About to leave Sprint

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

<snipped>
> Reading comprehension problems? You're typing what I wrote for what
> reason? To sound it out?

No, I was asking what that had to do with replying to this thread. Yea, I've
got over 9000 messages in this newsgroup, but so what? I've been on this
newsgroup for 6 years now.
>
> > You asking a question in this newsgroup and
> > ripping and cussing everyone who replies to you?
>
> Even a cursory look at this thread shows I was merely dishing out what I
was
> receiving. The only difference is I'm not whining about it.

No one is whining in this thread. You initiated this thread, and said you
were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better for
you, and then ***** at everyone who took the time to reply to you. All
you've been doing here is trolling ...
>
> > Seems like you need to go back into treatment ... and maintain those
meds
> > of
> > yours ...
>
> Oh Bob, I should be more like you. No insults, just reasoned dialogue.
> *roll eyes*

Oh sure, reasoned dialog ... when you tell folks in your first replies to
them that they are a dick, then tell someone they are pulling information
out of their ass, or then call someone else a sock puppet?

All I can say is that you need to look in the mirror, when you say "No
Insults"

Have fun with Verizon and ... don't let the door hit you on your butt when
you leave this newsgroup.

Bob

---

› See More: About to leave Sprint

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
> <snipped>
>> Reading comprehension problems? You're typing what I wrote for what
>> reason? To sound it out?
>
> No, I was asking what that had to do with replying to this thread.

No, you didn't ask that. You repeated what I wrote with question marks,
which suggests your either a confused or a disturbed man.

> Yea, I've
> got over 9000 messages in this newsgroup, but so what?

So the libelous charge that I'm a "shill" is patently ridiculous in the
light of the fact that you've been defending and patrolling this newsgroup
for more than half a year. If the evidence shows anyone here is getting a
kickback from SprintPCS its you. Conversely, one negative post in this
newsgroup out of dozens, doesn't equate to me being a schill you slanderous
little ****.

> I've been on this
> newsgroup for 6 years now.

How much does Sprint pay you?

>>
>> > You asking a question in this newsgroup and
>> > ripping and cussing everyone who replies to you?
>>
>> Even a cursory look at this thread shows I was merely dishing out what I
> was
>> receiving. The only difference is I'm not whining about it.
>
> No one is whining in this thread.

You sure are. I didn't see a single post by you to the persons who replied
to my initial post with sarcastic, mean spirited garbage. I asked "can
anyone convince me to stay"...and I got back "who cares", "why would i even
try" "you can be easily bought", and a bunch of other trash. Naturally,
you weren't there until I spit fire back........probably because your a
shill.



> You initiated this thread,

I stated the problems I was having, and asked why I should stay. That's
not nasty, nor trolling.

> and said you
> were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better
> for
> you,

Actually I didn't state I was "already gone". I stated I was "about to
leave Sprint" and "about to go to Verizon", and asked for any information on
why I should stay. Of course, nobody offered a damn thing...just trolling,
insulting nonsense (much like you). And Verizon having a more efficient
network in New York City is point of fact...stop debating it, you look like
a fool.

>> (bull**** snipped)
>> > Seems like you need to go back into treatment ... and maintain those
> meds
>> > of
>> > yours ...
>>
>> Oh Bob, I should be more like you. No insults, just reasoned dialogue.
>> *roll eyes*
>
> Oh sure, reasoned dialog ... when you tell folks in your first replies to
> them that they are a dick, then tell someone they are pulling information
> out of their ass, or then call someone else a sock puppet?

All of that came after what? Try getting your head out of your ass for a
second and check what I was replying to.

> Have fun with Verizon and ... don't let the door hit you on your butt when
> you leave this newsgroup.

I'll be here for as long as your lying, sniveling trolls continue to
respond. You don't want me here, then shut the **** up you shill. Oh,
and by the way, I was once a Sprint defender too... check out my classically
hilarious reply to a person complaining here http://tinyurl.com/4gpza I
was once a fool like you all, but now see the light.

My last post in this thread ... comments below.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > <snipped>
> >> Reading comprehension problems? You're typing what I wrote for what
> >> reason? To sound it out?
> >
> > No, I was asking what that had to do with replying to this thread.
>
> No, you didn't ask that. You repeated what I wrote with question marks,
> which suggests your either a confused or a disturbed man.

