Bad Language Apologists

The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
group.


From: Lawrence Glasser ([email protected])
Subject: Re: best laptop for kids
Original FormatNewsgroups: comp.sys.laptops
Date: 2003-12-01 15:58:36 PST

Richard Grossman wrote:
>
> mas wrote:
>
> > what laptop should i get for a 8 year old kid i dont want to spend to
> > much. she needs it for school and some games.
>
> I'm a bit busy today but since everyone else who responded (so far)
> either doesn't know crap about what they are talking about, or seems to
> be some kind of "next thing the kids will want cell phones" geezer
> (wake-up notice: they have them, old-timer), I'll make some time to give
> another point of view.

Do you find it difficult being a pompous, little, asshole, or does it
come pretty easy?

Larry

=========================================

From: Thomas T. Veldhouse ([email protected])
Subject: Re: I hope I primed right...
Original FormatNewsgroups: rec.crafts.brewing
Date: 2003-07-09 06:14:31 PST


"Pennywise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >
> That is not too much sugar. That would equal about 2/3 cups for a five
> gallon batch, might be too little if you want high carbonation level.
> This amount might make it too flat for your tastes, but seeing it is a
> cider it should be fine.

What the hell is wrong with you anyway. You have been sniffing around my
asshole for way too long.

Tom Veldhouse

===================================================

From: Bob Smith ([email protected])
Subject: Re: <OT> money makes the world go round... <read it even
thoughit'...
Original FormatNewsgroups: alt.tv.stargate-sg1
Date: 2004-04-07 08:22:30 PST


"Derek" <[email protected]> wrote in message

>
> At the risk of invoking Godwin's Law - soup nazi!
>
> At this point, can we just call it quits and let the thread die?
>
> Derek
>
> [ Yeah. I did it again. ]

God Damn it ... all you are doing is continuing an argument no one gives
a
****, except for you. What are you, a control freak who has to have the
last
word? You just can't shut up and get let this go ... can you? Derek, I'm
filtering this new ID as well. If YOU want to continue it and have the
last
word, then go for it.

Bob::By the by, I replied to Hunter ... not to you ... get over it.::

========================

From: Scott Stephenson ([email protected])
Subject: Re: Microsoft ****ed Over Commodore, Be Inc. - Now they are
after Linux via Sco
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.microsoft, alt.conspiracy, alt.os.linux
Date: 2003-11-04 15:46:18 PST

Frank Crow wrote:

> No you see, I'm like the farmer's duck. He's flat foot...and flat foot
> don't give a ****!
>
> So little faggy fleeb is gonna call me "TROLL"....how cute....
>
> While we're talking about what I've forgotten...I've probably forgotten
> more than your stupid ass will ever know about computer science...
>
> I would ask your technical brilliance what the prefered method is except
> for
> one thing...I DON'T GIVE A ****. YOU LITTLE FAG.
>
> See...I knew the kids are getting bored...they've even started to pick
> fights they can't win.
>
> "Seems [I] 'have been around' so long...ya blah blah blah"
>
> Well, neo-maxi-zoom dweebie, I've been an internet user since about 1983,
> not that long to me...since I do have a very long memory...speaking of
> which what'd you say your name is?
>



Nice way to introduce yourself, moron. Too bad all of that
self-professed intelligence exists only in your imagination, because
nobody of any intelligence would stoop to such stupidity.

And while the 'little ****s' might not know anything about computers, but
there are some of us just a little bit older that might actually know
more than you. Your "I'm a badass" approach has no effect on us, except
to make make beer shoot out of our noses as we laugh uncontrollably.
And dude- try speel check and grammar check sometime. It might make you
lose the sixth grade education feel to your posts.

