Seeking Angry Customers for Class Action

>Anyone can *claim* to have $10,000 in some mythical escrow.

BTW, why didn't you just accept the bet, and pick an escrow.

I have no problem with depositing first.

You can see it in there before you deposit.

Escrow's aren't "mythical". There are several very real online
escrows. I let you pick it. you were free to pick the "non-mythical"
escrow. Some are very highly respected. Many large Ebay transactions
go through escrow. 'Mythical"? Hardly. You knowledge of the modern
world is less than even what I would expect.

You could have chosen an online escrow of your very own.

For obvious reasons, you didn't.

---

› See More: Seeking Angry Customers for Class Action

FWIW wrote:
>
> >Anyone can *claim* to have $10,000 in some mythical escrow.
>
> BTW, why didn't you just accept the bet, and pick an escrow.
>
> I have no problem with depositing first.
>
> You can see it in there before you deposit.
>
> Escrow's aren't "mythical". There are several very real online
> escrows. I let you pick it. you were free to pick the "non-mythical"
> escrow. Some are very highly respected. Many large Ebay transactions
> go through escrow. 'Mythical"? Hardly. You knowledge of the modern
> world is less than even what I would expect.
>
> You could have chosen an online escrow of your very own.
>
> For obvious reasons, you didn't.

<filters off>

Ah, you're still an asshole.

<filters back on>

Notan

><filters off>

You have no "filters". Or if you do have them, it's amazing how you
manage to see what everyone in the "filters" posts.

I knew you were lying.

Either that, or you just really, really, really suck at setting up
proper filters.


>Ah, you're still an asshole.

And you're still a proven liar.




><filters back on>

No they're not. They never were on.

I enjoyed your last Killfilter Opus though.

Please do give us another Killfilter Opus before pretending to put me
back in you fake filter.

Come on, what good is a killfilter declaration without an opus?

"FWIW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> >You haven't put up anything- a sure sign of trolldom.
>
> I have $10,000 ready for escrow right now. Are you ready?
>

I made you an offer for a $10,000 wager- you chose to ignore it and pussied
out. I knew you would- that's why I put it out there. I even gave you time
to ponder it and you chose to pussy out. I guess that would mean that you
are now the pussy of this newsgroup.

And you were right about one thing- I purposely took you out of my killfile
just long enough to expose you for the pussy you are. You can try and make
a big deal about me lying if you wish, but it is much harder to make it seem
like such a big deal when I am the one admitting the fib. And that's all it
was- a fib. Not some huge, credibility shaking admission- just a fib. A
fib to expose a pussy. Whether you go back in the killfile or when you go
back in my killfile is my choice, not yours and will be done at my leisure.

Now run along, little pussy.

>I made you an offer for a $10,000 wager- you chose to ignore it and pussied
>out. I knew you would- that's why I put it out there.

You made ME an offer? Please link to it. I never saw it. You said I
was in your "kill filter" and this assumed this would be impossible.

By all means, show me the terms and I very well may take you up on it.
I am not sure what your wager was.

> I even gave you time to ponder it and you chose to pussy out. I guess that would mean >that you are now the pussy of this newsgroup.

Nope, never saw it. Throw a link up and we'll talk.

>And you were right about one thing- I purposely took you out of my killfile
>just long enough to expose you for the pussy you are.

You just admitted that you willfully lied.


>You can try and make a big deal about me lying if you wish, but it is much harder to >make it seem like such a big deal when I am the one admitting the fib.

#1 I knew you were lying all along (most people probably knew). So
you might as well have just declared grass to be green.

#2 Admitting it was the right thing to do. I will make no more issue
of it. It takes a man to stand up and amit that they lied. I would
hope, however, that this also means that the lying is over.


>Not some huge, credibility shaking admission- just a fib.

A lie is a lie is a lie. If "fib" makes you feel better, then be my
guest.

>A fib to expose a pussy.

Now you are just trying to justify lying, which means that it probably
won't be your last one.


>Whether you go back in the killfile or when you go
>back in my killfile is my choice, not yours and will be done at my leisure.

You don't have a killfilter.

And assuming you get one, I am supposed to give a **** why?

Seriously, I would be interested to know why you would think I would
care. When you pretended to have me in it last time it affected me not
one iota. It actually made the Usenet experience more pleasant.

Put me in the make believe filter, leave me out of the make believe
filter, mold the make believe filter in the shape of a supository and
stick it up your rectum ... I am struggling to find a reason care and
have been unsuccessful so far.

The only person who cares about your pretend filter is you. Not sure
why you bring it up.

What I do care about is this $10,000 wager you mention. Can you give
me a pointer please?


>Now run along, little pussy.

No, I'll take a look at the action you claimed to offer first and see
if I'm interested. You wouldn't want me to run away if you had an
opportunity to collect 10 large .... would you?

Stick around. I want to see if we can come up with some terms for this
wager you claim to have offered.

Children,

Can you please take this juvenile discussion offline to email and spare us
having to killfile you? I have not heard such juvenile name-calling since I
was in junior high school. Sheesh, they certainly do not give enough
homework to these junior high juveniles otherwise they would not have so
much time to spend here.

