Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20
  1. #1
    Jack Zwick
    Guest
    <http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>

    side effects:

    No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular

    No need to worry about stopping to use AT&T Wireless name on April 23,
    or removing AT&T Wireless name from all the stores where it still is.
    SBC which owns the majority of Cingular will also own AT&T, and tell
    AT&T to not complain.



    See More: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T




  2. #2
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    Jack Zwick wrote:
    > <http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    >
    > side effects:
    >
    > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular


    Hey Phillipe, I thought you weren't going to post here (a.c.spcs) anymore. Said
    you were leaving because you were fed up with Sprint and with us.

    Guess you lied? (not a big surprise)

    --
    JustThe.net - Apple Valley, CA - http://JustThe.net/ - 888.480.4NET (4638)
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / [email protected] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED

    "In case anyone was wondering, that big glowing globe above the Victor
    Valley is the sun." -Victorville _Daily Press_ on the unusually large
    amount of rain the Southland has gotten this winter (January 12th, 2005)



  3. #3
    Isaiah Beard
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    Jack Zwick wrote:
    > <http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    >
    > side effects:
    >
    > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular



    Not really. Maybe good for CIngular, but a lot has happened since the
    AT&T/Sprint deal was announced, such as the Nextel merger.

    --
    E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
    Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.



  4. #4
    Jack Zwick
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Jack Zwick wrote:
    > > <http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    > >
    > > side effects:
    > >
    > > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    > > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    > > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular

    >
    >
    > Not really. Maybe good for CIngular, but a lot has happened since the
    > AT&T/Sprint deal was announced, such as the Nextel merger.


    Keep dreaming that AT&T would use SprintPCS
    if they're being bought by SBC. Sprint was counting those AT&T bucks,
    that now they wont get.



  5. #5
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T


    "Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Jack Zwick wrote:
    > > <http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    > >
    > > side effects:
    > >
    > > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    > > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    > > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular

    >
    > Hey Phillipe, I thought you weren't going to post here (a.c.spcs) anymore.

    Said
    > you were leaving because you were fed up with Sprint and with us.
    >
    > Guess you lied? (not a big surprise)


    Yup ... It's ole Phillipe, and showing what a liar he is, when he said he'd
    never post in the group again.

    Bob





  6. #6
    Jack Zwick
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    In article <[email protected]>,
    "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:

    >
    > "Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    > > Jack Zwick wrote:
    > > > <http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    > > >
    > > > side effects:
    > > >
    > > > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    > > > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    > > > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular

    > >
    > > Hey Phillipe, I thought you weren't going to post here (a.c.spcs) anymore.

    > Said
    > > you were leaving because you were fed up with Sprint and with us.
    > >
    > > Guess you lied? (not a big surprise)

    >
    > Yup ... It's ole Phillipe, and showing what a liar he is, when he said he'd
    > never post in the group again.
    >
    > Bob


    And your childish insults makes up for how many hundred million dollars
    SprintPCS will lose now?



  7. #7
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T


    "Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > "Bob Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >
    > > "Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > > news:[email protected]
    > > > Jack Zwick wrote:
    > > > > <http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    > > > >
    > > > > side effects:
    > > > >
    > > > > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile)

    when
    > > > > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no

    need
    > > > > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular
    > > >
    > > > Hey Phillipe, I thought you weren't going to post here (a.c.spcs)

    anymore.
    > > Said
    > > > you were leaving because you were fed up with Sprint and with us.
    > > >
    > > > Guess you lied? (not a big surprise)

    > >
    > > Yup ... It's ole Phillipe, and showing what a liar he is, when he said

    he'd
    > > never post in the group again.
    > >
    > > Bob

    >
    > And your childish insults makes up for how many hundred million dollars
    > SprintPCS will lose now?


    Childish insults? LMAO Phillipe. Every time you post under a different ID,
    you show what a child you are. As for insults, it was you who said you would
    never post here, yet you did. That wasn't an insult, it was the truth.

    As for the stock market today, it seems that the investors like what's going
    on, as SPCS is current up $.59 a share as of 12:55 PM ECT. ATT investors are
    too happy right now, as their share price is down $0.64 right now.

    As for the lack of any income SPCS might have received from ATT, that was
    all funny money until they started reselling service.

    Bob





  8. #8
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    Jack Zwick wrote:

    >>Not really. Maybe good for CIngular, but a lot has happened since the
    >>AT&T/Sprint deal was announced, such as the Nextel merger.

    >
    > Keep dreaming that AT&T would use SprintPCS
    > if they're being bought by SBC. Sprint was counting those AT&T bucks,
    > that now they wont get.


    Hello, He Who Swore He'd Never Post To Alt.Sprintpcs Again:

    The point was that with the Nextel deal, the loss of AT&T isn't going to have
    the impact that it originally might have. Why'd you lie about posting to the
    SPCS newsgroup?

    --
    JustThe.net - Apple Valley, CA - http://JustThe.net/ - 888.480.4NET (4638)
    Steven J. Sobol, Geek In Charge / [email protected] / PGP: 0xE3AE35ED

    "In case anyone was wondering, that big glowing globe above the Victor
    Valley is the sun." -Victorville _Daily Press_ on the unusually large
    amount of rain the Southland has gotten this winter (January 12th, 2005)



  9. #9
    Michael Arends
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    Smiling Wickedly, Bob Smith answered:
    > "Steve Sobol" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    > news:[email protected]
    >
    >>Jack Zwick wrote:
    >>
    >>><http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    >>>
    >>>side effects:
    >>>
    >>>No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    >>>they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    >>>to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular

    >>
    >>Hey Phillipe, I thought you weren't going to post here (a.c.spcs) anymore.

