Disgrace of Sprint

> Sure would help yourself if you'd stop *earning*
> the title every other post.


Rob, you are a disgrace to Sprint.
Justin came in to post his experiences, and instead of offering some
compassion, you totally falsely call him a liar.

---

› See More: Disgrace of Sprint

[email protected] (Sprintposter) wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
> > Sure would help yourself if you'd stop *earning*
> > the title every other post.
>
>
> Rob, you are a disgrace to Sprint.
> Justin came in to post his experiences, and instead of offering some
> compassion, you totally falsely call him a liar.
>
>

OK, then, can you show me where I ever said what happened to him didn't
happen?

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them

[posted via phonescoop.com]

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] (Sprintposter) wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Sure would help yourself if you'd stop *earning*
> > > the title every other post.
> >
> >
> > Rob, you are a disgrace to Sprint.
> > Justin came in to post his experiences, and instead of offering some
> > compassion, you totally falsely call him a liar.
> >
> >
>
> OK, then, can you show me where I ever said what happened to him didn't
> happen?
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=+d...crnsc03&rnum=2

Justin wrote:

>
>>In addition, I wasn't given the full, "as-advertised" discount. I
>> was only given $100 off of each phone.

>Yes you were. That *was* the discount at the time you bought them. They
>were $30 cheaper MSRP, and $30 less in discount.
>--
>-+-
>RØß
>O/Siris
>I work for Sprint
>I *don't* speak for them


Here's an example. You claimed I DID get the discount I was supposed to at
the time I bought the phones, yet you WERE NOT THERE and you CANNOT even
tell me when I bought the phones. More crap being pulled out of your butt.
The phones may have been $199.99 at some point in time, but your statement
was truly FALSE.

Basically, you just wanted to be a jerk. You succeeded.

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> [email protected] (Sprintposter) wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> > > Sure would help yourself if you'd stop *earning*
> > > the title every other post.
> >
> >
> > Rob, you are a disgrace to Sprint.
> > Justin came in to post his experiences, and instead of offering some
> > compassion, you totally falsely call him a liar.
> >
> >
>
> OK, then, can you show me where I ever said what happened to him didn't
> happen?
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]



Look at the post you wrote just 3 minutes later:

>Rearranging history again, Justin. That's exactly what I was referring
>to with "earning it every other post." The overall story hasn't
>changed, nor is it challenged. The details, however, have been *quite*
>pliable depending upon to whom you've been responding.
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
> [posted via phonescoop.com]


Either it changed, or it didn't. If part of my story did change, that means
the part I originally posted didn't happen. Make up your mind. You're
saying the details have changed. Again, please post some examples. For
your education:

Pliable
1.. Easily bent or shaped. See Synonyms at malleable.
2.. Receptive to change; adaptable: pliable attitudes.
3.. Easily influenced, persuaded, or swayed; tractable.
So what details have I bent or shaped?
What details have I changed?

You're trolling again.

Justin wrote:
>
>
> Either it changed, or it didn't. If part of my story did change,
> that means the part I originally posted didn't happen. Make up your
> mind. You're saying the details have changed. Again, please post
> some examples. For your education:
>
> Pliable
> 1.. Easily bent or shaped. See Synonyms at malleable.
> 2.. Receptive to change; adaptable: pliable attitudes.
> 3.. Easily influenced, persuaded, or swayed; tractable.
> So what details have I bent or shaped?
> What details have I changed?
>
> You're trolling again.

You're the one unable to drop a subject you said you would.

