Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34
  1. #1
    Ron
    Guest
    Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.

    New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
    have a dividend.

    "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
    subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
    depreciation is also expected to fall."

    http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/





    See More: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.




  2. #2
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    As I predicted back when it went after NEXTEL.


    On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:06:00 -0600, Ron <[email protected]>
    wrote in <[email protected]>:

    >Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
    >
    >New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
    >have a dividend.
    >
    >"The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
    >subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
    >depreciation is also expected to fall."
    >
    >http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/


    --
    Best regards,
    John Navas <http:/navasgroup.com>

    "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
    difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
    boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford



  3. #3
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    Ron <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
    >
    > New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
    > have a dividend.
    >
    > "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
    > subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
    > depreciation is also expected to fall."
    >
    > http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
    >
    >
    >


    Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET

    Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.

    Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days when
    I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to the next
    town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your phone from ONLY
    ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your iPhone. You don't REALLY
    want to eliminate all ATT's competition, again, do you?

    NOT!

    ATT bought Centennial Communications, yesterday.....monopoly in action....

    http://biz.yahoo.com/ap/081111/at_t_rating.html?.v=1



  4. #4
    Ron
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:28:23 -0800, John Navas
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    >As I predicted back when it went after NEXTEL.
    >


    Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
    but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.

    Google proves that.


    >
    >On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 05:06:00 -0600, Ron <[email protected]>
    >wrote in <[email protected]>:
    >
    >>Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
    >>
    >>New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
    >>have a dividend.
    >>
    >>"The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
    >>subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
    >>depreciation is also expected to fall."
    >>
    >>http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/




  5. #5
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:15:42 -0600, Ron <[email protected]>
    wrote in <[email protected]>:

    >On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:28:23 -0800, John Navas
    ><[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >>As I predicted back when it went after NEXTEL.

    >
    >Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
    >but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.
    >
    >Google proves that.


    Thou doth attempt to spliteth hairs, but the record doth say otherwise:
    <news:[email protected]>
    <news:[email protected]>
    <news:[email protected]>
    --
    Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
    John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
    Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
    Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>



  6. #6
    Ron
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    On 11 Nov 2008 22:04:43 GMT, That80sGuy <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In message news:[email protected], Larry
    ><[email protected]> done wrote:
    >
    >> Ron <[email protected]> wrote in
    >> news:[email protected]:
    >>
    >>> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
    >>>
    >>> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
    >>> have a dividend.
    >>>
    >>> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
    >>> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
    >>> depreciation is also expected to fall."
    >>>
    >>> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>

    >>
    >> Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
    >>
    >> Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
    >>
    >> Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days
    >> when I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to
    >> the next town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your
    >> phone from ONLY ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your
    >> iPhone. You don't REALLY want to eliminate all ATT's competition,
    >> again, do you?

    >
    >If you cared about monopolies you'd be working to destroy the Federal
    >Reserve System, which is neither "federal" nor a "reserve system"


    YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
    excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.



  7. #7
    Steve Sobol
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    On 2008-11-12, John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:

    >>Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
    >>but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.
    >>
    >>Google proves that.


    OMG. Would the two of you please stop waving your weenies around and
    stick 'em back in your pants, please? The "I told you so" crap is childish.

    --
    Steve Sobol, Victorville, California, USA
    It's all fun and games until someone starts a bonfire in the living room.




  8. #8
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    Ron <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:n6a[email protected]:

    > YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
    > excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.
    >
    >


    What nonsense. They all work for the same masters.....




  9. #9
    Kurt
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    In article <[email protected]>,
    Steve Sobol <[email protected]> wrote:

    > On 2008-11-12, John Navas <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    > >>Not quite. You correctly predicted the merger would not be a success,
    > >>but you made no predictions for the demise of SprintPCS at that time.
    > >>
    > >>Google proves that.

    >
    > OMG. Would the two of you please stop waving your weenies around and
    > stick 'em back in your pants, please? The "I told you so" crap is childish.


    John could at least post a weenie-waving alt.cellular.cingular FAQ. Been
    a while since we've seen on.

