Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Rod Golding
    Guest
    As taken out of USAToday

    Verizon gets Vodafone OK for Sprint bid
    NEW YORK (Reuters) - Verizon Communications has gained the backing of
    partner Vodafone Group to bid for Sprint in a move that could thwart
    Sprint's potential $35 billion bid for Nextel Communications, the Wall
    Street Journal reported on Tuesday.
    Officials at Verizon (VZ), which jointly owns Verizon Wireless with
    Britain's Vodafone (VOD), have been talking about a possible takeover in the
    past few days after studying a potential deal for 18 months, people familiar
    with the situation told the newspaper, adding it is unclear if Verizon will
    indeed make a bid.

    A Verizon bid for Sprint (FON) could still be days or weeks away, the
    Journal said, because Verizon and Vodafone need to agree on issues such as
    how much to bid and how to deal with Sprint's land-line and long-distance
    phone operations.

    Sprint and Nextel (NXTL) have held talks over the past year about merging,
    renewing negotiations in recent days to create a wireless giant with about
    39 million customers to rival industry leaders Cingular Wireless and Verizon
    Wireless.

    The Journal reported that Sprint's board met on Monday afternoon to discuss
    the proposed deal with Nextel, while Nextel's board is also considering the
    prospective deal, noting that the merger is scheduled to be announced later
    on Tuesday in New York.







    See More: Verizon buying Sprint




  2. #2
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Verizon buying Sprint

    Rod Golding <[email protected]> wrote:
    > As taken out of USAToday
    >
    > Verizon gets Vodafone OK for Sprint bid
    > NEW YORK (Reuters) - Verizon Communications has gained the backing of

    <snip>

    This was completely expected. It was even mentioned as likely in the
    article that I read in the Minneapolis Star Tribune on Sunday.

    To me, this is a better fit, except for one thing. I expect that there
    would be a significant overlap in spectrum that the FCC would like
    require a sell-off. Now, that could cause a congestion issues that
    might make both sets of customers angry in some areas. At least
    Cingular and AT&T mostly had the same frequencies and thus didn't have
    as large of a problem as Verizon and Sprint will have.

    --
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
    Spammers please contact me at [email protected].




  3. #3
    Isaiah Beard
    Guest

    Re: Verizon buying Sprint

    Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
    > Rod Golding <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>As taken out of USAToday
    >>
    >>Verizon gets Vodafone OK for Sprint bid
    >>NEW YORK (Reuters) - Verizon Communications has gained the backing of

    >
    > <snip>
    >
    > This was completely expected. It was even mentioned as likely in the
    > article that I read in the Minneapolis Star Tribune on Sunday.



    Well, turns out it was a false rumor:

    http://tinyurl.com/4ujfq

    And a moot point anyway, as Sprint/Nextel is now official.


    --
    E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
    Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.




  4. #4
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Verizon buying Sprint

    Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > Well, turns out it was a false rumor:
    >
    > http://tinyurl.com/4ujfq
    >
    > And a moot point anyway, as Sprint/Nextel is now official.
    >


    True. It is possible that Verizon might surprise and bid, and that
    could throw a large cog into it all.

    --
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
    Spammers please contact me at [email protected].




  5. #5
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Verizon buying Sprint

    In article <41c09994$0$187
    [email protected]>, Thomas T.=20
    [email protected] says...
    > True. It is possible that Verizon might surprise and bid, and that
    > could throw a large cog into it all.
    >=20


    I actually think this would be to Verizon's *detriment*. =20
    There's too many legal requirements on *both* the landline=20
    and the wireless side. I suspect it would take more than a=20
    year to complete (and thus even longer to see any return on=20
    it, if any).

    --=20
    R=D8=DF
    O/Siris
    -+-
    **A thing moderately good
    is not so good as it ought to be.
    Moderation in temper is always a virtue,
    but moderation in principle is always a vice.**
    -Thomas Paine. The Rights of Man. 1792-



  6. #6

    Re: Verizon buying Sprint

    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    X-Trace: individual.net K45fXhVap6kulgO1iANCRw+m+HAAoWovzDOwNi4FKQfYcLnr23
    X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
    Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.cellular.sprintpcs:152299

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 16:52:39 GMT, O/Siris <0sīrīs@sprīntpcs.cōm>
    wrote:

    >[email protected] says...
    >> True. It is possible that Verizon might surprise and bid, and that
    >> could throw a large cog into it all.
    >>

    >
    >I actually think this would be to Verizon's *detriment*.
    >There's too many legal requirements on *both* the landline
    >and the wireless side. I suspect it would take more than a
    >year to complete (and thus even longer to see any return on
    >it, if any).


    I would certainly oppose it actively.

    If Verizon were to buy Sprint there would be a big percentage LESS
    competition in the market. I think Sprint buying Nextel is bad
    enough, but at least they mostly served different markets. Verizon
    and Sprint compete directly. I LIKE competition. Keeps the prices
    lower, keeps the service better (in theory, at least)

    I find it sad that the government let Cingular buy ATT. They
    shouldn't have. But ATT was probably unsustainable.



  7. #7
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Guest

    Re: Verizon buying Sprint

    X-No-Archive: yes
    Organization: Veldy's Brewery
    X-Homebrew: Relax, Don't Worry, Have a Hombrew!
    X-LearnToBrew: http://www.howtobrew.com
    X-Jokes: http://www.veldy.net/mailman/listinfo/jokes
    Date: 20 Dec 2004 15:14:35 GMT
    Lines: 20
    NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Dec 2004 09:14:35 CST
    X-Complaints-To: [email protected]
    Xref: news.newshosting.com alt.cellular.sprintpcs:152307

    O/Siris <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > I actually think this would be to Verizon's *detriment*.
    > There's too many legal requirements on *both* the landline
    > and the wireless side. I suspect it would take more than a
    > year to complete (and thus even longer to see any return on
    > it, if any).
    >


    I think it would be comparible in scale to the AT&T and Cingular merger.
    The resulting company would be a little bigger, so it would certainly
    cost more. Further, Verizon has a very low gross margin compared to its
    competitors [this perplexes me] so they probably have less to work with
    than Cingular did.

    --
    Thomas T. Veldhouse
    Key Fingerprint: 2DB9 813F F510 82C2 E1AE 34D0 D69D 1EDC D5EC AED1
    Spammers please contact me at [email protected].




  • Similar Threads