You've already multiply proven your dishonesty, Justin. As your idol Philly
pointed out, it's not trolling if it's true.
--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint
I *don't* speak for them

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:Gaz7b.410319$uu5.75090@sccrnsc04...
> Justin wrote:
> >
> >
> > Either it changed, or it didn't. If part of my story did change,
> > that means the part I originally posted didn't happen. Make up your
> > mind. You're saying the details have changed. Again, please post
> > some examples. For your education:
> >
> > Pliable
> > 1.. Easily bent or shaped. See Synonyms at malleable.
> > 2.. Receptive to change; adaptable: pliable attitudes.
> > 3.. Easily influenced, persuaded, or swayed; tractable.
> > So what details have I bent or shaped?
> > What details have I changed?
> >
> > You're trolling again.
>
> You're the one unable to drop a subject you said you would.
>
> You've already multiply proven your dishonesty, Justin. As your idol
Philly
> pointed out, it's not trolling if it's true.
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint
> I *don't* speak for them


Again, you continue to post my dishonesty, yet you cannot back up your
claims. YOU on the other hand, HAVE proven your dishonesty by assuming to
know things you could not possibly know. You don't back up your ridiculous
claims with any semblance of facts, nor do you even admit that you posted
the untruthful post.

And YOU continued to post on and on after I said I would drop it, so yes, I
un-dropped it. If you couldn't give a last word or two and shut the hell
up, why should I? Especially when you CONTINUE to call me a liar without
posting the lies I supposedly told.

It's a shame people like you actually hold jobs where you're involved with
the customer. You're so dishonest, you're part of the problem at Sprint
PCS. And to think that people actually listen to you here as you give out
what has to be described as questionable advice (now that we know you twist
words and can't prove anything) is sad.

Nothing is true or fact unless it can be proven. And you can't even tell me
what lies I've supposedly told.

--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint PCS
I *don't* speak for them


"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
<[email protected]>:
>
>
> Again, you continue to post my dishonesty, yet you cannot back up your
> claims. YOU on the other hand, HAVE proven your dishonesty by assuming to
> know things you could not possibly know. You don't back up your ridiculous
> claims with any semblance of facts, nor do you even admit that you posted
> the untruthful post.

ROFLMAO, how ridiculous can you get? I posted twice more, and that was
the "many times" that "forced" you to "undrop" it?

Actually, Justin, I *can* know. But because that would violate your
privacy, You go on pretending you won. I refuse to sink to the depths
you and your buddy Phillipe have to try to "get" those who dare to
disagree with you.


[posted via phonescoop.com]

"O/Siris ." <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
>
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint PCS
> I *don't* speak for them
>
>
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote in article
> <[email protected]>:
> >
> >
> > Again, you continue to post my dishonesty, yet you cannot back up your
> > claims. YOU on the other hand, HAVE proven your dishonesty by assuming
to
> > know things you could not possibly know. You don't back up your
ridiculous
> > claims with any semblance of facts, nor do you even admit that you
posted
> > the untruthful post.
>
> ROFLMAO, how ridiculous can you get? I posted twice more, and that was
> the "many times" that "forced" you to "undrop" it?

Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5 e-mails
you've sent me.

> Actually, Justin, I *can* know. But because that would violate your
> privacy, You go on pretending you won. I refuse to sink to the depths
> you and your buddy Phillipe have to try to "get" those who dare to
> disagree with you.

And here's the entire point, Genius. You *didn't* know when you posted
that. Not only that, you were WRONG.

>>Justin wrote:
>>
>> In addition, I wasn't given the full, "as-advertised" discount. I
>> was only given $100 off of each phone.

>Yes you were. That *was* the discount at the time you bought them. They
>were $30 cheaper MSRP, and $30 less in discount.
>--
>-+-
>RØß
>O/Siris
>I work for Sprint
>I *don't* speak for them

Look, 1) You don't even know when I bought the phones. You didn't know when
you posted that, and you don't know now. 2) You had no way of knowing what
I saw when I walked into the store, which was the placard behind the 8100
model phone that said $99 after $130 discount for agreeing to a 2 year
contract. 3) I paid $280 for both phones, meaning that either way, I got
screwed, whether they signed me up under the old $199 phone with $100
discount or the $229 with $100 discount. I'm not making **** up. I know
what was being advertised in the store the day I bought the phones. I took
the $100 discount because I thought it was given to me as a favor for my
troubles, not for the 2 year agreement they signed me up for without my
consent or knowledge.