Oh- don't bother responding. I've already expended way more energy in
reading your post and responding to it than you are worth, and the
killfile entry will not let anything else through. Besides, I really
doubt anything intelligent can possibly come out of that deformed brain
you possess.
===============================
From: Michael L. Arends ([email protected])
Subject: Re: Grudges (was: Please Read "RECOGNIZING...)
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d, alt.binaries.cracks,
alt.binaries.news-server-comparison, alt.2600.warez, alt.liberalminded,
altnet.general
Date: 2004-03-02 19:06:07 PST

Ethan Allen **** out his mouth:

> Possibly you're a ****ing idiot?
>
>
>>If I thought it would make a difference, I'd forge apologies from
>>everyone.
>
>
> Admission that you'd commit Usenet abuse if you believed it would
> accomplish something positive in the long run, noted.
>
> Remember that during our next Digital Enema, hypocrite.
>
>
>
>
> ___ ___ ___
> / /\ / /\ / /\
> / /:/ / /::\ / /::\
> / /:/ / /:/\:\ / /:/\:\
> /__/:/ /\ / /::\ \:\ / /::\ \:\
> \ \:\ /:/ /__/:/\:\ \:\ /__/:/\:\ \:\
> \ \:\/:/ \__\/ \:\_\/ \__\/ \:\_\/
> \ \::/ \ \:\ \ \:\
> \__\/ \__\/ \__\/
>
> -=- Usenet Freedom Fighters -=-

JUST ANOTHER PIECE OF **** UFF SOCKPUPPET.

Go **** YOURSELF. YOU PIECE OF **** MAGGOT.

---

› See More: Bad Language Apologists

"Bad Language by apologists" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
> disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
> group.

And old Phillipe is now up to 70 different IDs ...

BTW Phillipe ... Bite me!

Bob

[email protected] (Robert M.) wrote:
<<The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
group. >>

As opposed to you who just ignores it when you are proven wrong? In the
AT&T group, you said that a poster was making up a plan since you'd
never seen it on their website... but when he came back with proof of
it, you said nothing -- no apology or anything.

If these people want to swear, who cares? When did you become the
moderator of all USENET?

"Bad Language by apologists" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
> disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
> group.
>

And who made you Moderator for Usenet?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bad Language by apologists <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Thomas T. Veldhouse ([email protected])
> Subject: Re: I hope I primed right...
> Original FormatNewsgroups: rec.crafts.brewing
> Date: 2003-07-09 06:14:31 PST
>
>
> "Pennywise" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> That is not too much sugar. That would equal about 2/3 cups for a five
>> gallon batch, might be too little if you want high carbonation level.
>> This amount might make it too flat for your tastes, but seeing it is a
>> cider it should be fine.
>
> What the hell is wrong with you anyway. You have been sniffing around my
> asshole for way too long.
>
> Tom Veldhouse
>

Wow ... you can use Google. The words I used were well deserving at the
time. So what is it too you asshole?

- -- -
Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAjZ9D1p0e3NXsrtERApvFAJ9jzVbblSw6wd4uBQrUSM6SUGLc/wCfRKTF
xqSzem0TJWbK+vVhG6f5xBM=
=O92v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Bad Language by apologists <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
> disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
> group.
>

Yet you don't consider

"Is Mike a moron too? "

and

"Does your mommy know you're using the computer?"

insults?

Looks like our local Sprint PCS antagonist also uses insults when he
doesn't agree with someone.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

> Bad Language by apologists <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
> > disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
> > group.
> >
>
> Yet you don't consider
>
> "Is Mike a moron too? "

You think the words posted by the APOLOGITS worse? Well thank you for
defending and encouraging such behavior.

[email protected] (Robert=A0M.) wrote:
<<You think the words posted by the APOLOGITS worse? Well thank you for
defending and encouraging such behavior. >>

Don't forget to snip the rest of that post you responded to.

Don't you think "Does your mommy know you are using the computer" would
be considered an insult? You insult people on here just as much as
anyone else. Just because you don't use foul language doesn't mean its
any less of an insult.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
>
> > Bad Language by apologists <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:<[email protected]>...
> > > The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
> > > disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
> > > group.
> > >
> >
> > Yet you don't consider
> >
> > "Is Mike a moron too? "
>
> You think the words posted by the APOLOGITS worse? Well thank you for
> defending and encouraging such behavior.

I don't like it when anyone posts childish insults.

