Cellular Repeaters (in the USA)

"MarkF" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Gentlemen...Gentlemen...
>
> I think that we can bring this to a close. John was man enough to
> post his reply from the FCC, even though it wasn't exactly what he was
> looking for in the reply, but we all should thank him for it and not
> continue to poke him in the ribs and continually say "I told you so".
> John seems (from what I have read prior) satisfied with the FCC's
> reply and that should be good enough for all of us.
>
> There are still some that think the FCC's Federal R&R's (on BDA's
> specifically) is a suggestion and not a law and those also probably
> think that the posted speed limit is also a suggested value that has
> no real meaning. Let them interpret the R&R's as they see fit and if
> there is an enforcement action against them then they can explain it
> to the judge.
>
> Mark

This thread definitely makes the Geek Hall of Fame!

---

› See More: Cellular Repeaters (in the USA)

SOrry for going OT on this but this waws too funny to pass up.

Actually posted speed limits ARE suggestions. they are "maximum suggested"

IE you can not legally go faster but YOU CAN illegally go the same speed as.

IE you can be tickets for doing 55 in a 55 IE a speeding ticket if that
speed is unsafe for the conditions.

rain snow etc.. etc..

Just thought that was an interesting tidbit.

Chris Taylor
http://www.nerys.com/


> There are still some that think the FCC's Federal R&R's (on BDA's
> specifically) is a suggestion and not a law and those also probably
> think that the posted speed limit is also a suggested value that has
> no real meaning. Let them interpret the R&R's as they see fit and if
> there is an enforcement action against them then they can explain it
> to the judge.
>
> Mark