Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 71
  1. #31
    Harry Krause
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    Donkey Agony wrote:

    > Harry Krause wrote:
    >
    >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
    >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
    >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
    >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
    >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.

    >
    >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
    >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
    >> they are supposed to think.

    >
    > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
    > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
    >
    > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
    > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
    >

    Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
    approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
    presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
    rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
    love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered up.




    --
    Email sent to [email protected] is never read.



    See More: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless




  2. #32
    Al Klein
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 20:35:52 GMT, "Karen" <[email protected]> posted
    in alt.cellular.verizon:

    >They said that Nextel was making money and although
    >Verizon had $30 billion in debt


    That number is meaningless without knowing how much cash and income
    they have to cover it. If they have $40 billion available they're a
    good investment. If, like Sprint, they have almost nothing to cover
    their debt, they're in trouble.



  3. #33
    Giambi
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Donkey Agony wrote:
    >
    > > Harry Krause wrote:
    > >
    > >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
    > >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
    > >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
    > >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
    > >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.

    > >
    > >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
    > >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
    > >> they are supposed to think.

    > >
    > > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
    > > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
    > >
    > > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
    > > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
    > >

    > Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
    > approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
    > presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
    > rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
    > love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered

    up.
    > --
    > Email sent to [email protected] is never read.


    You didn't answer the question.
    --
    Jason G
    Marlins Win. The Gods of Baseball Smite Me Again.
    Remove 'WINNER' to reply.





  4. #34
    Harry Krause
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    Giambi wrote:

    > "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]...
    >> Donkey Agony wrote:
    >>
    >> > Harry Krause wrote:
    >> >
    >> >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
    >> >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
    >> >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
    >> >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
    >> >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
    >> >
    >> >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
    >> >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
    >> >> they are supposed to think.
    >> >
    >> > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
    >> > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
    >> >
    >> > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
    >> > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
    >> >

    >> Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
    >> approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
    >> presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
    >> rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
    >> love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered

    > up.
    >> --
    >> Email sent to [email protected] is never read.

    >
    > You didn't answer the question.



    Oh, I have lots of news sources. I read the paper editions of the WSJ,
    NYTIMES, WASH POST every weekeday, plus a number of vertical news pubs,
    and I get the post and the times on the weekends, along with a plethora
    of news magazines. I watch some TV news programs.

    --
    Email sent to [email protected] is never read.



  5. #35
    Tony Clark
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    Wasn't the reported that admitted to making up news stories from the NY
    Times?

    TC


    "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Giambi wrote:
    >
    > > "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]...
    > >> Donkey Agony wrote:
    > >>
    > >> > Harry Krause wrote:
    > >> >
    > >> >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
    > >> >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
    > >> >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
    > >> >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other

    links
    > >> >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.
    > >> >
    > >> >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
    > >> >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
    > >> >> they are supposed to think.
    > >> >
    > >> > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with

    CNN's
    > >> > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that

    regard.)
    > >> >
    > >> > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
    > >> > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
    > >> >
    > >> Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
    > >> approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
    > >> presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to

    news:
    > >> rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch

    it
    > >> love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered

    > > up.
    > >> --
    > >> Email sent to [email protected] is never read.

    > >
    > > You didn't answer the question.

    >
    >
    > Oh, I have lots of news sources. I read the paper editions of the WSJ,
    > NYTIMES, WASH POST every weekeday, plus a number of vertical news pubs,
    > and I get the post and the times on the weekends, along with a plethora
    > of news magazines. I watch some TV news programs.
    >
    > --
    > Email sent to [email protected] is never read.






  6. #36
    Tron
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless


    "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Donkey Agony wrote:
    >
    > > Harry Krause wrote:
    > >
    > >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
    > >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
    > >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
    > >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
    > >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.

    > >
    > >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
    > >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
    > >> they are supposed to think.

    > >
    > > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
    > > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
    > >
    > > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
    > > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
    > >

    > Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
    > approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
    > presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
    > rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
    > love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered

    up.
    >


    Oh no, is wittle baby lefty a wittle cranky because he knows there will be
    another 4 years of the current administration? Boo hoo. Now go back to
    your Doonsberry.

    I love it... Fox is unbalanced right wing bla bla... But CNN is totally
    unbalanced and fair--Right, it didn't get the term Clinton News Network for
    nothing! (As well as PMSNBC)





  7. #37
    Been There
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    > Fox News is consistent in it's complete and utter right wing bias,
    So what! After years of constant leftist propaganda from the other boys,
    the majority now has a source for news. You may see it as "right wing
    bias", I see it as RIGHT!

    > whereas CNN moves where the wind blows. To get somewhat unbiased news

    Thought I would never see anyone admit this! I guess the wind blows because
    CNN sucks!





  8. #38
    Justin
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    Been There wrote on [Wed, 03 Dec 2003 13:37:11 GMT]:
    >> Fox News is consistent in it's complete and utter right wing bias,

    > So what! After years of constant leftist propaganda from the other boys,
    > the majority now has a source for news. You may see it as "right wing
    > bias", I see it as RIGHT!


    Well then, you'd be wrong.


    >> whereas CNN moves where the wind blows. To get somewhat unbiased news

    > Thought I would never see anyone admit this! I guess the wind blows because
    > CNN sucks!


    Yes, CNN does suck. US news media isn't about NEWS, it's about SELLING
    ADS. So, Fox panders to the right wing fascists, and CNN panders to
    whoever will watch them.



  9. #39
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    Jeremy wrote:

    > And that Sprint makes it so difficult to actually speak to a human being.


    Uhm ... *2 and say "representative". Tough one to figure out though.

    Tom Veldhouse






  10. #40
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    Aboutdakota wrote:
    >
    > If you live in the MSP area, Cingular Nation is great. With a T62u,
    > you can roam on T-Mobile (GSM), AT&T (¿GSM and TDMA? and AMPS), and
    > Verizon Wireless (AMPS). Coverage cannot be beat with that phone.
    >
    > AD


    If you live in Minneapolis, you can not buy service from Cingular. Cingular
    roams primarily onto AT&T in the Twin Cities with T-Mobile probably as the
    preferred GSM partner.

    Tom Veldhouse





  11. #41
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless


    "Harry Krause" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    >
    > All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
    > United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what they
    > are supposed to think.
    >


    Most media in the US is decidedly NOT right wing.

    Tom Veldhouse





  12. #42
    Steven M. Scharf
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    "Karen" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...

    > They said that Nextel was making money and although
    > Verizon had $30 billion in debt, they had the best service and would gain
    > from number portability. Didn't even mention Stinkular or T-imobile.


    Which is what the analysts have been saying all along. AT&T has the most to
    lose from number portability because they have the highest percentage of
    corporate customers that don't want to change phone numbers, and that are
    upset with the declining quality of service.





  13. #43
    Steven M. Scharf
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless


    "Good Riddance AT&T" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > Why would it matter where he's located?
    > No one should ever be annoyed with a company's service.
    > Even a poll made by AT&T said their CS sucks donkey's ass.
    >
    > I ported my service to a different provider and while the number was

    ported
    > not AT&T still says that I still have service with them with the same

    number
    > and that they're going to send me the bill for usage up to Friday plus
    > cancellation fee because I was still under contract. I know my contract
    > ended Nov. 15th and the phone number ported completely on Tuesday, and

    they
    > don't even see that in their system. What gives? What a bunch of
    > nincompoop!!!


    Does the carrier have to let your number go even if they claim that you are
    under contract and owe them a cancellation fee? I'm trying to convince my
    sister-in-law to just leave AT&T and let them try to get the cancellation
    fee. She's had them for five years, never got a new phone or renewed her
    contract (and turned down offers of new phones because she didn't want to
    extend her contract), but they claim she is under contract. When she turned
    down a new phone the last time, the rep told her he was giving her free long
    distance because she was such a good, long-time customer. She explicitly
    asked if this would put her into a contract and he said no, but it did put
    her under contract.





  14. #44
    idamaybrown
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless

    Harry Krause <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    > Donkey Agony wrote:
    >
    > > Harry Krause wrote:
    > >
    > >>> was http://www.jsonline.com/enter/tvradio/apr03/133295.asp :
    > >>> The average audience for Fox News is 3.4 million households,
    > >>> CNN's is 2.7 million and MSNBC's is 1.3.
    > >>> There were many similar links. According to some of the other links
    > >>> returned, Fox overtook CNN in January 2002 c.e.

    >
    > >> All this proves is that there is an excess of right-wingers in the
    > >> United States who tune in Faux News for their daily feeding of what
    > >> they are supposed to think.

    > >
    > > Or maybe it's because Fox offered some excitement contrasted with CNN's
    > > stale fare. (Though CNN seems to have improved lately in that regard.)
    > >
    > > So what is *your* news source that gives you such smug enlightenment
    > > which distinguishes you from the unwashed masses?
    > >

    > Faux News is obviously right-wing in its slant and in its rah-rah
    > approach to the Bush Administration. It is the most irresponsible
    > presentation of news on cable. It is the Rush Limbaugh approach to news:
    > rabble-rousing, snide, and rarely factual. But the righties who watch it
    > love it; it's sort of like watching a football game while you're beered up.


    As opposed to Far Left-Wing NPR, PBS, NY Times, LA Times , etc....



  15. #45
    Aboutdakota
    Guest

    Re: FOX News Trashed ATT Wireless



    Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
    > Aboutdakota wrote:
    >
    >>If you live in the MSP area, Cingular Nation is great. With a T62u,
    >>you can roam on T-Mobile (GSM), AT&T (¿GSM and TDMA? and AMPS), and
    >>Verizon Wireless (AMPS). Coverage cannot be beat with that phone.
    >>
    >>AD

    >
    >
    > If you live in Minneapolis, you can not buy service from Cingular. Cingular
    > roams primarily onto AT&T in the Twin Cities with T-Mobile probably as the
    > preferred GSM partner.
    >
    > Tom Veldhouse


    Yes, however, if you have Cingular from another market, you can ROAM in
    MSP. If you are on the Cingular Nation plan, you are required to have a
    GAIT phone (GSM/TDMA/AMPS 850/1900).

    ==AD




  • Similar Threads




  • Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast