About to leave Sprint

"NobodyMan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:22:37 GMT, "Christopher F"
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> and said you
>>> were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better
>>> for
>>> you,
>>
>>Actually I didn't state I was "already gone". I stated I was "about to
>>leave Sprint" and "about to go to Verizon", and asked for any information
>>on
>>why I should stay. Of course, nobody offered a damn thing...just
>>trolling,
>>insulting nonsense (much like you). And Verizon having a more
>>efficient
>>network in New York City is point of fact...stop debating it, you look
>>like
>>a fool.
>
> What? I responded to your post, refuting every claim you made with
> the facts that I have experienced. Neither of us is right or wrong as
> we are each one person and TWO people extolling their experiences is
> highly insignificant in the statistical universe.
>
> Further, what you state about Verizon being more efficient in NYC is
> NOT point-of-fact. It is what YOU extrapolate from looking at the
> data YOU found. (snip whiny bull****)

No, it's a point of fact: Larger coverage...enough said.

Do you wish to put a $1000 bet on this fact? (And please for your own sake
don't respond with "large and better coverage doesn't mean it's better!!!!")

Now please shut the **** up, NobodyMan.

---

› See More: About to leave Sprint

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news[email protected]...
>> >> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> news:[email protected]...
>> >> >
>> >> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> >> > news:[email protected]...
>> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://nyccell.com/ <---- Find out for yourself who the best in
>> >> >> New
>> >> > York
>> >> >> is according to subscribers and research.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> > A highly opinionated and highly editorialized site at best (snip
> crap)
>> >>
>> >> A site based largely on user reviews is going to be
> opinionated...that's
>> > the
>> >> point. If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors
>> >> are
>> >> purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel
>> >> free
>> >> to provide it, otherwise you're slander will be regarded as
>> > unsubstantiated
>> >> nonsense, which I suspect it is.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > I'll let you decide which user reviews led to the following: (snip
> tripe)
>> >
>>
>> If you think I'm reading all that tripe than you should stop holding your
>> handset so close to your temple. Post the link or shut the **** up.
>>
>>
> So, let me get this right- you can't be bothered to read the post here,
> but
> if I post a link to it, you'll read it there? (snip shuck and jive side
> stepping nonsense)

If the link is still the same long-winded nebulous nonsense on Nextel then
no I won't. If you can post a link where the site is credibly debunked as
biased, then I'll concede.

You can't, so you'll continue to respond with more of your hand-waving
bull**** and balogna.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>> If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors are
>> purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel
>> free
>> to provide it,
>
> Did that- you were either too lazy or stupid to read it.
>

You posted some long winded nonsense from Usenet that nobody cares to read.
Post a verifiable link from a credible source, or please stop your *****ing
and moaning. What are you going to do, provide more Google Groups proof?
ahahhaha

Please quit while you're behind, boy.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>
> If the link is still the same long-winded nebulous nonsense on Nextel then
> no I won't. If you can post a link where the site is credibly debunked as
> biased, then I'll concede.

Your right- it was nebulous nonsense- directly out of the mouth of the
creator of the website. He said all that ****, not me. If the words of the
site's creator and his claim to purposely single out a single carrier
because his buttons got pushed aren''t enough to debunk it, you are a much
bigger idiot than most. But as I said in an earlier post, your ignorance is
not my concern. You're a real big man when it comes to making claims and
accusations, but act more like my eight year old when called on it- you try
to deflect attention by ignoring facts.
>
> You can't, so you'll continue to respond with more of your hand-waving
> bull**** and balogna.
>

Does your hand get out of your lap long enough to be able to wave?

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news[email protected]...
> >> If you have even an iota of evidence that the site editors are
> >> purposely skewing their data towards a particular company please feel
> >> free
> >> to provide it,
> >
> > Did that- you were either too lazy or stupid to read it.
> >
>
> You posted some long winded nonsense from Usenet that nobody cares to
read.
> Post a verifiable link from a credible source,

The creator of nyccell.com is not a credible source? That would mean the
website itself must not be very credible, which was my original point.
Thanks for agreeing.