Not at all.
>
> > Yea, I've
> > got over 9000 messages in this newsgroup, but so what?
>
> So the libelous charge that I'm a "shill" is patently ridiculous in the
> light of the fact that you've been defending and patrolling this newsgroup
> for more than half a year. If the evidence shows anyone here is getting
a
> kickback from SprintPCS its you. Conversely, one negative post in this
> newsgroup out of dozens, doesn't equate to me being a schill you
slanderous
> little ****.
>

Defending SPCS? I don't know whether one can define whether I defend them or
just explain what I know about coverage, phones, etc. I have never actively
promoted SPCS in this newsgroup.

See here's where you have already lost this discussion, when declare I'm on
SPCS's payroll, or getting kickbacks. I've never received one red cent from
them, save for the same rebates most if not all of us, have received when
getting phones, etc.

> > I've been on this
> > newsgroup for 6 years now.
>
> How much does Sprint pay you?

Not a nickle ...

>
> >>
> >> > You asking a question in this newsgroup and
> >> > ripping and cussing everyone who replies to you?
> >>
> >> Even a cursory look at this thread shows I was merely dishing out what
I
> > was
> >> receiving. The only difference is I'm not whining about it.
> >
> > No one is whining in this thread.
>
> You sure are. I didn't see a single post by you to the persons who
replied
> to my initial post with sarcastic, mean spirited garbage. I asked "can
> anyone convince me to stay"...and I got back "who cares", "why would i
even
> try" "you can be easily bought", and a bunch of other trash. Naturally,
> you weren't there until I spit fire back........probably because your a
> shill.

Why would anyone care, when you've already said you are going to Verizon? As
to answering your initial post, I was fifth one to do so. I did not
initially reply to you because you said that you were already going to
leave.

>
>
> > You initiated this thread,
>
> I stated the problems I was having, and asked why I should stay. That's
> not nasty, nor trolling.

No but your replies were.
>
> > and said you
> > were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better
> > for
> > you,
>
> Actually I didn't state I was "already gone". I stated I was "about to
> leave Sprint" and "about to go to Verizon", and asked for any information
on
> why I should stay. Of course, nobody offered a damn thing...just
trolling,
> insulting nonsense (much like you). And Verizon having a more
efficient
> network in New York City is point of fact...stop debating it, you look
like
> a fool.

We were all fools to reply to your trolling ...
>
> >> (bull**** snipped)
> >> > Seems like you need to go back into treatment ... and maintain those
> > meds
> >> > of
> >> > yours ...
> >>
> >> Oh Bob, I should be more like you. No insults, just reasoned
dialogue.
> >> *roll eyes*
> >
> > Oh sure, reasoned dialog ... when you tell folks in your first replies
to
> > them that they are a dick, then tell someone they are pulling
information
> > out of their ass, or then call someone else a sock puppet?
>
> All of that came after what? Try getting your head out of your ass for
a
> second and check what I was replying to.
>
> > Have fun with Verizon and ... don't let the door hit you on your butt
when
> > you leave this newsgroup.
>
> I'll be here for as long as your lying, sniveling trolls continue to
> respond. You don't want me here, then shut the **** up you shill. Oh,
> and by the way, I was once a Sprint defender too... check out my
classically
> hilarious reply to a person complaining here http://tinyurl.com/4gpza I
> was once a fool like you all, but now see the light.

Good. Now go towards the light ...

Bob

"Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> My last post in this thread ... comments below.

Tired of the ***** slapping? Too bad, I was enjoying slapping your
worthless ass up and down this NG.

>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > <snipped>
>> >> Reading comprehension problems? You're typing what I wrote for what
>> >> reason? To sound it out?
>> >
>> > No, I was asking what that had to do with replying to this thread.
>>
>> No, you didn't ask that. You repeated what I wrote with question marks,
>> which suggests your either a confused or a disturbed man.
>
> Not at all.

Still confused? It's ok, just ask the SprintPCS cronies who pay you what
to do next.

>>
>> > Yea, I've
>> > got over 9000 messages in this newsgroup, but so what?
>>
>> So the libelous charge that I'm a "shill" is patently ridiculous in the
>> light of the fact that you've been defending and patrolling this
>> newsgroup
>> for more than half a year. If the evidence shows anyone here is getting
> a
>> kickback from SprintPCS its you. Conversely, one negative post in this
>> newsgroup out of dozens, doesn't equate to me being a schill you
> slanderous
>> little ****.
>>
>
> Defending SPCS?

Yes defending.