*BUT** You're complaining that people are tossing insults at you, but
then you post comments with malice, too.

"Go back to flying business class"
"Go back to Best Buy and buy your horror movies"
(I'm still trying to figure out these two)

"Is Mike a moron too?"
"DOes your mommy know you're using the computer?"

All those, even though they don't use 'foul' language, are still
insults.

And the only insult I've hurled at you has been hypocrite, but that's
because the way you argue points, you are one, and if you don't think
so, go look up the definition.

You complain about people insulting you while you then turn around and
insult them. I'd say the same if anyone who posted these insults
started to attack others for posting them.

As for the foul language, I don't like it, but it's a free country,
and an unmoderated Usenet forum. In other words, no holds barred as
long as no laws are broken (like posting hate propoganda etc..). If I
don't like what they post, even if it's directed at me, I'll ignore
it, it doesn't offend me, and I'm mature enough that I don't have to
go crying about when someone does. Also, you never had one complaint
while Justin swore more than a ghetto high school, why is that? It's
OK for people with the same anti-PCS attitude you have to swear, but
not OK for the others? Talk about a double standard.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:
> >
> > > Bad Language by apologists <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:<[email protected]>...
> > > > The Blind SprintPCS Apologists that use bad language whenever they
> > > > disagree with someone, don't restrict that bad behavior to this news
> > > > group.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yet you don't consider
> > >
> > > "Is Mike a moron too? "
> >
> > You think the words posted by the APOLOGITS worse? Well thank you for
> > defending and encouraging such behavior.
>
> I don't like it when anyone posts childish insults.

Then be a little even handed in your speaking about the subject **for
once**.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

TechGeek <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I don't like it when anyone posts childish insults.
>
> *BUT** You're complaining that people are tossing insults at you, but
> then you post comments with malice, too.
>
> "Go back to flying business class"
> "Go back to Best Buy and buy your horror movies"
> (I'm still trying to figure out these two)
>
> "Is Mike a moron too?"
> "DOes your mommy know you're using the computer?"
>
> All those, even though they don't use 'foul' language, are still
> insults.
>
> And the only insult I've hurled at you has been hypocrite, but that's
> because the way you argue points, you are one, and if you don't think
> so, go look up the definition.
>
> You complain about people insulting you while you then turn around and
> insult them. I'd say the same if anyone who posted these insults
> started to attack others for posting them.
>
> As for the foul language, I don't like it, but it's a free country,
> and an unmoderated Usenet forum. In other words, no holds barred as
> long as no laws are broken (like posting hate propoganda etc..). If I
> don't like what they post, even if it's directed at me, I'll ignore
> it, it doesn't offend me, and I'm mature enough that I don't have to
> go crying about when someone does. Also, you never had one complaint
> while Justin swore more than a ghetto high school, why is that? It's
> OK for people with the same anti-PCS attitude you have to swear, but
> not OK for the others? Talk about a double standard.

To attack me he had to google up an word I used in a homebrewing
newsgroup last summer! It just doesn't make sense why he enjoys the
things that he does.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAjx2R1p0e3NXsrtERAtdyAJ9NGRu/cYbSjr2bpT/JvjMnfQ74tQCgqv/0
HnqpPZb7vWo8a4Ggd8SQrBw=
=6rao
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
>
> Then be a little even handed in your speaking about the subject **for
> once**.

I would, but they're not the ones who are constantly complaining about
it. The only time they complain is in reaction to a similar complaint
to you.

You post insults,
Then you complain that others post insults directed at you,
You post insults,
Then you complain that others post insults directed at you.

See a trend? No one else is following that trend.

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] (TechGeek) wrote:

> "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:<[email protected]>...
> >
> > Then be a little even handed in your speaking about the subject **for
> > once**.
>
> I would, but

Well you proved you support their bad language then.

"Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...

> Well you proved you support their bad language then.

I think you are completely justified in being offended by these
apologists... Just to thoroughly punish all of them, why don't you
deny them ALL the benefit of your wisdom and sage advice and never
post in this NG again.

That'll show them!