Website Leaches of my Usenet Postings...Cease and Desist

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:44:39 -0400, Agent_C
<[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:06 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>#3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
>><http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>
>You keep on posting this non-working URL.

Because it's the source.
Content easily found with a simple Google search:
<http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Myths+About+Copyright+Explained%22>
First link, cached version
Or the second link
etc.
You know how to use Google?

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

---

› See More: Website Leaches of my Usenet Postings...Cease and Desist

John Navas wrote:
>
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:44:39 -0400, Agent_C
> <[email protected]> wrote in
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:06 GMT, John Navas
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>#3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
> >><http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
> >
> >You keep on posting this non-working URL.
>
> Because it's the source.
> Content easily found with a simple Google search:
> <http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Myths+About+Copyright+Explained%22>
> First link, cached version
> Or the second link
> etc.
> You know how to use Google?

Sometimes, John, you're just a bit too full of yourself.

Why not just post a link that works!

http://www.totse.com/en/law/justice_.../10cpmyth.html

Notan

Agent_C wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:06 GMT, John Navas
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> #3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
>> <http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>
> You keep on posting this non-working URL.

When you have no citations to back up your position what else are you
supposed to do?!

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:51:28 GMT, John Navas
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Because it's the source.
>Content easily found with a simple Google search:
><http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Myths+About+Copyright+Explained%22>
>First link, cached version
>Or the second link
>etc.
>You know how to use Google?

You're such an ass...

A_C

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 18:33:48 -0400, Agent_C
<[email protected]> wrote in
<[email protected]>:

>On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:51:28 GMT, John Navas
><[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Because it's the source.
>>Content easily found with a simple Google search:
>><http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Myths+About+Copyright+Explained%22>
>>First link, cached version
>>Or the second link
>>etc.
>>You know how to use Google?
>
>You're such an ass...

You're such a child.

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:23:10 -0700, SMS <[email protected]>
wrote in <[email protected]>:

>Agent_C wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:06 GMT, John Navas
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> #3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
>>> <http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>>
>> You keep on posting this non-working URL.
>
>When you have no citations to back up your position what else are you
>supposed to do?!

LOL

--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

In article <[email protected]>,
Notan <[email protected]> wrote:

> John Navas wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:44:39 -0400, Agent_C
> > <[email protected]> wrote in
> > <[email protected]>:
> >
> > >On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:06 GMT, John Navas
> > ><[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >>#3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
> > >><http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>

This link works just fine (for me anyway). I takes me right to Brad
Tempelton's site. Not that Brad is a copyright attorney, but he is the
chairman of the board of the EFF and has a lot of legal insight into
these matters.
> > >
> > >You keep on posting this non-working URL.
> >
> > Because it's the source.
> > Content easily found with a simple Google search:
> > <http://www.google.com/search?q=%22Myths+About+Copyright+Explained%22>
> > First link, cached version
> > Or the second link
> > etc.
> > You know how to use Google?
>
> Sometimes, John, you're just a bit too full of yourself.
>
> Why not just post a link that works!
>
> http://www.totse.com/en/law/justice_.../10cpmyth.html
>
> Notan

--
-Ernie-

Ernie Klein wrote:
>
> In article <[email protected]>,
> Notan <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > John Navas wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:44:39 -0400, Agent_C
> > > <[email protected]> wrote in
> > > <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > >On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:06 GMT, John Navas
> > > ><[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>#3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
> > > >><http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>
> This link works just fine (for me anyway). I takes me right to Brad
> Tempelton's site. Not that Brad is a copyright attorney, but he is the
> chairman of the board of the EFF and has a lot of legal insight into
> these matters.
>
> <snip>

Yup, workin' now!

Notan

The link worked on Firefox [ver 1.5.0.6] the first time. It worked on
IE6 [ver 6.2900.2180.xpsp_gdr.05031-1519] the first time and
Netscape [ver 8.0.4] the first time. What browser were you using
that didn't work?

