Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Monday, March 24....

    http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938


    --
    John Bartley K7AAY http://celdata.cjb.net
    This post quad-ROT-13 encrypted; reading it violates the DMCA.
    "We're not living in a simulation. We're living in a collaborative SF novel... and now, of course, it's Philip K. Dick's turn. In a back room somewhere, Vernor Vinge and George Orwell are currently arguing about who gets to take over in 2025." (Ross Smit
    h)



    See More: Number portability for the rest of the US




  2. #2
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Number portability for the rest of the US

    In alt.cellular [email protected] wrote:
    > Monday, March 24....


    ITYM May 24

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
    Domain Names, $9.95/yr, 24x7 service: http://DomainNames.JustThe.net/
    "someone once called me a sofa, but i didn't feel compelled to rush out and buy
    slip covers." -adam brower * Hiroshima '45, Chernobyl '86, Windows 98/2000/2003



  3. #3
    RÝbert M
    Guest

    Re: Number portability for the rest of the US

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] wrote:

    > Monday, March 24....
    >
    > http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938


    Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in
    November.



  4. #4
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Number portability for the rest of the US

    In article <[email protected]>,=20
    [email protected] says...
    > Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in=20
    > November.
    >=20


    Something you still haven't proven, Phill, nor have you even=20
    attempted to do so.

    And no, quarter-over-quarter numbers are *not* considered relevant by=20
    real expert in the industry.

    The ones looking at this objectively (most everyone *but* you) know=20
    it's too early to come to a conclusion.

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



  5. #5
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Number portability for the rest of the US


    "RÝbert M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected] wrote:
    >
    > > Monday, March 24....
    > >
    > > http://pdaphonehome.com/forums/showt...threadid=29938

    >
    > Could hurt Sprint PCS, already a WLNP loser from what started in
    > November.


    So Phillipe, you've spouted this a few times ... Where's the proof
    previously asked for, by yours truly and others ...?

    By the by, should we reiterate your history on the SPCS newsgroup?

    Bob






  6. #6

    Re: Number portability for the rest of the US

    On Wed, 19 May 2004 18:23:42 -0500, Steven J Sobol <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    >In alt.cellular [email protected] wrote:
    >> Monday, March 24....

    >
    >ITYM May 24


    Brain Damage.
    --
    John Bartley K7AAY http://celdata.cjb.net
    This post quad-ROT-13 encrypted; reading it violates the DMCA.
    Nobody but a fool goes into a federal counterrorism operation without duct tape - Richard Preston, THE COBRA EVENT.



  • Similar Threads