Results 1 to 15 of 15
  1. #1
    Cheffie
    Guest
    I think it must be some formatting issue. I have a 512m SD card in
    the phone and when I put pictures on it some display and some do not.
    I also cannot "set" them as wallpapers or ringer dispalys, the manual
    sucks! Any help is appreciated



    See More: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600




  2. #2
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...
    > I think it must be some formatting issue. I have a 512m SD card in
    > the phone and when I put pictures on it some display and some do not.
    > I also cannot "set" them as wallpapers or ringer dispalys, the manual
    > sucks! Any help is appreciated
    >


    From what I understand, the SD card isn't treated as long-term memory,
    and so the phone doesn't even look there for pics, ringers, apps,
    anything.

    Also, I think the phone can only display standard JPEG images.

    --
    R
    O/Siris
    -+-
    A thing moderately good
    is not so good as it ought to be.
    Moderation in temper is always a virtue,
    but moderation in principle is always a vice.
    +Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792+



  3. #3
    Cheffie
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    The phone does look there for media and some of the pictures show and
    other don't I'm trying to figure out why and non of the ones that show
    can be set as a background or tied to a ringer. I am trying to see if
    there is limited size of color depth issues that are messing me up.
    Some of the images taht will not display are smaller than those that
    do. confusing?







    On Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:14:37 -0500, O/Siris <r[email protected]st.nt>
    wrote:

    >In article <[email protected]>,
    >[email protected] says...
    >> I think it must be some formatting issue. I have a 512m SD card in
    >> the phone and when I put pictures on it some display and some do not.
    >> I also cannot "set" them as wallpapers or ringer dispalys, the manual
    >> sucks! Any help is appreciated
    >>

    >
    >From what I understand, the SD card isn't treated as long-term memory,
    >and so the phone doesn't even look there for pics, ringers, apps,
    >anything.
    >
    >Also, I think the phone can only display standard JPEG images.





  4. #4
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...
    > The phone does look there for media and some of the pictures show and
    > other don't I'm trying to figure out why and non of the ones that show
    > can be set as a background or tied to a ringer. I am trying to see if
    > there is limited size of color depth issues that are messing me up.
    > Some of the images taht will not display are smaller than those that
    > do. confusing?
    >
    >


    Not confusing, really. But beyond my knowledge. The only thing I can
    think of is to make sure they are regular JPEG files, not progressive
    ones. But I don't know what that means, really. I just know someone
    who said it made a difference.

    --
    R
    O/Siris
    -+-
    A thing moderately good
    is not so good as it ought to be.
    Moderation in temper is always a virtue,
    but moderation in principle is always a vice.
    +Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792+



  5. #5
    Ludwig
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    "O/Siris" <r[email protected]st.nt> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...
    > The phone does look there for media and some of the pictures show and
    > other don't I'm trying to figure out why and non of the ones that show
    > can be set as a background or tied to a ringer. I am trying to see if
    > there is limited size of color depth issues that are messing me up.
    > Some of the images taht will not display are smaller than those that
    > do. confusing?
    >
    >


    Not confusing, really. But beyond my knowledge. The only thing I can
    think of is to make sure they are regular JPEG files, not progressive
    ones. But I don't know what that means, really. I just know someone
    who said it made a difference.

    Maybe you shouldn't give advice if you don't know what you are talking
    about.







  6. #6
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...
    > Maybe you shouldn't give advice if you don't know what you are talking
    > about.
    >


    I see. So that whole plethora of responses you got was made more
    confusing because I posted?

    You weren't getting any responses. I took a shot at it. Sorry if that
    upset you.

    No, not really. I'm not. I think it's insulting and pathetic that
    you'd treat someone who tried to help you like that.

    --
    R
    O/Siris
    -+-
    A thing moderately good
    is not so good as it ought to be.
    Moderation in temper is always a virtue,
    but moderation in principle is always a vice.
    +Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792+



  7. #7
    Tinman
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    Ludwig wrote:
    > "O/Siris" <r[email protected]st.nt> wrote in message
    >> me up. Some of the images taht will not display are smaller than
    >> those that do. confusing?
    >>
    >>

    >
    > Not confusing, really. But beyond my knowledge.


    Based on the statements above, you are indeed confused. Trust me.

    "Honest officer, I am *not* confused over how fast I was traveling. It's
    merely beyond my knowledge."


    >
    > Maybe you shouldn't give advice if you don't know what you are talking
    > about.


