Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18
  1. #1
    Larry Thomas
    Guest
    After about a year with no updates the online maps have finally been
    updated. For example they now show the new coverage in Kansas along
    Hwy 54 West of Witchita. They also show the new coverage along I-5 in
    San Diego in the Camp Pendelton area. There is also some new planned
    future coverage that wasn't marked before. Examples: Arizona and New
    Mexico along I-10 and I-40.



    See More: Online coverage maps updated




  2. #2
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] (Larry Thomas) wrote:

    > After about a year with no updates the online maps have finally been
    > updated. For example they now show the new coverage in Kansas along
    > Hwy 54 West of Witchita. They also show the new coverage along I-5 in
    > San Diego in the Camp Pendelton area. There is also some new planned
    > future coverage that wasn't marked before. Examples: Arizona and New
    > Mexico along I-10 and I-40.


    The maps are still totally unacceptable, ignoring "smaller" deadzones of
    two or three miles in size.



  3. #3
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] (Larry Thomas) wrote:
    >
    > > After about a year with no updates the online maps have finally been
    > > updated. For example they now show the new coverage in Kansas along
    > > Hwy 54 West of Witchita. They also show the new coverage along I-5 in
    > > San Diego in the Camp Pendelton area. There is also some new planned
    > > future coverage that wasn't marked before. Examples: Arizona and New
    > > Mexico along I-10 and I-40.

    >
    > The maps are still totally unacceptable, ignoring "smaller" deadzones of
    > two or three miles in size.


    And who made you Grand Poobah? Your twisted reading of the CTIA Consumer
    Code is incorrect.





  4. #4
    JRW
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    Robert M. wrote:
    > The maps are still totally unacceptable, ignoring "smaller" deadzones of
    > two or three miles in size.


    Obviously you don't understand radio theory and how it relates
    to quality of service. Radio systems are engineered to provide
    at coverage in 90% of the area 90% of the time.




  5. #5
    Scott Nelson - Wash DC
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    If it's unacceptable, don't look.

    Scotty


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] (Larry Thomas) wrote:
    >
    > > After about a year with no updates the online maps have finally been
    > > updated. For example they now show the new coverage in Kansas along
    > > Hwy 54 West of Witchita. They also show the new coverage along I-5 in
    > > San Diego in the Camp Pendelton area. There is also some new planned
    > > future coverage that wasn't marked before. Examples: Arizona and New
    > > Mexico along I-10 and I-40.

    >
    > The maps are still totally unacceptable, ignoring "smaller" deadzones of
    > two or three miles in size.






  6. #6
    Scott Nelson - Wash DC
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    Thanks.

    I will be down that way ( San Diego ) this weekend so, I'll try it out.

    Scotty


    "Larry Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > After about a year with no updates the online maps have finally been
    > updated. For example they now show the new coverage in Kansas along
    > Hwy 54 West of Witchita. They also show the new coverage along I-5 in
    > San Diego in the Camp Pendelton area. There is also some new planned
    > future coverage that wasn't marked before. Examples: Arizona and New
    > Mexico along I-10 and I-40.






  7. #7
    Alphad
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    Kentucky map is still the old one. Sprint has added coverage along the I-75
    corridor going into TN and some on I-64E towards Mt. Sterling which still
    are not on the map.


    "Larry Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > After about a year with no updates the online maps have finally been
    > updated. For example they now show the new coverage in Kansas along
    > Hwy 54 West of Witchita. They also show the new coverage along I-5 in
    > San Diego in the Camp Pendelton area. There is also some new planned
    > future coverage that wasn't marked before. Examples: Arizona and New
    > Mexico along I-10 and I-40.






  8. #8
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "Scott Nelson - Wash DC" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > If it's unacceptable, don't look.
    >
    > Scotty


    SprintPCS bragged that its a signatory to the Indutry Consumer Code, and
    violates one of its main points.

    And then its apologists wonder why its always cominbg in worst in
    studies of Customer Satisfaction?



  9. #9
    Larry Thomas
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    "Alphad" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]_s02>...
    > Kentucky map is still the old one. Sprint has added coverage along the I-75
    > corridor going into TN and some on I-64E towards Mt. Sterling which still
    > are not on the map.


    Yeah it appears that some of the maps have been updated and some haven't.



  10. #10
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated


    "Larry Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > "Alphad" <[email protected]> wrote in message

    news:<[email protected]_s02>...
    > > Kentucky map is still the old one. Sprint has added coverage along the

    I-75
    > > corridor going into TN and some on I-64E towards Mt. Sterling which

    still
    > > are not on the map.

    >
    > Yeah it appears that some of the maps have been updated and some haven't.


    They might be updating the regions on a piecemeal basis. Didn't see anything
    new on the Charlotte map.

    Bob





  11. #11
    Larry Thomas
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<drWec.7867
    > They might be updating the regions on a piecemeal basis. Didn't see anything
    > new on the Charlotte map.
    >
    > Bob


    I just noticed the Bakersfield, CA map (which oddly is the only map
    that shows the CA Central Coast area) has also been updated. There's a
    lot of new coverage along Hwy 101 between Santa Barbara and Monterey.



  12. #12
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    In article <[email protected]>,=20
    [email protected] says...
    > SprintPCS bragged that its a signatory to the Indutry Consumer Code, and=

    =20
    > violates one of its main points.
    >=20


    Isn't that for the CTIA to decide, since it's the certifying=20
    authority? Or are you now also more of an expert than the experts?

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



  13. #13
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    In article <[email protected]>,=20
    [email protected] says...
    > SprintPCS bragged that its a signatory to the Indutry Consumer Code, and=

    =20
    > violates one of its main points.
    >=20


    Isn't that for the CTIA to decide, since it's the certifying=20
    authority? Or are you now also more of an expert than the experts?

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



  14. #14
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    In article <[email protected]>,
    O/Siris <[email protected]întpcs.com> wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] says...
    > > SprintPCS bragged that its a signatory to the Indutry Consumer Code, and
    > > violates one of its main points.
    > >

    >
    > Isn't that for the CTIA to decide, since it's the certifying
    > authority? Or are you now also more of an expert than the experts?


    It would be nice if a map **EVER** actually showed all the known dead
    spots, or you think it's OK to have dishonest maps?



  15. #15
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: Online coverage maps updated

    In article <[email protected]>,
    O/Siris <[email protected]întpcs.com> wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] says...
    > > SprintPCS bragged that its a signatory to the Indutry Consumer Code, and
    > > violates one of its main points.
    > >

    >
    > Isn't that for the CTIA to decide, since it's the certifying
    > authority? Or are you now also more of an expert than the experts?


    It would be nice if a map **EVER** actually showed all the known dead
    spots, or you think it's OK to have dishonest maps?



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast