Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 55
  1. #1
    Robert M.
    Guest
    http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml

    In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    losses discussed earlier.



    See More: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers




  2. #2
    Wraith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers



    Robert M. wrote:

    > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    >
    > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > losses discussed earlier.


    And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.




  3. #3
    Wraith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers



    Robert M. wrote:

    > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    >
    > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > losses discussed earlier.


    And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.




  4. #4
    Wraith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers



    Robert M. wrote:

    > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    >
    > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > losses discussed earlier.


    And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.




  5. #5
    Wraith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers



    Robert M. wrote:

    > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    >
    > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > losses discussed earlier.


    And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.




  6. #6
    Wraith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers



    Robert M. wrote:

    > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    >
    > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > losses discussed earlier.


    And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.




  7. #7
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers


    "Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group

    ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
    >


    Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
    with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?

    You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
    outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
    of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.

    Bob





  8. #8
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers


    "Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group

    ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
    >


    Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
    with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?

    You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
    outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
    of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.

    Bob





  9. #9
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers


    "Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group

    ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
    >


    Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
    with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?

    You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
    outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
    of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.

    Bob





  10. #10
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers


    "Wraith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group

    ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.
    >


    Enough of this crap. It's bad enough that we have to suffer through Phillipe
    with all his ID Changes ... but you have to do it yourself?

    You've posted here with at least two other different IDs this past week, as
    outrider and t-hunter. Just because Phillipe does it, doesn't mean the rest
    of us need to crawl under his slimy, trolling ID changing rock as well.

    Bob





  11. #11
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.


    Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
    the truth.

    And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?


    Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
    Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
    net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.

    If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
    current churn rate could be calculated.



  12. #12
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.


    Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
    the truth.

    And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?


    Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
    Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
    net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.

    If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
    current churn rate could be calculated.



  13. #13
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.


    Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
    the truth.

    And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?


    Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
    Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
    net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.

    If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
    current churn rate could be calculated.



  14. #14
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    >
    > Robert M. wrote:
    >
    > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > >
    > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing up
    > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of 2,367,000+
    > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > losses discussed earlier.

    >
    > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint group ?
    > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.


    Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
    the truth.

    And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?


    Sprint also announced its results today. Some might like to compare.
    Sprint lost 1.3 million customers, 1 million less than AT&T WS,and had a
    net addition of 400,000. Its Churn rate was up to 2.9% /month.

    If someone knows the number of AT&T Wireless postpaid customers its
    current churn rate could be calculated.



  15. #15
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: AT&T Wireless has net loss of customers


    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Wraith <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > >
    > > Robert M. wrote:
    > >
    > > > http://www.attwireless.com/press/rel...s/042004.jhtml
    > > >
    > > > In the first quarter of 2004, AT&T Wireless ended with 367,000
    > > > fewer customers at the end of the quarter. Thats in spite of signing

    up
    > > > over 2 million new customers. That means they had a Churn of

    2,367,000+
    > > > customers. Which means more than the rumored 750,000 customer a month
    > > > losses discussed earlier.

    > >
    > > And what does this have to do with the price of rice in the Sprint

    group ?
    > > This guy is a troll, he's admitted it in other groups.

    >
    > Posting a press release is hardly trolling except for someone afraid of
    > the truth.
    >
    > And who is Wraith? Michael Arends or Bobbie Smith?


    Once again, more misstatements from Phillipe. He well knows full well that
    Michael is up in the Seattle area, and yours truly is from Charlotte. This
    poster, Wraith, outrider and t-hunter is from your state ... Dallas, TX to
    be precise.

    Bob ::who thinks Phillipe ... err, maybe I should just post the kill filter
    list, should move his coverage to Verizon, as he loves their service and
    coverage::

    Apply this rule after the message arrives
    Where the From line contains 'not John Rigas' or 'not at Adelphia' or
    'Robert M.' or 'Cell Merger' or 'Rob M.' or 'Robert M.' or 'A.M.' or 'Al' or
    'Alias for Smith' or 'Bernard Sharri' or 'BlueTooth Now' or 'Bob Veldrends'
    or 'Camile Cardenas' or 'Carl70015' or 'Carlos Z.' or 'CAT0NHAT' or 'Chris
    McFarland' or 'David' or 'Dennis' or 'Donald' or 'DSL GURU' or
    'Enchanter999' or 'HK' or 'J. Range' or 'James' or 'James Tullin' or 'John
    S.' or 'Jonathan' or 'Joseph' or 'Leonard' or 'LosAngelessLegal' or 'Loving
    Moonlight' or 'Matthew Lindeen' or 'Michael' or 'Milton Searlis' or 'Monday
    Cellphone' or 'not at Adelphia' or 'Not at Web TV' or 'P.' or 'P. Reality'
    or 'Patrick Bosley' or 'PHil_Real' or 'Phill.' or 'Phillipe .' or
    'Phillipe2004' or 'Posting Editor' or 'PTT ReadyLink' or 'Reginald' or
    'Renaldo' or 'Retention' or 'Richard' or '[email protected]' or 'Robert' or
    'Ronald' or 'Sanyo Guy' or 'Sarah Morlan' or 'Sergei Kosonov' or 'Sprint
    Secrets' or 'Sprint Truth' or 'Sprintinator' or 'Sprintposter' or 'Stewart'
    or 'Sunday Auto' or 'Thomas Aspland' or 'Tim Harrick' or 'Weekend Sunshine'
    or 'William Bays'
    Mark it as read

    Bob





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast