Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Nebby
    Guest
    The proof is in the 10-Q numbers and the 1,400,000 customers that left
    SprintPCS.

    Sprint PCS is a WLNP loser.

    http://www.sprint.com/sprint/ir/fn/ars.html

    Read it and weep.



    See More: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS




  2. #2
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS


    "Nebby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > The proof is in the 10-Q numbers and the 1,400,000 customers that left
    > SprintPCS.
    >
    > Sprint PCS is a WLNP loser.
    >
    > http://www.sprint.com/sprint/ir/fn/ars.html
    >
    > Read it and weep.


    Nope, didn't find what you are talking about ...

    Bob





  3. #3
    Nebby
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS

    > Nope, didn't find what you are talking about ...

    You didnt see the Motorola v60v for $199.99 either.

    <A
    HREF="http://www.sprint.com/sprint/ir/fn/ars.html">http://www.sprint.com/s
    print/ir/fn/ars.html</A>



  4. #4
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS


    "Nebby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > > Nope, didn't find what you are talking about ...

    >
    > You didnt see the Motorola v60v for $199.99 either.
    >
    > <A
    > HREF="http://www.sprint.com/sprint/ir/fn/ars.html">http://www.sprint.com/s
    > print/ir/fn/ars.html</A>


    So, Phillipe ... that still doesn't answer your original post . Do a
    copy/paste from the report, showing a net loss of 1,400,000 subs from WLNP
    .... and provide a direct link as well.

    Bob





  5. #5
    Nebby
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS

    The numbers are in the Quarterly 10-K filed with the SEC.

    Try and produce a URL saying SprintPCS is a winner if I'm wrong. YOU CAN'T.



  6. #6
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS


    "Nebby" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > The numbers are in the Quarterly 10-K filed with the SEC.
    >
    > Try and produce a URL saying SprintPCS is a winner if I'm wrong. YOU

    CAN'T.

    So, then you can't do a copy and paste of the text ... can you!

    Bob





  7. #7
    Røbert M
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected]ants (Nebby) wrote:

    > The numbers are in the Quarterly 10-K filed with the SEC.
    >
    > Try and produce a URL saying SprintPCS is a winner if I'm wrong. YOU CAN'T.


    How about:

    http://www.phoneplusmag.com/articles/411feat05.html



  8. #8
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS


    "Røbert M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > [email protected]ants (Nebby) wrote:
    >
    > > The numbers are in the Quarterly 10-K filed with the SEC.
    > >
    > > Try and produce a URL saying SprintPCS is a winner if I'm wrong. YOU

    CAN'T.
    >
    > How about:
    >
    > http://www.phoneplusmag.com/articles/411feat05.html


    Changing IDs in the same thread again Phillipe? That link of yours is dated
    1/2004, and doesn't say diddley with regards to your original post in this
    thread.

    Come on Phillipe. Do the copy and paste, confirming your comments. Put up or
    shut up Phillipe ...

    Bob





  9. #9
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Phillip <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> Try and produce a URL saying SprintPCS is a winner if I'm wrong. YOU CAN'T.

    >
    > How about:
    >
    > http://www.phoneplusmag.com/articles/411feat05.html


    That is a link from a online magazine dated just over one month after
    the beginning of WLNP. We are 6 months into it now. Further, they
    don't back up anything with numbers. That was a REALLY BIG STRETCH
    Phillip.

    - --

    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

    iD8DBQFArMMm1p0e3NXsrtERAvk8AJ4muBNOCb24ASM2jaSVQUHkCLLYXACdEWvx
    WwBqRiocgbrcShjwgQd7Sbw=
    =7tF9
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  10. #10
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Number portability loser - Sprint PCS

    In article <[email protected]>, nebby00007
    @aol.compants says...
    > The proof is in the 10-Q numbers and the 1,400,000 customers that left
    > SprintPCS.
    >=20
    > Sprint PCS is a WLNP loser.
    >=20
    > http://www.sprint.com/sprint/ir/fn/ars.html
    >=20
    > Read it and weep.
    >=20


    None of which says how many ported out, Phill. Another fact you=20
    ignore, which is what makes you the liar.

    Churn is *down* year over year, the standard *real* industry experts=20
    use. Another fact you continue to ignore.

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



  • Similar Threads