Scott Stephenson - right wing kook

In article <[email protected]>,
"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:

> "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>
> >
> > Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.
>
> Maybe they'll bring home more common sense than you appear to have.
> >
> > So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail *****ed
> > out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's name
> > and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
> > furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.
>
> Look again, Sherlock- I have done no such thing. I actually responded to
> the real thing. And the references to Kerry are fact-driven, as a google
> search on the Robert M. ID will prove. Stop trying to be so omnipotent (or
> maybe in your case its impotent) and do some research before throwing your
> pissy little darts.
>
> >
> > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's ****
> > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in reality
> the
> > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's Haliburton
> has
> > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
>
> I don't remember using the word Democrat in any of my posts. I mentioned
> Kerry, but he has already outlined his plans for more programs and bigger
> government. Robert has also stated his dreams for more regulatory agencies
> and expanded roles for those that already exist. The comparison is valid.
> The only dumb**** is the one arguing without knowing the facts.
>
> >
> > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
> > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
>
> And your point is...?
>
> >
> > -Donald in Austin
> > AA #2104
> >
> >

http://www.prisonplanet.com/260903cheneyties.html

tells it all.

---

› See More: Scott Stephenson - right wing kook

"Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > "The other Donald" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news[email protected]...
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe they'll bring you home a clue.
> >
> > Maybe they'll bring home more common sense than you appear to have.
> > >
> > > So, since you sit in the cheap seats and need every little detail
*****ed
> > > out for you, my point is that you ignorant ****s forge someone else's
name
> > > and post a message saying that they are a member of NAMBLA, and then
> > > furthering their fantasy with references to supporting Kerry.
> >
> > Look again, Sherlock- I have done no such thing. I actually responded
to
> > the real thing. And the references to Kerry are fact-driven, as a
google
> > search on the Robert M. ID will prove. Stop trying to be so omnipotent
(or
> > maybe in your case its impotent) and do some research before throwing
your
> > pissy little darts.
> >
> > >
> > > But, of course, dumb****s like you continue with the standard 70's
****
> > > about "Democrats want big government and entitlements," when in
reality
> > the
> > > government has grown under Bush's Administration and Cheney's
Haliburton
> > has
> > > been the biggest beneficiary of government handouts.
> >
> > I don't remember using the word Democrat in any of my posts. I
mentioned
> > Kerry, but he has already outlined his plans for more programs and
bigger
> > government. Robert has also stated his dreams for more regulatory
agencies
> > and expanded roles for those that already exist. The comparison is
valid.
> > The only dumb**** is the one arguing without knowing the facts.
> >
> > >
> > > Another reality check is that if it weren't for right-wing trash (Jon
> > > Matthews comes to mind) NAMBLA would lost to memory.
> >
> > And your point is...?
> >
> > >
> > > -Donald in Austin
> > > AA #2104
> > >
> > >
>
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/260903cheneyties.html
>
> tells it all.

Interesting article- Idon't see my name mentioned anywhere in it, though.
And how does my posting opinions of your tendencies affiliate me with either
side? I believe you are suffering from the '70's phenomenon that I was
accused of, by making such unfounded statements and using such an outdated
definition of political boundaries.

And being called a kook by a spineless troll is sort of like watching SNL- I
see the attempt at humor, but it falls flat somewhere in the delivery. I
also find it interesting that you selectively crosspost your responses,
something which you were *****ing about me doing yesterday. What happened to
the other groups- taking too much heat in those? And why do you keep
posting only your lame responses to sprint.pcs? They don't give a crap
about either of our political positions. Looks like an attempt to slander
me. Maybe that open Earthlink abuse ticket will come in handy after all.

"Robert" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
<snipped>
> http://www.prisonplanet.com/260903cheneyties.html
>
> tells it all.

I spent the time reading that article and am just curious where Scott's name
is in it. It's not there ... So Phillipe, is this a new category I can add
to the list of your internet inadequacies I should post?

Say, have you ever thought of using Ciela? It might help out on your Usenet
posts, as you certainly don't show anything here, save for a massive
inadequacy to back your words ...

Bob ::Thinking that Phillipe has shaved his right palm three times this past
week::