    >
    > Said
    >
    >>you were leaving because you were fed up with Sprint and with us.
    >>
    >>Guess you lied? (not a big surprise)

    >
    >
    > Yup ... It's ole Phillipe, and showing what a liar he is, when he said he'd
    > never post in the group again.
    >
    > Bob
    >
    >

    <Oh Gawd>....

    --
    *..· ´¨¨)) -:¦:-
    ¸.·´ .·´¨¨))
    ((¸¸.·´ .·´ -:¦:- Michael -:¦:-
    -:¦:- ((¸¸.·´*



  10. #10
    N9WOS
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular
    >
    > No need to worry about stopping to use AT&T Wireless name on April 23,
    > or removing AT&T Wireless name from all the stores where it still is.
    > SBC which owns the majority of Cingular will also own AT&T, and tell
    > AT&T to not complain.


    Side note......
    (Besides the fact that my internet connection will probably be screwed.)

    I hope SBC keeps the AT&T name.
    (ie)The final combined company will carry the ATT name.

    It was all ATT before the breakup, it would be sad for SBC to officially
    bring such a long lived brand to an end, instead of accepting the name
    as their own, because at one time, it was the name they went by.

    (all right, my sentimental streak is showing)





  11. #11
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    [POSTED TO alt.cellular.cingular - REPLY ON USENET PLEASE]

    In <[email protected]> on Mon, 31 Jan
    2005 03:06:22 GMT, Jack Zwick <[email protected]> wrote:

    ><http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/050130/sbc_at_t_9.html>
    >
    >side effects:
    >
    >No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    >they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    >to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular
    >
    >No need to worry about stopping to use AT&T Wireless name on April 23,
    >or removing AT&T Wireless name from all the stores where it still is.
    >SBC which owns the majority of Cingular will also own AT&T, and tell
    >AT&T to not complain.


    In other words, you were wrong. Imagine that.

    --
    Best regards,
    John Navas <http://navasgrp.home.att.net/>

    "A little learning is a dangerous thing." [Alexander Pope]
    "It is better to sit in silence and appear ignorant,
    than to open your mouth and remove all doubt." [Mark Twain]



  12. #12
    Joe Fabeitz
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    The breakup was 21 years ago. Get over it, already ...or become a "ZWICK".
    "N9WOS" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > > No need for AT&T to start a new wireless operation (AT&T Mobile) when
    > > they are part of SBC which is the majority owner of Cingular. So no need
    > > to use SprintPCS network. Bad for SprintPCS, good for Cingular
    > >
    > > No need to worry about stopping to use AT&T Wireless name on April 23,
    > > or removing AT&T Wireless name from all the stores where it still is.
    > > SBC which owns the majority of Cingular will also own AT&T, and tell
    > > AT&T to not complain.

    >
    > Side note......
    > (Besides the fact that my internet connection will probably be screwed.)
    >
    > I hope SBC keeps the AT&T name.
    > (ie)The final combined company will carry the ATT name.
    >
    > It was all ATT before the breakup, it would be sad for SBC to officially
    > bring such a long lived brand to an end, instead of accepting the name
    > as their own, because at one time, it was the name they went by.
    >
    > (all right, my sentimental streak is showing)
    >
    >






  13. #13
    Isaiah Beard
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    Jack Zwick wrote:

    >>Not really. Maybe good for CIngular, but a lot has happened since the
    >>AT&T/Sprint deal was announced, such as the Nextel merger.

    >
    >
    > Keep dreaming that AT&T would use SprintPCS


    I didn't say they would be. What I *AM* saying is that the MVNO isn't
    needed for Sprint's success.


    --
    E-mail fudged to thwart spammers.
    Transpose the c's and a's in my e-mail address to reply.



  14. #14
    Jack Zwick
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:

    > Jack Zwick wrote:
    >
    > >>Not really. Maybe good for CIngular, but a lot has happened since the
    > >>AT&T/Sprint deal was announced, such as the Nextel merger.

    > >
    > >
    > > Keep dreaming that AT&T would use SprintPCS

    >
    > I didn't say they would be. What I *AM* saying is that the MVNO isn't
    > needed for Sprint's success.


    I didnt say it was, I just said Sprint is apparently going to lose the
    big chunk of revenue it was expecting from AT&T Mobile's MVNO.



  15. #15
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Done Deal. SBC to buy AT&T


    "Jack Zwick" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Isaiah Beard <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > > Jack Zwick wrote:
    > >
    > > >>Not really. Maybe good for CIngular, but a lot has happened since the
    > > >>AT&T/Sprint deal was announced, such as the Nextel merger.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > > Keep dreaming that AT&T would use SprintPCS

    > >
    > > I didn't say they would be. What I *AM* saying is that the MVNO isn't
    > > needed for Sprint's success.

    >
    > I didnt say it was, I just said Sprint is apparently going to lose the
    > big chunk of revenue it was expecting from AT&T Mobile's MVNO.


    You've said a lot of things Phillipe ... All which don't mean diddley squat
    ....

    Bob::Remembering when Phillipe predicted that SPCS would go belly up last
    year 14 months ago::





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast