Results 1 to 11 of 11
  1. #1
    AR
    Guest
    Just thought I'd note here that my port from Cingular to Sprint on an
    additional line to my existing account took 5 weeks. During that time the
    old phone could still call out but neither the new or old phone could
    receive calls.

    -AR from Phila PA





    See More: port story




  2. #2
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: port story

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "AR" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Just thought I'd note here that my port from Cingular to Sprint on an
    > additional line to my existing account took 5 weeks. During that time the
    > old phone could still call out but neither the new or old phone could
    > receive calls.
    >
    > -AR from Phila PA


    Did you ask SprintPCS for compensation for that delay? Don't taking it
    lying down. FIGHT BACK.



  3. #3
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: port story


    "Robert M., aka Phil, the Village Idiot" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "AR" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Just thought I'd note here that my port from Cingular to Sprint on an
    > > additional line to my existing account took 5 weeks. During that time

    the
    > > old phone could still call out but neither the new or old phone could
    > > receive calls.
    > >
    > > -AR from Phila PA

    >
    > Did you ask SprintPCS for compensation for that delay? Don't taking it
    > lying down. FIGHT BACK.


    And where in the post did he mention that Sprint was the one holding up the
    port? More troll assumptions.





  4. #4
    tom ronson
    Guest

    Re: port story

    Hey Phil now that you're back in the world of SPCS (they must not have
    known, or need customers REAL bad) can the group ask a favor? It's simple
    and only requires you to stick to one identity so that those of us who don't
    care a whit one what you have to say can avoid you. I'm not sure why you
    think anyone gives a rat's ass about what you think, but most don't and
    would rather not read your "views" on Sprint --- and you should at show some
    courtesy by using just ONE user name here.

    Of course you'd not get the "action" that you so desperately crave, but how
    sad is it that you have to resort to changing user names to have some,
    albeit virtual, human contact?

    We can't do anymore than ask ---- for now. But at least consider the
    request --- I know a lot of folks would appreciate it (your using only 1
    under name here).

    --tr

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "AR" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Just thought I'd note here that my port from Cingular to Sprint on an
    > > additional line to my existing account took 5 weeks. During that time

    the
    > > old phone could still call out but neither the new or old phone could
    > > receive calls.
    > >
    > > -AR from Phila PA

    >
    > Did you ask SprintPCS for compensation for that delay? Don't taking it
    > lying down. FIGHT BACK.






    .................................................................
    Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
    >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<

    -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-




  5. #5
    mjohns2
    Guest

    Re: port story

    Thank you Tom..... Dont get me wrong Phil, I read some of your post, but
    it's not fair to me that you change your name all the time that I dont even
    know who's who... I think there was a time that someone claimed you answered
    or supported a comment you made yourself. I dont know if you did, i just
    stopped following the thread. Just stick to one name, that's a very fair
    request.


    --

    http://www.youmatch.net/



    "tom ronson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Hey Phil now that you're back in the world of SPCS (they must not have
    > known, or need customers REAL bad) can the group ask a favor? It's simple
    > and only requires you to stick to one identity so that those of us who

    don't
    > care a whit one what you have to say can avoid you. I'm not sure why you
    > think anyone gives a rat's ass about what you think, but most don't and
    > would rather not read your "views" on Sprint --- and you should at show

    some
    > courtesy by using just ONE user name here.
    >
    > Of course you'd not get the "action" that you so desperately crave, but

    how
    > sad is it that you have to resort to changing user names to have some,
    > albeit virtual, human contact?
    >
    > We can't do anymore than ask ---- for now. But at least consider the
    > request --- I know a lot of folks would appreciate it (your using only 1
    > under name here).
    >
    > --tr
    >
    > "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    > > In article <[email protected]>,
    > > "AR" <[email protected]> wrote:
    > >
    > > > Just thought I'd note here that my port from Cingular to Sprint on an
    > > > additional line to my existing account took 5 weeks. During that time

    > the
    > > > old phone could still call out but neither the new or old phone could
    > > > receive calls.
    > > >
    > > > -AR from Phila PA

    > >
    > > Did you ask SprintPCS for compensation for that delay? Don't taking it
    > > lying down. FIGHT BACK.

    >
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > ................................................................
    > Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access
    > >>>> at http://www.TitanNews.com <<<<

    > -=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
    >






  6. #6
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: port story


    "mjohns2" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Thank you Tom..... Dont get me wrong Phil, I read some of your post, but
    > it's not fair to me that you change your name all the time that I dont

    even
    > know who's who... I think there was a time that someone claimed you

    answered
    > or supported a comment you made yourself. I dont know if you did, i just
    > stopped following the thread. Just stick to one name, that's a very fair
    > request.
    >


    He's replied to his other posts under other ID's many a time here and in the
    other newsgroups. To date, he's got 52 known different ID's ...

    As he apparently has put filters on yours truly, you might ask him why he
    returned to SPCS, if he hates the company so much.

    Bob





  7. #7
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: port story


    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    >
    > "mjohns2" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    > > Thank you Tom..... Dont get me wrong Phil, I read some of your post, but
    > > it's not fair to me that you change your name all the time that I dont

    > even
    > > know who's who... I think there was a time that someone claimed you

    > answered
    > > or supported a comment you made yourself. I dont know if you did, i just
    > > stopped following the thread. Just stick to one name, that's a very fair
    > > request.
    > >

    >
    > He's replied to his other posts under other ID's many a time here and in

    the
    > other newsgroups. To date, he's got 52 known different ID's ...
    >
    > As he apparently has put filters on yours truly, you might ask him why he
    > returned to SPCS, if he hates the company so much.


    He must be filtering me, too- he hasn't responded to a single post of mine
    in quite a while. I guess the heat got a little too much for his delicate,
    little ego.





  8. #8
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: port story

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "mjohns2" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Thank you Tom..... Dont get me wrong Phil, I read some of your post, but
    > it's not fair to me that you change your name all the time that I dont even
    > know who's who... I think there was a time that someone claimed you answered
    > or supported a comment you made yourself. I dont know if you did, i just
    > stopped following the thread. Just stick to one name, that's a very fair
    > request.
    >




    I think your lame attempt to be moderator for this newsgroup might gain
    a tiny bit of credibility if you EVER said anything to Michael Arends
    with all his simultaneous alias explitive raining childish insults.

    Or spoke to Smith or Veldhouse about their obscenties.



  9. #9
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: port story


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:rmarkoff-65[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "mjohns2" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Thank you Tom..... Dont get me wrong Phil, I read some of your post, but
    > > it's not fair to me that you change your name all the time that I dont

    even
    > > know who's who... I think there was a time that someone claimed you

    answered
    > > or supported a comment you made yourself. I dont know if you did, i just
    > > stopped following the thread. Just stick to one name, that's a very fair
    > > request.
    > >

    >
    >
    >
    > I think your lame attempt to be moderator for this newsgroup might gain
    > a tiny bit of credibility if you EVER said anything to Michael Arends
    > with all his simultaneous alias explitive raining childish insults.
    >
    > Or spoke to Smith or Veldhouse about their obscenties.


    Just what obscenities would that be you little immature boy ...

    Bob





  10. #10
    Jim Catero
    Guest

    Re: port story



    Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > I think your lame attempt to be moderator for this newsgroup might gain
    > a tiny bit of credibility if you EVER said anything to Michael Arends
    > with all his simultaneous alias explitive raining childish insults.
    >
    > Or spoke to Smith or Veldhouse about their obscenties.


    I think your lame attempt to once again skirt the issue is indicative
    of your lack of credibility, and may I add that YOU have NO ROOM to talk
    on the credibility issue Phil , as you have absolutely none on this and
    many other N.G. 's
    BTW he's not trying to moderate, simply trying ( in vain ) to get you to
    post under one and not 100 identities , not an unreasonable request .
    Only problem is he's asked it of an unreasonable person, that'd be you
    Phil ( in case you were wondering ) and the fact that you are such a
    nasty lil troll only compounds things.
    Fact is Phil your lack of ethics, intelligence and creditability are the
    hall mark of your immaturity, you speak of others but in fact ,as is
    often true of people like you , you are what you accuse others of being.
    Your a total waste of skin and oxygen.
    And no matter how you may try to hide it , that is and I suspect always
    will be true in your case.

    Jim




  11. #11
    mjohns2
    Guest

    Re: port story

    I'm sorry Phil. I just saw a post that you no long have SPCS is this true?


    --

    http://www.youmatch.net/



    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "mjohns2" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Thank you Tom..... Dont get me wrong Phil, I read some of your post, but
    > > it's not fair to me that you change your name all the time that I dont

    even
    > > know who's who... I think there was a time that someone claimed you

    answered
    > > or supported a comment you made yourself. I dont know if you did, i just
    > > stopped following the thread. Just stick to one name, that's a very fair
    > > request.
    > >

    >
    >
    >
    > I think your lame attempt to be moderator for this newsgroup might gain
    > a tiny bit of credibility if you EVER said anything to Michael Arends
    > with all his simultaneous alias explitive raining childish insults.
    >
    > Or spoke to Smith or Veldhouse about their obscenties.






  • Similar Threads