Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Andrew Shepherd
    Guest
    Despite any corporate indications to the contrary, there is -- and
    actually has been for over two years -- native Sprint PCS footprint in
    Alaska. See the TinyURL below for links to PDF maps demonstrating the
    geographically concentrated SPCS coverage in Anchorage, Fairbanks, &
    Juneau.

    The five-year construction deadlines for SPCS' three PCS D 10 MHz BTA
    licenses covering all of AK came due in April 2002. By that time,
    legally SPCS must have launched systems covering at least 25% of the
    POPs in each of the respective BTAs in order to satisfy that condition
    of the licenses. Indeed, the Required Notification applications were
    filed w/ the FCC in March 2002. As such, whether commercially
    publicized or not, SPCS must have established a few active sites in
    AK. As each of the three BTAs are very sparsely populated outside of
    the titular cities, the 25% POPs coverage was probably achieved w/
    only a handful of sites in Anchorage, perhaps only one or two each in
    Fairbanks & Juneau.

    The following is an extraction from my own SPCS spectrum database. As
    the three licenses were issued in April 1997, adequate service must
    have been launched no later than April 2002.

    Alaska MTA049 (SID 4500)
    CDMA channels: PCS 0375-i
    BTA014 Anchorage, AK KNLH465 PCS D 1865-1870/1945-1950 MHz 10 MHz
    BTA136 Fairbanks, AK KNLH518 PCS D 1865-1870/1945-1950 MHz 10 MHz
    BTA221 Juneau-Ketchikan, AK KNLH545 PCS D 1865-1870/1945-1950 MHz 10
    MHz

    http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...p?licKey=10634
    http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...p?licKey=10687
    http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...p?licKey=10714

    The following is a link to the Required Notification application
    submitted to the FCC by SPCS in demonstration of satisfaction of its
    five-year PCS construction requirement in the three AK BTAs. Included
    are attached PDF buildout maps depicting the unspoken SPCS native
    footprint in AK.

    http://tinyurl.com/2hvjm

    Andrew
    --
    Andrew Shepherd
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    http://www.wirelesswavelength.com/



    See More: SPCS Alaska coverage maps...




  2. #2
    Røbert M.
    Guest

    Re: SPCS Alaska coverage maps...

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] (Andrew Shepherd) wrote:

    > The following is a link to the Required Notification application
    > submitted to the FCC by SPCS in demonstration of satisfaction of its
    > five-year PCS construction requirement in the three AK BTAs. Included
    > are attached PDF buildout maps depicting the unspoken SPCS native
    > footprint in AK.
    >
    > http://tinyurl.com/2hvjm


    "Unspoken"? In Texas thats called a LIE.



  3. #3
    bassrecord
    Guest

    Re: SPCS Alaska coverage maps...

    The below notwithstanding, we drove to Alaska and back in 2002 and could get
    SPRINT NOWHERE. That included British Columbia, Yukon, Anchorage, Fairbanks
    and all paved highways in Alaska. We did not try Juneau. The ironic quirk
    was that Sprint advertised their availability on all Alaska TV stations that
    we saw. From May through mid September we were ripped off because before we
    went Sprint Customer Service said Sprint was in Alaska. They lied. We could
    roam in Anchorage, Fairbanks and places on the Kenai peninsula.

    Good luck!
    John
    "Andrew Shepherd" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Despite any corporate indications to the contrary, there is -- and
    > actually has been for over two years -- native Sprint PCS footprint in
    > Alaska. See the TinyURL below for links to PDF maps demonstrating the
    > geographically concentrated SPCS coverage in Anchorage, Fairbanks, &
    > Juneau.
    >
    > The five-year construction deadlines for SPCS' three PCS D 10 MHz BTA
    > licenses covering all of AK came due in April 2002. By that time,
    > legally SPCS must have launched systems covering at least 25% of the
    > POPs in each of the respective BTAs in order to satisfy that condition
    > of the licenses. Indeed, the Required Notification applications were
    > filed w/ the FCC in March 2002. As such, whether commercially
    > publicized or not, SPCS must have established a few active sites in
    > AK. As each of the three BTAs are very sparsely populated outside of
    > the titular cities, the 25% POPs coverage was probably achieved w/
    > only a handful of sites in Anchorage, perhaps only one or two each in
    > Fairbanks & Juneau.
    >
    > The following is an extraction from my own SPCS spectrum database. As
    > the three licenses were issued in April 1997, adequate service must
    > have been launched no later than April 2002.
    >
    > Alaska MTA049 (SID 4500)
    > CDMA channels: PCS 0375-i
    > BTA014 Anchorage, AK KNLH465 PCS D 1865-1870/1945-1950 MHz 10 MHz
    > BTA136 Fairbanks, AK KNLH518 PCS D 1865-1870/1945-1950 MHz 10 MHz
    > BTA221 Juneau-Ketchikan, AK KNLH545 PCS D 1865-1870/1945-1950 MHz 10
    > MHz
    >
    > http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...p?licKey=10634
    > http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...p?licKey=10687
    > http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...p?licKey=10714
    >
    > The following is a link to the Required Notification application
    > submitted to the FCC by SPCS in demonstration of satisfaction of its
    > five-year PCS construction requirement in the three AK BTAs. Included
    > are attached PDF buildout maps depicting the unspoken SPCS native
    > footprint in AK.
    >
    > http://tinyurl.com/2hvjm
    >
    > Andrew
    > --
    > Andrew Shepherd
    > [email protected]
    > [email protected]
    > http://www.wirelesswavelength.com/






