Sanyo RL 2000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert M. <[email protected]> wrote:
> And generally if your screen breaks Sprint PCS will not cover you, but
> blame user abuse, except for a small number of phones on a secret list.

A BACK PEDAL! First you say they do this automatically, and now you say
generally ... soon I suppose you will say that they sometimes do ... or
perhaps it is just a rumor?

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAIrIr1p0e3NXsrtERAvHxAKCP3RlEsauvBRnKgjSk+lq4W5OUQwCgiXSL
7ht3yO4TSsYyT8rpRg1ie3Q=
=QGbs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---

› See More: Sanyo RL 2000

In article <rmarkoff-D00240.05355105022004
@news03.west.earthlink.net>, Robert [email protected]=20
says...
> I stand corrected. But basically my statement is correct, and you know=20
> it. A very few occasions may be an exception.=20
>=20

No, it's not correct. It's not totally out to lunch, but=20
it *is* inaccurate. You issued a flat declaration that we=20
declare screen failures to be abuse. That blanket=20
statement is inaccurate.

You're silliness about us keeping secrets has been refuted=20
so many times before that it deserves to be ignored, and so=20
will be henceforth by me.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <rmarkoff-D00240.05355105022004
> @news03.west.earthlink.net>, [email protected]
> says...
> > I stand corrected. But basically my statement is correct, and you know
> > it. A very few occasions may be an exception.
> >
>
> No, it's not correct. It's not totally out to lunch, but
> it *is* inaccurate. You issued a flat declaration that we
> declare screen failures to be abuse. That blanket
> statement is inaccurate.
>
> You're silliness about us keeping secrets has been refuted
> so many times before that it deserves to be ignored, and so
> will be henceforth by me.


If it's not a secret, please post the list of phones where screen
breakage is a known issue and SprintPCS will happily replace it.

If you post the list and it contains many phones, then you are correct,
if you insult me instead, then I am correct and SprintPCS is keeping it
secret as I maintain.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert M. <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> If it's not a secret, please post the list of phones where screen
> breakage is a known issue and SprintPCS will happily replace it.
>
> If you post the list and it contains many phones, then you are correct,
> if you insult me instead, then I am correct and SprintPCS is keeping it
> secret as I maintain.

Phillip ... do you honestly believe such a "list" exists? There may be
phones with a known defect that can lead to screen failure, but that
does not mean that every time a screen failure occurs on such a phone is
caused by that defect. They will certainly take this on a case by case
basis.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAI6T21p0e3NXsrtERAie4AJ9IiO8HZGlASchHTQe6M9WmAw6LQQCeKU32
sOQaNr0HdaOnzU0wUcHSYp4=
=T4L6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> If it's not a secret, please post the list of phones where screen=20
> breakage is a known issue
>=20

I already told you, Phillie, this has been refuted so many times I'm not=20
going to go through that again.

Refusing to shout it from the proverbial hilltops does *not* mean we are=20
keeping it secret. And you know that. You're just too dishonest to=20
concede the point.

--=20
-+-
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for SprintPCS
I *don't* speak for them.