> I don't know whether one can define whether I defend them or
> just explain what I know about coverage, phones, etc. I have never
> actively
> promoted SPCS in this newsgroup.

Wow, not only a shill, but also a liar. For a person who's never owned a
Verizon phone, you jump in here with snide comments about their axiomatic
superior coverage in New York. Give me a break.

>
> See here's where you have already lost this discussion,

Not at all...as ridiculous as your libelous contention is that I'm a
"Verizon shill", I'll throw the same venom right back at you, ****. Don't
do it, if you can't take it.

> when declare I'm on
> SPCS's payroll, or getting kickbacks. I've never received one red cent
> from
> them, save for the same rebates most if not all of us, have received when
> getting phones, etc.

Sure you don't. Everyone posts 9000 times to a freakin newsgroup for 6
straight years.

>
>> > I've been on this
>> > newsgroup for 6 years now.
>>
>> How much does Sprint pay you?
>
> Not a nickle ...

Free service? E-mail me about the details Bobby.

>
>>
>> >>
>> >> > You asking a question in this newsgroup and
>> >> > ripping and cussing everyone who replies to you?
>> >>
>> >> Even a cursory look at this thread shows I was merely dishing out what
> I
>> > was
>> >> receiving. The only difference is I'm not whining about it.
>> >
>> > No one is whining in this thread.
>>
>> You sure are. I didn't see a single post by you to the persons who
> replied
>> to my initial post with sarcastic, mean spirited garbage. I asked "can
>> anyone convince me to stay"...and I got back "who cares", "why would i
> even
>> try" "you can be easily bought", and a bunch of other trash. Naturally,
>> you weren't there until I spit fire back........probably because your a
>> shill.
>
> Why would anyone care, when you've already said you are going to Verizon?

Side-stepping the issue. Your original argument was that I came out guns a
blazin insulting everyone and anyone. Clearly that's been proven to be a
lie, so you've conveniently switched gears. Don't trip with all that
backpedaling, Bobby ole boy.

> As
> to answering your initial post, I was fifth one to do so. I did not
> initially reply to you because you said that you were already going to
> leave.

You replied in order to ***** and moan about my responses to other
people....*****ing and moaning you didn't do to the individuals replying to
me with sarcastic mean-spirited nonsense.

You're a hypocrite, and a documented liar now Bobby...


>
>>
>>
>> > You initiated this thread,
>>
>> I stated the problems I was having, and asked why I should stay. That's
>> not nasty, nor trolling.
>
> No but your replies were.

My replies to nasty replies were nasty. Get it now, moron?

>>
>> > and said you
>> > were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better
>> > for
>> > you,
>>
>> Actually I didn't state I was "already gone". I stated I was "about to
>> leave Sprint" and "about to go to Verizon", and asked for any information
> on
>> why I should stay. Of course, nobody offered a damn thing...just
> trolling,
>> insulting nonsense (much like you). And Verizon having a more
> efficient
>> network in New York City is point of fact...stop debating it, you look
> like
>> a fool.
>
> We were all fools to reply to your trolling ...

We at least you acknowledge you're a fool, Bob. I guess we can remove that
from the insult category then.

>>
>> >> (bull**** snipped)
>> >> > Seems like you need to go back into treatment ... and maintain those
>> > meds
>> >> > of
>> >> > yours ...
>> >>
>> >> Oh Bob, I should be more like you. No insults, just reasoned
> dialogue.
>> >> *roll eyes*
>> >
>> > Oh sure, reasoned dialog ... when you tell folks in your first replies
> to
>> > them that they are a dick, then tell someone they are pulling
> information
>> > out of their ass, or then call someone else a sock puppet?
>>
>> All of that came after what? Try getting your head out of your ass for
> a
>> second and check what I was replying to.
>>
>> > Have fun with Verizon and ... don't let the door hit you on your butt
> when
>> > you leave this newsgroup.
>>
>> I'll be here for as long as your lying, sniveling trolls continue to
>> respond. You don't want me here, then shut the **** up you shill.
>> Oh,
>> and by the way, I was once a Sprint defender too... check out my
> classically
>> hilarious reply to a person complaining here http://tinyurl.com/4gpza I
>> was once a fool like you all, but now see the light.
>
> Good. Now go towards the light ...