> or please stop your *****ing
> and moaning.

You're the only one in this thread wearing the maxi-pads and whining like a
child.

>What are you going to do, provide more Google Groups proof?
> ahahhaha

No more proof is needed. The question is really what are you going to do?
Continue to act like a moron- I realize your options are limited.

>
> Please quit while you're behind, boy.
>
Boy? LOL. I was driving my third car before the training wheels came off
your first bicycle. The only thing that makes me continue this is nothing
more than boredom and wanting to see just how much of an idiot you are
willing to make of yourself. Its not a real stretch for you- that is quite
obvious.

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>>
>> If the link is still the same long-winded nebulous nonsense on Nextel
>> then
>> no I won't. If you can post a link where the site is credibly debunked
>> as
>> biased, then I'll concede.
>
> Your right- it was nebulous nonsense-

Concession noted. No go find some non-Google groups proof or stop posting
your sniveling bull****.

Christopher F wrote:
> Concession noted. No go find some non-Google groups proof or stop posting
> your sniveling bull****.

I may just have missed your reply to the last post I made on this subject...
but I'm wondering what your point is. Why are you staying here and *****ing?
OK. Sprint isn't the best choice for you, obviously. You've found an
alternative carrier. I hope they work out better for you than Sprint did. All
you're doing right now is sniping back and forth with Scott Stephenson. The two
of you are never going to agree on what you're sniping about.

I really think both of you ought to give up the argument already.

--
JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services, http://JustThe.net/
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / 888.480.4NET (4638) / [email protected]
PGP Key available from your friendly local key server (0xE3AE35ED)
Apple Valley, California Nothing scares me anymore. I have three kids.

"Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Christopher F wrote:
> > Concession noted. No go find some non-Google groups proof or stop
posting
> > your sniveling bull****.
>
> I may just have missed your reply to the last post I made on this
subject...
> but I'm wondering what your point is. Why are you staying here and
*****ing?
> OK. Sprint isn't the best choice for you, obviously. You've found an
> alternative carrier. I hope they work out better for you than Sprint did.
All
> you're doing right now is sniping back and forth with Scott Stephenson.
The two
> of you are never going to agree on what you're sniping about.
>
> I really think both of you ought to give up the argument already.
>
> --

And this would differ from your week and a half long argument about coverage
definitions in the Verizon group with the troll over there just how? We all
do it- its just a new play thing.

"Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
>
> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> >
> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >
> >>
> >> If the link is still the same long-winded nebulous nonsense on Nextel
> >> then
> >> no I won't. If you can post a link where the site is credibly debunked
> >> as
> >> biased, then I'll concede.
> >
> > Your right- it was nebulous nonsense-
>
> Concession noted.

I see you decided to selectively quote. Did Mommy finally get tires of
explaining all of the big words to you? Is that why you couldn't handle the
big, long, scary post? It all makes sense now.

>No go find some non-Google groups proof or stop posting
> your sniveling bull****.
>
>

The only one sniveling here is you. You are real good at accustations, but
can't handle it when you get called on it with facts. Very trollish- quite
immature and totally what would be expected from someone with intellectual
challenges.

Scott Stephenson wrote:
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
> >
> > "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >
> > >>
> > >> If the link is still the same long-winded nebulous nonsense on Nextel
> > >> then
> > >> no I won't. If you can post a link where the site is credibly debunked
> > >> as
> > >> biased, then I'll concede.
> > >
> > > Your right- it was nebulous nonsense-
> >
> > Concession noted.
>
> I see you decided to selectively quote. Did Mommy finally get tires of
> explaining all of the big words to you? Is that why you couldn't handle the
> big, long, scary post? It all makes sense now.
>
> >No go find some non-Google groups proof or stop posting
> > your sniveling bull****.
> >
> >
>
> The only one sniveling here is you. You are real good at accustations, but
> can't handle it when you get called on it with facts. Very trollish- quite
> immature and totally what would be expected from someone with intellectual
> challenges.

Scott -

It takes two to tango.

Notan

On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 04:38:48 GMT, "Christopher F"
<[email protected]> wrote:

>"NobodyMan" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:22:37 GMT, "Christopher F"
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>> and said you
>>>> were already gone with your preconceptions that Verizon would be better
>>>> for
>>>> you,
>>>
>>>Actually I didn't state I was "already gone". I stated I was "about to
>>>leave Sprint" and "about to go to Verizon", and asked for any information
>>>on
>>>why I should stay. Of course, nobody offered a damn thing...just
>>>trolling,
>>>insulting nonsense (much like you). And Verizon having a more
>>>efficient
>>>network in New York City is point of fact...stop debating it, you look
>>>like
>>>a fool.
>>
>> What? I responded to your post, refuting every claim you made with
>> the facts that I have experienced. Neither of us is right or wrong as
>> we are each one person and TWO people extolling their experiences is
>> highly insignificant in the statistical universe.
>>
>> Further, what you state about Verizon being more efficient in NYC is
>> NOT point-of-fact. It is what YOU extrapolate from looking at the
>> data YOU found. (snip whiny bull****)
>
>No, it's a point of fact: Larger coverage...enough said.
>
>Do you wish to put a $1000 bet on this fact? (And please for your own sake
>don't respond with "large and better coverage doesn't mean it's better!!!!")
>
>Now please shut the **** up, NobodyMan.

Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?

If larger coverage = better, then you better dump Digital phones
completely and switch over to analog. Analog cellular still has the
MOST coverage across the entire US.

Regardless, if you are switching carriers, DO IT. Take your whiny
complaints about SPCS to heart, move over to Verizon and be done with
it. Just do us all a favor and quit posing here.

Buh Bye

Scott Stephenson wrote:

> And this would differ from your week and a half long argument about coverage
> definitions in the Verizon group with the troll over there just how? We all
> do it- its just a new play thing.

Heh. Yeah, I guess you're right. I didn't think of it that way...

--
JustThe.net - Apple Valley, CA - http://JustThe.net/ - 888.480.4NET (4638)
Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / [email protected] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED

"In case anyone was wondering, that big glowing globe above the Victor
Valley is the sun." -Victorville _Daily Press_ on the unusually large
amount of rain the Southland has gotten this winter (January 12th, 2005)

"Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
>>
>> "Scott Stephenson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> news:[email protected]...
>> >
>> > "Christopher F" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> > news:[email protected]...
>
> The only one sniveling here is you.

Actually no, it continues to be you, and your wild-eyed, hand-waving Google
Groups "proof". It's apparent to every reader here that I pulled your
card, which is why even your fellow SprintPCS supporters and telling you to
stop embarrassing yourself and shut your miserable trap.

Put the proof right here ---------------->

Or keep up the shuck and jive.

Notan wrote:
> Christopher F wrote:
>
>>5 years, loyal customer, but I just can't take it. I've been waiting for
>>Sprint to follow through on its promises for years now, but I've reached the
>>boiling point. The constant billing ****-ups, waiting half an hour to
>>get a text message during the day time, web browser screw ups, dropped
>>calls...etc are annoying. The retention plan nor the promises can keep me
>>around anymore....time to switch to Verizon...the best provider in New York
>>City.
>>
>>Can anyone convince me otherwise?
>
>
> Why would we even try?
>
> See ya!
>
> Notan
i have some questions about sprint if you have time

Kevin wrote:
>
> Notan wrote:
> > Christopher F wrote:
> >
> >>5 years, loyal customer, but I just can't take it. I've been waiting for
> >>Sprint to follow through on its promises for years now, but I've reached the
> >>boiling point. The constant billing ****-ups, waiting half an hour to
> >>get a text message during the day time, web browser screw ups, dropped
> >>calls...etc are annoying. The retention plan nor the promises can keep me
> >>around anymore....time to switch to Verizon...the best provider in New York
> >>City.
> >>
> >>Can anyone convince me otherwise?
> >
> >
> > Why would we even try?
> >
> > See ya!
> >
> > Notan
> i have some questions about sprint if you have time

We *all* have the time! <g>

Go for it.

Notan