Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    Frankie says
    Guest

    Re: **PORTABILTY LIST**



    Røbert M wrote:

    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    >>Hash: SHA1
    >>
    >>R?bert M <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>>A hollow offer in as much as you already are posting under multiple
    >>>identities,.

    >>
    >>That sir, you are dead wrong about.

    >
    >
    > NOPE, who else who fraudulently posts a [email protected] than you.



    Oh please, mister multi id's speaks of others ?

    Sad, very sad.

    Frank




    See More: **PORTABILTY LIST**




  2. #17
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: **PORTABILTY LIST**


    "Røbert M" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]...
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > > No, This group needs a counter balance to the folks who think Sprint

    PCS
    > > > can do no wrong, and refuse to help people with real problems. Insult
    > > > them rather than pass along Scott Lane's phone number when porting
    > > > hasn't been done after 23 days.

    > >
    > > I believe we all directed Scott in his quest to get ported.

    >
    > Duh - Scott Lane is the name of the SprintPCS honcho in charge of
    > porting. And you no such thing as directing the OP with any help other
    > than along avenues that were getting him no where.
    >
    > Scott Lane - Sprint PCD Director of Porting
    >
    > 913-762-7449


    That's fine- you can focus on the one error I made. I was confusing Scott
    Lane with the poster having problems with this port. That should show you
    soimething- I do admit error (try it some time). I notice you are ignoring
    both the rest of this post, and any other that asks for facts. Why is that?






  3. #18
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: **PORTABILTY LIST**

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
    Hash: SHA1

    Phillip <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > NOPE, who else who fraudulently posts a [email protected] than you.


    You are the one that originally used it. I am simply attempting to
    reply to a single ID on a consistant basis so that readers here have no
    doubt as to whom I am truly replying to. Are you trying to say that you
    NEVER used [email protected]?

    - --

    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

    iD8DBQFAsR0H1p0e3NXsrtERArGxAJ47psiLdlHrd1tcOsIOJ8hF/Hi9RwCfc9JF
    CM7PQ5uRXdZGF8bYOOrzQEI=
    =bxFn
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12