that you come to the defense of Justin. He was prone
    to insulting and profanity at a level not seen in this group since he left.
    It would appear you have a double standard going here, and you need to
    examine your priciples- you can't criticize people for something you condone
    from others.

    >
    > Seeing folks with defective A500 and 8500's being given the run around.


    Hmmmm- haven't seen that. Try living in the real world.

    >
    > Watch an apologist who owns an A500 pretend it has no issues, when
    > Google finds many posts of his about those very issues.


    URL's please.

    >
    > See folks improperly charged ETF.


    You definitions leave a lot to be desired.

    >
    > Seeing folks told they were stuck in their contract when Sprint stopped
    > providing coverage where they lived.


    Stopped providing coverage? URL's, please.

    >
    > Seeing folks getting the run-around trying to get their rebates.


    How is Sprint responsible for the actions of a third party vendor?

    >
    > Seeing stores lie to customers about the "Free" 14 day trial.


    It is clearly *****ed out both in the Service Agreement and on the website.

    >
    > Seeing employees lie to customers that they just needed a newer phone to
    > get better coverage.
    >
    > Watch SprintPCS try to charge for *2 calls. (At least they backed off
    > that).
    >
    > Watching blind apologists feebly try to discredit the JD Power reports
    > about SprintPCS, and then watch The yankee group and Consumer Reports
    > also repeatedly rate SprintPCS Customer Service worst.


    Not for long, dear troll.

    >
    > Having *2 CSRs hang up on me after 6 minutes.


    You're lucky- I'd hang up on you after the first 30 seconds, if you whine
    and pout like you do here.

    >
    > Being told by Executive Services that "Yes there is a tracked handle ime
    > for CSRs" and then watch employees post here and lie about that.


    What they are talking about andwhat you are talking about are two different
    things. The key word used by ES is AVERAGE.

    >
    > Watching a couple of apologists try to keep customers from going to
    > Executive Services .


    Never seen that. I've only seen people explain that it is not intended as
    the first means of contact.

    >
    > Watching Lauer get outrageous bonus for making SprintPCS stock disappear
    > so Sprint could coverup how bad the its wireless division is doing.
    > (Churn up, WLNP loser, cost of new customer acquisition up).


    No cover up- all of the numbers are in the SEC filings. They may not be
    broken out as you wish, but they don't tailor the report to the whims of a
    fool.

    >
    > Being insulted by SprintPCS employees for pointing out some of the
    > the above issues. That is **ALWAYS** counterproductive.


    Counterproductive is posting unsubstantiated opinions and guesses as fact.
    Counterproductive is using multiple ID's to falsely bolster your argument.
    Counterproductive is never admitting your mistakes. THese are your traits,
    and your's alone. Live with it.

    >
    > amongst others.






  14. #14
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Apologists


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > We know you're blowing something Philly and it ain't no whistle!
    > >
    > > Chris

    >
    > Does your mommy know you're using her computer little boy?


    Insults, Phil? I thought you were above that. Guess not- either practice
    what you preach, or don't preach.





  15. #15
    Mike
    Guest

    Re: Apologists

    Robert M. wrote:

    > Seeing O/Siris call Jason a liar last August.
    >
    > Seeing folks with defective A500 and 8500's being given the run around.
    >
    > Watch an apologist who owns an A500 pretend it has no issues, when
    > Google finds many posts of his about those very issues.
    >
    > See folks improperly charged ETF.
    >
    > Seeing folks told they were stuck in their contract when Sprint stopped
    > providing coverage where they lived.
    >
    > Seeing folks getting the run-around trying to get their rebates.
    >
    > Seeing stores lie to customers about the "Free" 14 day trial.
    >
    > Seeing employees lie to customers that they just needed a newer phone to
    > get better coverage.
    >
    > Watch SprintPCS try to charge for *2 calls. (At least they backed off
    > that).
    >
    > Watching blind apologists feebly try to discredit the JD Power reports
    > about SprintPCS, and then watch The yankee group and Consumer Reports
    > also repeatedly rate SprintPCS Customer Service worst.
    >
    > Having *2 CSRs hang up on me after 6 minutes.
    >
    > Being told by Executive Services that "Yes there is a tracked handle ime
    > for CSRs" and then watch employees post here and lie about that.
    >
    > Watching a couple of apologists try to keep customers from going to
    > Executive Services .
    >
    > Watching Lauer get outrageous bonus for making SprintPCS stock disappear
    > so Sprint could coverup how bad the its wireless division is doing.
    > (Churn up, WLNP loser, cost of new customer acquisition up).
    >
    > Being insulted by SprintPCS employees for pointing out some of the
    > the above issues. That is **ALWAYS** counterproductive.
    >
    > amongst others.


    Most whistleblowers do what they do for the greater good; their aim is
    to help people. Who do you help?
    -mike




  • Similar Threads

    1. Sprint PCS
    2. Sprint PCS
    3. alt.cellular.sprintpcs
    4. alt.cellular.sprintpcs
    5. alt.cellular.sprintpcs



  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast