Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Røbert M.
    Guest
    http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/NEWS_RELEASE/36910.htm

    "What I would consider fundamental, non-controversial rights of
    consumers, even such as having a due date printed on their bills or to
    credit a payment on the business day received, required negotiation with
    the industry." - Commissioner Geoffrey F. Brown; California Public
    Utilities Commission (PUC)



    See More: CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL OF RIGHTS




  2. #2
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL OF RIGHTS


    "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/NEWS_RELEASE/36910.htm
    >
    > "What I would consider fundamental, non-controversial rights of
    > consumers, even such as having a due date printed on their bills or to
    > credit a payment on the business day received, required negotiation with
    > the industry." - Commissioner Geoffrey F. Brown; California Public
    > Utilities Commission (PUC)



    Wasn't this one of the bozos that was around during the energy price gouging
    a few years back? California PUC really showed a lot of concern while that
    was going on, and showed that they don't give a crap about the consumer. Of
    course, what else is he going to say- I notice that there is no mention of
    anticipated revenue for the state from these regulations. Wonder why?





  3. #3
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL OF RIGHTS


    "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/NEWS_RELEASE/36910.htm
    >
    > "What I would consider fundamental, non-controversial rights of
    > consumers, even such as having a due date printed on their bills or to
    > credit a payment on the business day received, required negotiation with
    > the industry." - Commissioner Geoffrey F. Brown; California Public
    > Utilities Commission (PUC)


    BTW- I've had a due date on my cellular bill for years now.





  4. #4
    Scott Stephenson
    Guest

    Re: CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL OF RIGHTS


    "Røbert M." <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/NEWS_RELEASE/36910.htm
    >
    > "What I would consider fundamental, non-controversial rights of
    > consumers, even such as having a due date printed on their bills or to
    > credit a payment on the business day received, required negotiation with
    > the industry." - Commissioner Geoffrey F. Brown; California Public
    > Utilities Commission (PUC)


    One more thing- who gives a crap about the PUC? Last time I checked,
    cellular service was not a public utility.





  5. #5
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: CALIFORNIA TELECOMMUNICATIONS BILL OF RIGHTS

    In alt.cellular Scott Stephenson <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    > One more thing- who gives a crap about the PUC? Last time I checked,
    > cellular service was not a public utility.


    It apparently *is* regulated in some states. May be in Cali - I don't know.
    I do know that it isn't in Ohio, and that it is in New York...


    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, Apple Valley, CA PGP: 0xE3AE35ED
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
    Domain Names, $9.95/yr, 24x7 service: http://DomainNames.JustThe.net/
    "someone once called me a sofa, but i didn't feel compelled to rush out and buy
    slip covers." -adam brower * Hiroshima '45, Chernobyl '86, Windows 98/2000/2003



  • Similar Threads