Sprint's official BBB response. What a sick f'ing joke.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:

> Sprint doesn't even have a tower in Little Elm.

Many towers have equipment from more than one cellular company.

---

› See More: Sprint's official BBB response. What a sick f'ing joke.

"Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sprint's are WAY off in my area.
>
>
> There are dead spots in my area that are dead 24/7/365 and anyone you
> ask at SprintPCS will deny that. But all cellular companies deny their
> dead spots.

Verizon didn't. When I had them for a day, they admitted they were having
problems with a tower in my area and asked if I would wait a week and keep
the phones to see if it got better. Of course, I said no and went to AT&T,
but there has been a team of guys at the Verizon tower for the last 3
Saturdays in a row.

Sprint doesn't even have a tower in Little Elm.

"Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Sprint doesn't even have a tower in Little Elm.
>
> Many towers have equipment from more than one cellular company.

No, the lady in the Sprint store told me. On towers are in The Colony and
Frisco.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Sprint doesn't even have a tower in Little Elm.
> >
> > Many towers have equipment from more than one cellular company.
>
> No, the lady in the Sprint store told me. On towers are in The Colony and
> Frisco.

Sorry, I'm not doubting that Sprint has no tower in Little Elm, but its
also true that towers have equipment from multiple companies, so it
might be possible for SprintPCS to co-locate ==> if the wanted to <== .

"Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >
> > "Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news[email protected]...
> > > In article <[email protected]>,
> > > "Justin Green" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sprint doesn't even have a tower in Little Elm.
> > >
> > > Many towers have equipment from more than one cellular company.
> >
> > No, the lady in the Sprint store told me. On towers are in The Colony
and
> > Frisco.
>
> Sorry, I'm not doubting that Sprint has no tower in Little Elm, but its
> also true that towers have equipment from multiple companies, so it
> might be possible for SprintPCS to co-locate ==> if the wanted to <== .

I'm sure that's possible. Verizon has one tower and AT&T has another tower,
150 yards away. No Sprint tower or cells in Little Elm.

Justin wrote:
> "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>>>>I don't see anyone making excuses for your behavior, Justin.
>>>Ah, so posting anything negative about Sprint is bad behavior now? : )
>>
>>No, but cross-posting to off-topic forums is.

> Huh? I posted what in another forum?

You cross-posted this topic in alt.cellular.verizon when your beef is
with SprintPCS. That's considered bad nettiquette. Your complaint is
not with Verizon; why involve the participatns of that group with your
constant complaints? They sure as hell can't do anything about it:
they're not even Sprint customers!


>>As is butting into other
>>threads to present your problem, again.
>
>
> Not sure what that means either, since you're now posting in a thread I
> started.


Ah yes, clearly this is the only thread you've participated in, right?


> Is this not doing the same thing of which you accuse me?

No, this is your thread. And clearly, we're talking about you.

"Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin wrote:
> > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > news:[email protected]...
> >>>>I don't see anyone making excuses for your behavior, Justin.
> >>>Ah, so posting anything negative about Sprint is bad behavior now? : )
> >>
> >>No, but cross-posting to off-topic forums is.
>
> > Huh? I posted what in another forum?
>
> You cross-posted this topic in alt.cellular.verizon when your beef is
> with SprintPCS. That's considered bad nettiquette. Your complaint is
> not with Verizon; why involve the participatns of that group with your
> constant complaints? They sure as hell can't do anything about it:
> they're not even Sprint customers!

I'm not even subscribed to the Verizon board. I don't read it and haven't
since I turned their phones back in. Something must have gotten screwed up.

> >>As is butting into other
> >>threads to present your problem, again.
> >
> >
> > Not sure what that means either, since you're now posting in a thread I
> > started.
>
>
> Ah yes, clearly this is the only thread you've participated in, right?

We're talking about your hypocrisy now.

> > Is this not doing the same thing of which you accuse me?
>
> No, this is your thread. And clearly, we're talking about you.

Ahhh, you've been hypocritical, and now you're stretching. Thanks for
playing.

Justin <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm not even subscribed to the Verizon board. I don't read it and haven't
> since I turned their phones back in. Something must have gotten screwed up.

I think I xposted to ACV since I had some comments to make regarding
Verizon as well as SPCS.


--
JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Justin wrote:
> > > "Isaiah Beard" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> > > news:[email protected]...
> > >>>>I don't see anyone making excuses for your behavior, Justin.
> > >>>Ah, so posting anything negative about Sprint is bad behavior now? : )
> > >>
> > >>No, but cross-posting to off-topic forums is.
> >
> > > Huh? I posted what in another forum?
> >
> > You cross-posted this topic in alt.cellular.verizon when your beef is
> > with SprintPCS. That's considered bad nettiquette. Your complaint is
> > not with Verizon; why involve the participatns of that group with your
> > constant complaints? They sure as hell can't do anything about it:
> > they're not even Sprint customers!
>
> I'm not even subscribed to the Verizon board. I don't read it and haven't
> since I turned their phones back in. Something must have gotten screwed up.
>
> > >>As is butting into other
> > >>threads to present your problem, again.
> > >
> > >
> > > Not sure what that means either, since you're now posting in a thread I
> > > started.
> >
> >
> > Ah yes, clearly this is the only thread you've participated in, right?
>
> We're talking about your hypocrisy now.
>
> > > Is this not doing the same thing of which you accuse me?
> >
> > No, this is your thread. And clearly, we're talking about you.
>
> Ahhh, you've been hypocritical, and now you're stretching. Thanks for
> playing.

Justin: the SprintPCS apologists want to be moderators and more, and
tell you which threads you're allowed to post to.

Reminds me of years ago when I was President of a computer users group
and would write software or hardware reviews for the monthly
newsletter/magazine. Some folks would get all upset at anything anybody
said negative because it might reflect poorly on the platform. I guess
maybe our critics here they think, "we're suffering with Sprint, we want
others to also."
SPRINT: Good Network; Poor Customer Service

If they had their way, you and I could not add our experience or
knowledge or ability to research a question to any thread (and
definitely no opinions), and we certainly can't start a thread because
that would be trolling.

They really need to start a new group: alt.cellular.sprintpcs.advocacy

> Justin: the SprintPCS apologists want to be moderators and more, and
> tell you which threads you're allowed to post to.
>
> Reminds me of years ago when I was President of a computer users group
> and would write software or hardware reviews for the monthly
> newsletter/magazine. Some folks would get all upset at anything anybody
> said negative because it might reflect poorly on the platform. I guess
> maybe our critics here they think, "we're suffering with Sprint, we want
> others to also."
> SPRINT: Good Network; Poor Customer Service
>
> If they had their way, you and I could not add our experience or
> knowledge or ability to research a question to any thread (and
> definitely no opinions), and we certainly can't start a thread because
> that would be trolling.
>
> They really need to start a new group: alt.cellular.sprintpcs.advocacy

It's common for people who can't discuss issues to pick on *****ing, posting
mannerisms, etc. They usually can't respond to the actual topic, so they
find something else to pick on.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's common for people who can't discuss issues to pick on *****ing, posting
> mannerisms, etc. They usually can't respond to the actual topic, so they
> find something else to pick on.

They also have a hard time differentiating between fact and opinion; and
most don't understand the concept of anecdotal evidence. And statistics!
They love it or hate it, and often both at the same time, depending on
what the results are. My favorite was "I'm not questioning the JD Power
study, I just want to know how it was done". Worst of all is a *2 rep
who believes if something shows on their screen it must be Gospel,
luckily not all do. Anyone who works with a computer should have been
taught: "Garbage In ; Garbage Out", but if a SprintPCS billing computer
shows something, then the customer is always wrong according to some.

"Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news[email protected]...
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > It's common for people who can't discuss issues to pick on *****ing,
posting
> > mannerisms, etc. They usually can't respond to the actual topic, so
they
> > find something else to pick on.
>
> They also have a hard time differentiating between fact and opinion; and
> most don't understand the concept of anecdotal evidence. And statistics!
> They love it or hate it, and often both at the same time, depending on
> what the results are. My favorite was "I'm not questioning the JD Power
> study, I just want to know how it was done". Worst of all is a *2 rep
> who believes if something shows on their screen it must be Gospel,
> luckily not all do. Anyone who works with a computer should have been
> taught: "Garbage In ; Garbage Out", but if a SprintPCS billing computer
> shows something, then the customer is always wrong according to some.

Yeah, kind of like being told that the $150 fee waiver would be noted on my
account just to get me off the phone. The next day, the fee wasn't waived
and because she didn't note it on the account, the CS reps treated me like a
liar.

Phillipe <[email protected]> wrote:

> They also have a hard time differentiating between fact and opinion;

So have you decided to substantiate your claims that I work for Sprint
and/or ATTWS and/or Nextel yet?

--
JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services
22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950
Steve Sobol, Proprietor
888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * [email protected]

Justin wrote:


>>Justin: the SprintPCS apologists want to be moderators and more, and
>>tell you which threads you're allowed to post to.
>>
>>Reminds me of years ago when I was President of a computer users group
>>and would write software or hardware reviews for the monthly
>>newsletter/magazine. Some folks would get all upset at anything anybody
>>said negative because it might reflect poorly on the platform. I guess
>>maybe our critics here they think, "we're suffering with Sprint, we want
>>others to also."
>>SPRINT: Good Network; Poor Customer Service
>>
>>If they had their way, you and I could not add our experience or
>>knowledge or ability to research a question to any thread (and
>>definitely no opinions), and we certainly can't start a thread because
>>that would be trolling.
>>
>>They really need to start a new group: alt.cellular.sprintpcs.advocacy
>
>
> It's common for people who can't discuss issues to pick on *****ing, posting
> mannerisms, etc. They usually can't respond to the actual topic, so they
> find something else to pick on.
>
>
Kinda like you like to pick yer ass and then your teeth.

Ummm.... I wasn't referring to you.
"Phillipe" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Justin wrote:
>
>
> >>Justin: the SprintPCS apologists want to be moderators and more, and
> >>tell you which threads you're allowed to post to.
> >>
> >>Reminds me of years ago when I was President of a computer users group
> >>and would write software or hardware reviews for the monthly
> >>newsletter/magazine. Some folks would get all upset at anything anybody
> >>said negative because it might reflect poorly on the platform. I guess
> >>maybe our critics here they think, "we're suffering with Sprint, we want
> >>others to also."
> >>SPRINT: Good Network; Poor Customer Service
> >>
> >>If they had their way, you and I could not add our experience or
> >>knowledge or ability to research a question to any thread (and
> >>definitely no opinions), and we certainly can't start a thread because
> >>that would be trolling.
> >>
> >>They really need to start a new group: alt.cellular.sprintpcs.advocacy
> >
> >
> > It's common for people who can't discuss issues to pick on *****ing,
posting
> > mannerisms, etc. They usually can't respond to the actual topic, so
they
> > find something else to pick on.
> >
> >
> Kinda like you like to pick yer ass and then your teeth.
>