Results 31 to 45 of 71
- 11-30-2003, 06:53 PM #31Harry KrauseGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Donkey Agony wrote:
> Harry Krause wrote:
>
>>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
>>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
>>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
>>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
>>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
>
>> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
>> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
>> they are supposed to think.
>
> Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
> stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
>
> So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
> which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
>
Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered up.
--
Email sent to [email protected] is never read.
› See More: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
- 11-30-2003, 07:03 PM #32Al KleinGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:35:52 GMT, "Karen" <[email protected]> posted
in alt.cellular.verizon:
>They said that Nextel was making money and although
>Verizon had $30 billion in debt
That number is meaningless without knowing how much cash and income
they have to cover it. If they have $40 billion available they're a
good investment. If, like Sprint, they have almost nothing to cover
their debt, they're in trouble.
- 11-30-2003, 07:57 PM #33GiambiGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
"Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Donkey Agony wrote:
>
> > Harry Krause wrote:
> >
> >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
> >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
> >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
> >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
> >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
> >
> >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
> >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
> >> they are supposed to think.
> >
> > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
> > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
> >
> > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
> > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
> >
> Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
> approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
> presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
> rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
> love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered
up.
> --
> Email sent to [email protected] is never read.
You didn't answer the question.
--
Jason G
Marlins Win. The Gods of Baseball Smite Me Again.
Remove 'WINNER' to reply.
- 11-30-2003, 08:27 PM #34Harry KrauseGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Giambi wrote:
> "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> Donkey Agony wrote:
>>
>> > Harry Krause wrote:
>> >
>> >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
>> >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
>> >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
>> >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
>> >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
>> >
>> >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
>> >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
>> >> they are supposed to think.
>> >
>> > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
>> > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
>> >
>> > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
>> > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
>> >
>> Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
>> approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
>> presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
>> rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
>> love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered
> up.
>> --
>> Email sent to [email protected] is never read.
>
> You didn't answer the question.
Oh, I have lots of news sources. I read the paper editions of the WSJ,
NYTIMES, WASH POST every weekeday, plus a number of vertical news pubs,
and I get the post and the times on the weekends, along with a plethora
of news magazines. I watch some TV news programs.
--
Email sent to [email protected] is never read.
- 12-01-2003, 02:36 AM #35Tony ClarkGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Wasn't the reported that admitted to making up news stories from the NY
Times?
TC
"Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Giambi wrote:
>
> > "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >> Donkey Agony wrote:
> >>
> >> > Harry Krause wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
> >> >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
> >> >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
> >> >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other
links
> >> >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
> >> >
> >> >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
> >> >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
> >> >> they are supposed to think.
> >> >
> >> > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with
CNN's
> >> > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that
regard.)
> >> >
> >> > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
> >> > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
> >> >
> >> Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
> >> approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
> >> presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to
news:
> >> rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch
it
> >> love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered
> > up.
> >> --
> >> Email sent to [email protected] is never read.
> >
> > You didn't answer the question.
>
>
> Oh, I have lots of news sources. I read the paper editions of the WSJ,
> NYTIMES, WASH POST every weekeday, plus a number of vertical news pubs,
> and I get the post and the times on the weekends, along with a plethora
> of news magazines. I watch some TV news programs.
>
> --
> Email sent to [email protected] is never read.
- 12-02-2003, 05:19 PM #36TronGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
"Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Donkey Agony wrote:
>
> > Harry Krause wrote:
> >
> >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
> >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
> >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
> >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
> >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
> >
> >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
> >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
> >> they are supposed to think.
> >
> > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
> > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
> >
> > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
> > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
> >
> Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
> approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
> presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
> rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
> love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered
up.
>
Oh no, is wittle baby lefty a wittle cranky because he knows there will be
another 4 years of the current administration? Boo hoo. Now go back to
your Doonsberry.
I love it... Fox is unbalanced right wing bla bla... But CNN is totally
unbalanced and fair--Right, it didn't get the term Clinton News Network for
nothing! (As well as PMSNBC)
- 12-03-2003, 07:37 AM #37Been ThereGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
> Fox News is consistent in it's complete and utter right wing bias,
So what! After years of constant leftist propaganda from the other boys,
the majority now has a source for news. You may see it as "right wing
bias", I see it as RIGHT!
> whereas CNN moves where the wind blows. To get somewhat unbiased news
Thought I would never see anyone admit this! I guess the wind blows because
CNN sucks!
- 12-03-2003, 08:40 AM #38JustinGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Been There wrote on [Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:37:11 GMT]:
>> Fox News is consistent in it's complete and utter right wing bias,
> So what! After years of constant leftist propaganda from the other boys,
> the majority now has a source for news. You may see it as "right wing
> bias", I see it as RIGHT!
Well then, you'd be wrong.
>> whereas CNN moves where the wind blows. To get somewhat unbiased news
> Thought I would never see anyone admit this! I guess the wind blows because
> CNN sucks!
Yes, CNN does suck. US news media isn't about NEWS, it's about SELLING
ADS. So, Fox panders to the right wing fascists, and CNN panders to
whoever will watch them.
- 12-03-2003, 08:50 AM #39Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Jeremy wrote:
> And that Sprint makes it so difficult to actually speak to a human being.
Uhm ... *2 and say "representative". Tough one to figure out though.
Tom Veldhouse
- 12-03-2003, 08:52 AM #40Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Aboutdakota wrote:
>
> If you live in the MSP area, Cingular Nation is great. With a T62u,
> you can roam on T-Mobile (GSM), AT&T (¿GSM and TDMA? and AMPS), and
> Verizon Wireless (AMPS). Coverage cannot be beat with that phone.
>
> AD
If you live in Minneapolis, you can not buy service from Cingular. Cingular
roams primarily onto AT&T in the Twin Cities with T-Mobile probably as the
preferred GSM partner.
Tom Veldhouse
- 12-03-2003, 08:57 AM #41Thomas T. VeldhouseGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
"Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what they
> are supposed to think.
>
Most media in the US is decidedly NOT right wing.
Tom Veldhouse
- 12-03-2003, 10:10 AM #42Steven M. ScharfGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
"Karen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> They said that Nextel was making money and although
> Verizon had $30 billion in debt, they had the best service and would gain
> from number portability. Didn't even mention Stinkular or T-imobile.
Which is what the analysts have been saying all along. AT&T has the most to
lose from number portability because they have the highest percentage of
corporate customers that don't want to change phone numbers, and that are
upset with the declining quality of service.
- 12-03-2003, 10:14 AM #43Steven M. ScharfGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
"Good Riddance AT&T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Why would it matter where he's located?
> No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.
> Even a poll made by AT&T said their CS sucks donkey's ass.
>
> I ported my service to a different provider and while the number was
ported
> not AT&T still says that I still have service with them with the same
number
> and that they're going to send me the bill for usage up to Friday plus
> cancellation fee because I was still under contract. I know my contract
> ended Nov. 15th and the phone number ported completely on Tuesday, and
they
> don't even see that in their system. What gives? What a bunch of
> nincompoop!!!
Does the carrier have to let your number go even if they claim that you are
under contract and owe them a cancellation fee? I'm trying to convince my
sister-in-law to just leave AT&T and let them try to get the cancellation
fee. She's had them for five years, never got a new phone or renewed her
contract (and turned down offers of new phones because she didn't want to
extend her contract), but they claim she is under contract. When she turned
down a new phone the last time, the rep told her he was giving her free long
distance because she was such a good, long-time customer. She explicitly
asked if this would put her into a contract and he said no, but it did put
her under contract.
- 12-03-2003, 02:16 PM #44idamaybrownGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Harry Krause <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> Donkey Agony wrote:
>
> > Harry Krause wrote:
> >
> >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
> >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
> >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
> >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
> >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
>
> >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
> >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
> >> they are supposed to think.
> >
> > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
> > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
> >
> > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
> > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
> >
> Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
> approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
> presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
> rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
> love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered up.
As opposed to Far Left-Wing NPR, PBS, NY Times, LA Times , etc....
- 12-03-2003, 02:20 PM #45AboutdakotaGuest
Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless
Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Aboutdakota wrote:
>
>>If you live in the MSP area, Cingular Nation is great. With a T62u,
>>you can roam on T-Mobile (GSM), AT&T (¿GSM and TDMA? and AMPS), and
>>Verizon Wireless (AMPS). Coverage cannot be beat with that phone.
>>
>>AD
>
>
> If you live in Minneapolis, you can not buy service from Cingular. Cingular
> roams primarily onto AT&T in the Twin Cities with T-Mobile probably as the
> preferred GSM partner.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
Yes, however, if you have Cingular from another market, you can ROAM in
MSP. If you are on the Cingular Nation plan, you are required to have a
GAIT phone (GSM/TDMA/AMPS 850/1900).
==AD
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.nextel
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.cingular
Real estate investment in the UAE
in Chit Chat