Thanks you,

-mij

"Scott" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "FWIW" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> >You haven't put up anything- a sure sign of trolldom.
>>
>> I have $10,000 ready for escrow right now. Are you ready?
>>
>
> I made you an offer for a $10,000 wager- you chose to ignore it and
> pussied out. I knew you would- that's why I put it out there. I even
> gave you time to ponder it and you chose to pussy out. I guess that would
> mean that you are now the pussy of this newsgroup.
>
> And you were right about one thing- I purposely took you out of my
> killfile just long enough to expose you for the pussy you are. You can
> try and make a big deal about me lying if you wish, but it is much harder
> to make it seem like such a big deal when I am the one admitting the fib.
> And that's all it was- a fib. Not some huge, credibility shaking
> admission- just a fib. A fib to expose a pussy. Whether you go back in
> the killfile or when you go back in my killfile is my choice, not yours
> and will be done at my leisure.
>
> Now run along, little pussy.
>

> Escrow's aren't "mythical".

Yet another example of your prolific nature with dishonesty.

I didn't say escrows are mythical. I said yours is.

>Yet another example of your prolific nature with dishonesty.

Really? Which mythical escrow did I recomment out of prolific
dishonesty?

A specific if you have one.

>I didn't say escrows are mythical. I said yours is.

How could you say that about "my" escrow when I never specified one.

I'm not even sure you know what you are arguing about ... you are just
trying to divert attention from twatting out, but the only thing you
can do to solve that is stand up and back up your claims with something
tangible. You publically pussied out. You've told everyone that you
don't believe the things you say. Why should we believe what you say
if you don't?

I said you could pick the escrow.

Why didn't you pick one?

Ya they are ranked 3rd worst of how many carriers? Not really that bad
of ranking but then again just depends on who does the ranking. I've
seen them ranked from 1st to xx

[email protected] wrote:
> I've had it with the deception and lies, and pitiful customer service.
> FAST COMPANY ranked Sprint 3rd worst in customer service, so I KNOW
> there are many people out there in the same situation.
>
> Rather than file suit alone, there is power in numbers. My goal is to
> use the web to find 50,000 customers who are unsatisfied with poor
> signal coverage and lying help desk people. This is a beginning, and
> if I find 5 people in this group, it could soon turn into 5,000.
>
> Here is the letter sent to Sprint headquarters, and in the face of a
> really angry customer with legitimate complaints, their response is
> "silence".
> ---------
>
> Transmitted Electronically
>
> November 12, 2005
>
> To: Sprint Ethics and Compliance Committee
>
> From: Robert Ramirez, Irving, Texas
>
>
> This note is a followup to an earlier correspondence. So far, I have
> not heard back from the committee in regards to my allegation that your
> business practices are unethical for the following reasons:
>
> A) your phone help team is telling blatant lies that cause the
> customer to not get his/her problem fixed and waste time trying to get
> it resolved.
>
> a1) I have spent a great deal of time working to solve a simple
> problem and there is a cost to this and
>
> a2) you have been billing full fees during this entire period and not
> delivering full service.
>
> B) You are advertising one level of service and delivering another.
> Your coverage map shows excellent coverage in my neighborhood, yet the
> signal continually turns off, and my primary reason for cell phone
> service is to be able to talk to kids in California from home
>
> b1) this leads to aggravation as calls, including important business
> calls, are cut off in mid sentence due to inadquate signal;
>
> b2) loss of time
>
> b3) you bill full fees while not providing full service as promised.
>
> As you are certainly aware, a recent copy of FAST COMANY magazine
> listed SPRINT as the 3rd worst company in America for customer service.
> This means there are MANY MANY MANY people out there similarly
> dissatisfied and surely many of them can be made to understand that you
> have defrauded us by not providing promised services.
>
> They would probably easily understand why this customer feels he has
> good cause to bring suit against you. It will not be hard to find a
> lawyer who can help organize a class action lawsuit.
>
> I am now requesting, a SECOND time, that you respond, in writing to my
> initial complaint about your poor and unethical business practices.
> Please include in this letter:
>
> 1) Please advise who read the first letter,
> 2) what action was taken (beyond getting your technical people to
> ACTUALLY fix the problem after 4-5 months).
> 3)an explanation of failure to respond to this request.
> 4)Lastly, please advise what the next step should be in contacting
> corporate governance individuals regarding this serious complaint.
>
> I would expect to receive this letter within a reasonable amount of
> time, 5 business days or so, Otherwise, I'll assume you are
> non-responsive and will launch phase two of this operation.
>
> -----------
> Well, I promised them phase two, and it starts here.....Join in if
> you'd like to "stick it to the man!!!."
>

Can't really blame them, working in the wireless industry 99% of all
phones I see brought in for service are customer caused problems. Not
phone failure. Usually water damage, cracked screens, broken hinges,
etc.... Things which consumers consider covered under the manufacture
warranty and isn't.

O/Siris wrote:
>>From MSNBC:
>
> "Quarterly income amounted to $516 million, or 23 cents per share.
> Setting aside unusual items, the Reston-based company's profit was
> $655 million, or 29 cents per share, missing the average view of 38
> cents per share from analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial."
>
> http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9824194/from/RL.5/
>
> A 9 cent miss is significant. Not Earth-shattering. But significant.
> And I think projections were for 1.7 million adds, though I haven't
> found that.
>
> Starting the beginning of the year, Sprint is going to implement what I
> consider to be the single worst customer service policy in the industry
> today: It will no longer act as warranty agent for the phone
> manufacturers unless the customer subscribes to their ESRP (essentially
> the new name for the Equipment Replacement Plan). If a customer is
> going to get warranty service, they either pay for it, or deal with the
> manufacturer directly.
>
> Maybe not doom'n gloom. But certainly pointed in that direction.
>