Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 18 of 18
  1. #16
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level

    In article <rmarkoff-077321.13554308072004
    @news05.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
    > Its difficult to give that statement any value as you dont tell us where=

    =20
    > that is.
    >=20


    This from the same "expert" that can't even trust his own use of=20
    tinyurl.

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    I work for Sprint PCS
    I *don't* speak for them



    See More: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level




  2. #17
    Jerome Zelinske
    Guest

    Re: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level

    Any chance some gobmnt agency would dig a canal from the Pcific?
    Might be a good place for ship building, inland harbor, etc.?


    Steven J Sobol wrote:

    > Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >
    >>>"tens of feet below sea level"
    >>>
    >>>Care to elaborate?
    >>>
    >>>Notan

    >>
    >>Much of New Orleans, LA is below sea level.

    >
    >
    > Lowest point in USA: in Death Valley, California, 282 feet below sea level.
    >





  3. #18
    Steven J Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level

    Jerome Zelinske <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Any chance some gobmnt agency would dig a canal from the Pcific?
    > Might be a good place for ship building, inland harbor, etc.?


    A canal from the Pacific would have to go a long way to reach Death Valley.
    Death Valley sits on the Nevada border.

    So... No, probably not.

    --
    JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
    PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
    Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12