Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234
Results 46 to 52 of 52
  1. #46
    Nomen Nescio
    Guest

    Re: Executive Services now Blocked


    >If you want to talk about what SHOULD be, Sprint executives should be
    >randomly given one customer's email inquiry every day and be forced to call
    >customer service until somebody gives them the right answer (even if the
    >executive already knows it).



    Okay, okay ... we finally agree on something.


    This would be a great idea. Now, if only they would actually do it.




    See More: Executive Services now Blocked




  2. #47
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Executive Services now Blocked


    "Nomen Nescio" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    >
    > <sigh> With every reply like this Nomen, you lose more and more

    credibility
    > here ...
    >
    > Oh, cut the Martyr crap, Bob.
    >
    > When you start a post with "Not at all foul mouthed one ...", then unlike

    Sprint, I am going to
    > fulfull your expecations.


    Oh right ... who starting cussing in the prior post to that ... You did. I
    haven't sunk to your extremely low level in that reply or any other for that
    matter. I just posted reflecting your posting style ... which is very foul.
    >
    > Ad-honimens don't work on me, because I care neither about credibility, or

    making freinds, or
    > even being right all the time. I just want Sprint to do the right thing.

    I'll discuss my
    > interpretations of the law based on experience and precidents.
    >
    > If you wnat to fling feces at each other like a pair of rhesus monkeys,

    well, I can do that to.
    > Everyone blows off steam differently.


    Since when was I fling feces at you? By saying you are foul mouthed? Well,
    it's true isn't it? You've shown that in quite a few prior posts here.
    >
    > Don't want the attacks, don't initiate them. The person you attack may be

    better at it than you
    > are.


    What attacks? For calling you foul mouthed?
    >
    >
    > >Only losers need to revert to swearing to try to prove their
    > >position ...

    >
    > "Losers", eh Bob?
    >
    > I know people that make $500,000+ per year who curse like ****ing sailors.


    In public, in a newsgroup? Sorry, but in usenet, one only has to add
    colorful phrases when they have nothing else to argue about ...
    >
    > Losers have to pompously declare other people as losers because they

    disagree with their
    > demeanor.
    >
    > I think Losers constant support a company in the face of the indefensible,

    but that is the great
    > thing about freedom ... everyone has their differnt definitions.
    >
    > So, being the loser that I am, I might as well not fight the urge to ask

    you to suck ****
    > through a straw.


    There you go again ...
    >
    >
    > >What's more, you've tried to combine my comments from two
    > >different posts I've made which don't apply to each other.

    >
    > I don't think so. I think you obviously contradicted yourself. But

    interpret it as you like.

    Everyone knows you did. You were trying to read between the lines and
    through your deluded and muddled brain , you came up with that incorrect
    premise. Did you see anyone backing your side of the discussion?
    >
    > Asshole.
    >
    >
    > Love and kisses,
    > The un-credible Loser


    On that we can agree ... totally.

    Bob





  3. #48
    Carl.
    Guest

    Re: Executive Services now Blocked

    "Nomen Nescio" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    >
    > >Well said and exactly the point I was making initially Carl.

    >
    > Translation: "I'm on my knees Carl, now unzip your fly. Trust me, i'm

    good at this."

    And with that you have completed the transition from debate participant to
    general usenet nerd. Goodbye.


    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.509 / Virus Database: 306 - Release Date: 8/12/2003





  4. #49
    Nomen Nescio
    Guest

    Re: Executive Services now Blocked


    <sigh> With every reply like this Nomen, you lose more and more credibility
    here ...

    Oh, cut the Martyr crap, Bob.

    When you start a post with "Not at all foul mouthed one ...", then unlike Sprint, I am going to
    fulfull your expecations.

    Ad-honimens don't work on me, because I care neither about credibility, or making freinds, or
    even being right all the time. I just want Sprint to do the right thing. I'll discuss my
    interpretations of the law based on experience and precidents.

    If you wnat to fling feces at each other like a pair of rhesus monkeys, well, I can do that to.
    Everyone blows off steam differently.

    Don't want the attacks, don't initiate them. The person you attack may be better at it than you
    are.


    >Only losers need to revert to swearing to try to prove their
    >position ...


    "Losers", eh Bob?

    I know people that make $500,000+ per year who curse like ****ing sailors.

    Losers have to pompously declare other people as losers because they disagree with their
    demeanor.

    I think Losers constant support a company in the face of the indefensible, but that is the great
    thing about freedom ... everyone has their differnt definitions.

    So, being the loser that I am, I might as well not fight the urge to ask you to suck ****
    through a straw.


    >What's more, you've tried to combine my comments from two
    >different posts I've made which don't apply to each other.


    I don't think so. I think you obviously contradicted yourself. But interpret it as you like.

    Asshole.


    Love and kisses,
    The un-credible Loser




  5. #50
    Nomen Nescio
    Guest

    Re: Executive Services now Blocked


    >If you want to talk about what SHOULD be, Sprint executives should be
    >randomly given one customer's email inquiry every day and be forced to call
    >customer service until somebody gives them the right answer (even if the
    >executive already knows it).



    Okay, okay ... we finally agree on something.


    This would be a great idea. Now, if only they would actually do it.




  6. #51
    Nomen Nescio
    Guest

    Re: Executive Services now Blocked

    >And with that you have completed the transition from debate participant to
    >general usenet nerd. Goodbye.


    You going somewhere, Carl?

    Well, enjoy your vacation.




  7. #52
    Bob Smith
    Guest

    Re: Executive Services now Blocked


    "Nomen Nescio" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:[email protected]
    >
    > <sigh> With every reply like this Nomen, you lose more and more

    credibility
    > here ...
    >
    > Oh, cut the Martyr crap, Bob.
    >
    > When you start a post with "Not at all foul mouthed one ...", then unlike

    Sprint, I am going to
    > fulfull your expecations.


    Oh right ... who starting cussing in the prior post to that ... You did. I
    haven't sunk to your extremely low level in that reply or any other for that
    matter. I just posted reflecting your posting style ... which is very foul.
    >
    > Ad-honimens don't work on me, because I care neither about credibility, or

    making freinds, or
    > even being right all the time. I just want Sprint to do the right thing.

    I'll discuss my
    > interpretations of the law based on experience and precidents.
    >
    > If you wnat to fling feces at each other like a pair of rhesus monkeys,

    well, I can do that to.
    > Everyone blows off steam differently.


    Since when was I fling feces at you? By saying you are foul mouthed? Well,
    it's true isn't it? You've shown that in quite a few prior posts here.
    >
    > Don't want the attacks, don't initiate them. The person you attack may be

    better at it than you
    > are.


    What attacks? For calling you foul mouthed?
    >
    >
    > >Only losers need to revert to swearing to try to prove their
    > >position ...

    >
    > "Losers", eh Bob?
    >
    > I know people that make $500,000+ per year who curse like ****ing sailors.


    In public, in a newsgroup? Sorry, but in usenet, one only has to add
    colorful phrases when they have nothing else to argue about ...
    >
    > Losers have to pompously declare other people as losers because they

    disagree with their
    > demeanor.
    >
    > I think Losers constant support a company in the face of the indefensible,

    but that is the great
    > thing about freedom ... everyone has their differnt definitions.
    >
    > So, being the loser that I am, I might as well not fight the urge to ask

    you to suck ****
    > through a straw.


    There you go again ...
    >
    >
    > >What's more, you've tried to combine my comments from two
    > >different posts I've made which don't apply to each other.

    >
    > I don't think so. I think you obviously contradicted yourself. But

    interpret it as you like.

    Everyone knows you did. You were trying to read between the lines and
    through your deluded and muddled brain , you came up with that incorrect
    premise. Did you see anyone backing your side of the discussion?
    >
    > Asshole.
    >
    >
    > Love and kisses,
    > The un-credible Loser


    On that we can agree ... totally.

    Bob





  • Similar Threads




  • Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst ... 234