I will, cocksucker.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >>
> >> http://nyccell.com/ <---- Find out for yourself who the best in New
> > York
> >> is according to subscribers and research.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > A highly opinionated and highly editorialized site at best (snip crap)
>
> A site based largely on user reviews is going to be opinionated...that's
the
> point. If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors are
> purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel free
> to provide it, otherwise you're slander will be regarded as
unsubstantiated
> nonsense, which I suspect it is.
>
>

I'll let you decide which user reviews led to the following:

Newsgroups: alt.cellular.sprintpcs,alt.cellular,alt.cellular.verizon
From: "Steven M. Scharf" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 05:23:41 GMT Local: Tues, Jan 20 2004 9:23 pm
Subject: Re: Verizon first in Consumer Reports satisfaction survey

Look at Nextel's own web site (which you are quite fond of quoting).

http://nextel.com/about/corporateinfo/profile.shtml


Target Audiences
-Enterprise
-General Business
-Vertical Markets


They don't mention going after the individual user, for obvious reasons. I
know of none of my friends, relatives, or colleagues that would put up with
Nextel's coverage unless they have another phone to use when travelling
outside the urban core.


The reason for the Nextel sponsorships is that they believe that the viewers
for the shows they sponsor include the decision makers for the target
audiences that they specify in their corporate profile. They don't expect
much response from individuals that have no need for PTT, but they don't
turn away these customers either.


You seem to think I have it in for Nextel, but in reality it is you who were
so upset over Nextel's ratings in the Consumer Reports survey that you came
up with all sorts of bizarre and unsubstantiated excuses and
rationalizations. At first I was shocked to see the stuff you posted, and
how blatant the misleading statements on Nextel's site were. But when I look
further, I'm less upset; even Nextel doesn't claim itself as a service that
is a suitable replacement for regular cellular or PCS service. In the
context of their stated target markets, their statements are less
outrageous, though still misleading.


I've updated part of my web site with some of the material you provided.
http://www.nordicgroup.us/ssub/fraud.htm . You provided some excellent
examples of how important it is to learn how to dissect marketing and
advertising claims.


We have a Nextel phone in our family. I have nothing against the company.
Nextel serves its target audiences well, and has carved out a profitable
niche. I originally declined to include Nextel on my own web sites. I felt
that it was unfair to apply the same criteria to them as I applied to other
carriers, especially the importance of ubiquitous coverage; their target
customer is clearly not the person who cares about coverage outside the
urban core.


My web sites provide referenced facts, as well as informed opinions.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------

The link provided above by Mr. Sharf is a page that appears in navigating
the nyccell.com site. You'll notice his last claim of using "informed
opinions" (no mention of user reviews). I also invite you to visit the page
referenced above and comment on the inequity of opinions for each carrier.
I called him out on his opinions, and he chose to make my example of the
moment (Nextel) his newest target. You'll also notice that he is ripe with
opinions in the above post, many of which make it into the website, and are
not the result of user reviews. The data used is a compilation of publicly
available information, and none is produced as a result of any survey or
base research by the website.



Based on the inclination of the webmaster to editorialize as a result of a
Usenet post and the very slanted negative attention given to one company
proves that it is not the unbiased site you are protraying it to be. Read
the entire thread some time- you'll see that the update to the website came
as a direct result of my pushing his buttons.

It is clear to me now people that we're dealing with a child, either a
child in the mental aspect or the physical. He can't read or write properly
and that is the first sign of either someone who is uneducated or mentally
unstable. He frequesntly uses 'your' when he should use 'you're and vise
versa and Bob Smith said he was here for six years but Chris thought he said
six months.

Hey Chris, do me a faor and run over to this website. It has special
information that you might be interested in.

