Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Robert M.
    Guest
    In article <[email protected]>,
    O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

    > In article <rmarkoff-537C7F.04232430042004
    > @news04.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
    > > It's no big deal you said if SprintPCS loses $27 million, which is what a
    > > a .2% increase in churn equals in lost revenue JUST from recurring
    > > charges.
    > >

    >
    > You're math is still as far off as ever. Keep ranting, though,
    > Phillie. It's obvious you've no intention of ever *discussing*.


    Saying my math is off does not make it so. It's just a LIE.
    Part of your typical midnight run of insults


    I posted the math, you never posted different math. YOU ARE THE LIAR
    here, the disgrace of SprintPCS.


    From: Robert M. ([email protected])
    Subject: Sprint employee OK's losing $27 million *
    View this article onlyNewsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs
    Date: 2004-04-25 03:41:35 PST

    In article <[email protected]>,
    O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:

    > In article <rmarkoff-3FB383.05473524042004
    > @news03.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
    > > Baloney. SprintPCS has not released the WLNP numbers that support such a
    > > statement.

    >
    > Churn increased 0.2% in the last quarter over the previous. how bad
    > can it be? Not much at all. And in line with what was predicted. A
    > minimal impact.


    Liar, not in line with predictions.

    Let's do the math. .2% per month = 2.4% per year. With 16.3 million
    customers, thats 455,200 Extra Customers Lost. At an average of
    $61/month each thats $27,312,00 lost.

    $27 Million + is "Not much at all" If this doesn't fit the definition
    of a Blind Sprint apologist, nothing does.

    Lauer also predicted SprintPCS would be a winner from WLNP and then
    didnt puiblish those numbers.

    Lauer also predicted decreasing costs, and then didnt publish cost of
    new customer acquisition, previously outrageously high.



    See More: Sprint employee coverup




  2. #2
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Sprint employee coverup

    In article <[email protected]>,=20
    [email protected] says...
    > Saying my math is off does not make it so.
    >=20


    The math shows itself, Phillie. I don't have to post it.

    2x2=3D5 is wrong whether or not someone ever actually posts that 2x2=3D4

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



  • Similar Threads