Sprint no longer to be sold at Best Buy

In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> I think by having customer friendly CSRs
> that arent hampered by restrictive handle times, and upsell quotas,=20
> Sprint could reduce its churn.
>=20


You've never proven this, Phillie. Even though the figures you've=20
cited have been refuted multiple times from BOTH sides of the=20
conversation, you still have yet to show that the handle times are=20
restrictive.

--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

---

› See More: Sprint no longer to be sold at Best Buy

In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] says...
> > I think by having customer friendly CSRs
> > that arent hampered by restrictive handle times, and upsell quotas,
> > Sprint could reduce its churn.
> >
>
>
> You've never proven this, Phillie. Even though the figures you've
> cited have been refuted multiple times from BOTH sides of the
> conversation, you still have yet to show that the handle times are
> restrictive.

You are the only one that trys to white wash the "handle time" issue.

Even Executive Services admits its an issue.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> > > I think by having customer friendly CSRs
> > > that arent hampered by restrictive handle times, and upsell quotas,
> > > Sprint could reduce its churn.
> > >
> >
> >
> > You've never proven this, Phillie. Even though the figures you've
> > cited have been refuted multiple times from BOTH sides of the
> > conversation, you still have yet to show that the handle times are
> > restrictive.
>
> You are the only one that trys to white wash the "handle time" issue.
>
> Even Executive Services admits its an issue.

The only place this has been an issue is in your own posts- further
eveidence that all you do is whine about factless claims.

Robert M. wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>First off, the only person who has asserted that sales will drop at Best
>>Buy is you.
>
>
> WRONG. Tech Geek did also.

Link?


--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

In article <[email protected]>,
Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:

> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>First off, the only person who has asserted that sales will drop at Best
> >>Buy is you.
> >
> >
> > WRONG. Tech Geek did also.
>
> Link?

Your apology will be accepted. Google shows the following by TechGeek
on March 22:



" Sprint shells out a lot of money for these chains to sell their
products. They pay the stores a higher comission than their sales
reps in the Sprint stores, they pay for the space they get in the
stores, they pay for training on Sprint products to these stores,
etc..

Sprint will save a lot of money each year doing this. Will they lose
sales? They'll lose some "

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> Your apology will be accepted. Google shows the following by TechGeek
> on March 22:
>
>
>
> " Sprint shells out a lot of money for these chains to sell their
> products. They pay the stores a higher comission than their sales
> reps in the Sprint stores, they pay for the space they get in the
> stores, they pay for training on Sprint products to these stores,
> etc..
>
> Sprint will save a lot of money each year doing this. Will they lose
> sales? They'll lose some "

So, let me get this straight- you are willing to take his wird because it
backs you up in this instance, and then accuse him of being wrong every
other time? Does your ass get big splinters from sitting on the fence like
that all the time?

> So, let me get this straight

Get this straight SprintPCS is a money losing operation, and cant even afford
anymore to have its reps at BestBuy.

"Cell merger" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> > So, let me get this straight
>
> Get this straight SprintPCS is a money losing operation,

just like every other cellular provider has been in the past

> and cant even afford
> anymore to have its reps at BestBuy.

Here we go again- Phil playing both sides of the coin. First, he whines
because they aren't making money, and then he whines because they are
containing costs.

I'm reallyhaving a hard time figuring out who the bigger idiot is- you, or
the Supreme ****up.

Scott does Adelphia let you use foul language like that?


Don't break your arm by patting yourslef on the back for lamely trying to
defend Sprint.

Containing costs by cutting sales never helped anyone.

"Sprint Secrets" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Scott does Adelphia let you use foul language like that?

Why shouldn't they? AOL lets you lie and whine like you do.

>
>
> Don't break your arm by patting yourslef on the back for lamely trying to
> defend Sprint.
>
> Containing costs by cutting sales never helped anyone.

What's the matter, Phil- need to use a different name in an attempt to fake
support for your claims?

Show me proof that sales are down. You can't, because once again, you have
posted an unsubstantiated opinion.

Robert M. wrote:


>>>>First off, the only person who has asserted that sales will drop at Best
>>>>Buy is you.
>>>
>>>
>>>WRONG. Tech Geek did also.
>>
>>Link?
>
>
> Your apology will be accepted.

okay. I *feel* sorry for you, that you're such a pathetic troll that
you must cut and paste a quote to make it suit your needs effectively
misquoting the OP.

Now, *your* apology will be accepted, my dear troll, for misquoting
TechGeek. What, do you think you're the only person who can do a google
search?

But still, you posted no link, so I will post the link with the WHOLE,
UNBUTCHERED quot for you:

http://tinyurl.com/3bb53

Google shows the following by TechGeek
> on March 22:
> Sprint will save a lot of money each year doing this. Will they lose
> sales? They'll lose some "

and to complete the butchered quote: "... but since most stores are
within a stone's throw of Circuit City and Best Buy, the sales affect
will be minimal."

Furthermore, the quote is moot, because TechGeek was posting under the
assumption that Best Buy was going to stop selling Sprint PCS phones.
That is not the case.

So how pathetic is that? Not only did you have to use quote someone
who, through no fault of their own, had erroneous information to work
with, but then you had to MISQuote that person to have that unreliable
quote suit your needs. That's pretty bad, dude.


--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

"Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Robert M. wrote:
>
>
> >>>>First off, the only person who has asserted that sales will drop at
Best
> >>>>Buy is you.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>WRONG. Tech Geek did also.
> >>
> >>Link?
> >
> >
> > Your apology will be accepted.
>
> okay. I *feel* sorry for you, that you're such a pathetic troll that
> you must cut and paste a quote to make it suit your needs effectively
> misquoting the OP.
>
> Now, *your* apology will be accepted, my dear troll, for misquoting
> TechGeek. What, do you think you're the only person who can do a google
> search?
>
> But still, you posted no link, so I will post the link with the WHOLE,
> UNBUTCHERED quot for you:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3bb53
>
> Google shows the following by TechGeek
> > on March 22:
> > Sprint will save a lot of money each year doing this. Will they lose
> > sales? They'll lose some "
>
> and to complete the butchered quote: "... but since most stores are
> within a stone's throw of Circuit City and Best Buy, the sales affect
> will be minimal."
>
> Furthermore, the quote is moot, because TechGeek was posting under the
> assumption that Best Buy was going to stop selling Sprint PCS phones.
> That is not the case.
>
> So how pathetic is that? Not only did you have to use quote someone
> who, through no fault of their own, had erroneous information to work
> with, but then you had to MISQuote that person to have that unreliable
> quote suit your needs. That's pretty bad, dude.

No ... that's just Phillipe ...

Bob