http://www.amishrakefight.org/gfy/

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> > <snipped>
> >> Reading comprehension problems? You're typing what I wrote for what
> >> reason? To sound it out?
> >
> > No, I was asking what that had to do with replying to this thread.
>
> No, you didn't ask that. You repeated what I wrote with question marks,
> which suggests your either a confused or a disturbed man.
>
> > Yea, I've
> > got over 9000 messages in this newsgroup, but so what?
>
> So the libelous charge that I'm a "shill" is patently ridiculous in the
> light of the fact that you've been defending and patrolling this newsgroup
> for more than half a year. If the evidence shows anyone here is getting
a
> kickback from SprintPCS its you. Conversely, one negative post in this
> newsgroup out of dozens, doesn't equate to me being a schill you
slanderous
> little ****.
>
> > I've been on this
> > newsgroup for 6 years now.
>
> How much does Sprint pay you?
>
> >>
> >> > You asking a question in this newsgroup and
> >> > ripping and cussing everyone who replies to you?
> >>
> >> Even a cursory look at this thread shows I was merely dishing out what
I
> > was
> >> receiving. The only difference is I'm not whining about it.
> >
> > No one is whining in this thread.
>
> You sure are. I didn't see a single post by you to the persons who
replied
> to my initial post with sarcastic, mean spirited garbage. I asked "can
> anyone convince me to stay"...and I got back "who cares", "why would i
even
> try" "you can be easily bought", and a bunch of other trash. Naturally,
> you weren't there until I spit fire back........probably because your a
> shill.
>
>
>
> > You initiated this thread,
>
> I stated the problems I was having, and asked why I should stay. That's
> not nasty, nor trolling.
>
> > and said you
> > were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better
> > for
> > you,
>
> Actually I didn't state I was "already gone". I stated I was "about to
> leave Sprint" and "about to go to Verizon", and asked for any information
on
> why I should stay. Of course, nobody offered a damn thing...just
trolling,
> insulting nonsense (much like you). And Verizon having a more
efficient
> network in New York City is point of fact...stop debating it, you look
like
> a fool.
>
> >> (bull**** snipped)
> >> > Seems like you need to go back into treatment ... and maintain those
> > meds
> >> > of
> >> > yours ...
> >>
> >> Oh Bob, I should be more like you. No insults, just reasoned
dialogue.
> >> *roll eyes*
> >
> > Oh sure, reasoned dialog ... when you tell folks in your first replies
to
> > them that they are a dick, then tell someone they are pulling
information
> > out of their ass, or then call someone else a sock puppet?
>
> All of that came after what? Try getting your head out of your ass for
a
> second and check what I was replying to.
>
> > Have fun with Verizon and ... don't let the door hit you on your butt
when
> > you leave this newsgroup.
>
> I'll be here for as long as your lying, sniveling trolls continue to
> respond. You don't want me here, then shut the **** up you shill. Oh,
> and by the way, I was once a Sprint defender too... check out my
classically
> hilarious reply to a person complaining here http://tinyurl.com/4gpza I
> was once a fool like you all, but now see the light.
>
>
>
>

To the group:

This pantywaste reminds me of dr.arm who trolled the amazon, fitness and
some comp.sys groups a few years back. In my experience he is the ulimate
troll and the only way to rid us of him is to just not respond. Use your
killfiles if you have to. I'm not saying this guy is dr.armpit, he just
reminds me on him.

Chris F: Here's another two sites I want you to see:
http://tinyurl.com/3dg
http://tinyurl.com/yt7bc

Christopher F wrote:

>>I don't need to so much as lift a finger to prove myself, especially when
>>my posting history proves it for me.
>
>
> Then don't. I've had you pegged as a supernews anonymous troll for some
> time now, and you don't have a shred of evidence to the contrary.

*sigh* Morons like you really chap my hide.

http://tinyurl.com/5qspl <--- posting going back to at least 1998

http://tinyurl.com/4f6c4 <--- the entire archive, at least as google
sees it.

Now, HOW long have you had me "pegged" as a "supernews troll" again?

>
>>A simple google groups search will more than buttress my claim.
>

> Googling will simply show more posts from your anonymous supernews account.
> That proves nothing, troll.

I just proved otherwise. As far as supernews goes, quite frankly it's
not my problem that my ISP dumped its usenet feed a few months back. If
you think that constitutes a credibility problem, well hell, you haven't
looked in the mirror.

> Sure you did. Did you actually use a real name and real email address
> then?

*looks at my sig, just two lines down* Uhm, can you READ?

--
E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.

"Scooterflex" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:q7%[email protected]...
> (meaningless crap snipped) Bob Smith said he was here for six years but
> Chris thought he said
> six months.

Flashnewsgroups.com? Is this newsgroup just one poster who posts from
various anonymous accounts in order to create the illusion of support?
Looks like.

And here's my quote, ****: "Sure you don't. Everyone posts 9000 times to
a freakin newsgroup for 6 straight years." So much for me thinking it was
6 months, eh?

Learn to read you illiterate buffoon.

"Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Christopher F wrote:
>
>>>I don't need to so much as lift a finger to prove myself, especially when
>>>my posting history proves it for me.
>>
>>
>> Then don't. I've had you pegged as a supernews anonymous troll for some
>> time now, and you don't have a shred of evidence to the contrary.
>
> *sigh*

Keep sighing....I checked the links out, and they confirm beyond any shadow
of a doubt that you're both a liar, and a troll.