  4. #4
    larry
    larry is offline
    Junior Member
    larry's Avatar

    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    19 - liked 4 times

    In order to acquire Sprint in Alaska back in 2002 I believe you had to have an updated PRL. That could be why you couldn't get a signal even though Sprint was advertising it as being available.
    Sprint user since 1997



  5. #5
    larry
    larry is offline
    Junior Member
    larry's Avatar

    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    19 - liked 4 times

    Re: SPCS Alaska coverage maps...

    Originally posted by Andrew Shepherd
    Despite any corporate indications to the contrary, there is -- and
    actually has been for over two years -- native Sprint PCS footprint in
    Alaska. See the TinyURL below for links to PDF maps demonstrating the
    geographically concentrated SPCS coverage in Anchorage, Fairbanks, &
    Juneau.
    Andrew,

    I heard recently that Sprint was providing service in Alaska using an affiliate (maybe Alaska DigiTel??). Is that true? I also heard that no Vision data services are available there.
    Sprint user since 1997



  6. #6
    Andrew Shepherd
    Guest

    Re: SPCS Alaska coverage maps...

    larry <[email protected]> wrote in message news:<[email protected]>...
    >
    > Andrew,
    >
    > I heard recently that Sprint was providing service in Alaska using an
    > affiliate (maybe Alaska DigiTel??). Is that true? I also heard that no
    > Vision data services are available there.


    Alaska DigiTel controls the PCS A license for the entire Alaska MTA.
    Actually, to be more precise, Alaska DigiTel controls the PCS A1 15
    MHz license. The PCS A2 upper 15 MHz was disaggregated to Denali PCS.

    http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...sp?licKey=8974
    http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...licKey=2448776

    Sprint PCS won at auction the PCS D 10 MHz license for each of the
    three BTAs in Alaska. Those three BTAs -- Anchorage, Fairbanks, &
    Juneau-Ketchikan -- comprise the Alaska MTA. Thus, SPCS effectively
    controls a consistent 10 MHz throughout all of Alaska. Reference my
    previous post w/in the thread for links likewise to the three SPCS
    licenses.

    In short, Alaska DigiTel has its own PCS spectrum -- 15 MHz to SPCS'
    10 MHz. And to my knowledge -- admittedly limited in this instance --
    there is no network partner affiliate relationship between them.
    Alaska DigiTel is simply a CDMA 1900 roaming partner.

    To explain further, a coverage report privately e-mailed to me by an
    SPCS user who recently visited Juneau is the proverbial smoking gun
    that prompted the investigation into the Alaskan licenses in the first
    place. The user reported -- for my ongoing deployed CDMA carrier
    channels documentation in my SPCS spectrum database -- that he
    received a native SPCS signal in downtown Juneau (SID 4500) (channel
    PCS 0325). The PCS D license includes three standard CDMA channel
    assignments: PCS 0325, 0350, 0375. As such, the coverage detected in
    Juneau was most certainly utilizing SPCS' PCS D license.

    I had blindly accepted the party line that SPCS yet had no native
    footprint in Alaska. When the user reported otherwise, I resolved the
    contradiction when it finally occurred to me that SPCS must have
    deployed at least a bare minimum of adequate service, otherwise the
    licenses would have automatically cancelled at the construction
    requirement deadline over two years ago.

    The SPCS user report also corroborated the assertion that Vision is
    not currently available in the tacit coverage in Alaska. I do
    suspect, however, that the Alaska SPCS infrastructure is truly
    cdma2000 1xRTT. It is unlikely that SPCS would have deployed more
    IS-95A as late as 2002. Lack of PCS Vision does not definitively
    indicate lack of CDMA1x, just as there is no such thing as only a "3G
    voice" handset. CDMA1x airlink enhancements -- QPSK, reverse-link
    pilot, fast forward-link power control, et al. -- demonstrate 1xRTT
    capability. But those enhancements do not have to provision
    supplemental channels for 153.6/230.4/307.2 Kbps packet data. Rather,
    the protocol revision of the SPCS sites is probably set artificially
    low so as not to allow PSD -- perhaps because the current backhaul
    capacity to the sites is not sufficent for anything but a few RS1 (9.6
    Kbps) or RS2 (14.4 Kbps) voice or CSD connections. Remember, after
    all, these few sites are merely placeholders to satisfy the FCC
    construction requirement until SPCS definitively decides upon a course
    of action -- to further buildout & launch commercial service in Alaska
    or to divest/relinquish the licenses as the cost-benefit analysis does
    not favorably compute.

    Andrew
    --
    Andrew Shepherd
    [email protected]
    [email protected]
    http://www.wirelesswavelength.com/



  • Similar Threads