In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <0siris@sprīntpcs.com> wrote:

> In article <[email protected]>,
> usirsclt No Way Spam @earthlink.net says...
> >
> > "With regards to being eligible to receive a rebate for replacing an 18
> > month old (or older) handset, I don't believe that's correct Rob. One
> > does not need to subscribe to Vision for an 18 month period of time. (Where
> > did you come up with the odd 18 month Vision subscription time
> > period?)"
> >
> > There is nothing in the verbiage of the rebate web page above about having
> > to subscribe to Vision for the prior 18 months on the phone being replaced.
> >
>
> I'll double check then. We were trained on this, and asked about it
> three separate times.

Thank you, we'd all like to know if there's been a change. SprintPCS is
certainly entitled to make any changes they want, but it did seem an 18
month requirment to Vision would be unfair.


› See More: 18 month changes