You claim

> As far as supernews goes, quite frankly it's not my problem that my ISP
> dumped its usenet feed a few months back.

A clear lie since according to the links you provided you're using
Earthlink, which provides access to Usenet for all its customers.

So which is it? Got banned from using Usenet on Earthlink for being a
moronic troll? hahahahhahaha

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> >>
>> >> http://nyccell.com/ <---- Find out for yourself who the best in
>> >> New
>> > York
>> >> is according to subscribers and research.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> > A highly opinionated and highly editorialized site at best (snip crap)
>>
>> A site based largely on user reviews is going to be opinionated...that's
> the
>> point. If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors are
>> purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel
>> free
>> to provide it, otherwise you're slander will be regarded as
> unsubstantiated
>> nonsense, which I suspect it is.
>>
>>
>
> I'll let you decide which user reviews led to the following: (snip tripe)
>

If you think I'm reading all that tripe than you should stop holding your
handset so close to your temple. Post the link or shut the **** up.

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:31:25 GMT, "Christopher F"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>
>>> http://nyccell.com/ <---- Find out for yourself who the best in New
>> York
>>> is according to subscribers and research.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> A highly opinionated and highly editorialized site at best (snip crap)
>
>A site based largely on user reviews is going to be opinionated...that's the
>point. If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors are
>purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel free
>to provide it, otherwise you're slander will be regarded as unsubstantiated
>nonsense, which I suspect it is.
>

Haven't you left yet? Start posting over in the Verizon group if you
are so hot on it. Just switch your carrier from SPCS to Verizon and
leave.

Don't go away mad...just go away.

On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:22:37 GMT, "Christopher F"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> and said you
>> were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better
>> for
>> you,
>
>Actually I didn't state I was "already gone". I stated I was "about to
>leave Sprint" and "about to go to Verizon", and asked for any information on
>why I should stay. Of course, nobody offered a damn thing...just trolling,
>insulting nonsense (much like you). And Verizon having a more efficient
>network in New York City is point of fact...stop debating it, you look like
>a fool.

What? I responded to your post, refuting every claim you made with
the facts that I have experienced. Neither of us is right or wrong as
we are each one person and TWO people extolling their experiences is
highly insignificant in the statistical universe.

Further, what you state about Verizon being more efficient in NYC is
NOT point-of-fact. It is what YOU extrapolate from looking at the
data YOU found. It is not easy to evaluate data like this that is not
purely objective, as service that is OK to person B will NOT be OK to
person A.

Let me know if you didn't understand any of the big-boy words I just
used.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news[email protected]...
> >> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> news:[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> >> > news:[email protected]...
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> http://nyccell.com/ <---- Find out for yourself who the best in
> >> >> New
> >> > York
> >> >> is according to subscribers and research.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > A highly opinionated and highly editorialized site at best (snip
crap)
> >>
> >> A site based largely on user reviews is going to be
opinionated...that's
> > the
> >> point. If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors are
> >> purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel
> >> free
> >> to provide it, otherwise you're slander will be regarded as
> > unsubstantiated
> >> nonsense, which I suspect it is.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I'll let you decide which user reviews led to the following: (snip
tripe)
> >
>
> If you think I'm reading all that tripe than you should stop holding your
> handset so close to your temple. Post the link or shut the **** up.
>
>
So, let me get this right- you can't be bothered to read the post here, but
if I post a link to it, you'll read it there? Must be troll logic. Bottom
line- I posted everything you need to verify that the words contained in my
last post were written by the owner of your beloved site. Your refusal to
read his words (which can be verified through Google) and claiming it to be
'tripe' is pretty funny. You accused me of slander, and I refuted your
claim. Your inability to read plain english is not my concern.

As far as your handset advice goes- I'd give you the same advice, but there
might be logistical problems in getting both the phone and your head up your
ass- your head seems to taking up most of the space at this time.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors are
> purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel free
> to provide it,

Did that- you were either too lazy or stupid to read it.

>otherwise you're slander will be regarded as unsubstantiated
> nonsense, which I suspect it is.

My post proved otherwise, which is why you claimed not to read it. That's
OK- I'm sure others read it and drew their own conclusions. Your public
refusal simply boosts my argument.

You are the perfect troll toy- so easy to play with, too stupid to realize
that its happening.