Forging still

> no one at EL did ...

Just the gentleman in the Earthlink newsgroup than was responsible for USENET
at Earthlink last fall.

Too bad Google doesn't archive that internal newsgroup, so I could remind you
of the post that so informed you. (earthlink.support.usenet)

Earthlink has and had no problem with folks using or changing alias in USENET.
And you know that.

---

› See More: Forging still

Nebby00007 wrote:
> GET REAL Steven


http://tinyurl.com/3bjft

"Nebby00007" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> > no one at EL did ...
>
> Just the gentleman in the Earthlink newsgroup than was responsible for
USENET
> at Earthlink last fall.
>
> Too bad Google doesn't archive that internal newsgroup, so I could remind
you
> of the post that so informed you. (earthlink.support.usenet)
>
> Earthlink has and had no problem with folks using or changing alias in
USENET.
> And you know that.

Yes, it is too bad. It might refresh your memory of what really happened in
that newsgroup.

Bob

(Bob=A0Smith) wrote:
<<Yes, it is too bad. It might refresh your memory of what really
happened in that newsgroup. >>

Just let it go, Bob. Don't turn this into one of those long, drawn-out
exchanges like he and O/Siris had. If you really want to clean up the
clutter in this newsgroup like you say you do, don't participate in a
back-and-forth then.

(Bob=A0Smith) wrote:
<<Don't stop there Tom. He also lies like a dog, purposely misquotes
prior posts and posters, and has impersonated other folks posting here,
yours truly included. >>

That's a good thing to post to try and get someone to change their ways.
Gee, I wonder if this was antagonizing someone.

"Eric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
(Bob Smith) wrote:
<<Don't stop there Tom. He also lies like a dog, purposely misquotes
prior posts and posters, and has impersonated other folks posting here,
yours truly included. >>

That's a good thing to post to try and get someone to change their ways.
Gee, I wonder if this was antagonizing someone.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------

Eric, despite your actions to try to reduce the arguments here, the truth
about Phillipe doesn't change. Just today, he used 7 different IDs ...

Bob

(Bob=A0Smith) wrote:
<<Eric, despite your actions to try to reduce the arguments here, the
truth about Phillipe doesn't change. Just today, he used 7 different IDs
... >>

And if one would think... the person that is causing him to do so these
past couple of days is whoever is posting as him. He stayed with the
Robert M. alias (and msn email addy) for quite some time prior to this
bozo popping up. But now this person has taken things into his own
hands and repeatedly posts things like "Don't respond to..." and such...
only to antagonize him more. He has said that he would quit with this
guy would, and so far, that guy hasn't yet.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Bob Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> "Nebby00007" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>
>> > no one at EL did ...
>>
>> Just the gentleman in the Earthlink newsgroup than was responsible for
> USENET
>> at Earthlink last fall.
>>
>> Too bad Google doesn't archive that internal newsgroup, so I could remind
> you
>> of the post that so informed you. (earthlink.support.usenet)
>>
>> Earthlink has and had no problem with folks using or changing alias in
> USENET.
>> And you know that.
>
> Yes, it is too bad. It might refresh your memory of what really happened in
> that newsgroup.
>
> Bob
>
>

You would be surprised what could be resurrected if one could just get
the message id.

- --

Thomas T. Veldhouse
Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFAnBN11p0e3NXsrtERAjjYAJ47WpyLdpvuwyeWRrNn7ktG7lJyDgCfZE0S
5gYV2CpMiLklEIBoprkOZeI=
=OQH3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

"Eric" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
(Bob Smith) wrote:
<<Eric, despite your actions to try to reduce the arguments here, the
truth about Phillipe doesn't change. Just today, he used 7 different IDs
... >>

And if one would think... the person that is causing him to do so these
past couple of days is whoever is posting as him. He stayed with the
Robert M. alias (and msn email addy) for quite some time prior to this
bozo popping up. But now this person has taken things into his own
hands and repeatedly posts things like "Don't respond to..." and such...
only to antagonize him more. He has said that he would quit with this
guy would, and so far, that guy hasn't yet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

No, he didn't just stay with the Robert M. ID Eric. He changed his address 4
separate times while using the Robert M. aliases, as shown below.

Robert M. [email protected]
Robert M. [email protected]
Robert M. [email protected]
Robert M. [email protected]


As to changing his IDs 86 times, no one forced him to do that. He does that
to get around kill filters, plain and simple. He's the antagonizer here.
There's no need to change IDs 15 times over the past two to three days.

As I mentioned previously, he's got a mental problem. No one in their sane
mind would change IDs so many times, do what he's done in the past and then
expect that all will be well, if he stops changing IDs. He's burned to many
friggin bridges with his ID changes, his lies, his misquotes, his unmunging
of email addresses and creating aliases of others here.

