Results 16 to 18 of 18
- 07-09-2004, 12:26 AM #16O/SirisGuest
Re: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level
In article <rmarkoff-077321.13554308072004
@news05.east.earthlink.net>, [email protected] says...
> Its difficult to give that statement any value as you dont tell us where=
=20
> that is.
>=20
This from the same "expert" that can't even trust his own use of=20
tinyurl.
--=20
R=D8=DF
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them
› See More: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level
- 07-10-2004, 09:58 AM #17Jerome ZelinskeGuest
Re: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level
Any chance some gobmnt agency would dig a canal from the Pcific?
Might be a good place for ship building, inland harbor, etc.?
Steven J Sobol wrote:
> Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>"tens of feet below sea level"
>>>
>>>Care to elaborate?
>>>
>>>Notan
>>
>>Much of New Orleans, LA is below sea level.
>
>
> Lowest point in USA: in Death Valley, California, 282 feet below sea level.
>
- 07-10-2004, 10:58 AM #18Steven J SobolGuest
Re: Sprint PCS reception and coverage are below sea level
Jerome Zelinske <[email protected]> wrote:
> Any chance some gobmnt agency would dig a canal from the Pcific?
> Might be a good place for ship building, inland harbor, etc.?
A canal from the Pacific would have to go a long way to reach Death Valley.
Death Valley sits on the Nevada border.
So... No, probably not.
--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
- alt.cellular.ericsson
- alt.cellular.sprintpcs
icecasino
in Chit Chat