Bill

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:23:10 -0700, SMS <[email protected]>
> wrote in <[email protected]>:
>
>>Agent_C wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 21:40:06 GMT, John Navas
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> #3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
>>>> <http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>>>
>>> You keep on posting this non-working URL.
>>
>>When you have no citations to back up your position what else are you
>>supposed to do?!
>
> LOL
>
> --
> Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
> John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>

Steven J. Sobol wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, Tinman wrote:
>
> > No need. He's got a lock on Idiot of the Month and is already a strong
> > contender for Idiot of the Year.
>
> Keep on posting stuff about him and he'll lash out at you like he did at
> me. Called me a Nazi, etc. Was quite a bit of fun

That post never called YOU anything, however I'd suggest bailing out of
Apple Valley,
and heading for Fairfax in LA...poppy seed strudel..yum yum.

>
>
> --
> Steve Sobol, Professional Geek ** Java/VB/VC/PHP/Perl ** Linux/*BSD/Windows
> Apple Valley, California PGP:0xE3AE35ED
>
> It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.

Diamond Dave wrote:
> On 28 Aug 2006 14:48:12 -0700, [email protected] wrote:
>
> >All of the below websites are now legally notified to cease and desist
> >copying MY intellectual property to your websites...JG
>
> Obviously you don't understand Usenet too well.
>
> My posts from 1991 are still floating around on Google Groups!
>
> Just bear in mind that when you post a message, its preserved forever.
>
> Dave

Lets examine one Leeching Website:
cellphonetopics.com
which calls ACS
Cell Phones Forum > Cellular service providers > Sprint PCS
and surrounds the site with Ads.

The owning company Jelsoft Ent. will soon see legal papers for money
damages.
Ditto for Cellbanter.com, another Jelsoft leecher.

JG

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 15:06:17 GMT, John Horner <[email protected]> wrote
> in <JPhJg.8783$Xl5.1470@trnddc06>:
>
>>Personally I think that when you make a usenet posting you should assume
>>that you have put that content into the equivalent of the public domain.
>
> Legally that's not true.
> #3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
> <http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>

Legally, you don't have a clue about copyright law- I refer to a thread last
year concerning ringtones where you were openly in violation of copyright
and fair use law and you were too stubborn to admit it. I believe that is
also the same thread where you claim that your use as a witness gave you
super-secret legal powers that made you more knowledgeable than the rest of
the group.

Now take your google search hits and go home- wait for a topic that you
actually know something about (I realize that it may take a while for one of
those to come up).

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

>>
>>Care to clarify what "from my citation" means?
>
> #3 of "Myths About Copyright Explained"
> <http://www.templetons.com/brad/copymyths.html>
>
>
A blog from a layperson? That is your authoratative source? Would you care
to explain how his opinion became fact in your eyes?

This is a new low even for you, Novice.

"John Navas" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:46:52 -0700, SMS <[email protected]>
> wrote in <[email protected]>:
>
>>John Horner wrote:
>>> Personally I think that when you make a usenet posting you should assume
>>> that you have put that content into the equivalent of the public domain.
>
>>Practically speaking, that's the case. Almost no one would have the
>>resources to get their postings removed from all the servers that they
>>end up on, and on all the forums they are reposted in.
>>
>>I see postings of mine from the early 1990's still floating around in
>>many forums, and I don't mean just on deja.com (Google Groups).
>
> Nothing of the sort. Public domain is a term of art with special
> meaning, and posting to Usenet doesn't put something in the public
> domain, effectively or otherwise. Should you be damaged by someone
> making use of it (e.g., for commercial purposes outside of your intended
> use on Usenet), you could pursue a copyright infringement action, which
> wouldn't be possible in a real case of public domain.
>

Sorry, Perry Mason- any case law to back that up? You've been asked that
question before, if it sounds familiar. You ignored it back then after you
couldn't find anything through Google to back up your point. Of course,
there's a reason for that- no case law exists. You are merely regurgitating
the untested opinion of others instead of case law, statute or regulation.

On 30 Aug 2006 17:09:41 -0700, [email protected] wrote:

>The owning company Jelsoft Ent. will soon see legal papers for money
>damages.
>Ditto for Cellbanter.com, another Jelsoft leecher.

Who will be originating these papers? A bona fide member of the Bar
(meaning a real lawyer with verifiable credentials) or some paranoid
nutcase with a word processor?

I'm putting my money on the latter...

A_C