    Maybe you should abide by your own advice.





  8. #8
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...
    > Maybe you should abide by your own advice.
    >
    >


    You were quoting me, but the words were not mine. Those were the words
    to which I was responding.

    I offered up some advice I'd seen given out, and that seemed to have
    helped in a similar situation. The OP seems to think he'd rather have
    had no response at all.

    What that "officer" analogy has to do with *anything* in this thread is
    something only you, apparently, can determine. Or perhaps you have the
    answer, and have simply opted not to reveal it for the mere sport of
    knowing?

    --
    R
    O/Siris
    -+-
    A thing moderately good
    is not so good as it ought to be.
    Moderation in temper is always a virtue,
    but moderation in principle is always a vice.
    +Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792+



  9. #9
    Tinman
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    O/Siris wrote:
    > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    > says...
    >> Maybe you should abide by your own advice.
    >>
    >>

    >
    > You were quoting me, but the words were not mine. Those were the
    > words to which I was responding.
    >


    No ****, Sherlock. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature should have
    been able to figure that out. Can't you tell the difference between ">"
    and ">>?"


    > I offered up some advice I'd seen given out, and that seemed to have
    > helped in a similar situation. The OP seems to think he'd rather have
    > had no response at all.
    >
    > What that "officer" analogy has to do with *anything* in this thread
    > is something only you, apparently, can determine. Or perhaps you
    > have the answer, and have simply opted not to reveal it for the mere
    > sport of knowing?


    <whatever>

    The phrases I responded to were Ludwig's. What was so hard about that to
    figure out? Regardless, it's the last time I'll ever back you up.
    Perhaps Ludwig was right after-all, cuz when it came to deciphering who
    was speaking to whom, you failed miserably.


    --
    Mike





  10. #10
    Oleg O.
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Tinman <[email protected]> wrote:
    >No ****, Sherlock. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature should have
    >been able to figure that out. Can't you tell the difference between ">"
    >and ">>?"


    Tinman, you need to pay more attention. Ludwig didn't use ">" when
    quoting O/Siris, so what you think he said was a part of O/Siris'
    message, which I'm sure is within your ability to verify. IMO, this is
    where you apologize to O/Siris.

    But as far as I can tell, "Ludwig" <[email protected]> was not the OP
    in this thread (who was "Cheffie" <[email protected]>), so O/Siris'
    tirade was misdirected too. I think he owes an apology to the OP.

    >The phrases I responded to were Ludwig's. What was so hard about that to
    >figure out? Regardless, it's the last time I'll ever back you up.
    >Perhaps Ludwig was right after-all, cuz when it came to deciphering who
    >was speaking to whom, you failed miserably.


    This is very funny to read, considering the above.

    This thread is pathetic.

    Unless it's me who's totally confused. And if that's the case, I
    apologize.





  11. #11
    Tinman
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    Oleg O. wrote:
    > In article <[email protected]>,
    > Tinman <[email protected]> wrote:
    >> No ****, Sherlock. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature should
    >> have been able to figure that out. Can't you tell the difference
    >> between ">" and ">>?"

    >
    > Tinman, you need to pay more attention. Ludwig didn't use ">" when
    > quoting O/Siris, so what you think he said was a part of O/Siris'
    > message, which I'm sure is within your ability to verify. IMO, this
    > is where you apologize to O/Siris.


    Yes, it certainly is! I do apologize. The first post I read in this
    thread was "Ludwig's" and from that it appeared that all of the unquoted
    text was his.

    And I only responded due to "Ludwig's" sentence, "Maybe you shouldn't
    give advice if you don't know what you are talking about." My comments
    to the earlier, non-Ludwig, statements were because they seemed so
    confusing; compared to--what I thought was--his closing sentence. He
    didn't even quote--he just threw out his one-liner. (Note how this is
    getting even more confusing.)


    >
    > This is very funny to read, considering the above.
    >


    Sure, laugh at others' expense! <g>

    I thought I was posting in support of Osiris, and was a bit surprised at
    his response to me. I shouldn't have even responded to "Ludwig," as I
    have seen no other posts from him and my guess is that he threw out
    flame bait--and got a hit.


    > This thread is pathetic.
    >
    > Unless it's me who's totally confused. And if that's the case, I
    > apologize.


    IMO, the one who needs a whippin' would be "Ludwig."


    --
    Mike





  12. #12
    Ludwig
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    "Tinman" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    > Oleg O. wrote:
    >> In article <[email protected]>,
    >> Tinman <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>> No ****, Sherlock. Anyone with an IQ above room temperature should
    >>> have been able to figure that out. Can't you tell the difference
    >>> between ">" and ">>?"

    >>
    >> Tinman, you need to pay more attention. Ludwig didn't use ">" when
    >> quoting O/Siris, so what you think he said was a part of O/Siris'
    >> message, which I'm sure is within your ability to verify. IMO, this
    >> is where you apologize to O/Siris.

    >
    > Yes, it certainly is! I do apologize. The first post I read in this thread
    > was "Ludwig's" and from that it appeared that all of the unquoted text was
    > his.
    >
    > And I only responded due to "Ludwig's" sentence, "Maybe you shouldn't give
    > advice if you don't know what you are talking about." My comments to the
    > earlier, non-Ludwig, statements were because they seemed so confusing;
    > compared to--what I thought was--his closing sentence. He didn't even
    > quote--he just threw out his one-liner. (Note how this is getting even
    > more confusing.)
    >
    >
    >>
    >> This is very funny to read, considering the above.
    >>

    >
    > Sure, laugh at others' expense! <g>
    >
    > I thought I was posting in support of Osiris, and was a bit surprised at
    > his response to me. I shouldn't have even responded to "Ludwig," as I have
    > seen no other posts from him and my guess is that he threw out flame
    > bait--and got a hit.
    >
    >
    >> This thread is pathetic.
    >>
    >> Unless it's me who's totally confused. And if that's the case, I
    >> apologize.

    >
    > IMO, the one who needs a whippin' would be "Ludwig."
    >
    >
    > --
    > Mike
    >


    Sorry about the quotes, it was not me that removed them. I was responding to
    the post where osinus gave advice but admitted it was 'beyond his knowledge'
    and that he didn't really know what it meant. I think some of you guys just
    like reading your own words.





  13. #13
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...
    > The phrases I responded to were Ludwig's. What was so hard about that to
    > figure out? Regardless, it's the last time I'll ever back you up.
    >


    From MANY Usenet eitquette sources:

    "Summarization is best done by including appropriate quotes from the
    original article."

    See that second to last word? Mine was not the original article when it
    came to the points you were discussing.

    And, in case you'd rather read it for yourself, here is one such
    etiquette source:

    http://www.csam.montclair.edu/docs/U...uide/news.html

    --
    R
    O/Siris
    -+-
    A thing moderately good
    is not so good as it ought to be.
    Moderation in temper is always a virtue,
    but moderation in principle is always a vice.
    +Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792+



  14. #14
    O/Siris
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...
    > Sorry about the quotes, it was not me that removed them. I was respondingto
    > the post where osinus gave advice but admitted it was 'beyond his knowledge'
    > and that he didn't really know what it meant. I think some of you guys just
    > like reading your own words.
    >


    Although you weren't the OP after all, I think my point stands.

    Did *you* provide an answer to the problem? Did *anyone* else make an
    attempt to resolve it? I speculated a bit because, otherwise, there was
    nothing for the user. I made it clear it was only what I'd heard, and
    offered no guarantee that it would work.

    You appear to think there's something wrong with offering up something
    where, otherwise, there was nothing. I disagree.

    --
    R
    O/Siris
    -+-
    A thing moderately good
    is not so good as it ought to be.
    Moderation in temper is always a virtue,
    but moderation in principle is always a vice.
    +Thomas Paine, "The Rights of Man", 1792+



  15. #15
    Tinman
    Guest

    Re: Need help getting my pics to display on the Sanyo 5600

    O/Siris wrote:
    > In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
    > says...
    >> The phrases I responded to were Ludwig's. What was so hard about
    >> that to figure out? Regardless, it's the last time I'll ever back
    >> you up.
    >>

    >
    > From MANY Usenet eitquette sources:
    >
    > "Summarization is best done by including appropriate quotes from the
    > original article."
    >


    LOL


    > See that second to last word? Mine was not the original article when
    > it came to the points you were discussing.
    >


    <sigh> That's because Ludwig didn't quote properly...


    --
    Mike | If a million monkeys typed on a million
    | keyboards for a million years, eventually all
    | the works of Shakespeare would be produced.
    | Thanks to Usenet, we know this is not true.





  • Similar Threads