    --
    To reply by email, remove the word "space"



  10. #10
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:54:47 +0000, Larry <[email protected]> wrote in
    <[email protected]>:

    >Ron <[email protected]> wrote in
    >news:[email protected]:
    >
    >> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
    >> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.

    >
    >What nonsense. They all work for the same masters.....


    That would be us, and we did throw the rascals out.
    --
    Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
    John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
    Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
    Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>



  11. #11
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    John Navas <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > That would be us


    Are you a banker?




  12. #12
    John Navas
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 04:06:10 +0000, Larry <[email protected]> wrote in
    <[email protected]>:

    >John Navas <[email protected]> wrote in
    >news:[email protected]:
    >
    >> That would be us

    >
    >Are you a banker?


    I'm a voter.
    --
    Best regards, FAQ for Wireless Internet: <http://wireless.navas.us>
    John Navas FAQ for Wi-Fi: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi>
    Wi-Fi How To: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_HowTo>
    Fixes to Wi-Fi Problems: <http://wireless.navas.us/wiki/Wi-Fi_Fixes>



  13. #13
    Ron
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    On 12 Nov 2008 12:20:42 GMT, That80sGuy <[email protected]> wrote:

    >In message news:[email protected], Ron
    ><[email protected]> done wrote:
    >
    >> On 11 Nov 2008 22:04:43 GMT, That80sGuy <[email protected]> wrote:
    >>
    >>>In message news:[email protected], Larry
    >>><[email protected]> done wrote:
    >>>
    >>>> Ron <[email protected]> wrote in
    >>>> news:[email protected]:
    >>>>
    >>>>> Net loss of more than 1 million subscribers last quarter.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> New limiting credit agreement with Chase. ie, not allowed to
    >>>>> have a dividend.
    >>>>>
    >>>>> "The company anticipates "continued pressure" on its monthly
    >>>>> subscription users and their average revenue. Operating income before
    >>>>> depreciation is also expected to fall."
    >>>>>
    >>>>> http://www.electronista.com/articles....2008.results/
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>> Real-time: 2.49 Down 0.74 (22.91%) 1:38pm ET
    >>>>
    >>>> Wow...another ATT monopoly buy.
    >>>>
    >>>> Be careful what you wish for. Without competition, like the old days
    >>>> when I was a kid and ATT was the ONLY phone company, a phone call to
    >>>> the next town was about $4/minute and you were FORCED to RENT your
    >>>> phone from ONLY ATT. You would be paying $99/month to RENT your
    >>>> iPhone. You don't REALLY want to eliminate all ATT's competition,
    >>>> again, do you?
    >>>
    >>>If you cared about monopolies you'd be working to destroy the Federal
    >>>Reserve System, which is neither "federal" nor a "reserve system"

    >>
    >> YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
    >> excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.

    >
    >HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Poor deluded fool.
    >
    >Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM was a
    >PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.


    Sorry your McSame lost, but the Governbor of Michigan is not a Crooked
    CEO like Cheney was.



  14. #14
    Larry
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    That80sGuy <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:[email protected]:

    > Did you see Obama's first press conference? EVERY PERSON BEHIND HIM
    > was a PART of the "business excesses" you speak of.
    >
    >


    The list of major contributors to the Obama/Democrat election reads like
    the fortune 500 companys and Forbes Magazine's richest men. Their minions
    contributed billions. They remain in the same control of the nation
    because they maintain control of the MONEY SUPPLY and its INTEREST and have
    since 1913 when the Federal Reserve Private Secret Bank Corporation was
    invented by the richest bankers on Jekyll Island, GA.

    Nothing has changed...only the faces and boldfaced lies to maintain the
    facade of "change" while maintaining firm CONTROL of all of us with DEBT.
    The whole fake system runs on control by DEBT.




  15. #15
    SMS
    Guest

    Re: Sprint continues it's Death spiral.

    Ron wrote:

    > YOU FORGET - AN Obama administration will not allow such business
    > excesses that the Bush folks merely winked at.


    Why do you think there was this huge rush to complete mergers that
    reduced competition?!



  • Similar Threads




  • Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast