Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Robert M.
    Guest
    In article <[email protected]>,
    "John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > But the rebate qualification rules have changed. You're (deliberately?)
    > ignoring one important factor:
    > Those who pay for occasional Vision use (a la carte rather than a pack)
    > will be excluded from getting a handset rebate that they qualified for
    > under the previous upgrade rules. This affects me very materially.


    Everyone except osiris sees the rule change as the PRICE INCREASE it is.
    and it is a disgrace to SprintPCS for him call anyone a liar for
    pointing that out.

    It affects the 75% plus of SprintPCS customers that currently have
    Vision phone, but do not have Vision.

    So is SprintPCS saying it needs you to subscribe to Vision to be
    profittable ( that would help them), and wants you to leave when you
    need a new phone?



    See More: 18 month changes - Is osiris spinning?




  2. #2
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: 18 month changes - Is osiris spinning?

    In article <[email protected]>,=20
    [email protected] says...
    > Everyone except osiris sees the rule change as the PRICE INCREASE it is.
    > and it is a disgrace to SprintPCS for him call anyone a liar for=20
    > pointing that out.
    >=20


    1. That isn't why you're a liar, Phill.

    2. No, it's not "everyone."

    #2 is why you're a liar.

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



  3. #3
    Peterbilt
    Guest

    Re: 18 month changes - Is osiris spinning?

    I asked you once before. Stop changing your f**king nym and email address.
    How can I keep blocking you if you keep changing your nym? I kind of figured
    you did when I saw there were over 90 messages in here. I wonder how many
    are yours, probably more than half. Meet by killfile once again. By the way,
    the phone you wanted to by from me has been sold on ebay for $150. I decided
    that the $100 you offered me was way below what it was worth.

    "Robert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    In article <[email protected]>,
    "John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote:

    > But the rebate qualification rules have changed. You're (deliberately?)
    > ignoring one important factor:
    > Those who pay for occasional Vision use (a la carte rather than a pack)
    > will be excluded from getting a handset rebate that they qualified for
    > under the previous upgrade rules. This affects me very materially.


    Everyone except osiris sees the rule change as the PRICE INCREASE it is.
    and it is a disgrace to SprintPCS for him call anyone a liar for
    pointing that out.

    It affects the 75% plus of SprintPCS customers that currently have
    Vision phone, but do not have Vision.

    So is SprintPCS saying it needs you to subscribe to Vision to be
    profittable ( that would help them), and wants you to leave when you
    need a new phone?





  4. #4
    Robert M.
    Guest

    Re: 18 month changes - Is osiris spinning?

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "Peterbilt" <amazon-*****@NO-SPAMeudoramail.com> wrote:

    > By the way,
    > the phone you wanted to by from me has been sold on ebay for $150. I decided
    > that the $100 you offered me was way below what it was worth.


    I never tried to buy a phone from you. Don't need to, I get them FREE
    from Sprint PCS.



  5. #5
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: 18 month changes - Is osiris spinning?

    In article <[email protected]>,=20
    [email protected] says...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
    >=20
    >=20
    > > you're a liar.

    >=20
    > That's all you know how to say.
    >=20
    > A disgrace to Sprinbt PCS is what Vargas is.
    >=20

    And yet, not 48 hours ago, you were pointing out how I was *not*=20
    calling others a liar.

    Do you enjoy stepping on your own toes, Phillie?

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



  • Similar Threads