This means you're not only twisting reality, you suck at math. And no, you
*can't* know because I would NEVER give an idiot asshole like you permission
to look up my account. You might anyway, but if you do and I find out, I'll
report you to Sprint in a heartbeat. As offered once, I will gladly scan
the receipt I received when I took them back and e-mail you that, if you
really want proof. I still have it.

But you're not interested in proof or facts. Your only interested in being
an asshole, and you're succeeding in that purpose. You expect "courtesy"
when you give none. On top of that you can't even have a decent discussion
about 800 MHz vs. 1900 MHz without being an ass, pulling facts out of your
rectum, changing the topic, and refusing to back up your claims. You post
one article about Nextel acquiring some 1900 MHz spectrum, and all of the
sudden, you're claiming that there are multiple advantages to being on 1900
vs. 800, but you won't list them so we can discuss them. All you will say
is, Nextel's president says there are advantages, I posted the link to the
article, blah blah blah.

You give advice on this board, and people should know that you're completely
full of it before they rely on that advice.

Justin wrote:
>
> Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5
> e-mails you've sent me.
>

More lying from you, Justin. A lie of omission, for one. Those weren't
"emails I've sent you." They were replies. *You* contacted *me*, Justin.
Not the other way around.

As usual, bigot, you and the truth lie 180 degrees removed from each other.
--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint
I *don't* speak for them

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:VNV7b.412543$YN5.277785@sccrnsc01...
> Justin wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5
> > e-mails you've sent me.
> >
>
> More lying from you, Justin. A lie of omission, for one. Those weren't
> "emails I've sent you." They were replies. *You* contacted *me*, Justin.
> Not the other way around.
>
> As usual, bigot, you and the truth lie 180 degrees removed from each
other.
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint
> I *don't* speak for them


Ok, Rob. Whatever. I know it's an exercise in futility to try and argue
with your twisted sense of reality. I sent you one e-mail and you couldn't
decide if you wanted to reply by e-mail or by posting. You did both,
complaining about my e-mail.

In article <[email protected]>,
"Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> news:VNV7b.412543$YN5.277785@sccrnsc01...
> > Justin wrote:
> > >
> > > Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5
> > > e-mails you've sent me.
> > >
> >
> > More lying from you, Justin. A lie of omission, for one. Those weren't
> > "emails I've sent you." They were replies. *You* contacted *me*, Justin.
> > Not the other way around.
> >
> > As usual, bigot, you and the truth lie 180 degrees removed from each
> other.
> > --
> > -+-
> > RØß
> > O/Siris
> > I work for Sprint
> > I *don't* speak for them
>
>
> Ok, Rob. Whatever. I know it's an exercise in futility to try and argue
> with your twisted sense of reality. I sent you one e-mail and you couldn't
> decide if you wanted to reply by e-mail or by posting. You did both,
> complaining about my e-mail.

These Sprint cheerleaders can't even count.
Master Vargas one = five. Master Smith 81 = 3.

Justin wrote:
> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> news:VNV7b.412543$YN5.277785@sccrnsc01...
>> Justin wrote:
>>>
>>> Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5
>>> e-mails you've sent me.
>>>
>>
>> More lying from you, Justin. A lie of omission, for one. Those
>> weren't "emails I've sent you." They were replies. *You* contacted
>> *me*, Justin. Not the other way around.
>>
>> As usual, bigot, you and the truth lie 180 degrees removed from each
>> other. --
>> -+-
>> RØß
>> O/Siris
>> I work for Sprint
>> I *don't* speak for them
>
>
> Ok, Rob. Whatever. I know it's an exercise in futility to try and
> argue with your twisted sense of reality. I sent you one e-mail and
> you couldn't decide if you wanted to reply by e-mail or by posting.
> You did both, complaining about my e-mail.