If he wants to be taken seriously, and wants forgiveness in this forum, he
needs to apologize to all concerned, fess up to his lies, and stick with one
ID ... Plain and simple.

By the by, I won't be replying to any of his posts, unless he starts going
after me ... Then the gloves are off.

Bob

Bob

I have him in my kill filter (as read) 46 times now. It would be up to 86
times, however he uses names of others who post here.

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Bob Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > "Nebby00007" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >>
> >> > no one at EL did ...
> >>
> >> Just the gentleman in the Earthlink newsgroup than was responsible for
> > USENET
> >> at Earthlink last fall.
> >>
> >> Too bad Google doesn't archive that internal newsgroup, so I could
remind
> > you
> >> of the post that so informed you. (earthlink.support.usenet)
> >>
> >> Earthlink has and had no problem with folks using or changing alias in
> > USENET.
> >> And you know that.
> >
> > Yes, it is too bad. It might refresh your memory of what really happened
in
> > that newsgroup.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> >
>
> You would be surprised what could be resurrected if one could just get
> the message id.

I still have copies of all my posts to earthlink.support.usenet. Here's a
copy of the post where EL support replied to yours truly in the newsgroup -

From: "Bob Smith" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: earthlink.support.usenet
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: What's EL's take on a user changing ID's 4 times in less than 3
weeks?
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:09:19 -0400
Lines: 29
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165


"EarthLink News Support" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<snipped >
>
> EarthLink does not have any policy that states a News Group user
cannot change their user ID 5 times in 3 weeks.
> However, changing an ID might be an indirect cause of an action that
violated the A.U.P.
>
> Please review the EarthLink Acceptable Use Policy at
http://www.earthlink.net/about/policies/use
>
> If you find that an EarthLink customer is in violation of the
A.U.P., please send a report to [email protected] as stated on
section 3 of the A.U.P.
>
>
> Robert O.
> EarthLink News Support
> [email protected]
> [email protected]

Thanks for the reply Robert. Unfortunately, I didn't notice any AUP
violations ...

Bob::thinking maybe EL should add a "P" to that list::

<EOM>

As you can see, no where did EL say for me to get out of there, as Phillipe
has said ...

Bob

Bob Smith wrote:
>
> <snip>

Y'know, Bob, I used to have a modicum of respect for you, thinking
that you were intelligent enough to remove yourself from these
childish discussions. Clearly, I was wrong.

Your obsession with the troll is becoming as much of an irritant to
others as he's become to you.

No need to respond.

Larry

[email protected] (Nebby0007) wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
> All your insults are counter productive.
>
> The triband phone post by tech-geek was an archtypical TROLL, but in double
> standard
> fashion you SprintPCS apologists didn't complain.

So, you tell me to stop posting, you call me a troll, then you
complain that others are insulting you? Talk about an unprevoked
attack.

How was my quad mode phone (not triband) a "trolling" post? I
admitted that I made a mistake in my statement regarding it, but the
rest was copy & pasted from the link I supplied.

Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
> Nebby00007 wrote:
>> GET REAL Steven
>
>
> http://tinyurl.com/3bjft

Very, very cute. I wouldn't buy anything from the spamming asswipes at
Real if they were the last company on earth offering streaming media software.

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
Domain Names, $9.95/yr, 24x7 service: http://DomainNames.JustThe.net/
"someone once called me a sofa, but i didn't feel compelled to rush out and buy
slip covers." -adam brower * Hiroshima '45, Chernobyl '86, Windows 98/2000/2003

Steven J Sobol wrote:

> Very, very cute. I wouldn't buy anything from the spamming asswipes at
> Real if they were the last company on earth offering streaming media software.
>

Yes, I haven't run Real in a very long time, save a day or two here and
there, when I try to remind myself why I don't run it the rest of the time.

I just never liked "GET REAL" or "BE REAL" as an argument.
It's silly, and sometimes, I want to respond in kind.
-mike

In article <[email protected]>,
Mike <[email protected]> wrote:

> Steven J Sobol wrote:
>
> > Very, very cute. I wouldn't buy anything from the spamming asswipes at
> > Real if they were the last company on earth offering streaming media
> > software.
> >
>
> Yes, I haven't run Real in a very long time, save a day or two here and
> there, when I try to remind myself why I don't run it the rest of the time.
>
> I just never liked "GET REAL" or "BE REAL" as an argument.
> It's silly, and sometimes, I want to respond in kind.

Strange how those that whine the most about "cleaning up" this newsgroup
encourage all the pot stirrers.