Results 1 to 2 of 2
- 05-06-2004, 03:46 AM #1Robert M.Guest
In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <rmarkoff-537C7F.04232430042004
> @news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> > It's no big deal you said if SprintPCS loses $27 million, which is what a
> > a .2% increase in churn equals in lost revenue JUST from recurring
> > charges.
> >
>
> You're math is still as far off as ever. Keep ranting, though,
> Phillie. It's obvious you've no intention of ever *discussing*.
Saying my math is off does not make it so. It's just a LIE.
Part of your typical midnight run of insults
I posted the math, you never posted different math. YOU ARE THE LIAR
here, the disgrace of SprintPCS.
From: Robert M. ([email protected])
Subject: Sprint employee OK's losing $27 million *
View this article onlyNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
Date: 2004-04-25 03:41:35 PST
In article <[email protected]>,
O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
> In article <rmarkoff-3FB383.05473524042004
> @news03.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> > Baloney. SprintPCS has not released the WLNP numbers that support such a
> > statement.
>
> Churn increased 0.2% in the last quarter over the previous. how bad
> can it be? Not much at all. And in line with what was predicted. A
> minimal impact.
Liar, not in line with predictions.
Let's do the math. .2% per month = 2.4% per year. With 16.3 million
customers, thats 455,200 Extra Customers Lost. At an average of
$61/month each thats $27,312,00 lost.
$27 Million + is "Not much at all" If this doesn't fit the definition
of a Blind Sprint apologist, nothing does.
Lauer also predicted SprintPCS would be a winner from WLNP and then
didnt puiblish those numbers.
Lauer also predicted decreasing costs, and then didnt publish cost of
new customer acquisition, previously outrageously high.
› See More: Sprint employee coverup
- 05-06-2004, 04:40 PM #2O/SirisGuest
Re: Sprint employee coverup
In article <[email protected]>,=20
[email protected] says...
> Saying my math is off does not make it so.
>=20
The math shows itself, Phillie. I don't have to post it.
2x2=3D5 is wrong whether or not someone ever actually posts that 2x2=3D4
--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
Similar Threads
- HP (Palm)
- Verizon
- Sprint PCS
- General Cell Phone Forum
Recover scammed cryptocurrency
in Samsung