Another lie, Justin. I mentioned it. That hardly qualifies as
"complaining."
--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint
I *don't* speak for them

P Reality wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>,
> "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
>> news:VNV7b.412543$YN5.277785@sccrnsc01...
>>> Justin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5
>>>> e-mails you've sent me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> More lying from you, Justin. A lie of omission, for one. Those
>>> weren't "emails I've sent you." They were replies. *You*
>>> contacted *me*, Justin. Not the other way around.
>>>
>>> As usual, bigot, you and the truth lie 180 degrees removed from
>>> each other. --
>>> -+-
>>> RØß
>>> O/Siris
>>> I work for Sprint
>>> I *don't* speak for them
>>
>>
>> Ok, Rob. Whatever. I know it's an exercise in futility to try and
>> argue with your twisted sense of reality. I sent you one e-mail and
>> you couldn't decide if you wanted to reply by e-mail or by posting.
>> You did both, complaining about my e-mail.
>
> These Sprint cheerleaders can't even count.
> Master Vargas one = five. Master Smith 81 = 3.

This from a grade-school brat who refuses to talk to those he seems so eager
to insult.

Intellectual cowardice that fits quite well into the schoolyard bully
personality you obviously have.
--
-+-
RØß
O/Siris
I work for Sprint
I *don't* speak for them

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:5db8b.420739$Ho3.67118@sccrnsc03...
> Justin wrote:
> > "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> > news:VNV7b.412543$YN5.277785@sccrnsc01...
> >> Justin wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5
> >>> e-mails you've sent me.
> >>>
> >>
> >> More lying from you, Justin. A lie of omission, for one. Those
> >> weren't "emails I've sent you." They were replies. *You* contacted
> >> *me*, Justin. Not the other way around.
> >>
> >> As usual, bigot, you and the truth lie 180 degrees removed from each
> >> other. --
> >> -+-
> >> RØß
> >> O/Siris
> >> I work for Sprint
> >> I *don't* speak for them
> >
> >
> > Ok, Rob. Whatever. I know it's an exercise in futility to try and
> > argue with your twisted sense of reality. I sent you one e-mail and
> > you couldn't decide if you wanted to reply by e-mail or by posting.
> > You did both, complaining about my e-mail.
>
> Another lie, Justin. I mentioned it. That hardly qualifies as
> "complaining."
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint
> I *don't* speak for them


Wow, yet more lies from you. Care to post any facts to back up your claims
about the phone discounts or the 800 vs 1900 issue? Your debate skills are
sorely lacking.

"O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
news:reb8b.420749$Ho3.66943@sccrnsc03...
> P Reality wrote:
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > "Justin" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "O/Siris" <robjvargas@sprîntpcs.côm> wrote in message
> >> news:VNV7b.412543$YN5.277785@sccrnsc01...
> >>> Justin wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Actually, it was about 8 times in two separate threads, plus the 5
> >>>> e-mails you've sent me.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> More lying from you, Justin. A lie of omission, for one. Those
> >>> weren't "emails I've sent you." They were replies. *You*
> >>> contacted *me*, Justin. Not the other way around.
> >>>
> >>> As usual, bigot, you and the truth lie 180 degrees removed from
> >>> each other. --
> >>> -+-
> >>> RØß
> >>> O/Siris
> >>> I work for Sprint
> >>> I *don't* speak for them
> >>
> >>
> >> Ok, Rob. Whatever. I know it's an exercise in futility to try and
> >> argue with your twisted sense of reality. I sent you one e-mail and
> >> you couldn't decide if you wanted to reply by e-mail or by posting.
> >> You did both, complaining about my e-mail.
> >
> > These Sprint cheerleaders can't even count.
> > Master Vargas one = five. Master Smith 81 = 3.
>
> This from a grade-school brat who refuses to talk to those he seems so
eager
> to insult.
>
> Intellectual cowardice that fits quite well into the schoolyard bully
> personality you obviously have.
> --
> -+-
> RØß
> O/Siris
> I work for Sprint
> I *don't* speak for them


Coming from someone who doesn't know the difference between 800 MHz and 1900
MHz, you talk pretty big.