Is Mike a moron too?

Robert M. wrote:

> There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
> 2nd grade when they taught about question marks.

Maybe you weren't there in the 1st grade when they taught manners and
patience.
My response was a question, yours was an assault.
Think about it dude.

---

› See More: Is Mike a moron too?

You are the only one I call a moron and not a moroon (although sometimes we
pronounce it that way). Doesn't that Mac have any kind of a ***** checker
on it?

Chris

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Chris Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The original post was calling you, a moron
>
>
> We know, you call all too many people a moroon. I don't take it personal.

[email protected] (Robert=A0M.)
<<We know, you call all too many people a moroon. I don't take it
personal. >>

Ahh, a fan of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?"! Why you Moroon!

[email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
<<There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
2nd grade when they taught about question marks. >>

Sorry you were absent the entire length of elementary school when they
taught *****ing, because you should be the LAST one to comment on
someone's *****ing/punctuation/grammer/etc. You "moroon".

In article <[email protected]>,
r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
> > 2nd grade when they taught about question marks.
>
> Maybe you weren't there in the 1st grade when they taught manners and
> patience.
> My response was a question, yours was an assault.
> Think about it dude.

OK, I thought about it. So what? You still don't know what a question
mark is, and I don't use bad language like the SprintPCS apologists do
when they're shown to be wrong.

In article <[email protected]>,
r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
>
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?
> >
> >
> > There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
> > 2nd grade when they taught about question marks.
>
> Huh, so you don't insult people ?

I don't use the language that Bobbi Smith does for sure.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Robert M. wrote:
> >
> > > In article <[email protected]>,
> > > r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >> So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?
> > >
> > >
> > > There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
> > > 2nd grade when they taught about question marks.
> >
> > Huh, so you don't insult people ?
>
> I don't use the language that Bobbi Smith does for sure.

You deserve every accolade thrown at you Phillipe ....

Bob

[email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
<<OK, I thought about it. So what? You still don't know what a question
mark is, and I don't use bad language like the SprintPCS apologists do
when they're shown to be wrong. >>

No, when you are proven wrong, you just ignore it or twist it around to
divert attention. Just because you don't you ad language doesn't mean
you are a better person.

Robert M. wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Robert M. wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In article <[email protected]>,
>>> r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?
>>>
>>>
>>>There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
>>>2nd grade when they taught about question marks.
>>
>> Huh, so you don't insult people ?
>
>
> I don't use the language that Bobbi Smith does for sure.

That's beside the point, your still shoveling out insults.
It's like saying I only shot someone with a .38 cal. But sos an so did
it with a .44 mag.
You get the same results.

"r2175" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> Robert M. wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >>Robert M. wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>In article <[email protected]>,
> >>> r2175 <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> So , insinuation doesn't qualify as an insult ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>There is a question mark in the subject line. Sorry you were absent in
> >>>2nd grade when they taught about question marks.
> >>
> >> Huh, so you don't insult people ?
> >
> >
> > I don't use the language that Bobbi Smith does for sure.
>
> That's beside the point, your still shoveling out insults.
> It's like saying I only shot someone with a .38 cal. But sos an so did
> it with a .44 mag.
> You get the same results.

What does he care? He thinks by calling me Bobbi, or Bobbie that it's going
to affect me. It's not, but it really shows his immaturity ...

Bob
>

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> >
> > How am I attacking you? You're the one who's posted insults in the
> > subject line, not me. It sounds more like you're attacking "Mike".
>
> You get bent out of shape anytime I point out how posts from you and o
> contradict, proving at least one of you doesn't know what they're
> talking about.

That is irrelevant to this thread. You posted asking if someone is a
moron, insinuating that you think they are.

I then commented that you complain whenever someone insults you, but
then you turn around and post that.

If you call it an attack, fine. I call it being a hypocrite.

You love to argue both sides, and have a 'do as I say, don't do as I
do' policy, and when someone insults you, you fall back to the "See,
the apologists fall back to childish insults' while you're posting
threads with a subject line similar to this one.