Results 31 to 42 of 42
- 01-23-2007, 02:32 PM #31John RichardsGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
"skip" <skip[@nospam.com> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
> In Los angeles it is so dry your skin cracks and it hurts to use your eyes.
> The smog is the worst in the country and you develop a LA cough.
> The dust is everywhere . But the sun shines a lot so it is the best place
> on earth.
I'm not going to defend the smoggy LA area, but let's just say that
there's a lot more to California than just LA.
--
John Richards (happy in northern CA)
› See More: _Murky picture for video phones_
- 01-23-2007, 04:01 PM #32skipGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
"John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
> "skip" <skip[@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> In Los angeles it is so dry your skin cracks and it hurts to use your
>> eyes. The smog is the worst in the country and you develop a LA
>> cough. The dust is everywhere . But the sun shines a lot so it is the
>> best place on earth.
>
> I'm not going to defend the smoggy LA area, but let's just say that
> there's a lot more to California than just LA.
>
Yes I like northern cal myself.
- 01-24-2007, 10:11 AM #33KurtGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
In article <[email protected]>,
Larry <[email protected]> wrote:
> "John Richards" <[email protected]> wrote in news8jth.51705
> [email protected]:
>
> > That's about 50 miles west of me. I'm in the Napa Valley wine country,
> > aka paradise.
> >
> > --
> > John Richards
> >
> >
>
> Hmm....you bring the wine. I'll bring the big shrimps and Blue Crabs....
> (c;
>
> Larry
I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
- 01-24-2007, 06:58 PM #34LarryGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
@news.giganews.com:
> I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
>
>
No, not quite the same. Ours have 8 legs...(c;
Larry
--
Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.
- 01-24-2007, 06:59 PM #35LarryGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
@news.giganews.com:
> I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
>
>
You still dating "her"?.....or "him"?
Larry
--
Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.
- 01-24-2007, 08:24 PM #36KurtGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
In article <[email protected]>,
Larry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
> @news.giganews.com:
>
> > I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
> >
> >
>
> No, not quite the same. Ours have 8 legs...(c;
>
I've seen the NC girls...
--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
- 01-24-2007, 08:26 PM #37KurtGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
In article <[email protected]>,
Larry <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-4B07BC.08111524012007
> @news.giganews.com:
>
> > I once got the crabs... Don't recall they were blue.
> >
> >
>
> You still dating "her"?.....or "him"?
>
> Larry
Both- an Hermaphrodite. Got tired of trying to figure out which end was
up.
--
To reply by email, remove the word "space"
- 01-24-2007, 11:55 PM #38LarryGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-9588E3.18243624012007
@news.giganews.com:
> I've seen the NC girls...
>
So have I, but of course that is in NORTH Carolina. Charleston is
conveniently located in SOUTH Carolina, a planet away.
Larry
--
Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.
- 01-24-2007, 11:57 PM #39LarryGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
Kurt <[email protected]> wrote in news:labolide-C2A09E.18262024012007
@news.giganews.com:
> Both- an Hermaphrodite. Got tired of trying to figure out which end was
> up.
>
>
Too bad there isn't a valve you can switch on those so you can have a horny
female when you're in the mood, then throw the valve and have a buddy guy
to go to the football games with....(c;
We'll have them like that, shortly, with genetic engineering. They'll not
have valves....Bluetooth remote controls you won't be able to pair with on
a Verizon cellphone all hobbled up like they are....
ON TOPIC! ON TOPIC!!...hee hee.
Larry
--
Democracy is when two wolves and a sheep vote on who's for dinner.
Liberty is when the sheep has his own gun.
- 01-27-2007, 11:29 AM #40John NavasGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:45:01 GMT, Curtis R Anderson <[email protected]>
wrote in <xGUsh.9790$gS1.8509@trndny01>:
>SMS wrote:
>> That's the big difference between the U.S. and much of Europe and Asia.
>>
>> When I'm in Japan and Korea, there's a tremendous amount of text
>> messaging and watching other crap on phones, but it's because people are
>> bored while commuting on the train or subway and because it's considered
>> rude to be talking on your phone on the subway.
>>
>> If commuting on public transit ever became more popular for the middle
>> class in the U.S., outside of cities like NY, Chicago, and San
>> Francisco, then data usage on the cellular networks would go way up.
>
>And it is on a long bus ride, over 35 minutes for one route I can take,
>when I sit there and use WAP or play a BREW application. I'll get the
>spam cleaned out in my email on my ride home, making sorting it easier
>when I sit down at the main system later in the evening.
You get that much spam?! Have you considered better spam filtering? Of
the literally hundreds of spams sent to my email addresses each day,
typically no more than 1 or 2 (and often none) will make it past my spam
filters. (I could make it even more effective except that I'm not
willing to accept false positives.)
>Other than text messaging, I'm surprised I'm not seeing more WAP usage
>from others.
WAP uptake has been slow due to complexity, poor performance, limited
content, and high cost.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
- 01-28-2007, 08:10 PM #41Curtis R AndersonGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
John Navas wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 01:45:01 GMT, Curtis R Anderson <[email protected]>
> wrote in <xGUsh.9790$gS1.8509@trndny01>:
>>And it is on a long bus ride, over 35 minutes for one route I can take,
>>when I sit there and use WAP or play a BREW application. I'll get the
>>spam cleaned out in my email on my ride home, making sorting it easier
>>when I sit down at the main system later in the evening.
>
>
> You get that much spam?! Have you considered better spam filtering? Of
> the literally hundreds of spams sent to my email addresses each day,
> typically no more than 1 or 2 (and often none) will make it past my spam
> filters. (I could make it even more effective except that I'm not
> willing to accept false positives.)
In my case, I have to set up my own spam filters with this (as in the
email address you see) provider. They encourage users to set up their
own procmail rules for filtering.
I tend to leave that alone just in case of a false positive.
>>Other than text messaging, I'm surprised I'm not seeing more WAP usage
>
>>from others.
>
> WAP uptake has been slow due to complexity, poor performance, limited
> content, and high cost.
>
I definitely see the limited content. Not to mention it chews up the
RAZR battery in a hurry.
--
Curtis R. Anderson, Co-creator of "Gleepy the Hen", still
"In Heaven there is no beer / That's why we drink it here ..."
http://www.gleepy.net/ mailto:[email protected]
mailto:[email protected] (and others) Yahoo!: gleepythehen
- 01-29-2007, 06:54 PM #42John NavasGuest
Re: _Murky picture for video phones_
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 02:10:27 GMT, Curtis R Anderson <[email protected]>
wrote in <nIcvh.3526$yB5.1238@trndny03>:
>John Navas wrote:
>> You get that much spam?! Have you considered better spam filtering? Of
>> the literally hundreds of spams sent to my email addresses each day,
>> typically no more than 1 or 2 (and often none) will make it past my spam
>> filters. (I could make it even more effective except that I'm not
>> willing to accept false positives.)
>
>In my case, I have to set up my own spam filters with this (as in the
>email address you see) provider. They encourage users to set up their
>own procmail rules for filtering.
>
>I tend to leave that alone just in case of a false positive.
Take a hard look at naive Bayesian classifiers (e.g., POPFile
<http://popfile.sourceforge.net>), which do a remarkably accurate job of
spam classification (better than 99.5% in my case) once they have been
trained on a couple hundred messages or so.
--
Best regards, FAQ FOR CINGULAR WIRELESS:
John Navas <http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Cingular_Wireless_FAQ>
Similar Threads
- alt.cellular.verizon
- alt.cellular.attws
- Samsung
- Motorola
Mercado para la venta de autos.
in Chit Chat